1 CLG Handout Problem #1 (Examining interaction plots)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 10 F-tests in MLR (continued) Coefficients of Determination BMTRY 701 Biostatistical Methods II.
Advertisements

Kxk BG Factorial Designs expanding the 2x2 design reasons for larger designs statistical analysis of kxk BG factorial designs using LSD for kxk factorial.
Topic 12 – Further Topics in ANOVA
Factorial ANOVA More than one categorical explanatory variable.
Tic-Tac-Tolerance Steve and Torsten. Introduction We decided to play Tic-Tac-Toe with subjects in order to test mean number of games played We are looking.
Steve and Torsten We Do Math in a Minute. Introduction In our experiment we had two version of a basic multiplication table. One was in order starting.
5/15/2015Slide 1 SOLVING THE PROBLEM The one sample t-test compares two values for the population mean of a single variable. The two-sample test of a population.
What is MPC? Hypothesis testing.
Copyright ©2006 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Analysis of Variance Chapter 16.
Sociology 601 Class 13: October 13, 2009 Measures of association for tables (8.4) –Difference of proportions –Ratios of proportions –the odds ratio Measures.
Intro to Factorial ANOVA
The Two Factor ANOVA © 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved The Complete Randomized Block Design.
CHAPTER 1 Exploring Data 1.1 Analyzing Categorical Data.
Two-Way ANOVA in SAS Multiple regression with two or
Chapter 10 Factorial Analysis of Variance Part 2 – Apr 3, 2008.
REGRESSION AND CORRELATION
Lecture 15: ANOVA Interactions
2x2 BG Factorial Designs Definition and advantage of factorial research designs 5 terms necessary to understand factorial designs 5 patterns of factorial.
Full time and part time employment Coventry population in employment by gender Source: Annual Population Survey, Office for National Statistics
1 Chapter 13: Introduction to Analysis of Variance.
Crosstabs. When to Use Crosstabs as a Bivariate Data Analysis Technique For examining the relationship of two CATEGORIC variables  For example, do men.
Analysis of Factorial Designs Statistical Analysis of 2x2 Designs Statistical Analysis of kxk Designs.
Two-Way Balanced Independent Samples ANOVA Overview of Computations.
ANOVA Chapter 12.
Factorial Design Two Way ANOVAs
Lecture 14: Factorial ANOVA Practice Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.
Slide 23-1 Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education, Inc.
STA291 Statistical Methods Lecture 31. Analyzing a Design in One Factor – The One-Way Analysis of Variance Consider an experiment with a single factor.
Chapter 10 Factorial Analysis of Variance Part 2 – Oct. 30, 2014.
10.1 Estimating With Confidence
Comparing Two Population Means
Lecturer’s desk INTEGRATED LEARNING CENTER ILC 120 Screen Row A Row B Row C Row D Row E Row F Row G Row.
Chapter 12: Introduction to Analysis of Variance
Source: Annual Population Survey, Office for National Statistics. Full time and part time employment Coventry population.
Two-way ANOVA Introduction to Factorial Designs and their Analysis.
 Slide 1 Two-Way Independent ANOVA (GLM 3) Chapter 13.
1 Psych 5500/6500 The t Test for a Single Group Mean (Part 1): Two-tail Tests & Confidence Intervals Fall, 2008.
1 Chapter 10: Introduction to Inference. 2 Inference Inference is the statistical process by which we use information collected from a sample to infer.
Psych 5500/6500 Other ANOVA’s Fall, Factorial Designs Factorial Designs have one dependent variable and more than one independent variable (i.e.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved © 2010 Pearson Education Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Chapter.
Analysis of Variance 1 Dr. Mohammed Alahmed Ph.D. in BioStatistics (011)
Basic Analysis of Factorial Designs The F-tests of a Factorial ANOVA Using LSD to describe the pattern of an interaction.
Psychological Research Methods Psychology: Chapter 2, Section 2.
Statistics for Everyone Workshop Fall 2010 Part 4B Two-Way Analysis of Variance: Examining the Individual and Joint Effects of 2 Independent Variables.
Chapter 12 Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Tests for Means © 2010 Pearson Education 1.
Multiple Regression I 1 Copyright © 2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Chapter 4 Multiple Regression Analysis (Part 1) Terry Dielman.
Regression Analysis: Part 2 Inference Dummies / Interactions Multicollinearity / Heteroscedasticity Residual Analysis / Outliers.
CHAPTER Basic Definitions and Properties  P opulation Characteristics = “Parameters”  S ample Characteristics = “Statistics”  R andom Variables.
1.1 Analyzing Categorical Data Pages 7-24 Objectives SWBAT: 1)Display categorical data with a bar graph. Decide if it would be appropriate to make a pie.
Week 6. Statistics etc. GRS LX 865 Topics in Linguistics.
Hypothesis test flow chart frequency data Measurement scale number of variables 1 basic χ 2 test (19.5) Table I χ 2 test for independence (19.9) Table.
APPLIED DATA ANALYSIS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE CJ 525 MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY Juan P. Rodriguez.
Hypothesis Testing Introduction to Statistics Chapter 8 Feb 24-26, 2009 Classes #12-13.
+ Warm Up Which of these variables are categorical? Which are quantitative?
Inference About Means Chapter 23. Getting Started Now that we know how to create confidence intervals and test hypotheses about proportions, it’d be nice.
1 Topic 14 – Experimental Design Crossover Nested Factors Repeated Measures.
The accuracy of averages We learned how to make inference from the sample to the population: Counting the percentages. Here we begin to learn how to make.
+ Chapter 1: Exploring Data Section 1.1 Analyzing Categorical Data The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition - For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE.
Nonparametric Tests PBS Chapter 16 © 2009 W.H. Freeman and Company.
Sit in your permanent seat
Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition
Background: The age old question to Mr
Inferential Statistics
Statistical Analysis Error Bars
Interpreting and analysing data
Solution 9 1. a) From the matrix plot, 1) The assumption about linearity seems ok; 2).The assumption about measurement errors can not be checked at this.
Inferential Statistics
Interpreting and analysing data
Objectives 6.1 Estimating with confidence Statistical confidence
Presentation transcript:

