EPA CMAQ Development Team

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Lab, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division 28 October 2013 H. O. T. Pye, R. Pinder,
Advertisements

FEST-C for Bi-directional CMAQ: Update Ellen Cooter U.S. EPA, National Exposure Research Lab, Research Triangle Park, NC Verel Benson Benson Consulting,
Development of a Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Mechanism: Comparison with Smog Chamber Experiments and Atmospheric Measurements Luis Olcese, Joyce.
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory Overview of the Two-way Coupled WRF-CMAQ.
Limei Ran 1,2, Robert Gilliam 3, Jonathan Pleim 3, Adel Hanna 1, William Benjey 3 1 Center for Environmental Modeling for Policy Development, Institute.
Havala O. T. Pye 1, Rob Pinder 1, Ying Xie 1, Deborah Luecken 1, Bill Hutzell 1, Golam Sarwar 1, Jason Surratt 2 1 US Environmental Protection Agency 2.
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
Update on: 1. Secondary Organic Aerosol 2. Biogenic VOC emissions Colette L. Heald Chemistry Climate Working Group Meeting February.
1 Modelling Activities at LAC (PSI) in Switzerland Ş. Andreani-Aksoyo ğ lu, J. Keller, I. Barmpadimos, D. Oderbolz, A.S.H. Prévôt Laboratory of Atmospheric.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Jonathan Pleim and the CMAQ Development.
Colette Heald Fangqun Yu Aerosol Processes Working Group.
Update on biogenic and soil emissions modeling for DYNAMO Daniel Cohan, Rui Zhang, Quazi Rasool, and Arastoo Pour Biazar AQAST 9 meeting, St. Louis University.
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory Simple urban parameterization for.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
Operational Air Quality and Source Contribution Forecasting in Georgia Georgia Institute of Technology Yongtao Hu 1, M. Talat Odman 1, Michael E. Chang.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory Application and evaluation of the.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Atmospheric Modeling Division, Research Triangle Park, NC September 17, 2015 Annmarie.
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development, Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Prakash Bhave, Ann Marie Carlton, Sergey Napelenok,
Aerosol Microphysics: Plans for GEOS-CHEM
Modelling the Canadian Arctic and Northern Air Quality using GEM-MACH Wanmin Gong and Stephen Beagley Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
Examination of the impact of recent laboratory evidence of photoexcited NO 2 chemistry on simulated summer-time regional air quality Golam Sarwar, Robert.
Improving Black Carbon (BC) Aging in GEOS-Chem Based on Aerosol Microphysics: Constraints from HIPPO Observations Cenlin He Advisers: Qinbin Li, Kuo-Nan.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology University of California, Riverside Bourns College of Engineering Evaluation and Intercomparison of N.
WRAP Update. Projects Updated 1996 emissions QA procedures New evaluation tools Model updates CB-IV km MM5 Fugitive dust NH 3 emissions Model.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory | Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division| A Tale of Two Models: A Comparison.
Center for Community Modeling and Analysis System (CMAS) Adel Hanna Director, CMAS October 6, th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Robert Gilliam 1, and Aijun Xiu 2 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, NOAA, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with the.
Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture Megan Gore, D.Q. Tong, V.P. Aneja, and M. Houyoux Department of.
Source-Specific Forecasting of Air Quality Impacts with Dynamic Emissions Updating & Source Impact Reanalysis Georgia Institute of Technology Yongtao Hu.
Development and Preliminary Results of Image Processing Tools for Meteorology and Air Quality Modeling Limei Ran Center for Environmental Modeling for.
A new version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model: CMAQv5.1 EPA CMAQ Development Team Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division National Exposure.
Prakash Bhave, Shawn Roselle, Frank Binkowski, Chris Nolte, Shaocai Yu, Jerry Gipson, & Ken Schere CMAS Conference – Paper #6.8 Chapel Hill, NC, October.
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development, Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division Columbus Day 2010 Prakash Bhave U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Aerosol from Organic Nitrogen in the Southeast United States Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, United States Environmental.
Application of the CMAQ-UCD Aerosol Model to a Coastal Urban Site Chris Nolte NOAA Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC 6.
Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Model Version 5.1 K. Wyat Appel, Sergey Napelenok, Christian Hogrefe, Kristen M. Foley, George.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Shawn Roselle 1, Prakash Bhave 1, Russell Bullock 1, William Hutzell 2, Deborah Luecken 2, Chris Nolte 1, Golam Sarwar 2, Ken Schere.
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory Simple urban parameterization for.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling Division Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can.
THE MODELS-3 COMMUNITY MULTI- SCALE AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) MODEL: 2002 RELEASE – NEW FEATURES Jonathan Pleim, Francis Binkowski, Robin Dennis, Brian Eder,
New Features of the 2003 Release of the CMAQ Model Jonathan Pleim 1, Gerald Gipson 2, Shawn Roselle 1, and Jeffrey Young 1 1 ASMD, ARL, NOAA, RTP, NC 2.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
Impact of dimethylsulfide chemistry on sulfate Golam Sarwar, Kathleen Fahey, Kristen Foley, Brett Gantt, Deborah Luecken, Rohit Mathur October 7, 2015.
Evaluation of CMAQ Driven by Downscaled Historical Meteorological Fields Karl Seltzer 1, Chris Nolte 2, Tanya Spero 2, Wyat Appel 2, Jia Xing 2 14th Annual.
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Office of Research and Development | National Exposure Research Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling and Analysis Division |Research Triangle Park,
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division 26 October 2011 Diagnostic Evaluation.
Simulation of the indirect radiative forcing of climate due to aerosols by the two-way coupled WRF-CMAQ model over the continental United States: Preliminary.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Implementation of an Online Photolysis Module in CMAQ 4.7 Christopher G. Nolte.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy Jonathan Pleim, Shawn Roselle,
Advances in Support of the CMAQ Bidirectional Science Option for the Estimation of Ammonia Flux from Agricultural cropland Ellen Cooter U.S. EPA, National.
Understanding the impact of isoprene nitrates and OH reformation on regional air quality using recent advances in isoprene photooxidation chemistry Ying.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Updates to model algorithms and inputs for the Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS) model Jesse Bash, Kirk Baker, George Pouliot, Donna Schwede,
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory WRF-CMAQ 2-way Coupled System: Part II Jonathan.
Donna Schwede U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
SAPRC07T Implementation within the CMAQ model.
Development of a Multipollutant Version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Shawn Roselle, Deborah Luecken, William Hutzell,
Characterization of CMAQv5.2:
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
The Value of Nudging in the Meteorology Model for Retrospective CMAQ Simulations Tanya L. Otte NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, RTP, NC (In partnership with.
Update on 2016 AQ Modeling by EPA
Current Research on 3-D Air Quality Modeling: wildfire!
Measurement Needs for AQ Models
Recent Enhancements to the
Presentation transcript:

