Voters with Disabilities and the 2014 Elections November 10, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NATIONAL TRACKING POLL National Public Opinion Poll March 21-23, 2014 N=1,846 Likely 2014 Voters #
Advertisements

NATIONAL TRACKING POLL May 2-4, 2014 N=1,595 Likely 2014 Voters Margin of Error: +/- 2.5% #
Take Back the American Dream Conference participants call for stronger, bolder, more progressive agenda October 6, 2011.
Battleground Survey 2010 #12676 September 7-9, 2010.
2008 Latino Voter Survey in Key Battleground States Produced by The NALEO Educational Fund and Latino Decisions, Sponsored by AARP October 23, 2008.
& Conducted June 6 - 8, 1999 N=1,002 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
March, 2010 Public Support for Energy Reform in Colorado Survey Results.
January 6-8, 2002 / N=1,000 Registered “Likely”Voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. Battleground 2002 (XXI)
May 5, 2015 May 5, 2015 | Page 1 It’s jobs, stupid January 18, 2011 Campaign for America’s Future Democracy Corps.
Making Sense of the Jewish VoteMaking Sense of the Jewish Vote March 2012.
Asian American Survey - Florida Findings from a Survey of 700 Asian American Voters nationwide plus 100 each in FL, IL, NV, and VA Celinda Lake, David.
MIRRAM GROUP, LLC 895 Broadway, 5 th Floor New York, NY Voice: Fax: Presentation of Survey Findings November 2006 William.
NATIONAL POLL: VETERANS AFFAIRS, May 16-18, 2014 N=1,723 Likely 2014 Voters Margin of Error: +/- 2.4% #
NATIONAL TRACKING POLL National Public Opinion Poll March 31, 2014 #
October 27-31, 2013/ N=1,000 Registered “likely” voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. THE GEORGE WASHINGTON BATTLEGROUND POLL A national survey of 1,000 Registered “Likely”
FD | December 2010 Allstate/National Journal Heartland Monitor Poll.
POLI 300 STUDENT POLITICAL ATTITUDES SURVEY FALL 2008 (with Fall 2007)
Views on Health Reform Remain Divided As you may know, a new health reform bill was signed into law earlier this year. Given what you know about the new.
EMC Research, Inc th Street, Suite 820 Oakland, CA (510) EMC # Telephone Survey of Cambrian Elementary School District Voters.
st Street, NW, Suite 401  Washington, DC   The Graduate School of Political Management POLITICS FROM A NEW.
Civitas Institute Poll Presentation October 2013.
Immigration Reform: National and Swing District Polling Presented by Pete Brodnitz June 3, 2009.
NATIONAL POLL National Public Opinion Poll April 3-5, 2014 N = 1,804 Likely 2014 Voters #
Asian American Survey - Virginia Findings from a Survey of 700 Asian American Voters nationwide plus 100 each in FL, IL, NV, and VA Celinda Lake, David.
Influencing Congress Who has the greatest influence on Congress: Voters, Parties, or Lobbyists?
NATIONAL POLL April 24-27, 2014 N=1,960 Likely Voters #
April 22-24, 2001 / N=1,000 Registered Voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. A Survey Of Voter Attitudes Nationwide for the #8633.
Public Opinion, Political Socialization and the Media
BATTLEGROUND Presidential Tracking Fall 2004 Tracking/ N=1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters/±3.1% M.O.E. If the election for President were held today,
The Immigration Issue and the 2008 Presidential Election: Exit Poll of Hispanic Voters in Miami-Dade County, Florida and Los Angeles County, California.
Survey of 49 Swing Congressional Districts Regarding Environmental Issues August 26 - September 2, 2007 Ayres, McHenry & Associates, Inc. 112 North Alfred.
Flashcards for Election Quiz. Two major political parties in the United States.
BATTLEGROUND XXV. June 20-23, 2004/ N=1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters/±3.1% M.O.E. If the election for President were held today, and you had to make.
The Economy is Voters’ Major Concern But Health Care Also on the List Percent who name each issue as most important in their vote for President this year:
June 11-13, 2000 / N=1000 “Likely” Voters Nationwide / ±3.1% M.O.E. A Survey Of National Voter Attitudes for the #8296.
