RD51 collaboration meeting 13-15 October 2008 MoU section on Intellectual Property Bernard Denis, CERN-DSU-TT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 ENSEMBLES CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT Adrian Broad EU Manager, Met Office.
Advertisements

Collaborative Intellectual Property
ITU WORKSHOP ON STANDARDS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) ISSUES Session 5: Software copyright issues Dirk Weiler, Chairman of ETSI General Assembly.
WP6: Dissemination and exploitation Vladimir Meglič.
Research and Innovation Summary of MS questions on the Commission's proposal for DG Research & Innovation Research and Innovation Rules for Participation.
FP7 EC Rules – Groupe recherche 16 January 2006Megan Richards European Community FP7 Participation Rules (Commission proposal adopted )
IP rights in FP7 PROTECT Study Visit 10th June 2008 (Alicante) IPR-Helpdesk is a constituent part of the IP-BASE project which is financed by the CIP Programme,
Research Contracts and IP Services TRAINING WORKSHOPS ON HORIZON 2020 – 27 NOV 2014 The Grant Agreement Roger Wallace – Research Contracts & IP Services.
Intellectual Property (Contracts Officer- WMS)
Interface between patent and sui generis systems of protection of plant varieties The 1978 UPOV Act does not allow both systems to be applied to the same.
Emily M. Weitzenboeck - Institutt for Rettsinformatikk Access Rights for exploitation of results Emily M. Weitzenböck Institutt for Rettsinformatikk University.
Brussels, 29 October 2007 Bart Janse DG Research IPR in FP7.
1 Support for the coherent development of policies This document is purely provisional, and only reflects preliminary options from Commission services.
FP7 Model Consortium Agreements Warsaw, 12 th December 2007 Willem Wolters, Universities Team of Experts (UNITE) and Wageningen International Helpdesk.
Not legally binding FP7 Rules for Participation and Grant agreement FP7 Helpdesk 
Training & research for academic newcomers A project of the King Baudouin Foundation © 2013 Gabriella Calderari1.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
FP7 Regler för deltagande 18 december 2006 Monica Hjertman, Enheten för Europaprogrammen, VINNOVA
Advanced Grid Research Workshops through European and Asian Co-operation Intellectual Property Rights in EC projects Bruno Le Dantec
Web 2.0, IPR and You Naomi Korn & Dr Neil Witt 02/06/20151www.web2rights.org.uk.
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
1 Chapter 17 Licensing Copyright © Nelson Australia Pty Ltd 2003.
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation Charlyne Rabe CONTRACTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Charlyne RABE KT Legal Advisor.
Mexico - April 15, Intellectual Property Rights in EC projects Katerina Tsakona FORTH Bruno Le Dantec GEIE ERCIM
Constructing the “Price” of the Technology in IP Licensing Negotiations Sub Regional Training Program on IP Valuation Maribor November 5 to 7, 2012.
What is Intellectual Property ? Patents- protection of technology Trademarks- protection of domain names and product identity Copyrights- protection of.
Innovative Medicines Initiative Financial and IPR aspects Magali Poinot Legal Manager Info Day Bucharest, 10 December 2012.
Page 1 IOP Genomics Workshop Patents and Patenting Biotech Inventions Annemieke Breukink, Ph.D. September 8th, 2009.
Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation KT Training – 9 September 2014 Introduction to Intellectual Property Rights D. Mazur – 9 September 2014.
Alliance Agreements Business Alliance Mahidol University International College.
IPR related obligations DG Research & Innovation Research and Innovation.
Laurence DUMOULIN LEGAL TEAM , a v e n u e V i c t o r H U G O L L U X E M B O U R G Tel. (+352) Fax (+352)
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
2 nd RD51 Collaboration Meeting October, 2008 WG6: Production DSU/TT - Emir Sirage,
How Commercial Firms Protect Intellectual Property In Transactions Daniel J. Mazella Celera Genomics Group, An Applera Corporation Business.
1 WIPO – Geneva – April 2005 European Commission – Research DG D. Dambois European Patent Attorney IPR disputes in international.
FP OntoGrid: Paving the way for Knowledgeable Grid Services and Systems Intellectual Property Rights Review meeting Delft,
EPOCA – 13. June EPOCAConsortium Agreement (CA)
International Telecommunication Union New Delhi, India, December 2011 ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues Philip.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
© 2004 The IPR-Helpdesk is a project of the European Commission DG Enterprise, co-financed within the fifth framework programme of the European Community.
Intellectual Property Rights Economy and Ownership of Results in IST Projects The Research Council of Norway Niels Peter Thorshaug.
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
Intellectual Property Right Bernard Denis, DG-KTT.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
© 2004 The IPR-Helpdesk is a project of the European Commission DG Enterprise, co-financed within the fifth framework programme of the European Community.
Follow-Up on the Crystal Clear Collaboration Agreement H. Hillemanns May, 22 nd 2007.
Lecture 27 Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property simply defined is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes.
Legal Stuff Guidelines for CBI Markus Nordberg. Why bother? It is our duty to ensure that – Our students get their degrees without unnecessary delay or.
IPR Issues and Web2.0 Engagement Naomi Korn & Dr Charlotte Waelde 18/02/20161www.web2rights.org.uk.
PATENTS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS Presented By: Navdeep World Trade Organization.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
ip4inno Module 4C IP Licensing Name of SpeakerVenue & Date.
Patents Amy Bilton Knowledge Transfer Officer.
“COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE” USING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFORMATION
Towards a roadmap for collaborative R&D
Senior Executive Officer
National Contact Points (NCP) Training
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects
IPR in FP7 Bart Janse DG Research A.2.
CERERE Tom Reynolds Research and Innovation Advisory Group Member
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN FP7
IPR management in CA and GA
Perspective of an International Research Center
U.S. Army Technology Transfer Mechanisms
Presentation transcript:

RD51 collaboration meeting October 2008 MoU section on Intellectual Property Bernard Denis, CERN-DSU-TT

Technology Transfer Managing IP in R&D collaborations Defining access to pre-existing IP (so called background IP) in the framework of the collaboration Defining access to results (so-called foreground IP) Defining the principles for IP ownership Clarifying rules for the dissemination of results Defining the mechanisms for the exploitation of jointly owned results: who take the lead to protect? how the revenues from commercial exploitation will be shared? what kind of agreement are needed? who will draft the contracts? 2 Intellectual Property in RD51 collaboration Meeting in Paris October 08

Technology Transfer Principles (proposed at the Nikhef workshop) Declaration of background IPR The members of the collaboration declare what background IPR they make accessible to the collaboration and the possible limitations. Free access for research The members of the collaboration give to all members of the collaboration a royalty-free, non-transferable, non-exclusive right to use declared background IPR and foreground IPR for research purpose and for use in high energy physics, nuclear physics and astroparticle physics experiments. Ownership of foreground IP IP owned by the party generating it. Dissemination and exploitation of results Results published in reviewed journals and presented to conferences referring to the authors of the collaborating institutes. The parties owning the foreground IP make the decision to protect it or not. 3 Intellectual Property in RD51 collaboration Meeting in Paris October 08

Technology Transfer RD 51 MoU structure 4 Intellectual Property in RD51 collaboration Meeting in Paris October 08 MoU for the RD 51 collaboration Article 12: Intellectual Property Annex 2: General conditions applicable to experiments at CERN 7. Intellectual Property Annex 6: Declaration of background IP - CERN: ….

