Advisory Council Shepherds: Scott Leibrand & Stacy Hughes 2011-10 Remove Single Aggregate requirement from Specified Transfer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
62 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements.
Advertisements

60 Draft Policy ARIN Remove Web Hosting Policy.
Draft Policy Clarifying Requirements for IPv4 Transfers.
Draft Policy Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs Advisory Council Shepherds: David Farmer and Chris Grundemann.
Improving 8.4 Anti-Flip Language. Problem Statement Current policy prevents an organization that receives BLOCK A in the previous 12 months from.
ARIN Transfer Policy Slow Start and Simplified Needs Verification.
Equitable IPv4 Run-Out Shepherds: David Farmer & Leo Bicknell.
1 Draft Policy Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy Original Authors: Chris Grundeman, Martin Hannigan, Jason Schiller AC Shepherds: Bill Darte,
Recommended Draft Policy Section 8.4 Inter-RIR Transfer of ASNs.
60 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Anti-hijack Policy.
ARIN Clarifying Requirements for IPv4 Transfers Dan Alexander- Primary Shepherd David Farmer- Secondary Shepherd.
Draft Policy ARIN : Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments.
Policy Implementation and Experience Report Leslie Nobile.
Protecting Number Resources Draft Policy Advisory Council Shepherds: Marc Crandall Scott Leibrand.
Shepherd’s Presentation Draft Policy Allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space to Out-of-region Requestors 59.
Draft Policy Allocation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space to Out-of-region Requestors 59.
Policy Implementation & Experience Report Leslie Nobile Director, Registration Services.
Draft Policy ARIN Resolve Conflict Between RSA and 8.2 Utilization Requirements.
Standardize IP Reassignment Registration Requirements Draft Policy
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Out of Region Use.
Policy Experience Report Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
Simplified M&A transfer policy Draft Policy
ARIN Section 4.10 Austerity Policy Update.
PROP Leif Sawyer. Draft Policy ARIN Eliminating Needs-based Evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 Netblocks Author:
ARIN Modify section 8.2 to better reflect how ARIN handles reorganizations.
ARIN Out of Region Use Tina Morris. Problem Statement Current policy neither clearly forbids nor clearly permits out of region use of ARIN registered.
Draft Policy Transfers & Multi-National Networks Kevin Blumberg.
Advisory Council Shepherds: Marc Crandall & Scott Leibrand Combined M&A and Specified Transfers.
1 ARIN’s Policy Development Process Current Number Resource Policy Discussions and How to Participate Dan Alexander ARIN Advisory Council.
Draft Policy ARIN “Out of Region Use”. Problem statement (summary) Current policy neither clearly forbids nor clearly permits out of region use.
Draft Policy Preview ARIN XXVII. Draft Policies Draft Policies on the agenda: – ARIN : Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy – ARIN : Protecting.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Remove Web Hosting Policy.
Draft Policy IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement.
Draft Policy IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement.
ARIN Revising Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size Bill Sandiford ARIN AC.
Draft Policy ARIN : Remove NRPM section 7.1.
Waiting List For Unmet IPv4 Requests Draft Policy
ARIN Update Aaron Hughes ARIN Board of Trustees Focus Increased focus on customer service – Based on feedback and survey Continued IPv4 to IPv6.
ARIN Allow Inter-RIR ASN Transfers. Problem Statement We already allow transfer of ASNs within the ARIN region. Recently APNIC implemented a policy.
Draft Policy ARIN Modify 8.4 (Inter-RIR Transfers to Specified Recipients) Authors: David Huberman and Tina Morris AC Shepherds: Cathy Aronson and.
Policy Experience Report Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
Rework of IPv6 Assignment Criteria Draft Policy
Specified Transfer Listing Service (STLS) Service provided to facilitate NRPM Section 8.3 “Transfers to Specified Recipients” NRPM 8.3 transfers (“policy”)
Draft Policy Aligning 8.2 and 8.3 Transfer Policy.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Remove Sections 4.6 and 4.7.
Draft Policy ARIN Modify 8.4 (Inter-RIR Transfers to Specified Recipients) Presented by Chris Tacit.
Draft Policy Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers.
Advisory Council Shepherds: David Farmer & Chris Grundemann Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms by the IANA.
60 Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Reduce All Minimum Allocation/Assignment Units to /24.
ARIN Leif Sawyer. Draft Policy ARIN Eliminating Needs-based Evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 Netblocks Author:
60 Draft Policy ARIN NRPM 4 (IPv4) Policy Cleanup.
ARIN Update John Curran President and CEO, ARIN Focus IPv4 to IPv6 Transition Awareness – Targeting ISPs and Content Providers Continued enhancements.
ARIN Alignment of 8.3 Needs Requirements to Reality of Business.
Draft Policy ARIN Christian Tacit. Problem statement Organizations that obtain a 24 month supply of IP addresses via the transfer market and then.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN David Farmer
2011-4: Reserved Pool for Critical Infrastructure
Draft Policy ARIN Amy Potter
ARIN Scott Leibrand / David Huberman
Required Resource Reviews
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Post-IPv4-Free-Pool-Depletion Transfer Policy Staff Introduction.
Draft Policy ARIN Cathy Aronson
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Change timeframes for IPv4 requests to 24 months Tina Morris.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Eliminate HD-Ratio from NRPM
Recommended Draft Policy Section 8
Permitted Uses of space reserved under NRPM 4.10
ARIN Inter-RIR Transfers
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Modify 8
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN : Transfers for new entrants
Update Chris Woodfield, ARIN Advisory Council.
Presentation transcript:

Advisory Council Shepherds: Scott Leibrand & Stacy Hughes Remove Single Aggregate requirement from Specified Transfer

Problem Statement ARIN has received a number of legitimate transfer requests that involve multiple IPv4 netblocks. Some of these transfers were ordered by bankruptcy court. ARIN has interpreted 8.3’s “single aggregate” requirement to apply to the justification, not to the transfer.

Draft Policy Text Modify last sentence of 8.3: "can demonstrate the need for such resources, as a single aggregate, in the exact amount which they can justify under current ARIN policies.”

Benefits Allows otherwise legitimate transfers involving multiple netblocks to occur as a single transaction. Avoids putting ARIN policy at odds with legal requirements. Simplifies policy and reduces possible confusion over interpretation of “single aggregate” language.

Drawbacks By allowing transfers of multiple smaller netblocks instead of a larger one, may result in additional routes being announced into the DFZ.

Staff & Legal Assessment This would eliminate possible confusion and align the text with current implementation whereby transfers can involve multiple discontiguous IPv4 address ranges (in a single transaction with ARIN). Counsel affirmatively supports this suggested change. We do not see it as creating any additional legal liability. Given the myriad of factual situations that may arise, a single aggregate requirement could prove to be too rigid and could prohibit an overall good policy result.

Discussion?

Appendix – NRPM Transfers to Specified Recipients In addition to transfers under section 8.2, IPv4 number resources within the ARIN region may be released to ARIN by the authorized resource holder, in whole or in part, for transfer to another specified organizational recipient. Such transferred number resources may only be received under RSA by organizations that are within the ARIN region and can demonstrate the need for such resources, as a single aggregate, in the exact amount which they can justify under current ARIN policies.