I1i1 i2i2 r p r = runoff from upslope areas i 1 = inflow from Upper Carbonate aquifer i 2 = inflow from Decorah area infiltration p = precipitation (direct)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney
Advertisements

Nutrient Retention Model Water Supply Model Precipitation Evapotranspiration Soil Depth and Plant available water Land cover Topography (slope/runoff)
WATER AND DOWLING VILLAGE Chris Covel, Geologist
Dale T Littlejohn Senior Geologist. What is fate and transport in the vadose zone? Vadose Zone Hydrocarbon release from buried pipeline Aquifer Surface.
z = -50 cm, ψ = -100 cm, h = z + ψ = -50cm cm = -150 cm Which direction will water flow? 25 cm define z = 0 at soil surface h = z + ψ = cm.
Watershed Characteristics Approach for Ground Water Recharge Estimation John L. Nieber, Roman Kanivetsky, Bruce Wilson, Heidi Peterson, Francisco Lahoud,
IMPERVIOUS SURFACES Imperviousness values were assigned to each land use based on the literature. An average was calculated from a range of values for.
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Department Hydrology 101 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering.
Calculation of Abstractions Using GIS Gaurav Garg CVEN 689 Dept Of Civil Engg.
Watershed Delineation and Characteristics on Alaska’s North Slope Matt Khosh University of Texas at Austin Department of Marne Science.
Continuous Hydrologic Simulation of Johnson Creek Basin and Assuming Watershed Stationarity Rick Shimota, P.E. Hans Hadley, P.E., P.G. The Oregon Water.
Upper Brushy Creek Flood Study – Flood mapping and management Rainfall depths were derived using USGS SIR , Atlas of Depth Duration Frequency.
Digital Elevation Model based Hydrologic Modeling Topography and Physical runoff generation processes (TOPMODEL) Raster calculation of wetness index Raster.
precipitation amounts are much greater on the western slopes.
EAS 345 Lab #4 SolutionsHEAT AND HYDROLOGY: EVAPORATION AND SNOWMELT 1. Calculate the depth of water,  z that will evaporate in 8 hours if the average.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Lab 3 hydrological application using GIS. Deriving Runoff Characteristics ArcGIS Flow Diagram Load DEM Fill sinks Compute flow direction Compute flow.
Application of Stage IV Precipitation Data to Estimate Spatially Variable Recharge for a Groundwater Flow Model Heather Moser Mentor: Dr. William Simpkins.
SWAT – Land Phase of the Hydrologic Cycle Kristina Schneider Kristi Shaw.
Get to Know Your Groundwater By Jenny Erickson Sauk County UW-Extension.
EEOS 350: Quantitative hydrogeology Lecture 2 Water balance.
Applying Methods for Assessing the Costs and Benefits of CCA 2 nd Regional Training Agenda, 30 September – 4 October 2013 Priyanka Dissanayake- Regional.
Run-Off Characteristics of Streams
Groundwater Recharge and Groundwater Quality Issues Vincent W. Uhl, PH, PG Vincent Uhl Associates, Inc. Lambertville, NJ Slides 1 to 10.
Watershed Management Water Budget, Hydrograph Analysis
Ecology Everything Is Connected To Everything Else.
Ponds and Dams in the Pedernales River Basin John Middleton CE 394K.2 May 2005.
Watershed Assessment and Diagnosis of Condition for August 20, 2007 Joe Magner and Greg Johnson MPCA.
ESValue-SWF Valuing Ecosystem Services on Public Lands in Southwest Florida.
Management Application: Volume of Water in Storage (An Ogallala Example with Applicability to All Aquifers in Texas) Judy A. Reeves, Ph.D. Hydrogeologist,
These notes are provided to help you pay attention IN class. If I notice poor attendance, fewer notes will begin to appear on these pages 1.
September 4, EEOS 350 – Quantitative Hydrogeology n Syllabus  an (optimistic) approximation of what we will cover. n Text: Fundamentals of Ground.
Aquifer Storage Properties CVEG 5243 Ground Water Hydrology T. Soerens.
PG.81 Sources of water. Water on earth All water on earth constitutes the hydrosphere 97% is stored in oceans 2% in glaciers 1% lakes, streams, ground.
Created by: Mildred $100 Ground Water Climate Water Stuff Vocabulary Assorted Killer Questions $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
North Turkey Creek Watershed. Watershed (Drainage Basin) The area of land that is drained by a river and its tributaries. Surrounded by higher terrain.
Water Resources.
Principles of Groundwater Flow
By G.INDUMATHY LITERATURE ON ESTIMATION OF EVAPOTRANSPIRATION BY WATER BALANCE METHOD.
Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601 Module 2 General Hydrology Concepts.
Hydrologic Overview & Quantities It is important to understand the big picture when attempting to forecast. This includes the interactive components and.
6. Drainage basins and runoff mechanisms Drainage basins Drainage basins The vegetation factor The vegetation factor Sources of runoff Sources of runoff.
Water Resources Assessment Main Resources – Surface water – Groundwater – Unconventional Tools – Flood routing/delineation models – Runoff models – GIS.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
Runoff.
What is the water cycle?.
Sustainable Yield Groundwater in Arid and Semi-Arid Lands in Texas
Aquifer Test Analysis Carter Lake, Iowa
Creating a Generalized Hydrologic Water Budget for Cache Valley, UT/ID
FIELD INVESTIGATION OF IN SITU LIME NEUTRALIZATION OF ACIDIC SEDIMENT
Aquifers and Groundwater flow
Water Balance in MIKE-SWMM
Nonpoint Source Pollution
Surface Water Chapter 9.
Assuming equal amounts of precipitation and saturation, which soil could rain infiltrate the most readily? WHY?
Water Cycle It keeps cycling back
INTRODUCTION TO HYDROLOGY
Groundwater & Aquifers
TED-ED: Where did Earth’s water come from?
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Water Cycle It keeps cycling back
Hydrology CIVL341.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
OBJECTIVE HYDROSPHERE
Name __________________________
The Water Cycle Aka Hydrologic Cycle.
Hydrogeology of Ledgeview
Presentation transcript:

