1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inventory Issues and Modeling- Some Examples Brian Timin USEPA/OAQPS October 21, 2002.
Advertisements

Update on PM 2.5 – The Scope of the Problem and Overview of Sources Matthew M. Russell, PhD ENVIRON International Corporation Los Angeles, California April.
Development of a Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Mechanism: Comparison with Smog Chamber Experiments and Atmospheric Measurements Luis Olcese, Joyce.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Direct PM 2.5 Emissions Data, Testing, and Monitoring Issues Ron Myers Measurement Policy Group SPPD, OAQPS.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule for the 1997 PM2.5 Standards Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning Karsten Baumann, PhD. Polly Gustafson.
SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOLS WORKSHOP OVERVIEW John G. Watson Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV February 5, 2002.
Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
From Ammonia to PM 2.5 Brent Auvermann Texas Cooperative Extension Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Amarillo, TX.
Southeast Nexus (SENEX) Studying the Interactions Between Natural and Anthropogenic Emissions at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change A NOAA Field.
Eighteen Years of Acid Wet Deposition at Mt. Mansfield Goals & Objectives One goal of the VMC is to understand the sources, mechanisms, and effects of.
Missouri Air Quality Issues Stephen Hall Air Quality Analysis Section Air Pollution Control Program Air Quality Applied Sciences Team (AQAST) 9 th Semi-Annual.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Rokjin J. Park ACCESS VII,
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Air Quality, Atmospheric Deposition, and Lake Tahoe October 15, 2003 Western Regional Pollution Prevention Network Grannlibakken, Lake Tahoe Jim Pederson.
Implementation Issues for the Hour PM2.5 Standard EPA / WESTAR Residential Wood Smoke Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah March 1, 2011 Rich Damberg.
Temporal and Spatial Variations of PM2.5 Mass in Georgia Xiaolu Zhang EAS 6410 Spring 2007.
Preparation of Fine Particulate Emissions Inventories Lesson 1 Introduction to Fine Particles (PM 2.5 )
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
Did the recession impact recent decreases in observed sulfate concentrations? Shao-Hang Chu, US EPA/OAQPS/AQAD October, 2011.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q PM 2.5 Final NSR Implementation Rule Nat’l Tribal Air Assoc. July 16, 2008.
1 Summary of LADCO’s Regional Modeling in the Eastern U.S.: Preliminary Results April 27, 2009 MWAQC TAC June 15, 2009.
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
U.S.-Canada Air Quality Agreement: Transboundary PM Science Assessment Report to the Air Quality Committee June, 2004.
St. Louis PM 2.5 SIP Modeling Update Calvin Ku, Ph.D. Missouri Department of Natural Resources Air Pollution Control Program Air Quality Advisory Committee.
The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University Center for Air Resources Engineering.
Causes of Haze Assessment Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
PM Formation in the Atmosphere Primary and Secondary PM Sulfate Formation in the Atmosphere SO4 Formation in Clouds Season SO2-SO4 Transformation rate.
1.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
Regional Air Quality Modeling Results for Elemental and Organic Carbon John Vimont, National Park Service WRAP Fire, Carbon, and Dust Workshop Sacramento,
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
Weight of Evidence Discussion AoH Meeting – Tempe, AZ November 16/17, 2005.
Air Quality in Texas Birnur Guven Houston Advanced Research Center June 23, 2010 – Johnson Space Center.
Update on the PM2.5 Designations Process and the PM2.5 Implementation Rule Joseph Paisie WESTAR April 8, 2004.
Template Comparison of PM Source Apportionment and Sensitivity Analysis in CAMx Bonyoung Koo, Gary Wilson, Ralph Morris, Greg Yarwood ENVIRON Alan Dunker.
Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
June 15, 2011 Bob Dulla Sierra Research. Fairbanks PM 2.5 Design Values* ( ) * 98 th Percentile Concentrations 2.
Western Regional Technical Air Quality Studies: support for Ozone and other Air Quality Planning in the West Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
October 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Glossary1 Glossary and Acronyms This section provides definitions of acronyms and terms used in the workbook. A.
PROPOSED FINE PARTICULATE ATTAINMENT/ NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS This proposal is available on the DEP Website at
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
Informed NPS Air Quality Management Decisions in Response to a Changing Climate.
CENRAP Modeling and Weight of Evidence Approaches
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
Air Pollution and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Draft Modeling Protocol for PM2.5
Impact of NOx Emissions in Georgia on Annual PM2.5
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States
On-going developments of SinG: particles
Statistical analysis of the secondary inorganic aerosol in Hungary using background measurements and model calculations Zita Ferenczi   Hungarian Meteorological.
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007

