Latest Trends in Urban Modal Split in Warsaw Dr Jacek Malasek IBDiM – Road and Bridge Research Institute COST 355 Torino, 3 October 2007
Modal split in Warsaw % / Year On foot 28.0% Car Mass transit
Households description Household size - all members over 6 years old No. of cars No. of trips
Cars in households % car cars or more
Trip purpose structure Motivation Home 43.4% Work School Shopping Recreation Business Giving a lift Other In total 100.0
Modal split in Warsaw -workday vs. Saturday- WorkdaySaturday On foot 21.0%19.4 Bicycle Car Mass transit
Modal split in Warsaw and suburbs in 2005 WarsawSuburbs On foot 21.0%27.7 Bicycle Car Mass transit
Warsaw and suburbs characteristics 1. Household size Household sizeWarsawSuburb 1 person 28.0% or more
2. Type of vehicle Type of vehicle per household WarsawSuburb Private Company 0.05 Truck 0.01 Other In TOTAL
3. Number of cars Number of carsWarsawSuburb % car cars or more
4. Car use Car use – km/yearWarsawSuburb < – % – > On AVERAGE km19 600
5. Employment structure Employment structureWarsawSuburb Pupil 13.3%15.1 Student Employed Employed at home Self-employed Retired Unemployed Other
6. Mass transit season tickets Season ticketsWarsawSuburb Yes 44.6%17.6 No
Mass transit modes in Warsaw % of non-pedestrian trips / Year City bus Other buses Tram Bus+tram Metro Metro+bus Metro+tram Train MT+car
Mass transit modes – Warsaw vs. suburb % of non-pedestrian tripsWarsawSuburb City bus Other buses Tram Bus+tram Metro Metro+bus Metro+tram Train MT+car
Mobility – trips/day Motivation Home Work School Shopping Entertainment Business To give a lift Other
Travels on workday MotivationBy carBy MTBy bicycle Home 44.5% Work School University Shopping To hypermarket Entertainment Social events Business Giving a lift Other In total 100.0
Travels on Saturday MotivationBy carBy MTBy bicycle Home 44.6% Work School University Shopping To hypermarket Entertainment Social events Business Giving a lift Other In total 100.0
Travel time by purpose Motivations All 32’3436 Home Work School University 39
Travel time by mode Travel mode On foot 17’1617 Car Taxi Mass transit Bicycle
Opinions (1-5) on bicycle infrastructure WarsawSuburb Parking facilities Routes density Traffic safety Marking State-of-repair
Opinions (1-5) on pedestrian facilities WarsawSuburb State-of- repair Lack of obstacles Traffic safety Access to MT stops
Acceptance on MT priority No car1 car2 or more
Opinions (1-5) on MT WarsawSuburb Travel comfort Ticket price Personal safety Stop facilities Clines Vehicles Direct travel Travel time Travel information Waiting time Frequency Punctuality Unfailing Driver kindness
Importance of MT modernization WarsawSuburb Metro development 82.1%78.6 Bus traffic lines New tram routes Tram routes modernization MT priority in traffic Car restrictions P+R Commuter trains moder
Opinions on parking pricing No car1 car2 or more Good Poor Don’t know
Acceptance on PP development No car1 car2 or more
Modal split in Poznań CarMass transitOn foot/bicycle % in central area in CBD
Cities comparison CarMass transitOn foot/bicycle Kraków %4830 Łódź Poznań Katowice Warsaw