T. Delker, Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar 17 October 2012 T. Delker, Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. Working.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESTO Advanced Component Technology 11/17/03 Laser Sounder for Remotely Measuring Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations GSFC CO 2 Science and Sounder.
Advertisements

Successes of the OAWL IIP and next steps (with a FIDDL):
Studying the Physical Properties of the Atmosphere using LIDAR technique Dinh Van Trung and Nguyen Thanh Binh, Nguyen Dai Hung, Dao Duy Thang, Bui Van.
Calibration Scenarios for PICASSO-CENA J. A. REAGAN, X. WANG, H. FANG University of Arizona, ECE Dept., Bldg. 104, Tucson, AZ MARY T. OSBORN SAIC,
Uncertainty in Cloud Aerosol Transport System (CATS) Products and Measurements Presented by Patrick Selmer Goddard advisor: Dr. Matthew McGill Assisted.
38 th Meeting of the Working Group on Spacebased Lidar October 16, 2012.
Amplitude Control: Closing the Loop in a Zero Path Length Difference Michelson Interferometer Michael G. Littman, Michael Carr , Laurent Pueyo, Jeremy.
Louis J. Rubbo, Neil J. Cornish, and Olivier Poujade Support for this project was provided by the NASA EPSCoR program.
Chapter 25: Interference and Diffraction
Ben Kravitz November 5, 2009 LIDAR. What is LIDAR? Stands for LIght Detection And Ranging Micropulse LASERs Measurements of (usually) backscatter from.
UAH Ground-based Ozone Lidar - A New NDACC Lidar Station Member NDACC Lidar Working Group Meeting, NASA/JPL, Table Mountain, CA Nov. 4, 2013
CALIPSO and LITE Data for Space-based DWL Design and Data Utility Studies: Research Plans: Part II Dave Emmitt, Simpson Weather Associates Dave Winker,
LIDAR: Introduction to selected topics
Cophasing activities at Onera
Application of a High-Pulse-Rate, Low-Pulse-Energy Doppler Lidar for Airborne Pollution Transport Measurement Mike Hardesty 1,4, Sara Tucker 4*,Guy Pearson.
Science Objectives for the ATHENA-OAWL Venture Tech Airborne Mission M. Hardesty CIRES University of Colorado/NOAA S. Tucker and C. Weimer Ball Aerospace.
October 16-18, 2012Working Group on Space-based Lidar Winds 1 AEOLUS STATUS Part 1: Design Overview.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R Goddard Lidar Observatory for Winds (GLOW) Wind Profiling from the Howard University Beltsville Research.
S. Tucker, Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar 17 October 2012 S. Tucker, Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. Working.
Lidar Working Group on Space-Based Winds, Snowmass, Colorado, July 17-21, 2007 A study of range resolution effects on accuracy and precision of velocity.
B. Gentry/GSFCSLWG 06/29/05 Scaling Ground-Based Molecular Direct Detection Doppler Lidar Measurements to Space Using Wind Profile Measurements from GLOW.
21 May 2013 Jim Leitch, PI Geostationary Trace Gas and Aerosol Sensor Optimization (GeoTASO) ESTO IIP 21 May 2013 Jim Leitch,
Problems and Future Directions in Remote Sensing of the Ocean and Troposphere Dahai Jeong AMP.
Mike Newchurch 1, Shi Kuang 1, John Burris 2, Steve Johnson 3, Stephanie Long 1 1 University of Alabama in Huntsville, 2 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center,
Scaling Surface and Aircraft Lidar Results for Space-Based Systems (and vice versa) Mike Hardesty, Barry Rye, Sara Tucker NOAA/ETL and CIRES Boulder, CO.
B. Gentry/GSFCGTWS 2/26/01 Doppler Wind Lidar Measurement Principles Bruce Gentry NASA / Goddard Space Flight Center based on a presentation made to the.
Page_1 First Optical Autocovariance Wind Lidar Measurements and Status of the OAWL IIP * Christian J. Grund and Sara C. Tucker Ball Aerospace & Technologies.
Fig. 3 Wind measurements experimental setup Lidar (light detection and ranging) operates using the same concept of microwave RADAR, but it employs a lot.
OAWL System Development Status C.J. Grund, J. Howell, M. Ostaszewski, and R. Pierce Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. (BATC), 1600 Commerce.