2 Overview Sources of direct PM2.5 and SO2 must be evaluated for control measures in all nonattainment areas For a specific area, the presumptive policy for NOx, VOC, or ammonia can be reversed if the State and/or EPA provide a robust technical demonstration Implication: if statewide emissions of the precursor contribute significantly to PM2.5 concentrations in the area, then the state will need to evaluate sources of that precursor for reasonable control measures –These measures could include RACT/RACM for sources in the nonattainment area, and measures on other sources located in the state as needed for expeditious attainment

Source: Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers – A NARSTO Assessment, 2003.

4 Direct PM2.5 and SO2 Sulfate and carbon are significant fractions of PM 2.5 mass in all nonattainment areas. Reductions in SO2 lead to net reductions in PM2.5 mass concentrations despite potential slight increases in particulate nitrate levels. Policy: Direct PM2.5 emissions (includes organic carbon, elemental carbon, and crustal material) and SO2 must be addressed in all areas

5 VOC The organic carbon component of ambient PM2.5 is a complex mixture of hundreds or even thousands of organic compounds. High molecular weight VOC condense readily when emitted to ambient air and are considered direct organic carbon particle emissions. The relative importance of anthropogenic and biogenic VOC in the formation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) varies from area to area, depending upon local emissions sources, atmospheric chemistry, and season of the year. While significant progress has been made in understanding the role of gaseous organic material in the formation of organic PM, this relationship remains complex. SOA remains probably the least understood component of PM2.5.

6 VOC (cont.) Organic carbon typically exhibits higher mass during the summer, when photochemical SOA formation and biogenic VOC emissions are highest. Aromatic compounds such as toluene, xylene, and trimethyl benzene are considered to be the most significant anthropogenic SOA precursors and have been estimated to be responsible for 50 to 70 percent of total SOA in some airsheds. Man-made sources of aromatic gases include mobile sources, petrochemical manufacturing and solvents. Policy: States are not required to address VOC in PM2.5 implementation plans and evaluate control measures for VOC unless the State or EPA makes a technical demonstration that emissions of VOCs from sources in the State significantly contribute to PM2.5 concentrations in a given nonattainment area.

7 Ammonia Ammonia reacts with sulfuric acid and nitric acid to form ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate. Ammonium sulfate formation is preferential under most conditions, though ammonium nitrate is favored by low temperature and high humidity. Emission inventories of ammonia contain uncertainties. Researchers are seeking improvements through process-based inventory approaches for animal feeding operations. Monitoring of ammonia gas and nitric acid is important for identifying when PM2.5 formation in an area is limited by ammonia or by nitric acid. However, there are a limited number of such monitoring sites.

8 Ammonia (cont.) Reducing ammonia emissions in some areas may increase the acidity of particles and of deposition. Increased acidity is linked to adverse ecological effects and is suspected to be linked with human health effects and with an increase in the formation of secondary organic compounds. In areas with high SO2 emissions, ammonia reductions may marginally reduce PM2.5 concentrations, but particle and precipitation acidity may increase. After substantial SO2 reductions in the east, in general PM2.5 changes are predicted to be less responsive to reductions in ammonia than to reductions in nitric acid. Policy: A State is not required to address ammonia in its attainment plan or evaluate sources of ammonia emissions for reduction measures unless the State or EPA makes a technical demonstration that emissions of ammonia from sources in the State significantly contribute to PM2.5 concentrations in a given nonattainment area.

