The Local Health Department DHS 140 Review Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

No Time Like the Present: Preparing for (INSERT YOUR LHDs NAME) for National Accreditation.
10/12/2014 Wisconsin Statutes and Administrative Rules A Brief Orientation on Wisconsin’s Public Health History, Statutes and Administrative Rules.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
Working Toward Accreditation Joan Ellison, Public Health Director Mary Margaret Stallone, Director Center for Preventive Services Livingston County Department.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Voluntary National Public Health Accreditation 1 Elizabeth (Lieske) Giese, Director Western Regional Office New Health Officer Orientation, November 5-6,
RENEWAL & SUCCESSION CONSIDERATIONS Elisa A. Falco, Director of Education & Training.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
An Overview of the Accreditation Process and Important Policies Megan Scanlan, Director of Accreditation, Stacy Wright, Site Visit.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Joy Harris, Accreditation Coordinator. Background Influence the development of the national system. Outside view of department readiness. Readiness to.
GOOD AFTERNOON! We will be starting shortly. Please orient yourself to Live Meeting including use of Q and A Please mute your microphones and/or telephone.
RP 3 Webinar Series: Safety Overview of the RP 3 Safety Checklist Friday, April 25, :00pm – 2:00 pm.
Public Health Accreditation: County of San Diego HHSA’s Experience.
PHAB Slide Set 2013 The slides in this set are made available for use in presentations and educational sessions by health departments. The information.
Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members.
Public Health Accreditation New Health Officer Orientation November 15,
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
AcademyHealth Public Health Systems Research Interest Group Meeting Public Health Data Panel.
Independent School Process Agency of Education State Board of Education Presentation March 25, 2014.
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO] [ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification Review for [RELATED ENTITIES] [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE.
Presentation Title Office/Division Name if desired Wisconsin Department of Health Services The Local Health Department 140 Review Process Dennis Hibray.
Illinois State Board of Education Innovation and Improvement Division January 13, 2010 An Introduction to the 21 st Century Community Learning Center Self.
Moreno Valley Strategic Planning Schedule Voting Protocol Subcommittee Functions MV Planning Process.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
1 Economic Directorate’s Quality Audit Program Steven S. Klement Office of Statistical Methods and Research for Economic Programs.
DOH Hospice update. In-Home Services Rules The In-Home Services (IHS) rules (chapter WAC) are now open for updating. The IHS rules includes regulations.
Performance Management: Getting Ready for Accreditation Needs Assessment Survey Community Assessment 1 Online survey Open to anyone interested in this.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
1 The Washington State Board of Education Applying to Authorize: Authorizer Application and Evaluation Jack Archer, Senior Policy Analyst State Board of.
International Mobility Recent Events and Actions.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
David Stone, Education Specialist NIHB Public Health Summit May 31, 2012 Partners in Accreditation: _ Supporting Tribal Health Departments for Public Health.
Reports to the Board of Health July 29, 2013 New Local Health Officer Orientation Patti Wohlfeil, Health Officer, Waushara County Dennis Wedde, Board of.
Office of State Fire Marshal Oregon State Police Creating Opportunities For Improvement In Preparedness And Response Community Capability Assessment.
CSOC – Certification Structure Oversight Committee Application Guidance October 2015.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
EMS Technical Assessments for Critical Access Hospital Communities Mary Sheridan ORHP Grantee Partnership Meeting September 1, 2009 …improving access to.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
California Department of Public Health California Department of Public Health Domain Site Visit Team Orientation Office of Quality Performance and Accreditation.
California Department of Public Health Domain Team Orientation
Connecticut Department of Public Health - Keeping Connecticut Healthy Connecticut Department of Public Health PHABuloCiTy! Public Health Accreditation.
Domain Champion Updates New Mexico Department of Health.
6/18/2016 DES / AzEIP 2011 Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training.
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
California Department of Public Health California Department of Public Health Accreditation Readiness Team (ART) Orientation Office of Quality Performance.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15) November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker Meagan Steiner David LeBlanc.
Performance-Based Accreditation
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
CAEP Orientation: Newcomers
Presented by: Melanie Luna, TANF Sites Director
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Division of ACF / Assisted Living Surveillance
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15)
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

The Local Health Department DHS 140 Review Process Tim Ringhand DHS – Division of Public Health November 15, 2013 The Local Health Department DHS 140 Review Process New Health Officer Orientation November 15, 2013 Tim Ringhand, Regional Director Western Region Division of Public Health

Statutory and Administrative Rule 140 Review History 1993 Public Health Statutes revised to say: WI statute 251.20 (1) Rule making. The department shall promulgate rules that specify all of the following: (1) Required services for each of Levels I, II and III local health departments under s. 251.05 (2). (2) Additional required services for Level II and Level III local health departments under s. 251.05 (2) (b) and (c), including services that the department of health services determines appropriately address objectives or services specified in the most recent public health agenda under s. 250.07 (1) (a).