July 30 - August 3, 2000 / N=500 registered “likely” voters daily A Tracking Survey of National Voter Attitudes for the Republican National Convention.
Making Sense of the Jewish VoteMaking Sense of the Jewish Vote.
Voter registration numbers say a lot about what citizens think of their vote –Less than half of eligible citizens in America are registered to vote –40%
& Conducted August 23-25, 1998 N=1,000 “Likely” Registered Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
1 National Hispanic Voter Study on Immigration Policy March 19, 2010.
Protestant Pastors Approval of the President and Views on Endorsements Survey of 1,000 Protestant Pastors.
& Conducted August 23-25, 1998 N=1,000 “Likely” Registered Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
ECONOMIC TRACKING POLL March 9-11, 2014 N=1,932 Likely Voters #
Conducted January 3-5, 2000 N = 1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, and n = 250 Hispanic Voters Nationwide With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
August , 2000 / N=500 registered “likely” voters daily A rolling sample of N=1,000 Margin of Error +3.1% A Tracking Survey of National Voter Attitudes.
1 National Hispanic Voter Study on Immigration Policy March 19, 2010.
Conducted January 3-5, 2000 N = 1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, and n = 250 Hispanic Voters Nationwide With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
March 13-19, 2012 N=500 Hispanic Likely Voters Nationwide.
THE POLL Lake Snell Perry A s s o c i a t e s, I n c March 12-13, 2000 / N=1,000 Registered “Likely”Voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. A Survey Of Voter Attitudes for.
THE POLL Lake Snell Perry A s s o c i a t e s, I n c May 1-3, 2000 / N=1000 “Likely”Voters nationwide / ±3.1% M.O.E. A Survey Of National Voter Attitudes.
& Conducted January 3-5, 2000 N = 1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide.
THE POLL Lake Snell Perry A s s o c i a t e s, I n c May 1-3, 2000 / N=1000 “Likely”Voters nationwide / ±3.1% M.O.E. A Presentation Of National Voter Attitudes.
September 5 – November 2, 2000 / N=250 registered “likely” voters daily A Tracking Survey of National Voter Attitudes (unweighted) September 5 – November.
March 28-31, 2004/N=1,000 Registered “Likely” Voters/±3.1% M.O.E. BATTLEGROUND XXIV.
& Conducted June 6 - 8, 1999 N=1,002 Registered “Likely” Voters Nationwide, With A +3.1% Margin Of Error.
Support for Budget, Tax and Social Welfare Programs The Political Environment.
From Change to Change: Obama and the Tea Party in 2010 Presented by Terry Nelson November 30, 2010 International Democrat Union.
July 30 - August 3, 2000 / N=500 registered “likely” voters daily A Tracking Survey of National Voter Attitudes for the Democratic National Convention.
THE POLL May 1-3, 2000 / N=1,000 Registered “Likely”Voters / ±3.1% M.O.E. #8263 THE POLL.
By: John McLaughlin Saturday August 14 th, 2010 On the web National Voter Perceptions.
Medicare, Social Security, and the 2016 Election
BATTLEGROUND XXVII.
A presentation to the National Catholic Reporter
HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES AFL-CIO 2014 Election Night Survey.
Asian American Survey - Nevada
HOW IS THE PRESIDENT ELECTED?
BATTLEGROUND Presidential Tracking 2004
A Survey Of National Voter Attitudes for the
Disability Community Determined to
October National Survey
Presentation transcript:

Voters with Disabilities and the 2014 Elections November 10, 2014

Methodology and Overview 2 This presentation is based on a survey conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner for Democracy Corps and Respectability. The survey included voters nationwide was conducted from November 3-5, Results among are weighted to reflect election results and Exit Poll demographic results publicly posted by Edison Research. Overall results are weighted to the demographic characteristics of the likely 2016 electorate. Unless otherwise noted, margin of error= +/-3.10 percentage points at 95% confidence. 50 percent of respondents were reached by cell phone, in order to account for ever-changing demographics and trying to accurately sample the full American electorate.