9 NOx Nitrate continuously transfers between the gas and the condensed phases through condensation and evaporation processes in the atmosphere. The formation of aerosol ammonium nitrate is favored by the availability of ammonia, low temperatures, and high relative humidity. Because ammonium nitrate is semivolatile and not stable in higher temperatures, nitrate levels are typically lower in the summer months and higher in the winter months. –Similarly, PM2.5 concentrations typically will respond most effectively to NOx reductions in the winter. Under warm temperatures, Federal Reference Method monitors retain less nitrate in measured PM2.5.

10 NOx (cont.) Ammonia reacts preferentially with SO2, but in the absence of significant amounts of SO2, nitric acid will readily form ammonium nitrate (such as in many western cities). A decrease in NOx can reduce the oxidation process and thereby reduce sulfate formation. Policy: States are required to address NOx as a PM2.5 attainment plan precursor and evaluate reasonable controls for NOx in PM2.5 attainment plans, unless the State and EPA make a finding that NOx emissions from sources in the State do not significantly contribute to PM2.5 concentrations in the relevant nonattainment area.

11 Technical Demonstrations Any proposed technical demonstrations should be developed in advance of the attainment demonstration and in consultation with the EPA Regional Office Demonstration should consider all available scientific and technical information As part of the SIP, it will be subject to public review and comment under State administrative process If the administrative record related to development of the SIP shows that the presumption for a precursor is not technically justified for that area, the State must submit a demonstration to reverse the presumption [40 CFR (c)(5)]

12 Technical Demonstrations (cont.) Weight of evidence approach based on a number of technical analyses –Potential analyses vary by pollutant Demonstrations will be reviewed on case-by-case basis

13 Tools for Assessing Significance / Insignificance of Contribution from All Statewide Sources to Nonattainment Area PM2.5 Concentrations Photochemical modeling – zero-out analysis; sensitivity analysis Photochemical source apportionment tools (PSAT, DDM, TSSA, etc.) –For estimating impact of all sources Receptor modeling (e.g. PMF, CMB) Analysis of ambient monitoring data, speciation data, and trends Analysis of emissions inventories and trends Others…

Questions to Address in Technical Demonstrations 1)What is the contribution of all Statewide sources of the precursor (e.g. NOx, VOC, or ammonia) towards annual average PM2.5 concentrations in the nonattainment area? Example

Questions to Address in Technical Demonstrations (cont.) 2) Do contributions from the precursor to PM2.5 vary by season? - If so, are the contributions small in one or more seasons, but possibly significant in other seasons? - Is the precursor a key contributor to high concentrations on individual days? Source: “Source Apportionment Analysis of Air Quality Monitoring Data: Phase II,” prepared by Desert Research Institute, March 2005, for the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union And Midwest Regional Planning Organization

Questions to Address in Technical Demonstrations (cont.) 3)Do reductions or increases in the precursor affect the concentrations of other PM2.5 species? If so, what is the individual impact on each PM2.5 species? - Effect of ammonia reductions on atmospheric acidity - Effect of NOx reductions on sulfate and SOA - Effect of anthropogenic VOC reductions on SOA, sulfate, and nitrate Impact on Sulfate Concentrations from a Domainwide 50% NOx reduction

Questions to Address in Technical Demonstrations (cont.) 4)Does ambient monitoring support the conclusions? - Are there available monitoring data to determine whether an area is ammonia-limited or nitric acid limited?

Questions to Address in Technical Demonstrations (cont.) 5)Are there uncertainties in the emissions inventories that might lead to inconclusive findings regarding significance/insignificance of a precursor? 6)Do the uncertainties in the air quality models lead to inconclusive findings regarding significance/insignificance of a precursor?