5. Evidence for Plate Tectonics from Magnetics William Wilcock

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plate Tectonics Part 2 Sea Floor Spreading
Advertisements

Wegener’s principle of continental drift was often dismissed because he failed to produce a mechanism by which the continents moved.
Lecture 3 Outline: Plate Tectonics – from Hypothesis to Theory
Geomagnetism (I).
Chapter 4: Plate Tectonics Lesson 1: Continental Drift Quiz G
Solidified iron km ,00012,000 solid mantle Mg(Fe) silicates crust Rapidly convecting, electrically conducting, fluid iron The outer core:
Where do those plate reconstructions through time come from?
Relative plate velocities based on seafloor spreading rates and directions plus directions from earthquake slip vectors.
Solidified iron km ,00012,000 solid mantle Mg(Fe) silicates crust Rapidly convecting, electrically conducting, fluid iron The outer core:
P1 – Seafloor spreading. Today you need to know 1.Explain what evidence there was to support the theory of continental drift – suggested by Alfred Wegener.
Reversals of the Geomagnetic Field Secular variations- historic to modern changes in the field Archaeomagnetism: changes during the Holocene Reversals.
Section 17.2 – Seafloor Spreading
Plate Tectonics.
Essential Questions What evidence led to the discovery of seafloor spreading? What is the significance of magnetic patterns on the seafloor? How is the.
17-2 Seafloor Spreading Objectives
New Zealand EarthquakeEarthquake M 6.3 earthquake Shallow epicenter: 2- 3 miles Close to Christchurch, city of 370,000 After shock to the September 4 th.
Plate Tectonics Section 1 Section 1: Continental Drift Preview Key Ideas Wegener’s Hypothesis Sea-Floor Spreading Paleomagnetism Wegener Redeemed Continental.
Evidence for Continental Drift
Unit: 4 The Forces Within Earth
History of geological science: Continental Drift is not plate tectonics. Jigsaw fit of continents was noted by Alfred Wegener, a german meteorologist he.
Plate Tectonics II. Modern discoveries supporting Plate Tectonic Theory Symmetry of magnetic polarity across mid-ocean ridges Mid-ocean ridges – underwater.
Chapter 10 Plate Tectonics. Alfred Wegener Proposed they hypothesis of continental drift Proposed they hypothesis of continental drift CONTINENTAL DRIFT-
Evidence For Plate Tectonics The main evidence to support the idea of plate tectonics focuses on the different plate boundaries. The many different features.
Dynamic Earth Topics: -Earth’s Interior -Continental Drift -Seafloor spreading -Plate Tectonics -Earthquakes & Epicenters.
AIM: What evidence do we have for the Theory of Plate Tectonics?
What is Plate Tectonics Theory? Use this part of the PPT for p. 7 of your INB!!!
Daily Review #3 8. Tell the rock’s story… Composition of Earth 3 layers ◦ Based on compounds present ◦ Density differences Crust ◦ Outermost ◦
Plate Tectonics Earth’s Interior Convection and the Mantle Drifting Continents Sea-Floor Spreading The Theory of Plate Tectonics Table of Contents.
Drifting Continents Chapter 17.1
Title: 17.2 Seafloor Spreading Page #: 88 Date: 3/18/2012
Sea Floor Spreading What causes the continents to drift?....Hmmm…. Fact: The tallest mountain on the planet is not Mt. Everest, which is only ft.
The Theory of Seafloor Spreading. Seafloor Bathymetry Creating Maps of the Ocean Floor Scientists were able to map the ocean floor using sonar, an Echo-
Structure of the Earth and Plate Tectonics Notes.
Chapter 22 ISCI 2001 Structure of the Earth Tectonics.
Evidence of Continental Drift
Global Tectonics II- Origin of an Idea. Divergent Plate Boundaries –Plates moving apart Convergent Plate Boundaries –Plates moving toward one another.
Warm Up 11/4 Why are subduction zones not commonly found at convergent continental-continental boundaries? a. Oceanic lithosphere is too buoyant to be.
Chronology of geomagnetic field reversals magnetic anomaly “number” Ocean floor age, millions of years (Ma), determined largely from deep sea drilling.
Earth’s Magnetic Poles
Warm Up 11/5 Why are subduction zones not commonly found at convergent continental-continental boundaries? a. Oceanic lithosphere is too buoyant to be.
Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics. Crust: - the outermost layer - rigid and very thin km thick - brittle and breakable. Mantle: dense, hot.
On the Road to the Plate Tectonic Theory.   In the 1960s, several new discoveries were made due to new development in the mapping of the ocean floor.
DEVELOPMENT OF A THEORY Chapter 14 Lesson 2. Mapping of the Ocean Floor WWII played an important role in mapping of the ocean floor- Why? They were able.
Daily Review #1 What happens in radioactive decay? Define half-life.
Plate Tectonics The Discovery of Plate Tectonics A Mosaic of Plates
The Earth’s Magnetic Field
Continental drift and plate tectonics. Continental Drift Modern scientists consider the age of the Earth to be around 4.54 billion years Over that time.
Main Features of Plate Tectonics The Earth's surface is covered by a series of crustal plates.
SEA FLOOR SPREDING PLATE TECTONICS THEORY Continental drift Sea floor spreading.
Section 1: Continental Drift
Aim: What New Evidence is used to explain Plate tectonics? Do Now: What evidence did Wegener use to help explain his theory of Continental Drift?
Chapter 2 Plate Tectonics.
, Continental Drift Theory and Seafloor Spreading
Section 2: Seafloor Spreading
F4 KI 2 d and e …. earth’s magnetic field ……
9.4 – Testing Plate Tectonics
What is the evidence for Plate Tectonics?
Sea-Floor Spreading.
DO NOW Turn in Review #10. Pick up notes and Review #11.
2. Evidence for Plate Tectonics from Magnetics William Wilcock
Section 2: Seafloor Spreading
Seafloor Spreading Chapter 10:2 (pg ) SPI
What causes the plates to move

