 Department of Interior – Bureau of Land Management  USDA – Forest Service  CEQ – Council on Environmental Quality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Advertisements

Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Cooperating Agencies: CEQ Perspective & Guidance
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
The Role of State, Local and Tribal Governments in the Federal NEPA Process Presented by Susan E. Bromm Director, Office of Federal Activities United States.
Bureau of Land Management Regulations Washington State Association of Counties Cooperating Agency & Coordination Training November 22, 2013 – Vancouver,
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Environmental Impact Statement Process Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
Purpose of the Standards
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
The National Environmental Policy Act
1 Cooperating Agency and Coordination Training Washington State Association of Counties Friday, November 22, 2013 Victoria Barr, Oregon/Washington State.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Travel Management Rule Implementation
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Overview of SAFETEA-LU Sections 6001, 6002, 3005, and 3006 TRB January 13, 2008 Shari Schaftlein FHWA Project Development & Environmental Review Washington,
I Larry Heil, FHWA October 15, 2003 Environmental Streamlining.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Cooperating Agencies & Coordination Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and BLM Regulations Federal Coordination with Local Government Hosted.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Productive SB 18 Consultation Michelle LaPena, Esq. LaPena Law Corporation 2001 N Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA (916)
Energy Exploration & Development On National Forest System Lands Barry Burkhardt
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Environmental Management System Definitions
Strengthening Science Supporting Fishery Management  Standards for Best Available Science  Implementation of OMB’s Peer Review Bulletin  Separation.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
1.What is the standard relicensing process in the U.S. and what is the ALP (Alternative Licensing Process) ? 2.How did we convince FERC to agree to an.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT RESOURCE ADVISOR TRAINING / REFRESHER May 1, 2014.
Environmental Assessment in British Columbia Forum of Federations Conference September 14, 2009.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
Welco EPA TRIBAL PROGRAMS Cathy Villa, EPA Tribal Coordinator EPA’s Tribal Programs leads the effort to protect human health and the environment of federally.
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
How Tribes Can Influence State Title V Permits Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Winnemucca District Draft Resource Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement.
TOWARDS A COMMON GOAL Coordinating actions under the Clean Water Act (FWPCA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
Director’s Order 12 contains information concerning review of other agency proposals.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
BLM Decision Making Process
Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
Alaska Roadless Rulemaking
IS YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT PREPARED
Environmental Protection Agency
Presentation transcript:

 Department of Interior – Bureau of Land Management  USDA – Forest Service  CEQ – Council on Environmental Quality

 NEPA – National Environmental Policy Act  FLPMA – Federal Land Policy Management Act  NFMA – National Forest Management Act

Conservation Movement – end of the 19 th Century  Establishment of the Public Lands Environmental Movement – Post World War II  1960’s- 1970’s : Largest number of environmental laws passed in US History

 1860’s – National Concern over Western Public Lands – Trans-Continental Railroad and the Homestead Acts.  During the 1800’s one half of the Nation would be transferred into private ownership.  In all, about 1.1 billion acres were transferred  1976, Federal Land Policy Management Act ◦ Statement of policy to retain remaining lands in Federal ownership

 Realization that natural resources are finite

 Post World War II  Increase in Industrialization  Rapid increase in population  Rapid demand for goods and services produced from natural resources

Cuyahoga River Fires 1952

AIR POLLUTION – HOUSTON, TEXAS

 The Santa Barbara oil spill occurred in January and February 1969 in the Santa Barbara Channel near the city of Santa Barbara in Southern California. It was the largest oil spill in United States Waters at the time, and now ranks third after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon and 1989 Exxon Valdez spills. It remains the largest oil spill to have occurred in the waters off California.

 Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act  National Environmental Policy Act  Clean Air Act  Clean Water Act  Endangered Species Act  Wild and Scenic Rivers Act  Wilderness Act  Federal Land Policy Management Act  National Forest Management Act

◦ Forest Plans National Environmental Policy Act Forest Planning Project planning

 Became Law in 1976 ◦ Guiding law on how national forests will be managed. ◦ Requires Every National Forest and Grassland to develop and maintain a Land Management Plan.  Forest Service is operating a new Planning Rule finalized in All existing Forest Plans were developed under the original 1982 Planning Rule.