November 15, 2011 Four in Ten 2014 Voters Part of Disability Community 3 Do you, a family member, or a close friend have a disability? “Do you, a family member, or a close friend have a disability?” Yes, family member, 23 percent. Yes, close friend, 5 percent. Yes, myself, 10 percent. No, 59 percent. Don’t know, 2 percent. Total Yes 38 percent

November 15, Disability Community More Energized than Average Please rate your level of interest in voting in today’s/yesterday’s election for U.S. Congress and other offices on a scale from zero to ten, where zero means you are not at all enthusiastic about voting this year and ten means you are extremely enthusiastic about voting this year. “Please rate your level of interest in voting in today’s/yesterday’s election for U.S. Congress and other offices on a scale from zero to ten, where zero means you are not at all enthusiastic about voting this year and ten means you are extremely enthusiastic about voting this year.” Percent saying “10” on enthusiasm voters, 56 percent. Personally Disability, 66 percent. Disability community, 60 percent. Not Disability Community, 52 percent. Percent saying 10 on enthusiasm

November 15, Share Pessimism of the Rest of the Country Generally speaking, do you think that things in this country are going in the right direction, or do you feel things have gotten pretty seriously off on the wrong track? “Generally speaking, do you think that things in this country are going in the right direction, or do you feel things have gotten pretty seriously off on the wrong track?” 2014 voters, right direction, 22 percent; wrong track, 72 percent. Personally Disability, right direction, 18 percent; wrong direction, 80 percent. Disability community, right direction, 21 percent; wrong track 73 percent VotersPersonal DisabilityDisability Community

November 15, Obama Fares Better Among Individuals with Disabilities Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as president? “Do you approve or disapprove of the way Barack Obama is handling his job as president?” 2014 voters. Strongly approve, 21 percent. Total approve, 42 percent. Strongly disapprove, 43 percent. Total disapprove, 54 percent. Personally Disability. Strongly approve, 26 percent. Total approve, 47 percent. Strongly disapprove, 40 percent. Total disapprove, 48 percent. Disability community. Strongly approve, 23 percent. Total approve, 41 percent. Strongly disapprove, 45 percent. Total disapprove, 55 percent VotersPersonal DisabilityDisability Community

November 15, In Senate Races, Democrats Win Among Individuals; Republicans Win Among Friends and Family of People with Disabilities Thinking about the election for Senate, did you vote for (The Democratic Candidate) or (The Republican Candidate)? 2014 VotersPersonal Disability Disability Community Not Disability Community Family Member Disability Close Friend Disability “Thinking about the election for Senate, did you vote for the Democratic candidate or the Republican candidate?” 2014 voters. Democrat, 47 percent. Republican, 50 percent. Personally Disability. Democrat, 61 percent. Republican, 39 percent. Family member disability. Democrat, 39 percent. Republican, 57 percent. Close friend disability. Democrat, 37 percent. Republican, 54 percent. Disability community. Democrat, 47 percent. Republican, 53 percent. Not Disability Community. Democrat, 45 percent. Republican, 51 percent

November 15, Similar Pattern in House Races Now let me ask you about the election for Congress. Did you vote for the Democratic candidate or the Republican candidate? 2014 VotersPersonal Disability Disability Community Not Disability Community Family Member Disability Close Friend Disability “Now let me ask you about the election for Congress. Did you vote for the Democratic candidate or the Republican candidate?” 2014 voters. Democrat, 46 percent. Republican, 52 percent. Personally Disability. Democrat, 56 percent. Republican, 44 percent. Family Member Disability. Democrat, 38 percent. Republican, 61 percent. Close Friend Disability. Democrat, 38 percent. Republican, 57 percent. Disability community. Democrat, 44 percent. Republican, 55 percent. Not Disability Community. Democrat, 46 percent. Republican, 51 percent

