Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April 15 2004 The “Underlying Event” at CDF Niccolo’ Moggi Universita’ and I.N.F.N, Bologna for the CDF Collaboration April 15,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Minimum bias and the underlying event: towards the LHC I.Dawson, C.Buttar and A.Moraes University of Sheffield Physics at LHC - Prague July , 2003.
Advertisements

Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
IMFP Day 4 April 6, 2006 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics Rick Field University of Florida (for.
November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.
ISMD 2005 August 11, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 XXXV International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics 2005 Rick Field University of Florida (for.
HEP Seminar - Baylor Waco, January 21, 2014 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96 TeV 900.
University of Toronto March 18, 2008 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Studying the Underlying Event at CDF and the LHC Rick Field University of Florida.
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
University of California, Berkeley January 13, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Studying the Underlying Event at CDF and the LHC Rick Field University.
2012 Tel Aviv, October 15, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run 2 
IPPP Seminar Durham, September 8, 2015 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF “Tevatron Energy Scan” 300 GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96.
Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.
Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.
Fermilab Energy Scaling Workshop April 29, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 1 st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions Rick Field.
2015 London, September 1, 2015 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF “Tevatron Energy Scan” 300 GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96.
D0 Meeting September 6, 2002 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Hard Scattering Processes  What happens when a proton and an antiproton.
C2CR07-Lake Tahoe February 28, 2007 Rick Field – Florida/CDFPage 1 C2CR07 Rick Field University of Florida (for the CDF Collaboration) CDF Run 2 Min-Bias.
Workshop on Early LHC Physics May 6, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Workshop on Early Physics Opportunities at the LHC Rick Field University of.
LPC CMS Workshop June 8, 2007 Rick Field – Florida/CMSPage 1 LPC Mini-Workshop on Early CMS Physics Rick Field University of Florida (for the.
Perugia, Italy October 27, 2008 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Studying the Underlying Event at CDF and the LHC Rick Field University of.
LHCP 2014 New York, June 5, 2014 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Outline of Talk CDF Run GeV, 900 GeV, 1.96 TeV LHCP 2014  D0 Photon + Jet Measurements.
St. Andrews, Scotland August 22, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage Rick Field University of Florida Outline  Do we need a.
The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March.
Fermilab Energy Scaling Workshop April 28, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 1 st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions Rick Field.
CDF Paper Seminar Fermilab - March 11, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Sorry to be so slow!! Studying the “Underlying Event” at CDF CDF Run 2 “Leading.
UE&MB Working Group Meeting LPCC May 31, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Early LHC Measurements Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk.
2010 Glasgow, November 30, 2010 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk  Discuss the.
1 Underlying Event studies & Charged particle multiplicities in inelastic pp events with the ATLAS.
ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, July 5, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 ICHEP 2012 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run.
ISMD2004 July 27, 2004 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics Rick Field (theorist?) “Jet Formation in QCD”
Cambridge Workshop July 20, 2002 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Hard Scattering Processes  What happens when a proton and an.
Energy Dependence of the UE
The “Underlying Event” CDF-LHC Comparisons
Decomposing p+p Events at √s = 200 GeV with STAR
“softQCD” and Correlations Rick Field & Nick Van Remortel
Physics and Techniques of Event Generators
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Lake Louise Winter Institute
MB&UE Working Group Meeting UE Lessons Learned & What’s Next
A Closer Look at the Underlying Event in Run 2 at CDF
The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 (CDF)
MB&UE Working Group Meeting CMS UE Data and the New Tune Z1
Predicting MB & UE at the LHC
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
Modeling Min-Bias and Pile-Up University of Oregon February 24, 2009
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Lee Pondrom, U. of Wisconsin, for the CDF Collaboration
Min-Bias and the Underlying Event in Run 2
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
The Tevatron Connection
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics
The Next Stretch of the Higgs Magnificent Mile
The LHC Physics Environment
The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF
RHIC & AGS Annual Users’ Meeting
International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics
“Min-Bias” & “Underlying Event” at the Tevatron and the LHC
Multiple Parton Interactions and the Underlying Event
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event”
The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes
Perspectives on Physics and on CMS at Very High Luminosity
Rick Field - Florida/CDF
The “Underlying Event” at CDF and CMS
Workshop on Early Physics Opportunities at the LHC
The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Presentation transcript:

