Third-Party Evaluation Studies as a Basis for Determining Program Effectiveness and Improvement Needs Center for Research and Reform in Education Johns.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on Strategic Plan Inquiry Based Learning Grades 9-12 Minnetonka Public Schools 2011/12.
Advertisements

LINDSAY CLARE MATSUMURA HELEN GARNIER BRIAN JUNKER LAUREN RESNICK DONNA DIPRIMA BICKEL June 30, 2010 Institute of Educational Sciences Conference Evidence.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Providence School Board September 10, 2012 Introductory Briefing Providence Public School District Comprehensive Information Technology Blueprint Center.
Arkansas MSP Grants: Statewide Evaluation Plan Judy Trowell Arkansas Department of Education Charles Stegman Calli Holaway-Johnson University of Arkansas.
Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010.
Cambridge International Examinations
AMERICAN COMPETITIVENESS INITIATIVE U.S. Department of Education.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
Education Commission of the States Working Together to Address a Common Need: Partnerships for Teacher Quality Bruce Vandal Director, Postsecondary Education.
1 Implementation of Randomized Trials David Myers American Institutes for Research Washington, DC Prepared for IES/NCER Summer Research Training Institute,
Excellence for All Children 1 Higher Academic Standards A Defining Moment for Tennessee Schools.
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
Middle Level Best Practice and Student Achievement in Texas D. Michelle Williams AMLE Nashville, TN November 6, 2014.
Supporting PreK Teachers During Act 3 Implementation.
21st Century Skills in Minnesota TIES 2009 Education Technology Conference Leslie Yoder, Saint Paul Schools Julie Beddow-Schubert, Le Crescent-Hokah Schools.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
This work was supported in part by MSP grant # through the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily.
Private Ventures for the Public Good A Campaign to Change Opinions and Improve Opportunities to Benefit Education Entrepreneurs and the Students They Serve.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
1 Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) Update Holiday Inn Albany, New York October 15, 2010.
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
Exploring Strategies for the Secondary Level in Mathematics Patricia Latham and Cathie McQueeney September 28, 2006.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
The Pershing/Rice University Math Partnership: PUMPing Up Math Achievement Caren Grant Pershing MS, Houston ISD
1 By The Numbers. 2 One of largest programs of its kind at a major research institution Replication is underway at other universities. US Department of.
Tracy Keenan, Kara Mitchell, and Barbara Dray With Alan Davis, Honorine Nocon, Sheila Shannon & the DPS-UCD Research Collaborative Council of the Great.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
Getting More Students to Meet Standards: Research-based Practices That Work Southern Regional Education Board.
Reading and Writing National Standards workshop phase 2 Term
Striving to Link Teacher and Student Outcomes: Results from an Analysis of Whole-school Interventions Kelly Feighan, Elena Kirtcheva, and Eric Kucharik.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Hazlet Township Public Schools
The Impact of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative on Teachers, Students, and Learning Maine’s Middle School 1-to-1 Laptop Program Dr. David L. Silvernail.
Monica Ballay Data Triangulation: Measuring Implementation of SPDG Focus Areas.
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
CRESST’s Evaluation of the Artful Learning Program: “Findings,” Contexts, and Future Explorations Noelle Griffin,Ph.D UCLA Graduate School of Education.
FLORIDABROWARD ECHOSFAIRECHOSFAIR Not Yet Demonstrating 9%4%12%3% Emerging/Progressi ng 38%26%53%23% Demonstrating53%70%35%74% 2012 Third GradeFLORIDABROWARD.
Southern Regional Education Board Florida Leadership Academy for Innovation and Improvement US DOE Communication Hub Meeting Albuquerque, NM September.
Does Reading First Work? Feng-Yi Hung, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Program Evaluation Clover Park School District.
SCAN SCIENCE CONTENT AND NOTEBOOKING Allen Pietrok Yamileth Shimojyo California Math and Science Project
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Tim Brower Professor & Chair Manufacturing & Mechanical Engr. Oregon Institute of Technology MSP Regional Meeting, San Francisco, February 14 & 15, 2008.
EDUCATION FOR THE FUTURE THOMAS E. DAY AET 515 JULY 30, 2012 MARTHA KENNEDY.
CaMSP Cohort 8 Orientation Cohort 8 State and Local Evaluation Overview, Reporting Requirements, and Attendance Database February 23, 2011 California Department.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Why 21st Century Skills & STEM? Research indicates students across all grade-levels lack competencies in math and science. New demands have been placed.
Leading Beyond the Institution: Graduates as Learners, Leaders, and Scholarly Practitioners Drs. Ron Zambo, Debby Zambo, Ray R. Buss.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
ARTS EDUCATION in GEORGIA. Georgia Council for the Arts MISSION The mission of Georgia Council for the Arts is to cultivate the growth of vibrant, thriving.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Aiken County Public Schools’ Middle School STEM Initiative April 15, 2014.
Induction and Mentoring: Evidence From the Teacher Graduate Assessment Project Charles Rohn, Dean, Eastern Illinois University Andrew F. Wall, Project.
NSW Smarter Schools National Partnerships Evaluating literacy and numeracy improvements: Securing rewards for demonstrating improvement 1.
Past, Present, & Key to our Future. * In 1995 a survey was conducted across DE and it was found that the predominant form of Science Education was textbook.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Third-Party Evaluation Studies as a Basis for Determining Program Effectiveness and Improvement Needs Center for Research and Reform in Education Johns.
STEM and Expanded Learning in Providence N ATIONAL A CADEMY OF E NGINEERING N ATIONAL R ESEARCH C OUNCIL — B OARD ON S CIENCE E DUCATION Committee on Integrated.
Bridge to College Courses Funded by College Spark Washington Washington Bridge to College Project: Setting a Context for Principals Dr. Kathe Taylor Assistant.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Implementation of Randomized Trials
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
Summit Hill Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Third-Party Evaluation Studies as a Basis for Determining Program Effectiveness and Improvement Needs Center for Research and Reform in Education Johns Hopkins University Steven M. Ross, Ph.D. Professor and Evaluation Director