EPA CMAQ Development Team The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Model: Updates and Future Development Jonathan Pleim and EPA CMAQ Development Team Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division UK-US Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Meeting 20-24 October, 2014

New CMAQ releases The latest publically available model is CMAQv5.0.2 Released early 2014, included: Updates to base model Instrumented models Community contributions Updates to 2-way WRF-CMAQ model Next model is CMAQv5.1 To be released in October 2015, includes: Science updates Revised code structure for faster execution Improved physics and data assimilation in WRF Improved 2-way coupled WRF-CMAQ Plans for Next Generation AQ model (user forum)

Recent developments (v5.0.2) NH3 Bidirectional Flux from fertilizer Soil NH3 and pH from fertilizer computed by Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model (G = NH4+ / H+ ) FEST-C1.1 available from CMAS website New 2-level bi-directional flux algorithm in CMAQ Instrumented models: Direct Decoupled Method 3D (DDM-3D) Integrated Source Apportionment Method (ISAM) Sulfur Tracking Community Contributions VBS – Volatility Basis Set (see Matt Woody talk tomorrow) Alternative approach for modeling organic aerosols

2015 Model Release – CMAQv5.1 Model Structure Efficiency improvements Parallel I/O More efficient PBL solver for ACM2 Aerosol Microphysics (Fahey Poster) Improve treatment of aerosol size distributions Update nucleation parameterization Correction of current binary nucleation scheme (Vehkamaki et al., 2002) Researching new nucleation scheme involving amines and NH3 and the growth due to organics (Binkowski) Revisions to size distribution of PM emissions Gravitational settling through all layers Evaluate size distributions against measurements (Appel poster)

Gas Chem Mechanisms CB05e51 – runs faster Minor error updates and updates for better SOA from isoprene Further speciate organic nitrates Implications for both N-deposition as well as reactive N (and oxidant) chemistry (see Schwede talk and Luecken poster today) SAPRC07T – for the research studies Minor updates to correct OH+NO2, photolysis rates Research version with isoprene as Xie et al (2013) RACM2 New mechanism in CMAQ (5.0.2), different representation of peroxy radical reactions (Sarwar et al 2013, ACP) Halogen chemistry (lowers marine Ozone) (Sarwar poster today) Simple parameterized chemistry in release Detailed Iodine and Bromine chemistry in research version

In-Line Calculation of Photolysis Rates Code Restructuring and Optimization Cloud Effects based on hydrometer concentrations predicted by WRF resolved and CMAQ convective cloud models Absorption by aerosol elemental carbon based on Bond and Bergstrom (2006) Run-time options for Full Mie Calculation and Core-Shell Mixing Model to determine aerosol effects In comparison to old methods: revised methods generally increase cloud transmissivity increased ozone in some cloudy areas Courtesy of Bill Hutzell

