THE EFFICIENT USE OF OUTRIGGER AND BELT TRUSS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of Seismic-Resistant Steel Building Structures
Advertisements

Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridge.
Introduction to Lateral Force Resisting Systems
FRAMEDSTRUCTURE Members: Soriana Álvarez #C Teresa Tam #C Ainara Ricchiutti #C
CORE DESIGN.
Introduction to Structural Design
CEE Capstone II Structural Engineering
Gravity Force Resisting Systems
Structural Bracings Presentation by V. G. Abhyankar
LAYOUT OF STEEL STRUCTURES
CE A434 – Timber Design Structural Behavior.
Main Functions of Buildings 4 Provide a safe and comfortable environment for work and rest. (Protect us from wind, rain and the wild animals) 4 Two types.
SEISMIC LOADS LATERAL LOAD FLOW FRAMES and SHEAR WALLS.
Modeling for Analysis CE Design of Multi-Story Structures
CEA UNIT 3 TERMS & DEFINITIONS. BEAM A structural member, usually horizontal, that carries a load that is applied transverse to its length.
Connections and Bracing Configurations
Designing Tall Buildings: Why is it different
Rectangular framed structures
The University Sciences Building Northeast, USA Final Presentation Chris Dunlay Structural Option Dr. Boothby.
for Earthquake Resistance
High Rise Structural Systems
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
ID-2125 Marianela Najul KARLYS PULIDO PARICIA CAMACHO FRAMED STRUCTURE.
360 State Street New Haven  CT  Structural | Sabrina Duk | T. Boothby.
Rockville Metro Plaza II Rockville Pike John Vais | Structural Option PSU AE Senior Thesis 2014 Faculty Advisor – Dr. Hanagan Rockville, Maryland
BEAMS AND COLUMNS PRESENTED BY K.ROSHIN RUKSHANA.
All Hakuna Resort photos in courtesy of LMN Development LLC Young Jeon Structural Option Advisor: Heather Sustersic Hakuna Resort AE Senior Thesis 2015.
Skyscraper Basics The term “skyscraper” was coined in the 1880s, shortly after the first tall buildings were constructed in the United States – but the.
Frames and Walls Lateral Stability
TOPICS COVERED Building Configuration Response of Concrete Buildings
Introduction to Structural Design © 2010 Project Lead The Way, Inc.Civil Engineering and Architecture Architecture has recorded the great ideas of the.
7. APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
TUBE STRUCTURES Faculty, Prof. V. R. SHAH Mrs. AANAL SHAH
300 North La Salle Liam McNamara BAE / MAE Senior Thesis April 13 th, 2010.
The Bank of China Tower. BACKGROUND I. M. Pei (Architect) Leslie E. Robertson (Engineer)
Building Fun You will have 30 minutes to build the strongest structures you can with only the materials you are provided with. Explain to the class the.
Third Avenue NY, New York Michelle L. Mentzer Structural Option.
Dan Donecker BAE/MAE – Structural Option Senior Thesis Project 35 West 21 st Street New York, New York.
Howard County General Hospital Patient Tower Addition Columbia, MD Kelly M. Dooley Penn State Architectural Engineering Structural Option.
Whiteland Village Mary Longenecker Structural Option Senior Thesis August 7, 2007.
Nicholas Reed Structural Option Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition AE Senior Thesis 2013 Courtesy of Jim Boje, PE.
Stability systems in high rise buildings - Neo Bankside, Southbank, London - The Gherkin (Swiss Re Bank) 30 St Mary Axe, London Maryam & Elisavet.
Brad Oliver – Structural Option Advisor – Professor Memari.
Justin Purcell Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
IN MODULAR CONSTRUCTIONS
Vietnam Institute for Building Science and Technology (IBST)
Preliminary Design & Steel Deck Alternative Presentation
Look first at Out of Plane Loads Need to account for openings
Structural Systems Design for a Laramie Office Building
Structural Systems Design of the Lincoln Fire Department Headquarters Michelle Burback Structural Engineering Capstone and Senior Honors Project.
Model Making Workshop - Structure of Tall Buildings and Towers
Preliminary Design Ron Klemencic, P.E., S.E. President, Magnusson Klemencic Associates Presented by: John Hooper, P.E., S.E. Director of Earthquake Engineering,
DESIGN OF AIRPORT TERMINAL AND CONTROL TOWER
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridge. contents Bearings Horizontal and transversal wind bracing Classification of bridges.
Structural Engineering: Skyscrapers
Introduction to Structural Design
CONDOMINIUM TOWER & PARKING
Prepared by John R. Henry, P.E. Senior Staff Engineer
Basic structural design
Introduction to Structural Design
DEFINITION OF TALL BUILDINGS From the structural design point of view, it is simpler to consider a building as tall when its structural analyses and.
Misan University College of Engineering-Civil Engineering Department 3rd Stage
DEFINITION OF TALL BUILDINGS From the structural design point of view, it is simpler to consider a building as tall when its structural analyses and.
Equilibrium Of a Rigid Body.
Table of Contents: 1. Historical background about the tall buildings. 2. Lateral Resisting Systems. 3. Using Technology in high rise building design.
North Shore at Canton The Pennsylvania State University
Masonry Bearing Walls.
Introduction to Structural Design
Lesson 5: Gravity Load Path
Presentation transcript:

THE EFFICIENT USE OF OUTRIGGER AND BELT TRUSS SEMINAR PRESENTATION ON THE EFFICIENT USE OF OUTRIGGER AND BELT TRUSS IN TALL BUILDINGS Submitted to MALAVIYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, JAIPUR In partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of Degree of MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Under the supervision of: Submitted By: Dr. Ravindra Nagar Neeraj Agrawal Professor (Structural Engg. Deptt.) M.Tech.(Structural Engineering) MNIT Jaipur Student ID: 2010/PST/126 DEPARTMENT OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, MALAVIYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JAIPUR, JAIPUR-302017 2011-12

Tall building with conventional outriggers and belt truss INTRODUCTION The outrigger and belt truss system is one of the lateral loads resisting system in which the external columns are tied to the central core wall with very stiff outriggers and belt truss at one or more levels. Tall building with conventional outriggers and belt truss Taken from S. Fawzia and T. Fatima

The belt truss tied the peripheral column of building while the outriggers engage them with main or central shear wall. Strandard 3D view of Outrigger and belt truss Taken from S. Fawzia and T. Fatima

The aim of this method is to reduce obstructed space compared to the conventional method. The floor space is usually free of columns and is between the core and the external columns, thus increasing the functional efficiency of the building. Exterior columns restrained the core wall from free rotation through outrigger arms.

Outrigger and belt trusses, connect planar vertical trusses and exterior frame columns. Outrigger system can lead to very efficient use of structural materials by mobilizing the axial strength and stiffness of exterior columns.

THE CONCEPT OF OUTRIGGER The great sailing ships of the past and present use outriggers to help resist the wind forces in their sails. Like the ship, the core in the tall building can be related to the mast of the ship, the outrigger acting like the spreaders and the exterior columns like the stays or shroud of the ship.

THE USE OF OUTRIGGERS IN HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS TO CONTROL THE FORCES The incorporation of an outrigger which connects the two elements together provides a stiffer component which act together to resist the overturning forces. When an outrigger-braced building deflects under wind or seismic load, the outrigger which connects to the core wall and the exterior columns, makes the whole system to act as a unit in resisting the lateral load.

TYPES OF OUTRIGGER TRUSS SYSTEM On the basis of connectivity of core to exterior columns, this system may be divided as in two types : 1. CONVENTIONAL OUTRIGGER CONCEPT 2. VIRTUAL OUTRIGGER CONCEPT

CONVENTIONAL OUTRIGGER CONCEPT In the conventional outrigger concept, the outrigger trusses or girders are connected directly to shear walls or braced frames at the core and to columns located outboard of the core. Typically (but not necessarily), the columns are at the outer edges of the building. Tall building with conventional outriggers Taken from R. SHANKAR NAIR

VIRTUAL OUTRIGGER CONCEPT In the “virtual” outrigger concept, the same transfer of overturning moment from the core to elements outboard of the core is achieved, but without a direct connection between the outrigger trusses and the core. The basic idea behind the virtual outrigger concept is to use floor diaphragms, which are typically very stiff and strong in their own plane.

