DESIGN OF GROUND ANCHORS – USE OF NEW SECTION 8 Eric R Farrell AGL Consulting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr Colin Smith University of Sheffield, UK Director, LimitState Ltd UK
Advertisements

20/05/2008 LimitState:GEO launch & technology briefing - ICE London 12/01/2015geo1.0 LimitState:GEO Eurocode 7 Colin Smith MA(Cantab) PhD Director & LimitState:GEO.
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Graduation Project Foundation Design for Western Amphitheater of Nablus.
RETAINING EARTH STRUCTURE Session 11 – 16
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
AASHTO LRFD Section 11 Abutments, Piers, and Walls
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures –
A new assessment method for masonry arch bridges (SMART) Clive Melbourne, Adrienn Tomor School of Computing, Science and Engineering, University of.
GEO-MECHANICS (CE2204) Shear Strength of Soils
8. SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT
TOPIC 2: TYPES OF FOUNDATION
FOUNDATION DESIGN.
COLUMNS. COLUMNS Introduction According to ACI Code 2.1, a structural element with a ratio of height-to least lateral dimension exceeding three used.
Insurance provisions under JCT 1998 and JCT Standard Building Contract 2005 Brian Lewis – QBE CAR.
Beam Design.
Note: Moment Diagram Convention
EUROPEAN CENTER OF PREVENTION AND FORECASTING OF EARTHQUAKES – ECPFE
9.6 Other Heat Conduction Problems
Providing Design Standards for Frictional Compression Ground Anchors Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Lab., Seoul Natl. Univ. Master Course Student Joo,
ERT352 FARM STRUCTURES TRUSS DESIGN
NEWBuildS Tall Wood Building Design Project – Structural Design and Analysis Zhiyong Chen & Minghao Li University of New Brunswick, University of British.
Lecture 2 - Fundamentals. Lecture Goals Design Process Limit states Design Philosophy Loading.
Recent Experience on Building Collapses under Snow Loads Stewart Macartney – blyth+blyth.
Session 15 – 16 SHEET PILE STRUCTURES
Comparison Between GTStrudl Integrated and Partial Model Analysis Case study: ATF Power Plant CTG&STG Building foundation A Presentation Submitted to:
Settlement Criteria  f f f for clays, silty clays, plastic silts: Chapter 5 (short term) Chapter 7 (long term, i.e., consolidation)  i i i in this.
An-Najah Nationa Unuversity Faculty Of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Nablus-Palestine Foundation Design of Multy story building Suprevisors:
Axial resistance of micropiles : from French to Eurocode design Roger Frank CERMES (ENPC-LCPC), Paris, France.
An-Najah National University Faculty Of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Al-Najjar Building Footing Design Systems Alternative Prepared by : Mohammed.
4.4 SOIL NAILING SOIL NAILING IS A REINFORCEMENT METHOD TO REINFORCE THE GROUND WITH STEEL BARS OR STEEL BARS IN GROUT FILLED HOLES. IT IS MAINLY USED.
Recent Construction Sites of Micropiles in Germany Thomas F. Herbst Wessling / Munich Germany 5th IWM 2003 Seattle – Session 2.
Formwork By Paul Markham. Definition of formwork from BS5975:2008 Formwork (also forms, shutters or shuttering): structure, usually temporary, but in.
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Third Edition CHAPTER © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Analysis and Design of Beams for Bending.
Falsework By Paul Markham. Definition of falsework from BS5975:2008 Falsework : temporary structure used to support a permanent structure while it is.
Research at Northwestern University: End-bearing Micropiles in Dolomite.
Session 19 – 20 PILE FOUNDATIONS
BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL Session 3 – 4
UNIT-2.
5 December 2011 Task 2 Cavern Study Ground model and 3D cavern layout Matt Sykes Eden Almog Alison Barmas Yung Loo Agnieszka Mazurkiewicz Franky Waldron.
Results Verification Has the model been correctly implemented?
PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.
EAS 453 Pre-stressed Concrete Design
EAS 453 Pre-stressed Concrete Design
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-III (CE 434)
EAS 453 Pre-stressed Concrete Design Stress Limit of Pre-stressed Concrete 1Dr. NORAZURA MUHAMAD BUNNORI (PhD), USM.
1 EUROCODES A tool for building safety and reliability enhancement Introduction to EN 1990 – Section 6 Workshop on Eurocodes: Training the trainers Moscow.
GRRF Ad-Hoc Working Group
Outline Introduction Test section details Axial load test results
년도 한국지진공학회 춘계학술발표회 Hybrid Control Strategy for Seismic Protection of Benchmark Cable-Stayed Bridges 박규식, 한국과학기술원 토목공학과 박사과정 정형조, 한국과학기술원.
CHAPTER FOUR LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE. 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Definitions of Key Terms 3.2 Lateral Earth Pressure at Rest 3.3 Active and Passive Lateral Earth.
of a Novel Pipe Connection
Vertical harbour quay rehabilitation using ground anchors
Structure II Course Code: ARCH 209 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
CONSTRUCTION METHODS & TECHNOLOGY
Chapter 3 BENDING MEMBERS.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 10 TOPIC : 3
Mahesh Dhakal Stud Wall Design Mahesh Dhakal
Created analysis model
Structure II Course Code: ARCH 209 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.
BFC Structural Steel and Timber Design
Discussers (alphabetical order):
Preliminary design of foundation for HEPS
Roustness Det Tekniske Fakultet.
Roustness Det Tekniske Fakultet.
Civil Engineering Department
Reinforced concrete column
Graduation Project Bracing system for deep excavation.
Group Members: 1. NORAZLINA MD YUSOFF( ) 2.SHARIFAH NAZILA BT SYED MOHAMMAD ( ) 3.SHERVIN MOTAMEDI( ) 4.PEYMAN BEHTASH ( )
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Foundation
Presentation transcript:

