Results and discussion Results and Discussion Figure 3. Observed (symbols) and simulated (lines) V-Stages of soybean cultivars (MG 3.0 to 3.9) grown at.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Advertisements

Soybean seed quality response among maturity groups to planting dates in the Midsouth Larry C. Purcell & Montserrat Salmeron MidSouth Soybean Board Meeting,
Simulating Cropping Systems in the Guinea Savanna Zone of Northern Ghana with DSSAT-CENTURY J. B. Naab 1, Jawoo Koo 2, J.W. Jones 2, and K. J. Boote 2,
© Crown copyright Met Office 2011 Climate impacts on UK wheat yields using regional model output Jemma Gornall 1, Pete Falloon 1, Kyungsuk Cho 2,, Richard.
New development of Hybrid-Maize model Haishun Yang Associate Professor / Crop Simulation Modeler, Dept. Agronomy & Horticulture University of Nebraska.
Responses of Sweet Cherry Productivity and Soil Quality to Alternate Groundcover and Irrigation Systems Xinhua Yin 1, Xiaolan Huang 1, and Lynn Long 2.
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
Yield, Protein, and Quality Response to Planting Date, Variety, and Late N. B.D. Brown. University of Idaho. Introduction Higher market prices for the.
Agronomic and Productive Response to Different Concentrations of Gibberellic acid in Green and Purple Heads Artichoke Cultivars. C. Baixauli, J.M. Aguilar,
Results – climatic variables Temperature:  Local average air temperatures over have significantly increased during March, April and May in Fermoy.
Rationale and Objectives  Summer fallow is a common practice in the western portion of the Central Great Plains.  Summer fallow is inefficient at storing.
A Case Study of Crop Model Applications in an Increasing Diversity of Genetically Modified Traits Girish Badgujar 1, V.R. Reddy 1, K. Raja. Reddy 2, David.
Modelling the response of wheat canopy assimilation to CO 2 using two models of different level of empiricism D Rodriguez 1,2, F Ewert 3, J Goudriaan 1,
Impacts of Climate Change on Corn and Soybean Yields in China Jintao Xu With Xiaoguang Chen and Shuai Chen June 2014.
Corn and Soybean Production as Affected by Rotational Tillage Systems Jeffrey A. Vetsch* and Gyles W. Randall, Univ. of Minnesota, Southern Research and.
Chapter 6 Random Error The Nature of Random Errors
Development of tillering pattern under transplanting and direct sowing methods in spring planted sugarcane M. O. A. Galal *, A. M. Abou-Salama **, E. A.
Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessments Hands-On Training Workshop Impact, Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessment for the Agriculture Sector – Part 2.
Rate and Duration of Seed Component Accumulation in Water Stressed Soybeans José L. Rotundo & Mark Westgate Iowa State University, 1301 Agronomy Hall,
Foliage and Branch Biomass Prediction an allometric approach.
Spacing between plants Tillers plant DAP Standard error Tillers plant DAP Standard error Tillers plant DAP Standard error Tillers plant.
By C. Kohn Waterford Agricultural Sciences.   A major concern in science is proving that what we have observed would occur again if we repeated the.
Ch 9.5: Predator-Prey Systems In Section 9.4 we discussed a model of two species that interact by competing for a common food supply or other natural resource.
Ignacio A. Ciampitti, Cropping Systems Specialist K-State Research & Extension (TWITTER)
WP2. Adaptability and Productivity Field Trials Results from the fourth growing period and comparison of the results recorded from the years 2003, 2004.
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Climate impacts on UK wheat yields using regional model output
Results of Long-Term Experiments With Conservation Tillage in Austria Introduction On-site and off-site damages of soil erosion cause serious problems.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
DRAINMOD APPLICATION ABE 527 Computer Models in Environmental and Natural Resources.
Modelling Crop Development and Growth in CropSyst
Development of Vegetation Indices as Economic Thresholds for Control of Defoliating Insects of Soybean James BoardVijay MakaRandy PriceDina KnightMatthew.
Impact of 2012 Drought & Corn Production Research Update Agronomy In-service January 4, 2013 Peter Thomison Horticulture and Crop Science Ohio State University.