Sara C. Tucker Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. Working Group on Space-based Wind Lidar: April 2015 – Boulder, CO Sara C. Tucker Ball Aerospace.
__–––– Sensitivity Scaling of Dual Frequency Combs Ian Coddington, Esther Baumann, Fabrizio Giorgetta, William Swann, Nate Newbury NIST, Boulder, CO
Berechnung von Temperaturen aus Lidar-Daten Michael Gerding Leibniz-Institut für Atmosphärenphysik.
Update on NASA’s Sensor Web Experiments Using Simulated Doppler Wind Lidar Data S. Wood, D. Emmitt, S. Greco Simpson Weather Associates, Inc. Working Group.
Wu Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) New York.
Page 1 The Passive A-band Wind Sounder (PAWS) for Measurement of Tropospheric Winds Brian R. Johnson (CO- I), Shane Roark (PI), Pei Huang, Grzegorz Miecznik,
Status of CFLOS study using CALIPSO data G. D. Emmitt, D. Winker and S. Greco WG SBLW Destin, FL January 27-30, 2009.
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
Proprietary Meeting of the Working Group on Space-Based Lidar Winds Sedona, Arizona February 2004 GroundWinds New Hampshire and Hawaii Updates.
Cavity ring down spectroscopy 14 February 2012 CE 540.
NASA ESTO ATIP Laser Sounder for Remotely Measuring Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations 12/12/01 NASA Goddard - Laser Remote Sensing Branch 1 James B. Abshire,
An Alternative Direct Detection Approach to Doppler Winds that is Independent of Aerosol Mixing Ratio and Transmitter Frequency Jitter Ball Aerospace &
CLN QA/QC efforts CCNY – (Barry Gross) UMBC- (Ray Hoff) Hampton U. (Pat McCormick) UPRM- (Hamed Parsiani)
(to optimize its vertical sampling)
The GeoTASO IIP Project Jim Leitch Ball Aerospace
1/13 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 9, 2006) Mount.
Preliminary comparison results of the October 2003 experiment with GroundWinds NH and NOAA's mini-MOPA lidar S. Tucker 1,2, I. Dors 3, R. Michael Hardesty.
CO 2 an important driver for climate change. Currently only approximately half of the CO 2 produced by man can be accounted for in the atmosphere and oceans,
Can we see fringes coming from the interference of two lamps? …from the interference of two lasers? If the light is phase incoherent, no interference,
Tze-Wei Liu Y-C Hsu & Wang-Yau Cheng
Coherent Doppler Lidar Measurement of River Surface Velocity
Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corporation -
GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons M. Kavaya & G. Koch NASA/LaRC D. Emmitt & S. Wood SWA Lidar Working Group Meeting Sedona, AZ January 2004.
Lidar Wind Profiling from Geostationary Orbit using Imaging Optical Autocovariance Interferometry Chris Grund Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: Initial trade-off: Height-resolved.
Kavaya-1 Coherent Doppler Lidar Roadmap to Both the NRC Decadal Survey “Science Demonstration” and “Operational” Missions Michael J. Kavaya Jirong Yu Upendra.
Spectrometer for Sky-Scanning, Sun-Tracking Atmospheric Research (4STAR) Earth Science Division - NASA Ames Research Center 2006 A concept for a sun-sky.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Vision of the Brillouin lidar operated from a helicopter. The center ray represents.
METR Advanced Atmospheric Radiation Dave Turner Lecture 11.
1 Opto-Acoustic Imaging 台大電機系李百祺. 2 Conventional Ultrasonic Imaging Spatial resolution is mainly determined by frequency. Fabrication of high frequency.
Working Group on Space-based Lidar Winds
Aerosol extinction coefficient (Raman method)
LIDAR Ben Kravitz November 5, 2009.
Lidar winds from GEO: The Photons to Winds Conversion Efficiency
Lidar winds from GEO: The Photons to Winds Conversion Efficiency
Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp.
Huailin Chen, Bruce Gentry, Tulu Bacha, Belay Demoz, Demetrius Venable
Sandis Spolitis, Inna Kurbatska, Vjaceslavs Bobrovs
GAJENDRA KUMAR EC 3rd YR. ROLL NO
Validation of airborne 1
start at 40 sec xxx
Presentation transcript:

T. Delker, Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar 17 October 2012 T. Delker, Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar 17 October 2012

HOAWL relevance to Working Group pg 2 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO  Openings meeting goals by Mike Hardesty  “Can we combine a wind mission with another decadal survey mission to move up the priority list?”  Action Item List  “5. Continue to explore design modifications to a DWL mission for additional earth science measurement capabilities”  HOAWL combines Winds and HSRL in same instrument Opportunity: Combine lidar portion of ACE mission with 3D-Winds mission

HOAWL Executive Summary pg 3 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO  HOAWL funded under NASA’s ESTO 2011 ACT Program  Will result in measurements of both HSRL and wind in one instrument  Reuses much of OAWL Hardware  Upgrades hardware to allow two wavelength measurements Much of initial engineering and hardware already in place from IIP  Develop and measure HOAWL calibration factors for HSRL products  Develop algorithms  No impact on winds measurement  Wind measurement achieved through measuring phase of fitted sine  HSRL backscatter achieved by measuring amplitude and offset of fitted sine Calibration need to turn amplitude and offset in to HSRL  Any improvements to the instrument that increase SNR of HSRL will also increase wind measurement SNR  Allows off-nadir HSRL measurements  Doppler-shift does not effect HOAWL-HSRL retrievals

The HOAWL team  Electrical……………………… Mike Adkins  Optical……………………….. Shaun Ashby Harlan Kortmeyer  PI, PM, Optical……………….. Tom Delker  Software……………………… Dave Gleeson  CO-I …………………………. Christian Grund  Mechanical…………………… Miro Ostaszewski  CO-I/Modeling/Algorithms…... Sara Tucker  Management Support…………Carl Weimer Ray Demara pg 4 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO

HOAWL Introduction pg 5 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO  ACT will add HSRL retrievals to OAWL  Delivers both winds from aerosols and atmospheric composition measurements  OAWL works as a system  Successfully showed wind retrievals from ground with collocated coherent doppler wind lidar 1  Successfully showed wind retrievals and Doppler-shifted ground returns from air platform (WB-57) 2  HSRL hardware upgrades  Current OAWL only working for 355 nm  Add 2nd wavelength channel (532 nm) New collimator New waveplates Add signal acquisition card to data system Rework detectors  New Depolarization channel  Optical system realignment  System characterization 1) Tucker et al, (2012): Wind Profiling with the Optical Autocovariance Wind Lidar: Results of Validation Testing, AMS 92nd Annual Meeting, January, 2012 – New Orleans, LA 2) Tucker et al, (2012): Successes of the OAWL IIP and next steps (with a FIDDL), Working Group on Space-based Wind Lidar, 1-2 May Miami, FL

Why HSRL pg 6 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO  Goal  Measure atmospheric aerosol scattering and extinction profiles Supports ACE, GACM and GEO-CAPE missions  High Spectral Resolution Lidar  Lidar = range resolved measurements Something passive instruments can’t do and need  High spectral resolution => Can see effect of line broadening of laser light caused by molecular backscatter Allows separating aerosol from molecular backscatter Single wavelength insufficient to provide needed information for aerosol characterization  HRSL retrievals  Backscatter (β) Three wavelengths preferred OAWL currently configured for 2 wavelengths, could support three (355nm, 532, 1064 nm)  Extinction (α – for attenuation) Two wavelengths (355 nm, 532 nm)  Depolarization (δ) Two wavelengths (355 nm, 532 nm)

Aerosol vs. Molecular Coherence pg 7 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO As a result….  Aerosol return has approximately the same narrow bandwidth & temporal coherence length as the outgoing laser pulse.  Molecular return has a wide bandwidth due to all the Doppler shifts from the molecular vibrations (Doppler broadening)  shorter temporal coherence length.  The center of both returns is Doppler shifted by the line-of-sight wind speed V, according to:  Where  f o is the outgoing laser pulse frequency = c/λ 0  c is the speed of light Doppler Shift Due to wind A M A+M+BG BG Return spectrum from a Monochromatic source Wavelength Shift (m/s) Backscatter (W)

Separate Molecular vs. Aerosol pg 8 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO  Fringe contrast or interferometer visibility (V = (I max -I min )/(I max +I min )) depends on:  Maximum system contrast, V max  Optical Path Difference, OPD  Temporal Coherence length of the laser backscatter from atmosphere, Lc  Aerosol return (narrower BW) exhibits good fringe contrast over a range of OPDs  Molecular return (broader BW) fringe visibility is negligible (~ ) at HOAWL’s 0.9 meter OPD  The atmospheric return is the combination of the two.  The HSRL retrieval is in the separation of these two plus noise.

O D Phase(wind), Amplitude (Aerosol), and Offset (Molecular) pg 9 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO  Four channels: Ideally, these are aligned to detect the 0, 90, 180, and 270 phases of the interferometric signal.  [0, 90, 180, 270] could be [135, 225, 315, 45] or any set of values separated by 90.  The T0 detector phase definitions are arbitary – but used to define the current state of the interferometer.  For each time stamp, perform a sinusoidal fit to the detector amplitudes at these phases  phase, amplitude, and constant (‘dc”) offset of the fit are returned.  Phase provides the wind  Amplitude provides polarization-preserved Aerosol content  Aerosols return has ~same contrast as outgoing laser pulse  Calibrated with To signal shot to shot (ideally)  Offset provides polarization-preserved molecular content  Widened spectrum of molecular backscatter is incoherent for chosen optical path different  Results in offset in sine fit D