Technology Transfer Annex 2: General conditions applicable to experiments at CERN Publication and use of data and knowledge [...] The Collaborating Institutions shall strive to publish [...] through Open Access journals [...] Contribution of proprietary information A Collaborating Institution contributing proprietary information to the Collaboration shall ensure that it has [...] the rights to use, and to contribute to the Collaboration for use by the other Collaborating Institutions, such proprietary information for the execution of the Experiment.[...] Use of proprietary information The contribution by a Collaborating Institution of any proprietary information, including information protected by trademark, patent or copyright, [...] a free, irrevocable and non-exclusive licence to use such information in the execution of the Experiment. Publication and disclosure of proprietary information [...] the Collaborating Institutions shall strive to publish and make publicly available all proprietary information contributed to the Collaboration. In particular, they shall consider making any software available under Open Source licence conditions. Limitation of liability 5 Intellectual Property in RD51 collaboration Meeting in Paris October 08 Access Dissemination

Technology Transfer MoU Article 12 Each Party shall, prior to entering into this MoU, identify to the best of its knowledge at the time, the protected intellectual property (“IP”) it owns and contributes to the Collaboration for the execution of the RD-51 programme, and list such IP in Annex 6 together with any applicable restrictions. [...] Declaration of and access to background IP Any IP developed in the execution of the RD-51 programme (“Foreground IP”) shall belong to the Party having generated such Foreground IP. Such Party shall be free to protect and/or exploit the same at its own cost and risk, subject always to the provisions of this MoU. Ownership and exploitation In case Foreground IP has been generated by more than one Party, and either their respective share of the Foreground IP cannot be distinguished, or cannot be dissociated for the purpose of its protection, such Foreground IP shall be owned jointly by the Parties having generated it [...] Ownership The conditions of access to IP of a Party for the purpose of executing the RD-51 programme are set out in Annex 2. Access for all other uses, including but not limited to commercial exploitation, shall be the subject of a separate written agreement involving the Parties concerned. Access and exploitation Any publication by a Party relating to the execution and results of the RD-51 programme shall acknowledge the contribution of the other Parties. 6 Intellectual Property in RD51 collaboration Meeting in Paris October 08

Technology Transfer Annex 6: Declaration of background IP CERN IP to be contributed to the RD51 Collaboration: ( 1) The first ‘patent family’ covers the use of GEM foils as gas detectors. In the US, 2 patents have been granted: US (Planispherical parallax-free X-ray imager based on the gas electron multiplier) and US (Radiation Detector of very high performance). A PCT application has been filed, and is now being examined at the national level. Furthermore, the use of GEM foils as gas detectors is also covered by a patent owned by CNRS (the CAT patent). CERN and CNRS have concluded an agreement in 2006, whereby CERN has obtained a sub-licensable license for the CAT technology. Under this agreement, CERN can manufacture and sell GEM foils with attached licenses covering both the GEM and the CAT patents. Applicable restriction: no exploitation of the GEM technology can be carried out in the field of ‘dosimetry in water phantom’. (2) A second ‘patent family’ covers part of the method implemented by CERN for manufacturing GEM foils (MCML patent WO : Method for making a multilayer module with high-density printed circuits). Applicable restriction: no use of this method may be made in Poland. (3) CERN is also considering filing a patent concerning the manufacture of large area GEM foils. This could be relevant for both the RD-51 programme and for the exploitation of the Collaboration’s results. 7 Intellectual Property in RD51 collaboration Meeting in Paris October 08

Technology Transfer Summary Declaration of background IPR The members of the collaboration declare what background IPR they make accessible to the collaboration and the possible limitations. Free access for research The members of the collaboration give to all members of the collaboration a royalty-free, non- transferable, non-exclusive right to use declared background IPR and foreground IPR for research purpose and for use in high energy physics, nuclear physics and astroparticle physics experiments. Ownership of foreground IP IP owned by the party generating it. Dissemination and exploitation of results Results published in reviewed journals and presented to conferences referring to the authors of the collaborating institutes. The parties owning the foreground IP make the decision to protect it or not. MoU Art12, Annex 6 Annex 2 (“General cond…” ) Access in the framework of the collaboration only! MoU Art12 8 Intellectual Property in RD51 collaboration Meeting in Paris October 08