An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns MnAPA Annual Conference September 28, 2011 St. Cloud, Minnesota Mark Filipi, AICP PTP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GIS and Transportation Planning
Advertisements

Utilizing Connected Travel Demand and Land Use Models in the Sacramento Region Gordon R. Garry Sacramento Area Council of Governments April 30, 2010.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
“Old Approach to Needs Analysis” The standard practice in Oregon has been to extrapolate forward the past 5 or more years in housing production as the.
1 Beyond What If? The Next Phase of the TPB Scenario Study Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning Presentation to the Greater Washington 2050.
First home-interview survey (1944). Gravity model Where do the trips produced in TAZ 3 go? ? ? ? ?
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Lec 16, LU Part 2: Scenarios & Assessment of transportation impacts on the urban activity system Scenarios Envision Utah’s scenarios Assessment of transportation.
Lec 2. Ch.1 UTP: Definition and Context Primary purpose of the planning effort 4 basic questions of UTP UTP as a process Importance of considering multimodal.
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Lec 15 LU, Part 1: Basics and simple LU models (ch6.1 & 2 (A), ch (C1) Get a general idea of urban planning theories (from rading p (A)
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Transportation Planning CE 573 Lecture 2. Issues for Today Transportation planning and decision making Multimodal transportation planning Travel behavior.
GreenSTEP Statewide Transportation Greenhouse Gas Model Cutting Carbs Conference December 3, 2008 Brian Gregor ODOT Transportation Planning Analysis Unit.
The Freight Village What it is What it does Feasibility in NYMTC region Howie Mann, Project Manager, NYMTC Presentation to December 15, 2010Talking Freight.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Congestion Mitigation Fee Program Nexus Study GIS Based.
UrbanFootprint Module 3: Analysis Modules Materials prepared with funding support from the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, and the.
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan for River to Sea TPO September 26, 2014.
Presented by: David Jackson & Michael Snavely, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Robert Calix, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority May 9,
Smart Growth Area Planning Tool (SmartGAP): Pilot Test Results Prepared for 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5-9,
Navigating SB 375: CEQA Streamlining and SB 743 Transportation Analysis 2014 San Joaquin Valley Fall Policy Conference.
California's Global Warming Act Presented by: Jila Priebe Statewide Transit Planning & Research Branch Division of Mass Transportation California Department.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
E151U: Housing and Urban Development Policy Housing Planning.
Presentation Template Creating Sustainable Places Planning Tools for Creating Sustainable Places.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
Smart Growth Implementation Assistance Montgomery County, MD Fact Sheet More about Smart Growth at Preliminary Project.
1 Southern California Association of Governments Irvine, December 9, 2008 OCBC Infrastructure Committee SB 375 Presentation Hasan Ikhrata, Executive Director,
1 Briefing on the Round 8.0 Cooperative Forecasts Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director Department of Transportation Planning TPB Technical Committee.
1 CITY DEVELOPMENT WORLD AFRICA 2006 Johannesburg, South Africa November 6-9, 2006 TEAMWORK: WHY METROPOLITAN ECONOMIC STRATEGY IS THE KEY TO GENERATING.
2030 Mobility Plan City of Jacksonville Planning and Development Department January 2011.
Capturing the Effects of Smart Growth on Travel and Climate Change Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Modeling for Regional and Interregional Planning Caltrans.
Improving the Models, SACOG Perspectives Sustainable Communities Implementation Challenges and Opportunities UC Davis Policy Forum Gordon Garry March 5,
RPS Modeling Results Presentation to RPS Policy Committee Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit June 6,
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
1.Identify regional strategic areas for infill and investment 2.Develop “complete communities” 3.Develop nodes on a corridor 4.Plan for a changing demand.
September 6, 2011 Summerville Chamber Public Policy Committee.
Contra Costa County Climate Leaders Reducing VMT and GHG Emissions: Tools & Resources Ian Peterson, Environmental Planner Bay Area Air Quality Management.
Evaluating Transportation Impacts of Forecast Demographic Scenarios Using Population Synthesis and Data Simulation Joshua Auld Kouros Mohammadian Taha.
Joint Development of Land Use and Light Rail Stations The Case of Tel Aviv Regional Science Association International -The Israeli Section Daniel Shefer,
EPA’s Development, Community and Environment Division: T ools for Evaluating Smart Growth and Climate Change February 28, 2002 Ilana Preuss.
Russell Provost Urban and Regional Planning Principal Investigator: Ruth Steiner.
Land Needs Simulator: Overview and Recommended Assumptions Presented to: RPS Policy Committee Presented by: ECONorthwest January 9, 2007.
Planning and Sustainability Paul Farmer American Planning Association M6: Protecting the Urban Environment and Historical and Cultural Heritage.
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
1 Methodology for Estimating Green House Gas Emissions and Assessing Mitigation Options for Project Level Applications for O-Road Mobile Sources Graciela.
Baseline Scenario Quality Growth Strategy.
Putting the LBRS and other GIS data to Work for Traffic Flow Modeling in Erie County Sam Granato, Ohio DOT Carrie Whitaker, Erie County 2015 Ohio GIS Conference.
Moves 2010 Midwest Traffic Model Users Group September 30, 2010 Ames, Iowa Mark Filipi, AICP PTP Manager, Transportation Planning Services Metropolitan.
CEEDS Phase 3: Energy Saving Potential in Urban Passenger Transportation 5 March, 2012 Ralph D. Samuelson APERC Workshop, Kuala Lumpur 1.
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
Defining Alternative Scenarios MTC Planning Committee and ABAG Administrative Committee May 13, 2011.
Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.
Validation and Sensitivity Testing of the Metropolitan Council Phase I Minneapolis-St. Paul Socioeconomic Land Use Forecasting Model Colby Brown, AICP.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
Transit Oriented Development: Prospects for action on climate change February 16, 2011 Presented to NYMTC David King Columbia University.
Monica Bansal Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB CAC November 13, 2008 Progress on “CLRP Aspirations” & “What Would it Take?”
1 Draft Round 7.2 Cooperative Forecasts of Population, Households, and Employment Transportation Planning Board Timothy Canan, AICP April 15, 2009 Item.
Greater Toronto Transportation System
The TPB What Would It Take Scenario: Meeting Regional Climate Change Mitigation Goals for the Mobile Sector Presentation to MWAQC CAC June 15, 2009 Monica.
APERC Workshop, Kuala Lumpur
2040 Comprehensive Plan Open House
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
2009 Minnesota MPO Conference August 11, 2009
An Analytical Modeling Tool for Active Transportation Strategy Evaluation Presented by: Jinghua Xu, Ph.D., PE May 16, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns MnAPA Annual Conference September 28, 2011 St. Cloud, Minnesota Mark Filipi, AICP PTP