HSRL Data Products pg 10 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO Measurement or retrieval Description (all a function of range) P m =P m ǁ Return from molecular backscatter in the co-polarized OAWL receiver P a =P a ǁ Return from aerosol backscatter in the co- polarized OAWL receiver δaδa Aerosol depolarization ratio: P a  /P a ǁ α a+m Total extinction αaαa Aerosol extinction coefficient tata Aerosol optical depth βaβa Aerosol backscatter RaRa Aerosol lidar ratio: α a /β a R am Aerosol to molecular backscatter ratio: β a /β m

HSRL from Previous OAWL Data  Previous OAWL data used to test algorithm development  Ground validation data  Single Channel (355 nm)  Caveats  Overlap affects extinction estimate at the near ranges (common problem for all HSRL systems).  Horizontal view at low altitude  lots of extinction  SNR drops at farther ranges.  “ringing” in noise floor (believed to be from Q-switch electronics) falsely affects extinction estimate. pg 11 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO  To was not optimized (equal To and telescope path contrast not ensured).  Don’t have actual depolarization measurements  aerosol backscatter may be too high/low  No calibration has been performed.  Don’t have actual depolarization measurements  aerosol backscatter may be too high/low  Very difficult to validate with Denver data.

Successes  Output values are “reasonable” (i.e. within normal ranges) where SNR is strong and overlap issues are lessened.  Average of output (i.e. for aerosol backscatter, or aerosol extinction/AOD) is not affected by number of points used in the average (other than more points leads to smaller variance).  Data “generally” follow Denver air quality data (too many variables for good comparison) pg 12 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO

Preliminary Results: 11 July 2011  150 m range gates, 4 second averages pg 13 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO

Preliminary Results: 13 July 2011  37.5 m range gates, 1 sec. averaging  High aerosol backscatter & extinction day pg 14 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO

Preliminary Results: 21 July 2011  150 m range gates, 4 sec. averaging  Medium to low aerosol backscatter & extinction – overlap effects are also present  Note different color scales pg 15 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO

Average output results  Averages for full data set (2+ hrs)  150 m range gate on inputs  Not verified, but all within reasonable limits.  Biases (intensity & extinction) likely present due to range- dependent offsets (from Q-switch noise) and …  …from possible changes in system setup (experiment was intended for winds, not HSRL – some mods were made) pg 16 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO 11 July July July July July 2011

HOAWL ACT Summary  HOAWL ACT will demonstrate:  Two wavelength HSRL measurement  Two wavelength Aerosol wind measurement  Hardware upgrades underway  Initial hardware upgrades happening now Rooftop demonstration by end of this year  Additional hardware upgrades following first dual wavelength retrievals  Final data sets and wrap up ACT in early 2014 For FIDDL hardware integration  Algorithms under development  Some preliminary HSRL results from existing wind data pg 17 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO

HOAWL for LIDAR potion of ACE mission  HOAWL can deliver data for lidar portion of ACE baseline concept  HSRL 3β + 2α + 2δ Backscatter at 355 nm, 532 nm, 1064 nm Extinction at 355 nm and 532 nm Depolarization at 355 nm and 532 nm  In addition - Aerosol wind at 355 nm and 532 nm  Add FIDDL for molecular if desired and fits in cost  Minor hardware changes add HSRL to OAWL  Photons already there Emit existing 1064 nm and 532 nm light generated by laser Byproduct of 355 nm light currently used by OAWL  Multiwavelength optical components  Add backscatter channel at 1064 nm Dichroic with detector  Add depolarization channel 355 nm and 532 nm  Add 4 detectors at output interferometer Already exist in current OAWL  It’s not free, but it’s not expensive  Could descope some parts 1β + 1α + 1δ comes at the cost of just a single extra detector pg 18 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO

3D Winds plus LIDAR potion of ACE mission  Makes mission more relevant to NASA  Decadal survey already ranks 3-D winds mission low Especially when/if ADM-Aeolus flies  BUT, make sure cost increase is minor Maximize science/cost ratio CLARREO lesson – Don’t try to do too much It’s too expensive GEO-CAPE is taking the clue Separating Ocean Color from Aerosol Mission  Is this an ACE Mission with 3-D winds for free?  Use ACE for higher decadal survey position  Get winds from lidar portion of ACE via HOAWL for free It costs to add HSRL to 3-D winds  Need to verify  Do ACE mission and 3-D winds mission orbits overlap?  Do viewing and pointing requirements overlap?  Does HOAWL meet ACE HSRL measurement accuracy and precision?  Need to engage ACE mission scientists Goal: One system, one laser, global winds & aerosols. pg 19 Working Group on Space-Based Wind Lidar, October Boulder, CO