Statutory and Administrative Rule 140 Review History Chapter DHS 140 - REQUIRED SERVICES OF LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS DHS 140.07 Designation of level of local health department. (1) Under the authority of s. 251.20 (1), Stats., the department shall direct a process to formally review the operations of all local health departments in a county or municipality at least every 5 years. A review of the operations of a local health department shall result in a written finding issued by the state health officer as to whether the local health department satisfies the requirements for a level I, II or III local health department. (2) In directing the review under sub. (1), the state health officer shall use department personnel and other appropriate local health officials who have expertise in the field of public health and are knowledgeable about the requirements for local health departments.

140 Review History 140 reviews began in 1999 with the 140 review of all city and county health departments (HD). 140 review tools were developed that addressed various health department organizational styles: City HD County HD City/County HD Health and Human Service HD

140 Review History The 1999 140 tool also addressed the various Level of health departments. Level I, II, III criteria; and Incorporated Healthier People in Wisconsin – A Public Health Agenda for the Year 2000 (HW 2000) as our defining document.

2005 – 140 Review History Next five year 140 review cycle tool place in 2005. Major changes from the 1999 140 review process were: Used Healthiest Wisconsin 2010 (not HW 2000) as the standard. Reduced redundancy of similar questions/evidence during the 140 review process. Central Office/Regional Office team reviewed but did not collect evidence. Replaced the three main areas of the 1999 review (Board of Health (BOH), Health Officer (HO), Local Health Department (LHD)) with the “Twelve Essential PH Services” and placed specific questions under the specific Essential Service.

2005 – 140 Review History Major changes from the 1999 140 review process: Created a separate justification document for Level II and Level III LHDs. Used “Health Priorities” as a means to determine Level II or Level III status. Level II: Seven programs or services that address at least five health priorities of the current state health plan (Healthiest Wisconsin 2010). Level III: Fourteen programs or services that address at least seven health priorities of the current state health plan (Healthiest Wisconsin 2010).

2005 – 140 Review History Level III agency Agent of the state for the Hotel and Restaurant program. Agent of the state for the Tattoo and Body Piercing program. Health Officer with a master’s degree in public health, public administration, or similar field and three years of full time administrative experience in a public health agency or public health work. Bachelor’s of science and sixteen graduate credits toward a degree in public health, public or health administration, and five years of experience in a full time administrative position in a public health agency or public health work.

2009 – 140 Review History 2009 was the last major 140 review of all LHDs by DPH. Healthy Wisconsin 2010 still used as the resource. LHDs filled out 140 review electronic survey form. LHDs e-mailed the completed survey form to their respective regional office.

140 Review History – Lessons Learned 1. Simplify the review process where possible. Combine related statutes Eliminate redundant evidence requests Utilize evidence already provided to DPH 2. Use electronic document collection systems when possible. 3. Improve DHS 140 on-site visit so that it provides support for LHD operations. 4. Include changes in national standards such as the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB).

2014 140 Review Guiding Principles Assure LHD statutory compliance with requirements to provide a basic level of services for all citizens; Efficiently collect only evidence essential to meeting statutory requirements; Support PHAB accreditation readiness for non- PHAB accredited LHD’s; and Recognize accreditation evidence used by PHAB accredited LHD’s that is appropriate in meeting DHS 140 required documentation requests.

DHS 140 – PHAB Crosswalk Wisconsin Statutes and Rules used in the DHS 140 Review PHAB Domains and Standards To identify: Evidence requested by both PHAB accreditation and the DHS 140 Review. Evidence requested by the DHS 140 Review only. The PHAB Domain most closely related to each statute and rule reference.