 Forest Plans set priorities for management, allocate resources, and make recommendations for special areas.  They are on a 15-year revision cycle.  Counties must have an active role in their development and revisions.  New requirements for Forest Service to Cooperate and Coordinate with Counties

 Forest Service officials must: Notify State and County officials of planning actions early in the process. Where appropriate, invite States and Counties to be Cooperating Agencies. Include officials on interdisciplinary teams. Consult with tribal governments

 Forest Service has significantly increased requirements and direction for Coordinating with Counties.  The new planning rule recognizes the desire by counties to have goals and objectives in their local plans considered

 Coordinating Forest Service planning efforts with the planning efforts of State, Counties, and other Federal agencies.  For Forest Planning efforts, review land use policies of Federal, State, local, and tribal governments for: ◦ Consideration of local objectives ◦ Compatibility of these plans and policies ◦ Opportunities for the Forest Plan to address impacts identified ◦ Opportunities to resolve or reduce conflicts

 Forest Service direction to managers has been strengthened to include State and local governments as cooperating agencies for projects.  Requirements for Coordination are similar to those for Forest Plan development and revision.

NEPA Documentation Overview

 Notice of Intent  Scoping  Draft Environmental Impact Statement  Final Environmental Impact Statement  Record of Decision  Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

 The early and open process to determine scope of issues and identify the significant issues related to a proposed action. ◦ Invite affected Federal, State, and local agencies, affected Indian Tribes, and other interested parties to participate ◦ Determine the scope of the analysis and the significant issues ◦ Allocate responsibilities among all government agencies ◦ Develop the structure and process

The Role for local governments and Federally designated Tribes

 Cooperating agencies were involved in approximately 49% of Environmental Impact Statements and approximately 6% of environmental assessments during fiscal years

1. Lack of capacity or resources (i.e., training, time, personnel) continues to be a major reason. 2. Lack of another agency with expertise to engage with a specific environmental review. 3. Agencies choosing to participate on an informal basis rather than through a formal cooperating agency status designation.

 In the case of an action with effects primarily of local concern the notice may include:  Notice to State and area wide clearinghouses...  Notice to Indian tribes when effects may occur on reservations.  Following the affected State's public notice procedures for comparable actions.  Publication in local newspapers (in papers of general circulation rather than legal papers).  Notice to potentially interested community organizations including small business associations.  Publication in newsletters that may be expected to reach potentially interested persons.  Direct mailing to owners and occupants of nearby or affected property.  Posting of notice on and off site in the area where the action is to be located.

 Provides a list of proposed projects  Describes the type of action by National Forest  Describes the timing  Provides the responsible person to contact  Web-based information:

Special Expertise  Expertise needed to help the lead agency meet a statutory responsibility  Expertise developed to carry out an agency mission  Related program expertise or experience  Expertise regarding the proposed actions’ relationship to the objectives of a region, or State

 Becoming a cooperating agency requires a significant amount of time, resources, technical expertise, and funding.  Local governments in other states caution against applying to become a cooperating agency on every possible EIS

 Participate in the NEPA process at the earliest time  Participate in “Scoping”  Develop information and prepare environmental analyses  Provide staff support  Normally use its own funds

 An MOU is not required under NEPA – Options include an exchange of letters  Is the local government entering into a binding legal agreement?  Use MOU (or other document) because personnel and priorities change. Address: ◦ Roles and responsibilities ◦ Expectations (timeliness; quality)

 Establish a mechanism for addressing intergovernmental issues- a “seat at the table” that does not diminish or enhance authority.  Receive relevant information early in the analytical process  Apply available technical expertise and staff support  Avoid duplication with other federal, State, tribal, and local procedures  Foster intra and intergovernmental trust. Establish a relationship that improves overall working environments.

 Full disclosure can be frustrating – FOIA and Sunshine laws  Expectations are not always clearly outlined in the MOU  Not always a clear understanding of NEPA and agency planning processes and local, State, and Tribal planning  Effectiveness – involving the right people from the very beginning will save time and money in the end – dealing with changes in personnel  Some local governments have been rejected several times before they were finally accepted as a cooperating agency on a project. Do not give up. AGENCIES MUST REPORT TO CEQ WHEN THEY REJECT A REQUEST FROM ANOTHER AGENCY OR ORGANIZATION TO BE A COOPERATING AGENCY.

 Although the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations require scoping only for environmental impact statement (EIS) preparation, the Forest Service has broadened the concept to apply to all proposed actions.Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations  Scoping includes refining the proposed action, determining the responsible official and lead and cooperating agencies, identifying preliminary issues, and identifying interested and affected persons

 Whenever invited Federal, State, Tribal and local agencies elect not to become cooperating agencies, they should still be considered for inclusion in interdisciplinary teams engaged in the NEPA process and on distribution lists for review and comment on NEPA documents.

 To better integrate environmental impact statements into State or local planning processes, statements shall discuss any inconsistency of a proposed action with any approved State or local plan and laws (whether or not federally sanctioned).  Where an inconsistency exists, the statement should describe the extent to which the agency would reconcile its proposed action with the plan or law  Any environmental document in compliance with NEPA may be combined with any other agency document to reduce duplication and paperwork.

 Randy Phillips, USDA Forest Service ◦ Liaison to the National Association of Counties ◦ ◦