Metropolitan Council Background  2009 legislative mandate to prepare Land Use and Planning Resources Report.

Land Use and Planning Resources Report  Identify and assess land use & transportation strategies for 3 goals:  Reduce air pollution,  Mitigate congestion, and  Reduce costs for operation, maintenance or improvement of infrastructure.  Develop voluntary land use air quality assessment tool for local decision-makers.

Air Quality Assessment Tool  Assess green house gases (along with other criteria pollutants).  Based on local data to maximum extent possible.

Travel Model Data Requirements  Data needed to develop assessment tool:  Vehicle-miles-traveled data (VMT) – by trip purpose and community.  VMT elasticity relationships to adjust “Base Case” VMT to “Alternative Land Use/Design Scenario” VMT based on difference between development scenarios.

AQ Emission Rate Data Requirements  Data needed to develop assessment tool:  Air pollutant emission rate data generated with MOVES2010 using local input data from various available existing sources.

“Base Case” Land Use VMT Data  Regional travel demand model used to estimate and tabulate baseline “Base Case” VMT.  VMT aggregated for:  Home-Based,  Non-Home Based,  Through, and  Truck Trips

Community Aggregation  TAZ based VMT aggregated to communities based on:  Existing list of community TAZs, and  TAZs with only a portion in a community – GIS used to calculate area in community and homogenous distribution of land uses assumed to exist, so TAZ total VMT multiplied by calculated percent in community.

Calculation of VMT rates for HB and NHB Trips  Population, household and employment data taken from Council website to ensure consistency with publicly available data.  VMT for Home-Based trips divided by # of households in community.  VMT for Non-Home Based trips divided by # of employees.

Range of Resulting VMT Rates Definitions: Free Standing Growth Center – typically old farm community with job opportunities commensurate with residential intensity Rural Community – Typically a few households clustered around a crossroads with a few businesses thrown in SubAreaHB VMT per HHNHB VMT per Employee Central City3219 Suburb5527 Free Standing Growth Center 4222 Rural Community9365 Township11584

Land Use Strategies and Elasticities  Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis; Ewing and Cervero; JAPA; Summer 2010  TCRP Report 95: Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes:  Ch. 13: Parking Pricing and Fees  Ch. 15: Land Use and Site Design  Ch. 17: Transit Oriented Design

Land Use Strategies and Elasticities Strategy Built Environment Variable Elasticity Concentration of Population and Households Population and/or Household Density-0.04 Diversity of Land UsesLand Use Mix Jobs/Housing Balance DesignIntersection/Street Density Percent 4-way Intersection AccessibilityJob Accessibility by Automobile Job Accessibility by Transit TransitDistance to Nearest Transit Stop -0.05

Assessment Tool Implementation  Currently implemented as an Excel ® spreadsheet – some elements password protected  Long term implementation as application on Council website – facilitate maintenance of data from:  Updates of travel forecast model  Updates of air pollutant emission rates

Assessment Tool Implementation

Use of Assessment Tool  Local development data  “Build” scenario data – typically from development proposal  “No-Build” scenario data – potential sources:  Existing development  “Typical” recent development  Previous planned development

Assessment Tool Implementation

 Conclusions:  This is not a tool to estimate actual total emissions, just potential reductions between alternative land use scenarios.  Requires “Base Case” and “Alternative Land Use/Design” scenarios to calculate change in independent variable.  Can assist local decision makers in considering air quality impacts of land use decisions.

An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns MnAPA Annual Conference September 28, 2011 St. Cloud, Minnesota Mark Filipi, AICP PTP