1 CLG Handout Problem #1 (Examining interaction plots)

2 Interpreting interaction plots Be aware that you will never get “perfect” results from looking at a plot. In most cases we are identifying what we think is the case and certainly we need to follow up what we think we see with some hard numbers to verify it. So as we interpret the next 6 graphs, although we can comment on what we think we see, ultimately the F tests will tell us significance or not.

4 (A) Interaction  None. Lines are parallel. Drug effect  None. Gender effect  Yes, probably—looks like it would be significant. (Men higher than women) General interpretation  Only a Gender difference!

6 (B) Interaction  None. Lines are parallel. Drug effect  Yes, response goes down with Drug level 1. F test would determine if its significant. Gender effect  No. Men and women are nearly the same. General interpretation  Only a Drug effect!

8 (C) Interaction  Yes. Lines are NOT parallel. Drug effect  Not sure (probably though). Either way it’s tied to the interaction anyway. Gender effect  Yes, probably, but also tied to the interaction. General interpretation  “Typical” interaction. Drug seems to work for the only the women but not for the men. Can’t discuss main effects by themselves.

10 (D) Interaction  Yes. Lines are NOT parallel. Drug effect  No, shouldn’t be significant but it’s tied to the interaction anyway. Gender effect  Maybe, women seem a little higher than men but not much. Still tied to interaction though. General interpretation  Almost “reverse interaction”. Drug seems to work for the women, increasing their response. But at the same time it works for men lowering their response.

12 (E) Interaction  Yes. Lines are NOT parallel. Drug effect  No, shouldn’t be significant but it’s tied to the interaction anyway. Gender effect  No, shouldn’t be significant but it’s tied to the interaction anyway. General interpretation  “Reverse interaction”. Drug seems to work for the women, increasing their response. But at the same time it works for men lowering their response. Additionally, Men started higher but are lower after taking the drug, women start lower but are higher after taking the drug. Hence the reverse!

14 (F) Interaction  None. Very mild, probably not significant. Drug effect  None. Gender effect  Probably not, men seem slightly higher than women but probably not significant so. General interpretation  Nothing here at all. There are slight effects for all 3 terms but they are all mild enough that it probably is due to just randomness. We can’t expect all groups to be exactly the same so while we see mild differences, we want significant differences!

15 Problem #2 Exploring the relationships

16 ANOVA Table SOURCE DF SS MS F State Location State*Loc Error Total

17 Tests Interaction is marginally significant; Both main effects test quite significant.

18 Effect Sizes State Effect: ( )/3 – ( )/3 = 1.80 Rural vs. Suburb: ( )/2 – ( )/2 = Rural vs. Urban: ( )/2 – ( )/2 = Suburb vs. Urban: ( )/2 – ( )/2 = RuralSuburbUrban Arkansas Indiana

19 Effect Sizes (2) Arkansas has longer wait times than Indiana Urban > Suburban > Rural wait times Interaction? Very marginal. Description from plot: State effect size is slightly less for Rural areas than it is for Urban or Suburban areas.

20 Question #3 A SAS Example

21 Part (a) – Design Chart

22 Part (b) Assumptions are ok (you expect to see this type of QQ plot) since there are numerous identical responses

23 Part (b) Ad is clearly the most important effect Age and the Ad*Age interaction are marginally significant (small sample size so there’s a good chance they are important) Interaction plot tells some of the story

24 Interaction Plot

25 Interpreting the interactions Feature ads don’t appear to be effective. (Dump them entirely – we can draw this conclusion based on the picture and the fact that the main effect for ad is so significant). Visual ads may be more effective for older people; Budget ads almost surely the most effective for the younger age groups.

26 Tukey Groupings

27 Questions?