The mechanism for continental drift
Aim: What New Evidence is used to explain Plate tectonics?
Mon. April 7 Do Now What is the principle of superposition?
Developing the Theory of Plate Tectonics!
Ch – 15 Plate Tectonics II.
The Mechanism for Continental Drift
Presentation transcript:

5. Evidence for Plate Tectonics from Magnetics William Wilcock OCEAN/ESS 410 5. Evidence for Plate Tectonics from Magnetics William Wilcock

Lecture/Lab Learning Goals Understand the basic characteristics of the Earth’s magnetic field and how one measures its orientation Know the different kinds of rock magnetization and their use in paleomagnetism Be able to explain the historical concept of polar wander and its explanation in terms of continental drift Be able to explain patterns of marine magnetic anomalies in terms of plate spreading and magnetic field reversals Know how to interpret marine magnetic anomalies - LAB

Earth’s Magnetic Field Magnetic north Earth’s Magnetic Field north pole Geographic north pole The Earth is surrounded by a magnetic field that is strongest near the poles. The magnetic poles are displaced ~ 11.5° from the geographic poles about which the Earth rotates. Discuss Faraday disk generator Geodynamo Theory: The magnetic field is generated in the liquid metal region of the outer core. The outer core is extremely hot and flows at a rate of several km/yr in large convection currents. Convecting metal (Fe) creates electrical currents, which in turn create the magnetic field. Magnetic south south pole Geographic south Pole south pole After Plummer

Earth’s Magnetic Field The Earth’s magnetic field close to a dipole.  The radial (vertical) and tangential (north-south) components a dipole field are given by θ - Colatitude (0º at south pole; 90º at equator; 180º at north pole μ0 - magnetic permeability of a vacuum 4π x 10-7 N A-2 r - distance to the center of the earth (6.4 x 106 m at the Earth’s surface) M - is the dipole moment which for the earth is 7.95 x 1022 A m2 B - is the magnetic field. It units are Teslas 1 T = 1 kg A-1 s-2. 1 nT = 10-9 T = 1 Gamma Up at south pole, horizontal and north at equator, down and north pole. Twice as big at poles

Earth’s Magnetic Field From The way the Earth Works by P. J. Wyllie, Wiley 1976 Field is twice as strong at the poles as at the equator. About 60,000 γ at poles and 30,000 γ at equator

Measuring the Orientation of the Earth’s Magnetic Field I = -90 at south pole, 0 at equator and 90 at north pole I D = Declination (angle from geographic north) I = Inclination (dip angle) From The way the Earth Works by P. J. Wyllie, Wiley 1976

Measurements of the Earths Magnetic Field in the Oceans Measurements of the Earth’s magnetic field in the oceans were developed in the 2nd World War as a way to detect submarines (and later mines) Measurements of the magnetic field were first made with a fluxgate magnetometer. Such instruments are still in use today Victor Vaquier – SIO professor who died aged 102 in 2009. AC current in opposite windings create changing magnetic field that saturates and create equal and opposite voltage in secondary coil – no signal In presence of magnetic field, one core saturates first so there is a net voltage. Field in particular direction Proton procession magnetometer – rate at which protons in water process around earth’s field after strong applied field is removed. Absolute value but not direction