i1i1 i2i2 r p r = runoff from upslope areas i 1 = inflow from Upper Carbonate aquifer i 2 = inflow from Decorah area infiltration p = precipitation (direct) Diagram Illustrating Hydraulic Loading Sources to Soils Where the Decorah is the First Encountered Bedrock Soils overlying the Decorah (a 2 ) Upper Carbonate aquifer area (a 1 ) Target soil area (a 3 )

Q a = average annual hydraulic loading to target soil area Q a = r (a 1 + a 2 )+ i 1 (a 1 ) + i 2 (a 2 ) + p (a 3 ) r = 2 in/yr (1.2 gal/ft 2 /yr) i 1 = 7 in/yr (4.3 gal/ft 2 /yr) i 2 = 5 in/yr (3.1 gal/ft 2 /yr) p = 29 in/yr (18 gal/ft 2 /yr) Decorah area contribution = r (a 2 ) + i 2 (a 2 ) Target soil area contribution = p (a 3 ) Average Hydraulic Loading Rates by Source for the Decorah-Edge Landscape Setting in the Rochester Area Upper Carbonate aquifer area contribution = r (a 1 ) + i 1 (a 1 )

Generalized Shapes of Hydraulic Loading Areas in the Decorah Edge Landscape Setting Head SlopesNose SlopesSide Slopes Upper Carbonate aquifer area Decorah bedrock area Target soil area

i1i1 p r i2 r = runoff from upslope areas i 1 - inflow from Upper Carbonate Aquifer i 2 = inflow from Decorah area infiltration p = precipitation (direct) Cross Section Showing Hydraulic Loading Sources to Soils in the Decorah-Edge Hydrogeologic Setting

Calculated Hydraulic Loadings at the Decorah- Platteville Contact by Landscape Setting at PDS #1

23 acres drain to Head Slope Area 1.8 acres drain to Side Slope Area Area of Upper Carbonate Plateau Draining to Recharge Zones at PDS #1

Modeled Average Annual Hydraulic and Nitrogen Loading Rates into Soils Overlying the Decorah at PDS #1

Modeled Water Storage Volumes and Average Residence Times by Landscape Setting at PDS#1 (with runoff)* * Assumes an average of one foot of saturated soil (30% water), a constant recharge/discharge rate, uniform mixing and distribution of water and no evapo- transpiration -- actual storage volumes may be larger and residence times longer.

Estimated Recharge Rates at the Decorah Edge (gals/yr/lin.ft) USGS Modeled Rate: 18,765 GIS Modeled Rate for South Zumbro Watershed: 9,600 GIS Modeled Rate by Landscape Setting at PDS#1: –Head slope: 1,289,618 –Side slope: 1,340 –Nose slope: 1,000 –Average of all slopes: 4,562

Assumes: 11 mg/L NO 3 -N in Upper Carbonate aquifer inflow, 9 lbs N/ac/yr from precipitation, & 10 lbs N/ac losses in runoff from upgradient areas. 9 lbs N/ac/yr 28 lbs N/ac/yr 84 lbs N/ac/yr Modeled Nitrogen Loading Rates by Landscape Setting at the PDS #1

Modeled Average Annual Hydraulic and Nitrogen Loading Rates into Soils Overlying the Decorah at PDS #1