The Johns Hopkins and EIA Partnership JHU has an MOU with EIA to market our evaluation services to its members Dr. David Andrews, Dean of the School of Education (SOE), is on the EIA board of Directors

The Johns Hopkins and EIA Partnership The SOE believe strongly that the future success of 21 st Century education must include “nontraditional forces,” such as social entrepreneurs (TFA, New School Venture Fund, others) and the $4 billion education industry as key components in American (and international) education

The Johns Hopkins and EIA Partnership SOE is also building online courses on educational leadership, entrepreneurism, education organizations, educational policy for rising executives in member companies SOE and EIA are working to endow an institute on private sector education at SOE

The Johns Hopkins and EIA Partnership We want SOE to be the place where education companies go for research and development and instruction

The Center for Research and Reform in Education: Evaluation Services Independent studies of program implementation, products, and outcomes Literature reviews and research papers on selected topics Best Evidence Encyclopedia (BEE)

Recent and Ongoing CRRE Evaluations Parent Engagement and Partnership Program (EIA) Middlebury Interactive Program (EIA) JUMP Math in NYC Middle School Matters National Institute of School Leaders Three principal preparation programs Women’s Initiative Fellowship Program High school reform in Minnesota Social-emotional learning in Northern Ireland The Leader in Me Program in two schools Pre-K and K Early Literacy English Language Learners in Texas

Types of Evaluation Studies Simplest and Least Costly ◦ Case Study Example: Examining a middle school’s use of a new computer program for supplementing math instruction

Types of Evaluation Studies Simplest and Least Costly ◦ Survey/Interview Study Example: How 325 principals who participated in online leadership training react to the program and their application of the skills taught

Types of Evaluation Studies Simplest and Least Costly ◦ Achievement Profile Study Example: Descriptive analysis of posted state assessment scores for 25 schools before and after using a new after-school program in E/LA

Types of Evaluation Studies Medium Rigor and Cost ◦ Mixed-Methods Control Group Study Example: Program Schools A and B are compared on district science assessments to Control Schools C and D

Types of Evaluation Studies Medium Rigor and Cost ◦ Quantitative Control Group Study Example: Using statistical controls, comparisons are made on school-level AP scores in chemistry between 26 program schools and 50 control schools

Types of Evaluation Studies Medium Rigor and Cost ◦ Qualitative Control Group Study Example: Through observations, interviews, and surveys, teaching methods and student engagement are compared at two schools receiving professional development in project- based learning and two control schools

Types of Evaluation Studies Most Rigorous and Costly (Often funded by federal grants) ◦ Mixed-Methods Randomized Comparison Study Example: 10 schools randomly selected to use a new program are compared on student-level test scores and qualitative measures to 10 schools randomly selected to serve as control sites

Types of Evaluation Studies Most Rigorous and Costly (Often funded by federal grants) ◦ Mixed-Methods Matched Comparison Study Example: 10 schools that elected to use a new program are compared on student-level test scores and qualitative measures to 10 matched schools serving as control sites

What Determines Rigor? Multiple measures (triangulation) Standardized (unbiased/objective) measures Treatment-control group comparisons Equivalent comparison groups

What Determines Cost? Accessibility of data Cooperativeness of participants Travel

The Best Study for You: Major Considerations What questions do you want to answer? How quickly do you need the answers? What resources are available to fund the study? How accessible are participants and data?

Steven M. Ross Evaluation Director, CRRE