DHS 140 – PHAB Crosswalk DHS 140 Review Statutes, Rules and Evidence PHAB Domains, Standards, Measures and Evidence

DHS 140 – PHAB Crosswalk The Evidence

2014 – DHS 140 Review Tool Based on 2009 DHS 140 Review Tool. Combines more Statute and Rule references. More evidence available from DPH electronic documentation systems. Arranged by Essential Public Health Service. Identifies statute and rule references addressed by PHAB accreditation. Provides method for PHAB accredited agencies to address about one-third of evidence requests through submission of their PHAB accreditation report.

DHS 140 Review – Getting Started Two to three months prior to DHS 140 Process: DHS 140 letter to HO explaining the DHS 140 Review process. Link to the review tool(s). Proposed timeline for evidence submission to be completed . Proposed date of on-site review. LHD DHS 140 Review Team Recommendations shared with DPH Bureau Directors and staff assigned for DHS 140 review. DHS 140 Review Team convened. Bureau-specific evidence identified in the DHS 140 Review Tool.

DHS 140 Review – Documentation Submission LHD’s compile required documentation and submit the documentation as requested. The DHS 140 Review Team assigned to the LHD will review required documentation within two weeks of notification that documentation submission is complete. DHS 140 Review Team submits any questions regarding the required documentation back to the LHD. The LHD will respond to DHS 140 Review Team questions about documentation submitted within two weeks.

140 Review – Documentation Submission - PHAB Accredited For PHAB accredited agencies: Indicate on DHS 140 Review Tool if evidence for PHAB accreditation submitted met the PHAB evidence requirement. Submit PHAB accreditation report. If evidence used for PHAB accreditation does not correspond to DHS 140 required documentation requested, make requested documentation of meeting statute reference available.

DHS 140 Review – Documentation Submission Evidence types: Do not submit any electronic evidence containing patient confidential information! Web Links: links to documents available on agency or partner websites, e.g. community health assessment, community health improvement plan, annual report, minutes, newsletters, etc.) Electronic documents: load electronic documents on the DHS 140 SharePoint site. Hard copy documents: collect documents that cannot be sent electronically to be viewed during the on-site visit.

DHS 140 Level II and Level III Survey Review

DHS 140 Level II and Level III Survey Review Level II and Level III DHS 140 Review Surveys include: Level II and Level III Health Officer education and experience. Provision of public health programs and services: Level II: seven programs that meet at least five Healthiest Wisconsin 2020 health priorities. Level III: fourteen programs that meet at least seven Healthiest Wisconsin 2020 health priorities. Level III health departments provide the date of their most recent contract with the Division of Public Health for licensing and inspecting food, lodging and recreational facilities.

DHS 140 – On-Site Review DHS 140 Review Team visits the LHD to: Clarify evidence submitted. Review and hard copy documentation and complete review. Support the health department’s provision of public health services. DHS 140 Review Team determines if the LHD has met statutory requirements. If met, a DPH letter of designation is sent to the LHD, Board of Health Chair, and County Board Chair or other designated representatives; and a local presentation of the leveling certificate is scheduled. If not met, a DPH letter specifying DHS 140 deficiencies and asking for plan of remediation is sent.

Timeline

Timeline

DHS 140 Reviews Due New Local Health Officer Orientation Participants DHS 140 Review completed in 2009 DHS 140 Review completed after 2009 Burnett Douglas Eau Claire Madison/Dane De Pere Shawano-Menominee Marquette St. Croix Portage Lafayette Outagamie Walworth Waukesha

140 Reviews and Impact on You Agencies with new Health Officers have previously completed 140 reviews. Same documentation required. Same forms required. Face-to-face (LHD/DPH) meeting conducted. Board of Health members invited to participate.

What’s Happening Next with the DHS 140 Reviews November –December 2013 January – March 2014 Pilot Tests SharePoint site development Finalize DHS 140 Review Process Training DPH staff LHD Orientation BOH education DHS 140 Reviews expected to begin in earnest the second quarter of 2014

Benefits of the DHS 140 Review DHS 140 reviews are completed because: Per Wisconsin Statute 250, the Department of Health Services (DHS) requires evaluation of each health department in the state every five years to assure a basic level of services for all citizens. DHS 140 review process provides LHDs an opportunity: To review policies and procedures. To reorganize resource materials and update agreements. For staff and board members to learn from each other about the function and success of the local health department.

Example of 2009 Certificate of Designation that will be updated for 2014

Questions?