DESIGN OF GROUND ANCHORS – USE OF NEW SECTION 8 Eric R Farrell AGL Consulting.

Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 72 Section 8 Anchors  Anchor must have a free length  This presentation will cover the design of grouted anchor

ASSOCIATED STANDARDS EN1537:2013 Execution of special geotechnical work – Ground Anchors. Note – A ‘grouted anchor’ in EN is termed a ‘ground anchor’ in EN 1537 EN ISO Geotechnical investigation and testing-Testing of geotechnical structures-Part 5:Testing of pre-stressed ground anchors (only in draft form at present) Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 73

4 6m Lake (water) DESIGN EXAMPLE – THE DESIGN ISSUE DESIGN ANCHOR TO SUPPORT SHEET PILED QUAY WALL Sandy Gravel Design Approach 1 used Design is based on 3m anchor spacing.

Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 75 Anchor prestressed at this stage 2m (with overdig) 1m CONSTRUCTION STAGES

Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC m with overdig Surcharge of 20kPa

Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 77

8

FUNDAMENTAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS The design of the anchors must consider:-  Ultimate Limit States (ULS) and Serviceability Limit States (SLS) of the anchor,  ULS and SLS of the supported structure.  Prestress forces and the effect of prestress forces, where relevant. Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 79

Ultimate limit state (ULS) design force to be resisted by the anchors E ULS,d ≤ R ULS;d Eq. 8.1 where E ULS,d = max(F ULS,d ; F Serv,d ) Eq. 8.2 and F Serv,d =  Serv F Serv,k Eq. 8.3 R ULS;d = Design value of the resistance of an anchor complying with ULS criteria E ULS,d = ULS design force to be resisted by the anchor F ULS,d = Design value of the force required to prevent any ULS in the supported structure. F Serv,d = design value of the maximum anchor force (expected within the design life of the anchor), including effect of lock off load, and sufficient to prevent a SLS in the supported structure.  Serv = partial factor Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 710

Serviceability Limit State F Serv,k ≤ R SLS;d Eq.8.4 F Serv,k = characteristic value of the maximum anchor force (expected within the design life of the anchor), including effect of lock off load, and sufficient to prevent a SLS in the supported structure. R SLS;d = design value of the resistance of an anchor complying with SLS criteria Note, assumes partial factor of unity Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 711 WHERE REQUIRED IN THE NA

Note:- R ULS;d and, where required R SLS;d must be determined/validated by anchor tests. Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 712

Geotechnical ULS resistance of anchor Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 7 13

Geotechnical ULS resistance of anchor continued Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 7 14

Geotechnical SLS resistance of anchor (where required) Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 715

Geotechnical SLS resistance of anchor continued Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 716

Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 717 PARAMETERS REQUIRED FROM ANCHOR DESIGN Anchor required to satisfy the resistance values SUMMARY

Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 718 Limit equilibrium analysis Finite element analysis without/with initial prestress (lock-off) of 60kN/m Design SituationL (m) Anchor force kN/m Max. BM kNm/ m L (m) Anchor force kN/m Max. BM kNm/m Characteristic actions and soil parameters, no overdig /66* / /67.5 Characteristic actions and soil parameters, with overdig /73* / /80.1 DA1.C /102.5* / /87.6 DA1.C2 (  Q =1.3) /112.9* / /126.9 DA1.C2 (  Q =1.0) /102* / /113.9 Length 8.5m using char value with no overdig / /39.5 *25% added for arching F ULS,d F Serv,k

Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 7 19 PARAMETERS FOR ANCHOR DESIGN – assuming 3m spacing Anchor required to satisfy the resistance values

Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 7 20 ANCHOR TESTING

Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 721 ANCHOR DESIGN/TESTING  Preliminary estimation of bonded length based on ground conditions and geotechnical parameters  Investigation tests  Suitability tests  Acceptance tests Not part of EC7:Sec 8 EN ISO When available Number of Investigation/Suitability tests to be set in NA.

Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 722 Test Proof Load Investigation tests -Not on working anchor -Normally taken to failure of bonded length/ground -may require larger structural element Eq P P ≥ ξ ULS x  a;ULS x E ULS,d Suitability test-On working anchor -taken to load that verifies R ULS,d -P P comes from Eqs, 8.1, 8.6 & 8.7 Eq P P ≥ ξ ULS x  a;ULS x E ULS,d Acceptability tests-Must be carried out on all anchors -  a,acc;ULS and  a,acc;SLS from Table A.20 Eq P P ≥  a,acc;ULS x E ULS,d or Eq P P ≥  a,acc;SLS x F Serv,k

Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 723 kN/m 3m F Serv,k Characteristic value of the maximum anchor force, including effect of lock-off load, and sufficient to prevent a SLS in the structure F ULS;d Design value of the force required to prevent any ULS in the supported structure F Serv,d Eq.8.3  Serv =1.35 from Table A E ULS,d Eq PoPo Lock-off load, taken as about 80% of F Serv,k P Proof load, Suitability tests (P P ≥ ξ ULS x  a;ULS x E ULS,d …… Eq 8.12) ξ ULS = 1.0 (Table A.20)  a;ULS = 1.1 (Table A.19) P Proof load, Acceptability tests P P ≥  a,acc;ULS x E ULS,d Eq (Table A.20) or P P ≥  a,acc;SLS x F Serv,k Eq (Table A.20) Taking 3m spacing of anchors

Summary (using default values) Anchor spacing of 3m Preliminary estimate of bond length (NOT COVERED IN EUROCODE) Hole dia = 0.25m  v'ave = 3*18+7*10 = 74 kPa and taking K value =2 L = 426/(2x74xTan 38x3.1416x0.25)= 4.7m Investigation tests – Load to be taken to at least 426kN. Suitability tests on selected anchors, load to be taken to 426kN Acceptability tests (on all anchors), load to be taken to 426kN ???? These tests are required to validate that the anchors have the required R ULS,d and, if specified in the NA, R SLS,d Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 724

Measuring R ULS,m and R SLS,m of an anchor (draft ISO/DIS ) Method 1Method 2Method 3 Type of loading Cycle loading In steps Rest periods Maintained loadsMaintained deflectionMaintained load Measurements Tendon head displacement vs applied load at end of each cycle Load-loss vs time at the highest load of each cycle Anchor head displacement vs anchor load at the beginning and end of each load step., Tendon head displacement vs time k 1 versus anchor loadAnchor head displacement vs time for each load step.  1 versus anchor load  3 versus anchor load or bond load, if possible. Displacement vs load for all cycles R ULS,m Currently  1 =2mm Load loss ≤ 5% at P P or displacement ≤ 5%  e over log cycle of time (from BS8081) When plot of  3 vs load, is asymptote or  3 =5mm R SLS,m Not definedLoad loss ≤ 1%at P P or rate of displacement should reduce to 1%  e over log cycle of time (from BS8081) Pc (from a s vs load, end of pseudo linear portion) Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 725

Structural Design E ULS,d ≤ R t;d i.e 386kN ≤ R t;d Eq 8.11 where E ULS,d = Ultimate limit state design force to be resisted by the anchor. R t;d = Design resistance of the structural element Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 726

Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 727

Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 728 Cl (2)P of EN :2004 refers to from EN :2005 Cl (2)P- overstressing to 0.95f y is permitted if the force in the jack can be measured to an accuracy of ±5% P P = 426kN (=1.1xE ULS,d ) Therefore P P ≤ 0.95*629 = 597 kN > 426kN therefore OK STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENT FOR PROOF TESTING

Significant of changes The new proposals presents a rational design method for anchors The current anchor testing practices in many countries will required modification. The introduction of F Serv,k is relatively novel within the Eurocode system. Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 729

Comparison with present system Current practice in UK & Ireland is to use BS8081 Design is based on ‘working’ load T w No proper definition of T w is given (T w can be zero in some uplift situation, for example) Design of anchors to BS8081 does not consider ULS explicitly. Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 7 30

Acknowledgements Members of SC7/EG1 on Anchors Colleagues at AGL Consulting Brian Simpson and Georgios Katsigiannis for invitation Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 731

Design of Anchors – Use of New Section 8:EC 7 32 THANK YOU