Rock Magnetization Most minerals either repel or concentrate the Earth’s magnetic field lines but do not themselves become magnetized. A few ferromagnetic minerals retain magnetization. In the oceanic crust the most important is magnetite (Fe3O4). Others include ilmenite (FeTiO3), hematite (Fe2O3), and pyrrhotite (FeS). Forms of rock magnetism Thermo remnant magnetism - rock becomes magnetized when it cools below the Currie temperature (580°C) in a magnetic field Detrital remnant magnetism - sediments settle in a magnetic field Chemical remnant magnetism - Hematite precipitates from a fluid circulating through a rock.

Paleomagnetism In the 1950’s scientists learned how to measure the remnant magnetism of rock samples. If one can be sure that the rock has not been rotated by tectonic processes then: The Declination of the remnant magnetism gives the apparent direction of the North Pole at the time the rock formed. The Inclination gives the latitude of the rock when it formed

Geochronology In the 1950’s scientists also developed reliable techniques of dating rocks using radioactive isotopes The potassium isotope 40K decays to 40Ar with a half-life of 1.3x109 years. As argon is a gas any traces of that element will escape from rocks when they are molten. Therefore, any argon found in solid rocks must have been produced since that molten state ended and the rock solidified. The ratio of 40K to 40Ar can be analyzed and a numerical date since the last molten state can be assigned. By combining paleomagnetic data from lava flows with the lava ages, scientists were able to look at changes in the apparent position of the Earth’s magnetic pole with time.

“Polar Wander” Position of the North pole relative to Europe and Asia Position of the North pole relative to Eurasia and North America

Opening of the Atlantic http://museum.gov.ns.ca/fossils/geol/globe.htm

Polar Wander and Continental Drift K - 100 Myr; Tru - 200 Myr; Cu - 300 Myr; € - 500 Myr Polar wander for North America and Eurasia Polar wander corrected for the opening of the Atlantic

Evidence for Continental Drift - pre1960’s Fit of the Atlantic Coastlines and Geology Paleontology (Fossils) Paleoclimate Paleomagnetism Why wasn’t this evidence accepted? Physical impossibility of drift (the mantle is solid - it transmits seismic waves) Difficulties of magnetic measurements - scatter, reversals Conservatism

Polarity Reversals The mechanism of polarity reversals is poorly understood but they happen quickly (within no more than ~1000 years)

Using volcanic rocks to develop a polarity timescale Most geoscientists were initially skeptical of magnetic reversals but interest increased once it was realized that they provided a means to date events

Polarity timescale from magnetized lava flows The first timescales were obtained in the early 1960’s

History of Polarity Reversals Cretaceous Quiet Zone Jurassic Quiet Zone (a period of very rapid reversals?)

Marine magnetic anomalies The magnetization of the oceanic crust leads to small variations in the intensity of the magnetic field measured at the sea surface

Marine Magnetic Anomalies If we remove the background Earth’s magnetic field from the total magnetic intensity, we obtain the magnetic anomaly

Relationship Between Magnetic Anomalies and the Polarity of the Crust

Magnetic Stripes Raff and Mason, 1961

Vine and Matthews’ Magnetic Tape Recorder Normally magnetized crust dikes oceanic crust Magma Reversely magnetized crust N N Magma N N Normally magnetized crust N Magma

Vine and Matthews’ magnetic tape recorder

Global bathymetry, showing ocean ridge system East Pacific Rise Mid-Atlantic Ridge Map shown in next slide

Location of the Eltanin-19 profile Ship track across the East Pacific Rise which obtained the magnetic anomaly profile shown in the next slide. The measurements were made in the 1960’s by the Columbia University research vessel Eltanin.

Eltanin 19 Magnetic Anomaly Profile Ocean depth, km Magnetic anomaly, gamma The vertical scale for total intensity anomaly is shown in “gammas”. This is the same as nanoTeslas or nT. The horizontal lines are at zero anomaly; the scale is thus minus 500 to plus 500 nT.

Symmetry of the Eltanin 19 profile ESE WNW WNW ESE measured profile of total intensity anomalies mirror image of measured profile to show symmetry

Polarity Reversals and Spreading Rate

Polarity Reversals and Sedimentation Rates Depth, m

Age of the Seafloor