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April The “Underlying Event” at CDF Niccolo’ Moggi Universita’ and I.N.F.N, Bologna for the CDF Collaboration April 15, 2004 Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia XII International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April Outline 1. Topology of “minimum-bias” and “hard” collisions:  study transverse regions sensitive to the underlying event.  look to “beam-beam remnant” and multiple parton interaction component of underlying event in back-to-back jet collisions. 2. Jet structure in the underlying event:   correlations in the particle density “associated” to the maximum P T particle in the transverse region. 3. Jet structure in underlying event vs in “minimum bias”. Motivations: “underlying event” is not a well understood object Phenomenologically: may be made of everything except hard scattered jets

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April Data selection Min-BiasJET20JET50JET70JET100 Total Events3,716,0687,388,6391,844,407826,5971,052,530 Selected Events2,596,5533,127,001802,003352,820393,118 Sel. Ev. JetClu (|  (jet) < 2|, R = 0.7) 587,1542,473,013735,893338,668389,006 Event selection: 1.Zero or one primary vertex 2.|Z vertex | < 60 cm 3.SumE T < 1.5 TeV Track selection: 1.COT measured tracks 2.|Z-Z 0 | < 2 cm 3.|d 0 | < 1 cm 4.P T > 0.5 GeV/c 5.|  | < 1.0  ≈ 98% uniform

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April The transverse region  The direction of the leading calorimeter jet defines three transverse regions in   “Toward” = |  | < 60°  “Away” = |  | > 120°  “Transverse”= 60° <|  | < 120° (perpendicular to the jet#1 plane)  Each has same  area (  x  )2/6 = 4π/3  Jets are defined by JetClu with R=0.7 in |  |<2 “Leading jet” events = E T (jet#1) > 15 GeV no restrictions on 2 nd highest E T jet (when present).

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April Densities Study charged particles and form: 1. particle density dN ch /d  d  2. scalar P T Sum density: dSum(P T )/d  d  / / Scalar p T sum of Charged Particles PTsum (GeV/c) / /- 0.31Number of Charged ParticlesNchg Average Density per unit  -  Average CDF Run 2 “Min-Bias” Observable Divide by 4  Data uncorrected, but efficiency is high and uniform Es: 3 particles dN ch /d  d  = = 3/4  = 0.24 Area =  x  = = 2 x 2  = 4  Systematic due to track selection included in the plots Only tracks in: |  |<1.0 P T >0.5 GeV/c

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April PTsum Density in Transverse region(s) “Leading jet” events:  dependence of the scalar PTsum density relative to the direction of the leading jet transverse regions Average Min-Bias = 0.24 Notice log scale The leading jet is rotated to 270 ° Same in charged particle density Amount of hard initial+final state radiation in transverse region increases with E T of leading jet…..see better next slide 

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April MAX/MIN Transverse Regions “Leading jet” events: shows the charged particle density as a function of the leading jet E T Define “MAX” and “MIN” transverse regions on event-by-event basis : “MAX” = contains largest number of charged particles “MIN” = contains smallest number of charged particles MAX  gets hardest initial+final state radiation MIN  more sensitive to “beam-beam remnant” component of underlying event and to multiple parton interactions Same in scalar PT sum density

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April Back-to-back jet events Subset of the “leading jet” events. Require at least 2 jets with : 1)  > 150° 2) E T (jet#2)/E T (jet#1)>0.8 3) no 3 rd jet with E T >15 GeV Suppress initial+final state radiation: increase sensitivity of transverse region to beam-beam remnants and multiple parton scattering No increased activity in transverse region