SOA Updates SOA from isoprene updated SOA from ISOPRENE + NO3 added SV_PAH1 SV_PAH2 SOA Updates PAHs APAH1 APAH2 SV_ALK1 SV_ALK2 AALK1 AALK2 APAH3 long alkanes cloud water AORGC SOA from isoprene updated SOA from ISOPRENE + NO3 added Acid catalyzed isoprene SOA (AISO3J) updated SOA from PAHs (naphthalene) added SOA from alkanes added (CB05) or updated (SAPRC) SV_TOL1 SV_TOL2 ATOL1 ATOL2 O high-yield aromatics AOLGA H AXYL1 AXYL2 ATOL3 SV_XYL1 SV_XYL2 GLY MGLY AXYL3 low-yield aromatics NCOM ABNZ1 ABNZ2 SV_BNZ1 SV_BNZ2 ABNZ3 POC VOCs ATRP1 ATRP2 benzene AOLGB SV_TRP1 SV_TRP2 ANTHROPOGENIC EMISSIONS monoterpenes AISO3 ASQT SV_SQT sesquiterpenes AISO1 AISO2 BIOGENIC EMISSIONS EMISSIONS EMISSIONS EMISSIONS SV_ISO1 SV_ISO2 isoprene IEPOX Aqueous aerosol

Updated Acid-Catalyzed Isoprene SOA +H2O Based on later generation isoprene epoxides (IEPOX and MAE) Implemented as heterogeneous reaction that is a function of aerosol-phase composition (aerosol sulfate, water, pH, etc) +SO4-2 +NO3- acid +HO2 +OH,O2 IEPOX RO2 isoprene +H2O +NO +SO4-2 +NO3- +OH acid MPAN MAE (MAE Chemistry not in CB05) Updates to low-NOx chemistry (Xie et al. 2013 ACP), high-NOx chemistry (Lin et al. 2013 PNAS), and aerosol (Pye et al. 2013 ES&T)

Heterogeneous Chemistry Current model: Uptake of N2O5 on aerosols   When particle contain Cl, uptake of N2O5 can also produce ClNO2   Average change in winter-time predictions due to ClNO2 Chemistry TNO3 O3 SO42- Alters partitioning of reactive nitrogen, impacts oxidant chemistry, and thus impacts production of secondary pollutants (Sarwar et al., GRL, 2014)

Dynamic Aqueous Chemistry with Rosenbrock Solver A KPP-generated RODAS3 solver for aqueous phase chemistry based on the CMAQv5.0 aqueous chemistry mechanism has been developed Simultaneously treats phase transfer, chemistry, ionization, and deposition Benefits: Easily expandable for new chemistry or processes (e.g. IEPOX/MPAN SOA) More robust Reduced potential for coding error Treatment of mass transfer limitations and increased dependence of aqueous chemistry on cloud microphysical parameters Disbenefits Increased computational requirements kmt = mass transfer coefficient, wL = liquid water content fraction, Cg and Caq = gas and aq concentrations, H = henry’s law coefficient, Qi = Aq diffusion limitation, Raq = chemical production, Ascav = Aitken scavenging, Wdep = wet deposition, Xion = dissociation/association; KPP= kinetic preprocessor Courtesy of Kathleen Fahey

Emissions/land surface Integrate soil NO emissions and bidirectional exchange algorithms Sea-salt Emissions Added dependency on sea surface temperature Better reflects recent measurements and findings Reduced the size of the surf zone emissions Effects: Increase SS emissions Increase Nitrate aerosol Updates to biogenic emissions (BEIS) Two layer model with leaf temperature parameterization BELD data: Updated to 2001-2011 NLCD, MODIS, and Forest Inventory Analysis (FIA) data Finer spatial allocation of tree species Isoprene compared to AQS: ~30% reduction in NMB and 15% reduction in NME Reduction bias and error of PM2.5 and O3 ~1%-5% Gantt et al in prep

2-way WRF-CMAQ Updated to CMAQv5.1 Updated to WRFv3.6.1 Direct aerosol radiative effects now use core-shell algorithm for coated EC/BC Investigating trends in aerosol direct radiative effect over 20 years Northern Hemisphere – 108 km resolution North America - 36 km and 12 km resolution Chuen Meei Gan talk and Jia Xing Poster tomorrow Indirect aerosol radiative effect based on Abdul-Razzak and Ghan (2002, 2000) for CCN activation and Liu et al. (2007) for IN activation

Meteorology To be included in WRF3.7 – March 2015 A Simple Bulk Urban Approach for PX LSM Utilize NLCD-based Impervious surface data directly in land-surface model to scale surface heat capacity Use NLCD tree canopy coverage data in ET model Increase surface roughness and albedo for urban LU classes to better represent developed areas New iterative analysis scheme for high resolution modeling for indirect soil moisture and temperature nudging Ensemble FDDA study – estimate the uncertainty in CMAQ output that results from variability of the meteorology fields (Gilliam et al in prep) Updates to PX-LSM and ACM2 PBL models Improve SBL and evening transition

CMAQv5.1 Time table October/November 2014: Initial code freeze November 2014-January 2015: Initial testing, debugging, and evaluation January 2015: freeze β-version of the code β-version of the code will be made available upon request to facilitate the integration of community contributions February-August, 2015: additional testing/evaluation/documentation May/June 2015: Peer review September 2015: CMAQv5.1 release

Extra

Response to emision controls Effect of 25% emission reduction on isoprene SOA SOx reduction has larger impact than NOx reduction Change in epoxide OA in opposite direction of change in semivolatile OA [Pye et al. 2013 ES&T]