Cocktail algorithm studies Carmen Diez Pardos Silvia Goy López CIEMAT Madrid Muon POG 07/04/2011 1C. Diez Pardos.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
15-Apr-15 Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez L2 Muon Trigger Status Report: L2 seeding study B. de la Cruz, C. Diez (CIEMAT, Madrid) Muon HLT Meeting 17th April,
Advertisements

L2 trigger: chi2 tuning (includes changes/comments discussed in the meeting) Carmen Diez Pardos Silvia Goy López CIEMAT Madrid 11/01/2012 1C. Diez Pardos.
1 Preliminary stuff Summer09 ppMuMuX sample with CMSSW_3_3_2 –it requires opposite charge generated dimuons from heavy processes or K, pi, K0 L decays.
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
TRACK DICTIONARY (UPDATE) RESOLUTION, EFFICIENCY AND L – R AMBIGUITY SOLUTION Claudio Chiri MEG meeting, 21 Jan 2004.
A. Dabrowski, June Ratio(ke3/pipi0) 1 Final Results Γ(Ke3)/ Γ(pipi0) Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Collaboration Meeting 08 June.
Emily Thompson May 5 – UMass HEP Exp Group Meeting 1 Tag-probe method: Fitting Z → μ + μ - mass peaks Motivation: 1. Want to use long p T tail of muon.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Zhijun Liang,Song-Ming Wang,Dong liu, Rachid Mazini Academia Sinica 8/28/20151 TWiki page.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
MCP checks for the H-4l mass. Outline and work program The problems: – Higgs mass difference from the  – Possible single resonant peak mass shift (with.
Preliminary comparison of ATLAS Combined test-beam data with G4: pions in calorimetric system Andrea Dotti, Per Johansson Physics Validation of LHC Simulation.
Introduction Miha Zgubič, summer student Scintillating fibre tracker software Analysis of performance of momentum reconstruction 1.
Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU.
Energy loss improvements and tracking Niels van Eldik, Peter Kluit, Alan Poppleton, Andi Salzburger, Sharka Todorova Common Tracking Meeting 4 July 2013.
1 High energy photon pairs from RS-1 Gravitons: L1/HLT Studies Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS WG4 Group Meeting 01 June 2007.
Experience with muons in analysis: W’ search Carmen Diez Pardos CIEMAT Madrid Muon Barrel Workshop Physics sesion 25/02/
Archana Sharma, Suman Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Updates on the RPC trigger efficiency work with data driven.
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
Study of L1 and HLT efficiency in VBTF Monika Jindal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Jasbir Singh (panjab University, Chandigarh), Kajari Mazumdar (TIFR,
BesMUC Reconstruction Current Status You zhengyun, Mao yajun School of Physics, PKU
Status of K S   e analysis C. GattiT. Spadaro Selection on data Selection on MC Efficiencies from data, K L   e, K S    ,      , bhabha.
28 July 2006 CERN REU Status Report 1 Lindsey Gray, University of Florida RCT Trigger Supervisor and Database Project Status Lindsey Gray Advisors: Dr.
Higher harmonics flow measurement of charged hadrons and electrons in wide kinematic range with PHENIX VTX tracker Maki KUROSAWA for PHENIX collaboration.
First Look at Data and MC Comparisons for Cedar and Birch ● Comparisons of physics quantities for CC events with permutations of Cedar, Birch, Data and.
Drell-Yan study in CMS at 10 TeV, with 100 pb -1 Monika Jindal K.Mazumdar, D. Bourilkov, J.B. Singh 1LHC Physcis meeting.
FTKSim Status and plans FTK Meeting 07/13/2006 F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G.Volpi, P. Giannetti.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Preliminary results on DT T0s in beam collisions J. Santaolalla, J. Alcaraz (+ help/suggestions from C. Battilana, C. Fouz)
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
R. Castello (UC Louvain) on behalf of the Tracker alignment group The 2011 Tracker misalignment scenario CMS AlCa meeting Cern, 22/11/2011.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
Study of 1D Hit Error Assignment Marco Terranova, Filippo Pisano, N. Amapane, G. Cerminara.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.
Meeting V0 Daughter PID by TPC dEdx:pp real data By AliTPCIDResponse (aleph parameterization), 4 sigma Daughter PID cuts With this K0s candidates,
1 Status of Tracker Alignment b-tagging Workshop Nhan Tran (JHU) On behalf of the Tracker Alignment Group.
Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.
CMS Cathode Strip Chambers Performance with LHC Data Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2013 Varna, September 10,
HSCP 2011 Analysis Update with 715/pb Loïc Quertenmont European Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN 24 June 2011.
VHF working meeting, 4 Oct Measurement of associated charm production in W final states at  s=7TeV J. Alcaraz, I. Josa, J. Santaolalla (CIEMAT,
Cocktail algorithm studies
2nd lepton veto, in the one-lepton SUSY analysis
Full Sim Status Estel Perez 27 July 2017.
L2 Muon Trigger Study Status Report
F2F Tracking Meeting, Prague 12/12/2013
Status of tracking Thijs Cornelissen, Genova
Efficiency of Muon Reconstruction
fKK analysis in Run3 d+Au collisions: Update
Muon momentum scale calibration with J/y peak
DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data
Charged PID in Arbor 23/02/2016 Dan YU.
Reconstruction of TauTau events
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
 discrimination with converted photons
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
An Easy to Use Track Comparison Tool
Presentation transcript:

Cocktail algorithm studies Carmen Diez Pardos Silvia Goy López CIEMAT Madrid Muon POG 07/04/2011 1C. Diez Pardos

Introduction: cocktail algorithm Study in detail chi2, resolution and pulls for the data and MC used in the W' analysis Not many high pt muons Also: compare with cosmics (next step) There are several tunes, the used one is “TuneP” Algorithm logic: selection based on -lnProbchi2 Picky is taken as default, if it doesnt exit -> Take TPFMS -> tracker ->global If -lnProbchi2 (Picky-Tracker) >30, chosen tracker If -lnProbchi2 (TPFMS-chosen) >0 : takes TPFMS 2C. Diez Pardos

Samples and Muon Selection Samples:  Data: 2010RunB Nov4ReReco  MC: Fall10 W samples, W’ (1500GeV) Selection on the criteria for the analysis  Must be Global and Tracker Muons  Combined isolation: < 0.15 in a cone R < 0.3  Quality cuts related to the track: d0 0, number of valid tracker hits >10, number of matching segments >1, valid muon hits >0  Muon matched to a L3 muon: HLT_Mu9, _Mu11, _Mu15 Note: For this selection W MC is not enough to describe data (should include other BG), but it should be fine for p T > 100 GeV. 3C. Diez Pardos

Cocktail choice for data and MC In general, TPFMS preferred, for data Picky in the Barrel until pt 200 4C. Diez Pardos  At low pT data and MC differ in Barrel and EC:  Low pt W: more TPFMS  Data: more Picky (changes tendency at high pT, see next slide)  TkOnly contibrutes ~1%

Cocktail choice for data MORE TPFMS ACORDING TO joRDAN

-LnProb(chi2) difference TPFMS- PICKY Negative mean! W W W' W' Mass 1500 GeV BARREL ENDCAP 6C. Diez Pardos

Ratio chi2 MC W over Data pt>100 GeV In this region most of the BG is W, distributions are normalised to area o 7C. Diez Pardos

Ratio ln chi2 tail prob MC W over Data pt>100 In this region most of the BG is W, distributions are normalised to area TPFMS 8C. Diez Pardos PICKY

Pt distributions ANIADIR RATIO, PT for pt<100 W 9C. Diez Pardos

Resolution residuals for the chosen algo Left tail: reconstructed momentum higher than generated Interested: See tails in low pt distributions and resolution core in high pt MEAN: Similar? SIGMA: Quite similar within algorithm, better for the chosen one Fit for each algorithm the resolution, for the whole region and the BARREL ONLY?? PUT a plot 10C. Diez Pardos

Resolution residuals for the chosen algo Left tail: reconstructed momentum higher than generated Interested: See tails in low pt distributions and resolution core in high pt MEAN: Similar? SIGMA: Quite similar within algorithm, better for the chosen one Fit for each algorithm the resolution, for the whole region and the BARREL ONLY?? PUT a plot 11C. Diez Pardos

Resolution residuals for the chosen algo Left tail: reconstructed momentum higher than generated Interested: See tails in low pt distributions and resolution core in high pt MEAN: Similar? SIGMA: Quite similar within algorithm, better for the chosen one Results separated by selected or rejected for Picky and TPFMS PONER % de picky y TPFMS Por ver que mejor no cogerlo nunca?? ==> Hacer el del cocktail total 12C. Diez Pardos

Resolution residuals as a function of pt for W' MC Tracker not shown, too little stat 13C. Diez Pardos

Resolution residuals as a function of pt for W (allpt!) MC 14C. Diez Pardos

Pulls as a function of pt for W MC 15C. Diez Pardos

Pulls as a function of pt for W' MC 16C. Diez Pardos

Conclusions - How valid a tune with data/MC is applicable to the other samples: Different behaviour in eta regions and pt Datos: falta una contribucion para pt bajo de MC - Is it the optimal cocktail? (It seems that it works fine...) - Check with cosmics (Jordan?) Many, many thanks to Jordan for all the help and pacience 17C. Diez Pardos

Back-up 18C. Diez Pardos

Chi2 between data/MC (all BG) (Plots by G. Abendi, A. fanfani) 19C. Diez Pardos

Barrel Choice for MC and data

Data: all eta regions