Tribal Courts in Wisconsin for the Practitioner New to Tribal Courts Dane County Bar Association April 22, 2008 Attorney Paul Stenzel Stenzel Law Office,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Categories of Law CLN4U.
Advertisements

The Courts and What They Do
State Judicial System.
Federal and State Courts
Overview The structure of the Wisconsin court system The process of appeals in Wisconsin Pro se litigants Ethical considerations The structure of the.
Association on American Indian Affairs The Federal Trust Relationship, Tribal Sovereignty, and Self-Determination Prepared by Jack F. Trope, Executive.
A. JUDICIAL REGULATION AND THE DOCTRINE OF INHERENT POWER SUCCESSION OF WALLACE, p. 42  what is the issue, and how did it arise?  when a will names an.
PL-280 in Alaska Tribal Management Program Kevin M Illingworth J.D. University of Alaska Fairbanks College of Rural and Community Development
Supreme Court Of Canada
Chapter 4 – The Court System This chapter presents dispute resolution & the courts, along with the state & federal court systems.
Presented by Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts Court Overview Charlotte Jensen Judicial Education Services February 21-22, 2007.
History, Structure and Function of the American Legal System
Georgia’s Judicial Branch. The state’s highest appellate jurisdiction court It is a court of review (Court for correction of errors of law – Not a trial.
Suits against Indian tribes are barred by sovereign immunity absent a clear waiver by the tribe or congressional abrogation. A waiver cannot be implied.
FEDERAL COURTS AND KANSAS STATE COURTS By: Alisha Talsma All information obtained from Clack, G. (Ed.).(2004).Outline of the American Legal System(5 th.
Lower Federal Courts Section 2 The Federal Courts and the Judicial Branch Chapter 8.
Provincial Court (Province A) Provincial Court (Province B) Federal Court (Trial Court) Tax Court Supreme Court (Trial Court) Court of Queen’s Bench.
GA Government Bailey Smith 3rd Period.
LAW FOR BUSINESS AND PERSONAL USE © SOUTH-WESTERN PUBLISHING Chapter 4 Slide 1 The Court System Dispute Resolution and the Courts Federal.
Midwest Region Realty Report Partners in Action Conference June 23-25, 2015 Great Lakes Agency.
Chapter 25 The Texas Judiciary Pearson Education, Inc. © 2006 American Government 2006 Edition (to accompany Comprehensive, Alternate, Texas, and Essentials.
Supreme Court Only 1 Have original & Appellate jurisdiction 12 US Courts of Appeals: Courts who Review cases on appeal from the districts. Also called.
History, Structure and Function of the American Legal System 1 Court Systems and Practices.
The Court System Business Law Mr. DelPriore. Privately Resolved Disputes  Don’t go to court too fast “I’ll sue you.” “I’ll see you in court.” “My daddy.
Chapter 2 Section 1 A Dual Court System. The Federal Court System.
IV. FEDERALISM American Government Unit 3: Foundations of American Government.
The role of the judiciary is to act as an independent third party to resolve disputes Governed under principle of Rule of Law: Government must follow.
Jurisdiction 3: Original & Appellate. Major Classes of Jurisdiction Legislative jurisdiction –Congressional (Federal) –State –Municipal Executive Jurisdiction.
Judicial Branch Chapter 11: The Federal Court System.
Federalism CHAPTER 4 Section 1: Powers and Responsibilities
North Carolina Judicial Branch Chapter 13 Section 3.
Jeopardy Section1: Federalism: The Division of Powers Section 2: The National Gov’t and the 50 States Section 3: Interstate Relations PowerThe Constitution.
Article III The Judicial Branch. Section 1: Federal Courts Judicial Power: the power to decide legal cases in a court of law. Judicial Power: the power.
Case Law Update Wisconsin Tribal Judges Association January 7, 2016.
Chapter 5 – The Court System. Trial Courts  Trial Courts – listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts in disputed situations  Plaintiff.
The Courts – State Court System Objective: Compare the structure of a typical state court with the structure of the federal courts Identify typical state.
Georgia’s Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch Consists of the state’s courts Supreme Court Magistrate Court Probate Court Municipal Court Juvenile CourtState.
Federally Recognized Landed Tribes in Wisconsin. Land Cessions.
Tribal Child Support Jurisdiction Wisconsin Tribal Judges Association July 6, 2006 Forest County Potawatomi Community Indian Springs Lodge Paul Stenzel.
Ch. 4 Federalism Section 1 Powers and Responsibilities Continued.
The Court System Chapter 5. Courts  Trial Courts- two parties Plaintiff- in civil trial is the person bringing the legal action Prosecutor- in criminal.
Being a GAL in Tribal Court NAILS Pre-NLADA Indian Law Training Paul Stenzel – Stenzel Law Office LLC November 6, 2007.
Discretionary Transfer of Cases to Tribal Court James Botsford, Wisconsin Judicare Paul Stenzel, Stenzel Law Office Civil Law Seminar Thursday, December.
IV-D Law and Regulations National Tribal Child Support Association Annual Conference 10:45 AM to 12:00 PM, July 23, 2012 Attorney Paul Stenzel Stenzel.
Magruder’s American Government
Types of Courts Unit A Objective Dual Court System Federal Court System State Court System.
CHAPTER 4: FEDERALISM Section 1: Federalism: The Division of Power.
Chapter 5 “A Dual Court System” Business Law. A Dual Court System.
Bell Ringer – if you were not here last class, don’t ask me questions…. RQ #7 – STUDY!
Chapter 4 Section 2 and Review
Discretionary Transfer of Cases to Tribal Court
NORTH CAROLINA COURTS.
Indian Law in Wisconsin: A Primer for Family Court Commissioners
Chapter 4: Federalism Section 1
Wisconsin Judicial College: Indian Law – A Very Brief Primer
NORTH CAROLINA COURTS.
Conflict of Laws M1 – Class 4.
Chapter 4: The Federal System
History, Jurisdiction, & Functions of Contemporary Tribal Courts
Bellringer How many articles are in the Constitution? How many amendments are there to the Constitution?
EFFECTIVE PARTNERSHIPS WITH THE TRIBES OF WISCONSIN AND THE STATE OF WISCONSIN Presented by: Gloria Cobb, President Income Maintenance/TANF Association.
4-1 Dispute Resolution and the Courts
Federalism defined - A system of government in which a written constitution divides the powers of government between a central (national) government and.
Judicial Writing Wisconsin Tribal Judges Association January 10, AM to 4 PM Paul Stenzel Stenzel Law Office
Article III Judicial Branch.
Categories of Law CLN4U.
Return to Title IV Town WASFAA Conference
Chapter 3 Court Systems.
Florida Courts Scavenger Hunt
Tribal Jurisdiction in Alaska
Presentation transcript:

Tribal Courts in Wisconsin for the Practitioner New to Tribal Courts Dane County Bar Association April 22, 2008 Attorney Paul Stenzel Stenzel Law Office, LLC

Wisconsin Tribal Courts Overview –Brief background and history –Discussion of Tribal Courts in general –Wisconsin Tribal Courts –Q & A

Tribes in Wisconsin Eleven federally recognized Tribes in Wisconsin –Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa –Forest County Potawatomi –Ho-Chunk Nation –Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa –Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa –Menominee Indian Tribe –Mole Lake (Sokaogon) Band of Lake Superior Chippewa –Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin –Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa –St. Croix Band of Lake Superior Chippewa –Stockbridge-Munsee Band of Mohicans

Indian Tribes The United States recognizes Indian tribes as “domestic dependent nations.” –Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S. (5 Pet.) 1, 17 (1831).

Indian Tribes Tribes do not draw their powers from any source of federal law. Rather, they are the inherent powers of sovereigns that pre-exist the federal Union. –United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313, (1978); Talton v. Mayes, 163 U.S. 376, 384 (1896).

U.S. Supreme Court on Tribal Courts: We have repeatedly recognized the Federal Government's longstanding policy of encouraging tribal self-government. This policy reflects the fact that Indian tribes retain "attributes of sovereignty over both their members and their territory," to the extent that sovereignty has not been withdrawn by federal statute or treaty. - Iowa Mutual Ins. Co. v. LaPlante, 480 U.S. 9, 14 (1987)(internal citations and quotation marks omitted)

U.S. Supreme Court on Tribal Courts The federal policy favoring tribal self- government operates even in areas where state control has not been affirmatively preempted by federal statute. –Id.

U.S. Supreme Court on Tribal Courts Tribal courts play a vital role in tribal self-government, and the Federal Government has consistently encouraged their development. –Id. at 15.

Public Law 280 Wisconsin is a Public Law 280 state. 28 USC § 1360, 18 USC § Under PL-280, the State of Wisconsin has criminal jurisdiction on Indian Reservations, over Indians (except on the Menominee Reservation).

Public Law 280 State Courts have concurrent civil adjudicatory jurisdiction over private causes of action arising on Reservations. Public Law 280 does not grant the State civil regulatory jurisdiction on Indian reservations. –Bryan v. Itasca County, 426 U.S. 373 (1976).

Wisconsin Tribal Courts All eleven Tribes in Wisconsin have some form of a judicial system. Formality and procedure vary, but all are based on the adversarial process. In addition to adversarial court, the Ho- Chunk Nation operates a Traditional Court and other Tribes have peacemaking available.

Wisconsin Tribal Courts What law is applied in Tribal Courts? –Tribal law Is it written down? –Yes. Many tribes have their Court rules and ordinances available online. Resource for Tribal Court information – has links to all tribal courts with information online. Phone numbers to each Court also available.

Wisconsin Tribal Courts Do I need to be admitted to practice? –Varies by court; most allow one-time appearance pending application. –Some courts have entrance examination. –Call the Clerk of Courts.

Wisconsin Tribal Courts What types of actions do tribal courts hear? –Civil disputes –Employment –Divorce –Child Support –Contract claims –Constitutional challenges –Election disputes –Domestic violence restraining orders –Name changes –Juvenile actions –Abuse and neglect cases –Workers compensation appeals

Wisconsin Tribal Courts Do Indian tribal courts provide due process? Yes; amount of due process varies by issue and jurisdiction.

Wisconsin Tribal Courts Indian Civil Rights Act, 25 USC § 1302 –Imposes on Indian tribes by federal statute substantially similar, but not identical, obligations under the U.S. Bill of Rights –Notable differences: Establishment Clause Right to counsel Jury trial

Wisconsin Tribal Courts Going to a new tribal jurisdiction: –Find out as much as possible about law and local rules. Tribal constitution Tribal court code –Recon on judges –Talk to other lawyers who have practiced there (call the Tribal Attorney). –Case law –Requirements for practice –Respect

Wisconsin Tribal Courts Other issues –Tribes possess sovereign immunity from suit. Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 (1978) Tribal law on immunity varies by Tribe. –Teague v. Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, 2003 WI 118. –Full faith and credit; Wis. Stat. §

Wisconsin Tribal Courts DOS AND DON’TS –DO show respect. –DO NOT rely on Wisconsin Bar Admission for admission to tribal court practice. –DO educate yourself. –DO NOT expect Tribes to be the same. –DO be aware of your biases. –DO NOT cite to or rely on Wisconsin law unless adopted by the Tribe.

Attorney Paul Stenzel Stenzel Law Office, LLC Shorewood, WI