Chitu, E. Topor, E. Paltineanu, C. R. Dumitru, I. M. Sumedrea, D. Chitu, V. Ionita, A. D. Filipescu, L. Research Institute for Fruit Growing Pitesti -
Yield Loss Prediction Tool for Field-Specific Risk Management of Asian Soybean Rust S. Kumudini, J. Omielan, C. Lee, J. Board, D. Hershman and C. Godoy.
At the end of this Lesson, you have learned to answer: 1.How pearl millet is a better crop than other cereal crops like maize, wheat, etc.? 2.How many.
After successful completion of this Lesson, you have learned to answer: 1.How pearl millet is a better crop than other cereal crops like maize, wheat,
Introduction Soybeans are an important crop on many cotton farms in the Midsouth. Rapidly rising input prices have increased the cost of soybean production.
Introduction Efficient use of nitrogen is becoming important due to increasing N fertilizer prices and the growing concerns about NO 3 - contamination.
Dr. Joe T. Ritchie Symposium : Evaluation of Rice Model in Taiwan Authors : Tien-Yin Chou Hui-Yen Chen Institution : GIS Research Center, Feng Chia University,
Introduction: Early planting (Fig. 1a) is a current recommendation for increasing soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield in the upper Midwest, USA. Average.
Rate Distortion Theory. Introduction The description of an arbitrary real number requires an infinite number of bits, so a finite representation of a.
The Equilibrium Constant Expression Here comes K!!
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
What Maturity Group to Plant - When and Where Larry Purcell, Michael Popp, and Montserrat Salmeron MSSB Meeting January 12, 2016 Memphis,
Soybean Maturity Groups and Selection
Fig.3. Photoperiod trend during growing season
Irrigation Modeling for Crops Drip Irrigation & Row Plantings
Introduction to Expert Systems
Prof. DSc Eng. Zornitsa Popova, Assist. Prof. Dr Eng. Maria Ivanova
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences
Models for estimate yield losses due to wheat rusts and powdery mildew By Dr.Gamalat Abd-Elazize& Dr. Mohamed Abdelkader Wheat Diseases Research Department.
Height and Pressure Test for Improving Spray Application
1Dept. of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, AL
Fig 1: Nitrogen fertilizer application at V7.
Long-term crop rotations suppress soybean sudden death
Sensing Resolution in Corn
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Maize Light Interception and Grain Yield as Affected by Precision Planting.
Lodging immediately after July 4, 2007 storm.
Relationship between mean yield, coefficient of variation, mean square error and plot size in wheat field experiments Coefficient of variation: Relative.
Evangelos Gonias, Derrick Oosterhuis, Androniki Bibi and Bruce Roberts
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Supplementary Table S1. Yield and phenological parameters of 12 soybean cultivars grown under two [CO2] levels in two years: aCO2, ambient [CO2]; eCO2,
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Crop Growth Model Simulation of G2F Common Hybrids
Fig. 6 Relation between Q and other impact indicators.
Advanced Algebra Unit 1 Vocabulary
Purdue-Indiana Seed Industry Forum: Crop Production Shawn P. Conley
MGS 3100 Business Analysis Regression Feb 18, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Results and discussion Results and Discussion Figure 3. Observed (symbols) and simulated (lines) V-Stages of soybean cultivars (MG 3.0 to 3.9) grown at Lincoln, Nebraska in Colors of the symbols and lines indicate V-Stages of plants from difference emergence dates: 10-May (red), 23-May (blue), 7-June (green), and 24-June (yellow). Table 1. Cultivar information (associated with model parameters), final node number and root mean square error (RMSE) of V-Stages simulation for each of the 14 soybean cultivars and emergence dates. MG= Relative maturity group Type: ID = Indeterminate, SD = Semi-determinate DG = V-End indicator group for indeterminate cultivars V n,10-May = Final node number for 10-May emerged plants Figure 4. Mean and standard error of V-End Indicator (a), maximum node appearance rate (R LA,MAX ) (b), R1-R5 duration (c), and final number of nodes (V n ) (c) for each of the emergence dates. On average, vegetative stage prediction can be achieved with a precision of less than 1 node using the proposed model as long as the effects of emergence dates and maturity on maximum node appearance rate and that of emergence date on V-End indicator are taken into account. The effect of emergence date on V-Stages simulation parameters may be linked to the inter- relationship between phenology and growth and warrants further investigation. Shorter R1 to R5 duration, smaller maximum node appearance rate, and earlier V-End indicator cause the late planted (2-June and 17-June) soybeans to end with approximately 4 nodes less than the earlier planted (28-April and 16-May ) soybeans. Variables definitions V-Stages simulation begins at unifoliate stage (V1), which is simulated using Eq. 1. and emergence (Emg) as the starting point. Afterwards, rate of main stem node appearance is driven by daily average temperature (Eq. 2 and Fig. 2a) and V-Stages for a given day is calculated as a cumulative node appearance rate (Eq. 3) and modifiable by a dimensionless (0-1) chronological function (CF) at the later phase of V-Stages. During the initial phase of V-Stages CF equals 1. Determination of end of V-Stages requires input from the reproductive development sequence, particularly the assignment of a V-End indicator (D). The V-End indicator is dependent on the V-End coefficient (r D ), which is a dimensionless developmental progress from R1 toward R5. R1 to R5 developmental rate is driven by temperature and photoperiod functions (Eq. 4). Once V-End indicator is reached, a chronological function associated with reduction of node appearance rate is calculated using Eq. 5. Different sets of parameters of the chronological function are used for indeterminate and semi-determinate cultivars to describe the differences in node appearance rate of the two types of soybean near the end of vegetative development (Fig. 2b). Figure 2. Temperature function (a) and chronological function (b) used in simulation of soybean node appearance (vegetative stage). Field Experiments Data for model development and evaluation was obtained from an irrigated field experiment at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, in Fourteen soybean cultivars (maturity group 3.0 to 3.9) were grown on a conventionally tilled Kennebec silt loam (Cumulic Hapludolls) following corn at four different planting dates (28-April, 16-May, 2-June, and 17-June). The row spacing, seeding rate, and planting depth was 76 cm, 370,658 seeds ha -1 and 2.54 to 3.84 cm, respectively. The seed yield obtained from the experiment was from 3.2 Mg ha -1 (averaged 17-June planting) to 4.6 Mg ha -1 (averaged 28-April planting). Vegetative and reproductive stages (Fehr and Caviness, 1977) were recorded biweekly by using a numerical average of 10-random plants for each of the cultivar x planting date treatments. Abstract Development and evaluation of an approach to predict soybean V- stages (node appearance) is being presented. V-Stages are simulated using two main functions: 1) a non-linear temperature function associated with rate of main stem node appearance, and 2) a chronological function related with decreasing node appearance near the end of V-Stages. Model evaluation based on 13 indeterminate maturity group III cultivars and a semi-determinate cultivar at Lincoln, NE in 2004 indicates a satisfactory prediction of V- Stages with overall RMSE of 0.7 nodes. Maximum node appearance rate did not differ between cultivars with MG 3.0 to 3.6, but a higher rate was found in MG 3.9. Maximum node appearance rate and signal determining end of V-Stages tended to be lower at later planting dates. These phenomena along with shorter duration between R1 and R5 are responsible for the observed lower number of final nodes among the late planted plants. Rationale Accurate prediction of vegetative development (node appearance) in soybean is useful for scheduling field management and simulating leaf area index (Sinclair soybean model) and plant height (CROPGRO model). Soybean node appearance responds to temperature under controlled environment in a non-linear fashion (Hesketh et al., 1973). A type of non-linear temperature function, the beta function, can describe developmental response to temperature in several crops such as cassava, maize, rice, and sorghum (Yan and Hunt, 1999; Yin et al., 1995) and was used to predict leaf appearance rate in winter wheat (Streck et al., 2003). The beta function version used in Wang and Engel ( 1998) and Streck et al. (2003) is of particular interest because of simplicity of its parameters. Soybean vegetative development under field conditions and how final node number is determined, however, is more complicated because there is an apparent interaction with reproductive stage as seed development and growth compete for available assimilates. Objective To develop soybean vegetative stage simulation by using a beta function to describe the response of node appearance rate to temperature and by relating the developmental progress with reproductive stage. Material and Methods Model Description Figure 1. Sequence description and equations used in the model for simulation of soybean vegetative development. Soybean Phenology: Simulating V-Stages (Node Appearance) Using Non-Linear Temperature and Chronological Functions Related to Reproductive Stage T. Setiyono 1), A. Dobermann 1), A. Weiss 2), J. Specht 1), A. Bastidas 1) 1) Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2) School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln