1 Wal-Mart’s View on Demand Response Program Design Anoush Farhangi Angela Beehler.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
Advertisements

1 Conservation Program Cost-Effectiveness Tests Presentation to the: Florida Public Service Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency Initiatives November.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
The Power to Make a Difference PPL Electric Utilities April 2010.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
Demand Response in Connecticut Presented by: Bob Laurita ISO New England December 2, 2004.
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
WAL-MART STORES, INC. DEMAND RESPONSE. Wal-Mart in New York Supercenters45 Discount Stores45 Neighborhood Markets 0 Sam’s Clubs17 Distribution Centers4.
The Benefits of Dynamic Pricing of Default Electricity Service Bernie Neenan UtiliPoint International Prepared for Assessing the Potential for Demand Response.
Texas Deregulation – A Success Story The ERCOT Market Framework Has Been A Success Implementation  Bilateral Contracts - Participants contract up to 100%
Northumberland Manufacturers’ Association Lakefront Utilities Information Session – Dereck Paul 1.
The Bottom Line In Energy Cost Reduction Energy Automation Systems, Inc. EASI.
1 Northeast Public Power Association Electric Utility Basics Electric Rates and Cost of Service Studies.
Electrical Engineering Fundamentals for Non-EEs; © B. Rauf
1 EERMC Public Meeting on Combined Heat and Power September 17, 2013.
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
Solutions to California’s Energy Crisis: Real-Time Pricing by Frank Wolak Chairman, Market Surveillance Committee March 17, 2001.
Let’s Talk Energy Savings: The City of Norwalk partners with Conservation & Load Management (C&LM) Mayor Alex Knopp November 18, 2004.
Utility Analysis. Baseline Electricity Analysis  Understanding and documenting current energy use is called developing a baseline. Developing a baseline:
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 14 Energy Efficiency Module 14: DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
ANALYZING YOUR ELECTRIC BILL Bob Walker Met-Ed November 7, 2007.
WAL-MART STORES, INC. ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND DEMAND RESPONSE.
Energy Audit- a small introduction A presentation by Pune Power Development Pvt. Ltd.
1 Price Elasticity of Demand in Current Zonal Market PUCT Demand Response Workshop (Project No ) Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates January 2007.
California Energy Commission, May, 1999 California Incentives For Renewable Markets Timothy N. Tutt California Energy Commission (916)
NJ Clean Energy Program Noveda Technologies Liberty Science Center By: Joe Fiorella Information from the:
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
Battling Load Growth in NYC Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
MEC: Customer Profitability Models Topic DSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability Jesse Langston, OG&E Oct 20 th 2013.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
NAESB MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION MODEL BUSINESS PRACTICE RETAIL ELECTRIC DEMAND RESPONSE NARUC update 9/14/09.
Consumer Empowerment Consumer Empowerment May 15, 2012 Presented by: Alparslan Bayraktar Commissioner Energy Market Regulatory Authority of Turkey (EPDK)
Distributed Energy Resources Concept Document Discussion ERCOT Staff DREAM Task Force Aug. 25,
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Smart Energy Smart Energy July 28, Smart Energy.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
Demand Response
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.
Demand Response, Planning, and Regional Markets NASUCA Conference June 30, 2009 Joe Rosenthal, CT OCC.
Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
Proxy $G and other Loads in SCED 2 Litmus Tests Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Dec. 2, 2014.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
JOINT WORKSHOP ON MULTIPLE-USE APPLICATIONS. AMS’S 50 MW FLEET FOR SO. CAL EDISON MULTIPLE USE CASE #5: BEHIND- THE-METER DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES.
NON-RESIDENTIAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT HCDE, Facilitator and DRF Industries, LLC Consultants Energy Education, Energy Cost, TDU Charges, & Demand Reduction.
Advanced Meter School August 18-20,2015 Time of Use and Load Profile Jeremiah Swann.
Irvine Ranch Water District Distributed Energy Storage Case Study
SMECO Demand Response filing
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Energy Saving Bureau Industrial energy audits in coherence with Directive on the promotion of end-use efficiency and energy services.
SMUD - Whole Foods Energy Storage System
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
Leveraging Energy Infrastructure to Drive Revenue
ANSI/ASHRAE 90.4 Energy Standard for Data Centers
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
New England Electricity Restructuring Roundtable
Environmental Sustainability Manager
Coal as Green Energy Source
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Presentation transcript:

