October 17, 2013 JLBC Internet Sales Taxation Presentation to the Joint Task Force on Income Tax Reform.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOUTH CAROLINA South Carolina Voters Tell Congress: NO to New Internet Sales Tax Laws! South Carolina Statewide Survey: June 1-2, 2014 N= 400 Likely South.
Advertisements

MISSOURI Missouri Voters Tell Congress: NO to New Internet Sales Tax Laws! Missouri Statewide Survey: June 2-3, 2014 N= 400 Likely Missouri Voters 70%
Proposal to the States and Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board
Medicaid Opportunities & Challenges Task Force June 26, 2013 Jeff Bechtel, Senior Consultant Summary of Congressional Budget Office Reports and Analysis.
E-Commerce in Business
Budget Trends Commission February 27, 2008 Minnesota Taxes: Growth, Stability, and Demographic Changes Presented by: Paul Wilson MN Department of Revenue.
Streamlined Sales Tax ProjectStreamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP) Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP) Overview Society for Information Management (SIM)
Tribal Governments and the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement September 20, 2007 John Dossett, NCAI General Counsel Chairman Arlan Melendez, Reno-Sparks.
SENATE BUDGET AND EVALUATION OFFICE Overview of the Georgia State Revenues and Budget Slides are up to date as of 4/29/10. Please note that numbers are.
JLBC Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona October 26, 2007.
History of Arizona’s Individual Income Tax System Presentation to the Joint Task Force on Income Tax Reform August 21, 2013 JLBC.
PENNSYLVANIA Pennsylvania Voters Tell Congress: NO to New Internet Sales Tax Laws! Pennsylvania Statewide Survey: June 4-5, 2014 N= 400 Likely Pennsylvania.
NORTH CAROLINA North Carolina Voters Tell Congress: NO to New Internet Sales Tax Laws! North Carolina Statewide Survey: June 1-2, 2014 N= 400 Likely North.
Chapter 11 Taxes on Sales and Consumption Chapter outline 1.Why Tax Sales? 2.Sales Taxes, Value-added Taxes, Excise Taxes 3.Efficiency Issues in Sales.
The Impact of Not Collecting Sales and Use Tax from Internet Sales into Pennsylvania Robert P. Strauss Professor of Economics & Public Policy Carnegie.
1 Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board. The Marketplace Fairness Act of 2015(MFA) Grants state and local jurisdictions the right to require the collection.
HED 460 Taxation 3-year moratorium imposed in 1998 ended Oct. 21 Congress plans to pass an extension by year’s end.
Budget trends for local governments Judith I. Stallmann Community Development Extension Centra meeting August 9, 2006.
The Effect of State Tax Policies on Where E-Tailers Collect Sales Tax Donald Bruce, Professor of Economics William F. Fox, Professor of Economics LeAnn.
Personal Income Tax Systems in the United States Presentation to the Joint Task Force on Income Tax Reform September 4, 2013 JLBC.
1 Exemption AdministrationTraining Related to Accepting Certificates Prepared by the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board Audit Committee Prepared January.
E-Tailing Electronic Retailing or E-Tailing - is the sale of goods or services through the internet. This can include: business-to-business sales (B2B)
Streamline – states working together to increase their sovereignty Scott Peterson Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board.
E-business and Supply Chain COSC 648 Sungchul Hong.
The Impact of Electronic Commerce On Pennsylvania Sales and Use Tax 2000 FTA Revenue Estimating and Tax Research Conference Waterville Valley, New Hampshire.
DMH1 Overview of Mental Health Services Act Funding: Collection to Expenditure Tom Greene, Chair, Mental Health Funding and Policy Committee Mark Heilman,
Discussion on Overall Cost of Compensation and Part 2 Compensation 9/28/09.
The Debate Over Internet Taxation And the Implications for Local Government Revenues Suzette Barta, Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma State.
Marketplace Fairness Act March States Without a Sales Tax Alaska Delaware New Hampshire Montana Oregon.
House Judiciary Committee Proposal for Origin Rules & Revenue Return Steve DelBianco executive director 1 NCSL Meeting, 9-Jan-2015 New Orleans.
Streamlined Sales Tax Implications for Alaska Patty Ware Alaska Municipal League.
Tax trends for the state Judith I. Stallmann The Academy for Leadership in Local Governance July 14, 2006.
AN OVERVIEW By Tom Johnson
 E-Commerce (electronic commerce) is the buying and selling of goods and services on the Internet.
MIS 565 – What is Ecommerce Instructor: Ali Hashmi.
Business Information Systems Systems Analysis & Design Academic Year 2008/9 Lecture 2.
Governor’s Tax Simplification Task Force Overview and Impact on City of Phoenix Presentation to Phoenix Chamber of Commerce January 15, 2013.
Voluntary Disclosure Systems  State and City Voluntary Disclosure Procedures Should be Uniform  Procedures, Requirements, and Allowances Should be Codified.
SAFE HARBOR Certain statements contained in this presentation regarding Rick's Cabaret future operating results or performance or business plans or prospects.
WORK SESSION ON COMPENSATION WHAT’S IN AM9003 AND THE FEDERAL BILL?
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 10-1 E-commerce Kenneth C. Laudon Carol Guercio Traver business. technology. society. Third Edition.
Copyright© Genetic Computer School Singapore.2009 MIS8 Page-1 Lesson 8 E-Commerce: Digital Markets.
Streamlined Sales Tax Opportunity and Challenges King Woolf – Revenue Recovery Group.
HED 460 Pricing Feasible to test new pricing models Traditional price setting is being modernized due to information availability Internet reduces transaction.
Current Issues in Sales Tax Alabama Department of Revenue.
2014 Legislative Overview League of Arizona Cities and Towns.
Chapter 6 E-COMMERCE: DIGITAL MARKETS, DIGITAL GOODS.
Module 5 E-commerce and Internet Reporting Convery
Initiative 1100: Summary & Impact 1 Rick Garza Deputy Administrative Director.
July 11, 2011 Commerce in the eMarketplace – “eFairness” CWAG Laurie Smalling Director of Public Affairs and Government Relations.
CONNECTING ECOMMERCE MERCHANTS TO CHINA THE CHINESE EL DORADO: NEW BUSINESS FRONTIERS.
E-commerce: Digital Markets, Digital Goods
| 1 | STATE AND LOCAL TAXES (SALT): CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS Bruce Nelson, M.A., CPA EKS&H (970)
May 3, 2016 Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board Max Behlke Manager, State-Federal Relations National Conference of State Legislatures.
IMPACTS OF PROPERTY TAX REFORM January 30, Introduction Randy Singh, Office of Management & Budget –Opening Remarks Bill Donegan, Orange County.
The Movement to Overturn Quill: An Alabama Update JOE GARRETT, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.
Alabama’s Experience Where we were 2015:
SALES TAXES AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE
Median Age by County 2010.
Retail Scenario – India
The Debate Over Internet Taxation
Federal Legislation Addressing State Taxation
C h a p t e r 16 TAXES ON CONSUMPTION AND SALES
Digital Goods & Wayfair
1 in 4 Arizona children live in poverty.
MANAGING THE SALES TAX EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE AFTER THE SUPREME COURT RULING: BEST PRACTICES FOR THE CREDIT TEAM Scott E. Blakeley, Esq. Blakeley LLP
Maumelle’s Financial Future
Sales Tax for Remote Sellers
Exemption AdministrationTraining Related to Accepting Certificates
The Importance of Sales & Use Tax
Presentation transcript:

October 17, 2013 JLBC Internet Sales Taxation Presentation to the Joint Task Force on Income Tax Reform

JLBC 2 What is the Marketplace Fairness Act?  1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision stated that absent federal legislation, states could not collect sales tax from retailers with no physical presence (“nexus”) in their state  Marketplace Fairness Act is Federal legislation that would enable states to collect sales tax from those remote retailers with no nexus in their state  Remote sellers include online and catalogue retailers  Retailers with less than $1 million in remote sales annually would be exempted

JLBC 3 MFA Requires States to Simplify Their Sales Tax Laws  State must be in compliance with either: The Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement – Arizona is not currently a member state of SSUTA Other alternative simplification requirements, including establishing a uniform sales tax base throughout the state  Does Arizona currently meet the simplification mandates under MFA? Several areas which do not currently comply with the MFA guidelines: different tax bases at the city vs. state level, and city use of tiered rates (such as lower tax rate for single large purchases)

JLBC 4 Any Revenue Gain From Marketplace Fairness Act Would Come From Reducing Non-Compliance  Online sales from retailers outside Arizona are already subject to use tax – however there is a significant amount of non-compliance  MFA is intended to significantly affect non-compliance by requiring retailer to collect required tax at time of sale  Non-compliance can vary depending on type of commerce Business-to-business (B2B) or business-to-consumer (B2C)

JLBC 5 What Are The Potential Sales Tax Revenue Gains?  University of Tennessee study estimated the total nationwide increase in state and local sales tax collections from e-commerce legislation to be $11.4 billion in 2012  State and local sales tax gains in Arizona were estimated to be $370 million (State share = $190 M?)  UT estimates included the impact of e-commerce only, not other remote sales (e.g., mail and phone orders)

JLBC 6 UT Study Probably Significantly Overstates Potential Revenue Gain  Numerous caveats associated with UT estimation  Alternative study reached much different conclusion – total Arizona revenue gain estimated at $98 M  Given challenges, we recommend JLBC Staff work with the Executive to develop state-generated estimate.

JLBC 7 What Are Some of the Caveats of the UT Estimates? - Differing Estimates on Amounts of E-Commerce  UT Study based on 2006 U.S. census data on nationwide amount of e-commerce Is UT assumption of 9% annual growth (2007 – 2012) in online sales reasonable? Or will growth rates slow as most households gain broadband internet access?  Arizona’s share of US e-commerce – UT study assumes 2.9% compared to 2.1% share of US population

JLBC 8 What Are Some of the Caveats of the UT Estimates? (Continued)  UT estimate assumes an overall e-commerce non-compliance rate of 25% Business-to-business transactions already typically viewed as having a low non-compliance rate Growth of “brick and click” (online sales from traditional stores) tends to reduce business-to- consumer (B2C) non-compliance Is there enough overall non-compliance to generate estimated revenue gains?  However, non-compliance is by definition impossible to measure and is therefore highly uncertain  Uncertain impact of exempting smaller retailers given lack of exact data

JLBC 9 Amazon Already Collects Arizona Sales Tax  Amazon has started collecting sales tax for any goods sold to Arizonans  Based on SEC filings, and the experience of Amazon in other states, JLBC Staff estimated that General Fund would gain an additional $15 million in FY 2014 from Amazon sales.  Therefore, any state revenue gain from MFA would exclude Amazon sales.  Amazon’s market share of online sales highlights need to better understand what types of sales MFA would impact

JLBC 10 Other Issues  MFA bill (S. 743) passed out of U.S. Senate in May but its fate in the U.S. House remains uncertain.  U.S. House is considering removing the small business exemption.  Unknown issues such as implementation process, litigation and compliance costs if MFA were enacted