November 15, In Senate, Republicans Improve Slightly in the Disability Community Over last Two Months Thinking about the election for Senate, did you vote for (The Democratic Candidate) or (The Republican Candidate)? “Thinking about the election for Senate, did you vote for the Democratic candidate or the Republican candidate?” 2014 voters. September. Democrat, 45 percent. Republican, 48 percent. November. Democrat, 47 percent. Republican, 50 percent. Disability community. September. Democrat, 45 percent. Republican, 47 percent. November. Democrat, 47 percent. Republican, 53 percent VotersDisability Community September November

10 Now I am going to read you a list of reasons people vote for one candidate over another. After I read this list, tell me which THREE are the most important when deciding who to vote for in the election for U.S. Congress. Like Other Voters, Disability Community Focused on the Economy 2014 VotersDisability Community * Blind-accessible data on next slide.

11 Now I am going to read you a list of reasons people vote for one candidate over another. After I read this list, tell me which THREE are the most important when deciding who to vote for in the election for U.S. Congress. Like Other Voters, Disability Community Focused on the Economy “Now I am going to read you a list of reasons people vote for one candidate over another. After I read this list, tell me which THREE are the most important when deciding who to vote for in the election for U.S. Congress.” 2014 voters. Their position on the economy, jobs and wages, 54 percent. Their position on the new health care law, 30 percent. Their position on foreign affairs, ISIS, and Ebola, 28 percent. Their position on spending and deficits, 27 percent. Their position on immigration, 26 percent. Their position on Medicare and Social Security, 26 percent. Their position on abortion and gay marriage, 23 percent. Their position on women’s issues, 17 percent. Because I support their political party, 11 percent. Because of Barack Obama, 8 percent. Disability community. Their position on the economy, jobs and wages, 58 percent. Their position on the new health care law, 26 percent. Their position on foreign affairs, ISIS, and Ebola, 32 percent. Their position on spending and deficits, 32 percent. Their position on immigration, 20 percent. Their position on Medicare and Social Security, 29 percent. Their position on abortion and gay marriage, 21 percent. Their position on women’s issues, 15 percent. Because I support their political party, 10 percent. Because of Barack Obama, 9 percent.

12 Many Agree Not Raising Issues Important to Them Now I'm going to read you a pair of statements. Please tell me whether the FIRST statement or the SECOND statement comes closer to your own view, even if neither is exactly right Voters Disability Community The President and the political debate in the country are raising issues important to people. The national political debate in the country just isn't dealing with issues that matter to people. “Now I'm going to read you a pair of statements. Please tell me whether the FIRST statement or the SECOND statement comes closer to your own view, even if neither is exactly right.” The President and the political debate in the country are raising issues important to people. OR The national political debate in the country just isn't dealing with issues that matter to people voters. Strongly agree with raising important issues, 20 percent. Total agree with raising important issues, 33 percent. Strongly agree with not raising important issues, 46 percent. Total agree with not raising important issues, 59 percent. Disability community. Strongly agree with raising important issues, 23 percent. Total agree with raising important issues, 33 percent. Strongly agree with not raising important issues, 46 percent. Total agree with not raising important issues, 58 percent.