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April Leading vs b-t-b jets: Ch. Density Different behavior of “Leading jet” and “Back-to-back jet” events: With respect to E T (jet#1), “AVE” densities rise in leading jet and fall in back-to-back events (where initial+final state radiation is suppressed)

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April Leading vs b-t-b jets: PTsum Density Different behavior of “Leading jet” and “Back-to-back jet” events Same as previous: shown here the PTsum density

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April Transverse MIN region “MIN” transverse region is more sensitive to the beam-beam remnant and to the multiple parton interaction component of “underlying event”. Expect “Leading jet” and“Back-to-back jet” events to be similar and both to be similar to Min-Bias collisions Notice the decrease in the back-to-back data… !?!

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April Transverse PTmax  Define “PTmaxT” to be the highest P T particle in the transverse region(s).  Study densities “associated” with PTmaxT, not including PTmaxT  Measure correlations in the transverse region increase only for “leading jet” events. In “back to back” is almost equal to MB. Densities associated to PTmaxT larger than in average transverse region. “Jet structure” in the underlying event at P T ~ 1 GeV

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April ΔΦ Correlations relative to PTmaxT  PTmaxT defined to be the highest P T particle in the transverse region :  “TransMAX” is the transverse region which contains PTmaxT  TransMIN” the opposite one  Rotate PTmaxT in 180° :  Jet#1 will then be somewhere in 240° <  <300° = TransMAX+90°  Jet#2 will then be somewhere in 30°<  <150° = (jet#1 Region+180°)+/-30°  Study  correlation of charged particles relative to PTmaxT

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April “Associate” density in b-t-b jet events Back-to-back jet events: plot  dependence of “associate” densities of charged tracks and scalar PTsum, relative to the direction of PTmaxT Shows “jet structure” in the transverse region also in “back-to-back jet” events (as can be expected, also in “leading jet” events, not shown here) Select PTmaxT : >0.5, >1.0, >2.0 GeV/c “Associate” densities do not include PTmaxT itself Log scale

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April “Associate” density vs jet E T “Back-to-back” jet events: compare the” associate” density for events with different leading jet E T In “back-to-back” jet events the jet structure in the transverse region does not increase with the first jet E T, since hard initial+final state radiation is strongly suppressed. Behavior in transverse region changes with jet E T in “leading jet” events PTmaxT = 0.5 GeV/c here, same with 1.0 / 2.0 GeV/c

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April Compare the densities “Transverse density” (previous) vs “associate density” (new) The density of charged particle associated with PTmaxT is larger than the average density of particles in the transverse region also in “b-t-b jet” events

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April Min-Bias Events Min-Bias events: use the maximum P T charged particle in the event, (PTmax) to define a direction and look at the “associated” density dN chg /d  d . Plot  dependence of the “associate” particle density. Jet structure of MinBias at P T ~ 1GeV/c Min Bias x 1.65 !!! Min-Bias vs “Back-to-back”: Similar shape of particle density associate to PTmax in the transverse region.

Niccolo’ Moggi XII DIS April Summary and Conclusions We studied the density of charged particles and of the scalar P T Sum in two “transverse” regions which are very sensitive to the “underlying event”. By selecting a subsample of “back-to-back” jet events we looked closer into the “beam-beam remnant” and multiparton interaction component of the “underlying event”: this component is very similar to MB and flat with respect to the jet E T. To examine the jet structure of the “underlying event” we studied the  dependence of the particle density associate to the maximum P T particle in the transverse region: data show strong correlation in the transverse region which indicate a “jet structure” in the “underlying event” for both “leading jet” and “back-to-back jet” events. Min-Bias data also show a “jet structure” at low P T (~1 GeV/c) which is similar to that of hard “back-to-back” jet events. A lot of work has been done in comparing the data with PYTHIA and HERWIG. In general PYTHIA (tune A) is observed to work better. For brevity reasons no comparison was shown here, but MC can provide an important handle to understand the details of the processes involved.