1 Wal-Mart’s View on Demand Response Program Design Anoush Farhangi Angela Beehler

2 Metering Concerns  A cornerstone of deregulation is advanced metering. Without measuring consumption in finer intervals it is not possible to verify participation in demand response programs.  The cost of advanced metering should be lowered by removing unreasonable regulation, and promoting competition and innovations.  Customers should be allowed to install their own advanced meters given that they are in compliance with the standards set by the regulatory authority.  Customers should receive full credit for meter ownership.  Customers or their authorized representative should have full, frequent and easy access to their own meter data.  The data should be made available to customers in a standard format set by the regulatory authority.  The customer should not bear any cost for access to their own meter data.

3 Identify Target Market  The highest priority of the Commission should be the development of rules, regulations and incentive plans that would encourage Demand Response among all customers.  Rules should not be developed for the benefit of a handful of market participants.  Large industrial customers that are the sole beneficiaries of the current regulations could engage in one on one contracts with Ercot.

4 Terms and Conditions  Customers or their authorized representative should be able to directly participate in demand response programs without having to go through a third party aggregator and without having to pay any participation fees.  Paperwork, and program terms should be kept simple and standard across TDSP’s and systems.  A customer should be able to aggregate its entire load from multiple sites in one system or zone.  Minimum per site requirement is discriminatory and prevents the full participation of commercial customers.

5 Market Reforms  Market data should be available to all customers in a timely basis.  Market should be transparent. After the fact changes to market data should be kept to a minimum.  Price signals should be accurate and allocated to specific intervals in which the cost occurs.  Balancing accounts, uplift charges, etc. that apply to load ratio shares not to hourly prices distort market signals and should be minimized.  Customers must be made aware of severe market conditions well ahead of time to prepare for full load participation.

6 Incentives Reform  There should be a parity between demand and supply alternatives.  Reliability pay should be proportional to the response time, not to size. A customer able to reduce one KW in 10 minutes should get paid more than a customer able to reduce 1 KW in 30 minutes. A customer able to reduce load by 10,000 KW in 10 minutes should get the SAME rate per KW as the customer that can reduce 1 KW in 10 minutes.  Demand Resources can be used to reduce load, shift load, provide reliability support or to lower system ramp rate.  Demand resource deployments can result in shifting load from high heat rate periods to low heat rate periods, or in conservation.  In addition to providing reliability benefits, demand resources provide environmental attributes as well.  The Commission should consider providing to the customers environmental incentives for deployment of demand resources such as RECS or White Tags.

7 Base Line Development  Calculation of baseline energy should be based on the conditions at the time of interruptions and not based on historical data.

8 Experiments

9 Connecticut Experiment 8/1/2006 and 8/2/2006 The Experiment resulted in around 3 MW of load reduction in 35 facilities in CT in two critical periods in the Northeast.

10 Light Dimming Experiment in Alice Texas Lights were dimmed to take advantage of natural daylight Spikes in lighting load as cloud cover reduced natural daylight Direct effect: Significant reduction in lighting load around 70KW Indirect effect: Reduction in Air Conditioning load around 40 KW Currently, over 100 stores in Ercot are equipped with the dimming technology.

11 Pre Cooling Experiment, Tyler Texas The store was pre cooled in the early morning hours. Set point was returned to normal at 7 am. 250 kwh increase in AC, 120 KWH reduction in Refrigeration, a net of 130 KWH gain. Can be used to lower system ramp rate.

12 Texas 4/17 and 4/18 load Significant reduction on 4/18 after AC set point was raised by 3 degrees

13 Baseline estimated from historical data is not an accurate measure of savings