November 15, Few Heard Candidates Speaking to Their Issues, But Disability Community More Likely to Hear Message 2014 VotersPersonal Disability Disability Community Not Disability Community Family Member Disability Close Friend Disability “Thinking about the issues in the contested campaigns in your state, would you say that any candidates put forward specific serious policies to improve opportunities for people with disabilities, or did candidates not put forward any serious policies on those issues?” 2014 voters. Yes, put forward policies, 22 percent. No, did not put forward policies, 58 percent. Personally Disability. Yes, put forward policies, 38 percent. No, did not put forward policies, 49 percent. Family member Disability. Yes, put forward policies, 23 percent. No, did not put forward policies, 65 percent. Close friend Disability. Yes, put forward policies, 18 percent. No, did not put forward policies, 61 percent. Disability community. Yes, put forward policies, 26 percent. No, did not put forward policies, 60 percent. Not Disability Community. Yes, put forward policies, 19 percent. No, did not put forward policies, 58 percent. Thinking about the issues in the contested campaigns in your state, would you say that any candidates put forward specific serious policies to improve opportunities for people with disabilities, or did candidates not put forward any serious policies on those issues?

November 15, Powerful Impact Among Voters Who Heard Message (IF HEARD POLICIES) Would you say that candidates' stances on policies towards people with disabilities had a major impact on your vote, a minor impact on your vote, or no impact on your vote? (IF IMPACT) And did the candidate's stance on policies towards people with disabilities make you more or less likely to support that candidate? 2014 VotersPersonal DisabilityDisability Community * Blind-accessible data on next slide.

November 15, Powerful Impact Among Voters Who Heard Message “(IF HEARD POLICIES) Would you say that candidates' stances on policies towards people with disabilities had a major impact on your vote, a minor impact on your vote, or no impact on your vote? (IF IMPACT) And did the candidate's stance on policies towards people with disabilities make you more or less likely to support that candidate?” 2014 voters. Major impact, 36 percent. Total impact, 78 percent. No impact, 22 percent. Much more likely to support that candidate, 48 percent. Total more likely, 83 percent. Total less likely, 9 percent. Personally Disability. Major impact, 76 percent. Total impact, 84 percent. No impact, 16 percent. Much more likely to support that candidate, 58 percent. Total more likely, 92 percent. Total less likely, 7 percent. Disability community. Major impact, 43 percent. Total impact, 82 percent. No impact, 18 percent. Much more likely to support that candidate, 48 percent. Total more likely, 84 percent. Total less likely, 9 percent.

November 15, Voters In and Out of Disability Community Wanted to Hear More And would you, or would you not have been interested in hearing more from the candidates on their policies to expand opportunities for people with disabilities? “And would you, or would you not have been interested in hearing more from the candidates on their policies to expand opportunities for people with disabilities?” 2014 voters. Yes, would have been, 65 percent. No, would not have been, 31 percent. Disability community. Yes, would have been, 69 percent. No, would not have been, 25 percent. Not Disability Community. Yes, would have been, 62 percent. No, would not have been, 35 percent VotersDisability Community Not Disability Community

November 15, Some Run Into Accessibility Problems with Voting And thinking about the election this year, do you think voting was fully accessible to people with disabilities, or were some people with disabilities unable to vote due to inaccessibility? “And thinking about the election this year, do you think voting was fully accessible to people with disabilities, or were some people with disabilities unable to vote due to inaccessibility?” 2014 voters. Fully accessible, 68 percent. Some inaccessible, 12 percent. Personally Disability. Fully accessible, 73 percent. Some inaccessible, 18 percent. Disability Community. Fully accessible, 76 percent. Some inaccessible, 14 percent VotersPersonal Disability Disability Community

10 G Street, NE Suite 500 Washington, D.C Phone: Fax: Bloomsbury Sq. London, UK WC1A 2NS Phone: +44 (0) Cabrera 6060, 7D C1414 BHN, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina Phone: W 40 th St, New York, NY Phone: CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS WORLD HEADQUARTERS EUROPEAN HEADQUARTERS LATIN AMERICAN HEADQUARTERS First Canadian Pl. Toronto Board of Trade Tower Toronto, ON M5K 1C1 Phone: CANADIAN HEADQUARTERS