BELT TRUSSES AS VIRTUAL OUTRIGGERS The use of belt trusses as virtual outriggers avoids many of the problems associated with the use of conventional outriggers. The principle is the same as when belt trusses are used as virtual outriggers. Some fraction of the moment in the core is converted into a horizontal couple in the floors at the top and the bottom of the basement. Tall building with belt trusses as “virtual” outriggers Taken from R. SHANKAR NAIR

ADVANTAGES OF USE OF BELT TRUSSES AS VIRTUAL OUTRIGGERS There are no truss diagonals extending from the core to the exterior of the building. The need to locate outrigger columns where they can be conveniently engaged by trusses extending from the core is eliminated. 3. The complicated truss-to-core connection is eliminated.

4. Differential shortening or settlement between the core and the outboard columns does not affect the virtual outrigger system since the floor diaphragms, though stiff in their own plane, are very flexible in the vertical, out-of-plane direction. Taken from R. SHANKAR NAIR

FACTORS AFFECTING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF OUTRIGGER SYSTEM The stiffness and location of the outrigger truss system. The stiffness and location of the Belt truss system. 3. Geometry of the tall building. 4. Stiffness of the central core. 5. Floor-to-floor height of the tall building.

Advantages of using Outrigger & Belt truss system There are no trusses in the space between the core and the building exterior. 2. There are fewer constraints on the location of exterior columns. The need to locate large exterior columns where they can be directly engaged by outrigger trusses extending from the core is eliminated.

3. All exterior columns (not just certain designated outrigger columns) participate in resisting overturning moment. The difficult connection of the outrigger trusses to the core is eliminated. 5. Core overturning moments can be reduced through the reverse moment applied to the core at each outrigger connection.

6. Exterior framing can consist of simple beam and column framing without the need for rigid-frame-type connection, thus reducing the overall cost. 7. Reduction or elimination of uplift and net tension forces without the column and foundation system.

EXAMPLES

PLAZA RAKYAT TOWER The 77-story Plaza Rakyat office tower in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, uses a concrete shear core, a concrete perimeter frame, exterior concrete belt walls at two levels, and a conventional outrigger system at the roof as the building’s lateral load-resisting system

JIN MAO TOWER The 88-story Jin Mao Office, Hotel, observation, retail tower is in Shanghai, China. The tower is built around an octagon-shaped concrete shear wall core surrounded by 8 exterior composite super columns and 8 exterior steel columns. Three sets of 8 two-story high outrigger trusses connect the columns to the core at six of the floors to provide additional support

TAIPEI 101 The 101-story TAIPEI-101 Office, Hotel, observation, retail tower is in Shanghai, China. The design achieves both strength and flexibility for the tower through the use of high-performance steel construction. Thirty-six columns support Taipei 101, including eight "mega-columns" packed with 10,000 psi (69 MPa) concrete. Every eight floors, outrigger trusses connect the columns in the building's core to those on the exterior.

CHIFLEY TOWER The 42-story Chifley Tower Office, financial institutions, law firms and corporations tower is in Sydney, Australia.

CONCLUSTIONS ON TALL BUILDINGS USING OUTRIGGER & BELT TRUSS There are no trusses in the space between the core and the building exterior. 2. There are fewer constraints on the location of exterior columns. The need to locate large exterior columns where they can be directly engaged by outrigger trusses extending from the core is eliminated.

3. All exterior columns (not just certain designated outrigger columns) participate in resisting overturning moment. 4. The difficult connection of the outrigger trusses to the core is eliminated. 5. Complications caused by differential shortening of the core and the outrigger columns are avoided.

REFERENCES B.S. Taranath, Structural Analysis & Design of Tall Buildings. New York, Mc Graw Hill, 1998. 2. R. S. Nair, Belt Trusses and Basements as “Virtual” Outriggers for Tall Buildings. Engineering Journal / Fourth Quarter/ 1998. Stafford Smith, B., Cruvellier, M., Nollet, M-J., and Mahyari, A. T., “Offset Outrigger Concept for Tall Buildings,”

4. P.S. Kian and F.T.Siahaan, The use of outrigger and belt truss system for high-rise concrete buildings. Dimensi Teknit Sipil, Volume 3, No1, Maret 2001, Page 36-41,ISSN1410-9530. Smith, B. S., Coull, A. Tall Building Structures: Analysis and Design. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York. 6. S. Fawzia and T. Fatima, Deflection Control in Composite Building by Using Belt Truss and Outriggers Systems, Brisbane 4000, Australia.

THANKS