Mercury - overview of global emissions, transport and effects John Munthe IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling Atmospheric Mercury Deposition to the Sounds and Other Water Bodies O. Russell Bullock, Jr. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (On assignment to the.
Advertisements

Out-of-state and Natural Contributions to Baseline Atmospheric Mercury Deposition in Alaska Krish Vijayaraghavan, Jaegun Jung and Ralph Morris ENVIRON.
1 Source-attribution for atmospheric mercury deposition: Where does the mercury in mercury deposition come from? Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory.
Shannon Capps April 22, Mercury cycling From
The UNEP Global Mercury Programme and Fate and Transport Research
Slide 1 Transport and chemical processing of mercury during long-range transport in the Pacific by Dan Jaffe University of Washington Acknowledgements:
Mercury Chemistry in the Global Atmosphere: Constraints from Mercury Speciation Measurements Noelle Eckley Selin EPS Grad Student Seminar Series 14 February.
Building a Global Modeling Capability for Mercury with GEOS-CHEM Noelle Eckley Selin, Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob Constraining the global budget of.
Building a Global Modeling Capability for Mercury with GEOS-CHEM Noelle Eckley Selin GEOS-CHEM meeting 6 April 2005.
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
Sarah Strode, Lyatt Jaeglé, Dan Jaffe, Peter Weiss-Penzias, Phil Swartzendruber University of Washington Noelle Eckley Selin, Chris Holmes, Daniel Jacob.
Acid rain and mercury. NATURAL pH OF RAIN Equilibrium with natural CO 2 (280 ppmv) results in a rain pH of 5.7: This pH can be modified by natural acids.
Eric Prestbo Ph.D. Analysis of Atmospheric Mercury Speciation at HEDO Station, Okinawa.
Global Transport of Mercury (Hg) Compounds Noelle Eckley EPS Second Year Symposium September 2003 Photo: AMAP & Geological Museum, Copenhagen.
Building a Global Modeling Capability for Mercury with GEOS-CHEM Noelle Eckley Selin, Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob Constraining the global budget of.
Mercury Source Attribution at Global, Regional and Local Scales Christian Seigneur, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Kristen Lohman, and Prakash Karamchandani AER.
MERCURY IN THE ATMOSPHERE, BIOSPHERE, AND POLICY SPHERE: MERCURY IN THE ATMOSPHERE, BIOSPHERE, AND POLICY SPHERE: Constraints from a global 3D land-ocean-atmosphere.
Mercury in the Great Lakes Region Sponsored by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation’s Environment, Economy and Trade and Pollutants and Health.
Atmospheric Mercury Simulation with CMAQ Version Russ Bullock - NOAA Air Resources Laboratory* Kathy Brehme - Computer Sciences Corp. 5 th Annual.
Wet Deposition of Mercury In The U.S. Results from the NADP Mercury Deposition Network, David Gay Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL,
D. Gay, Schmeltz, Sharac, Nat. Tribal Conf. for Env. Management, Billings, MT, June 26, 2008, Slide 1 Current Mercury Monitoring Approaches in Tribal Country.
Challenges in Global Mercury Modeling Ashu Dastoor Meteorological Service of Canada Environment Canada Acknowledgements: Didier Davignon and Arturo Quintanar.
Mercury Deposition Network – Mercury Analytical Laboratory Bob Brunette and David Gay National Atmospheric Deposition Program Mercury Deposition Network.
An overview of mercury speciation measurements and analysis at high latitudes Chris Moore 1, Daniel Obrist 1, Steve Brooks 2, William R. Simpson 3, Peter.
NEW PERSPECTIVES ON ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY Daniel J. Jacob with Noelle E. Selin and Christopher D. Holmes Supported by NSF, EPA and Sarah Strode and Lyatt.
Organization of Course INTRODUCTION 1.Course overview 2.Air Toxics overview 3.HYSPLIT overview HYSPLIT Theory and Practice 4.Meteorology 5.Back Trajectories.
Trans-Pacific Chemical Transport of Mercury: Sensitivity Analysis on Asian Emission Contribution to Mercury Deposition in North America Using CMAQ-Hg C.-J.
Mercury in the West* Land and Water Fund of the Rockies and Rocky Mountain Office of Environmental Defense January 2003 *The information in this presentation.
Observational Evidence: Ozone and Particulate Matter EMEP SB, 13 September summary Chapter 2 Kathy Law LATMOS-CNRS,
Organization of Course INTRODUCTION 1.Course overview 2.Air Toxics overview 3.HYSPLIT overview HYSPLIT Theory and Practice 4.Meteorology 5.Back Trajectories.
O. Russell Bullock, Jr. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division (in partnership with the U.S. Environmental.
Importance of Lightning NO for Regional Air Quality Modeling Thomas E. Pierce/NOAA Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Global Modeling of Mercury in the Atmosphere using the GEOS-CHEM model Noelle Eckley, Rokjin Park, Daniel Jacob 30 January 2004.
Modeling the Atmospheric Deposition of Mercury to Lake Champlain (from Anthropogenic Sources in the U.S. and Canada) Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources.
12 th ICMGP, Jeju, Korea, 2015 Multi-model assessment of mercury cycling in the atmosphere Oleg Travnikov, Johannes Bieser, Ashu Dastoor, Carey Friedman,
Intercontinental and Hemispheric Scale Transport and the LRTAP Convention Terry J. Keating, Ph.D. Office of Air and Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection.
Building a Global Modeling Capability for Mercury with GEOS-CHEM Noelle Eckley Selin EPS Day 12 March 2005.
Application of the CMAQ Particle and Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) to Support Water Quality Planning for the Virginia Mercury Study 6 th Annual.
1 Modeling the Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of Mercury Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland Mercury Workshop, Great.
Progress of HM & POP modelling from global to country scale Ilya Ilyin, Oleg Travnikov, Victor Shatalov, Alexey Gusev Meteorological Synthesizing Centre.
Evaluation of pollution levels of lead and PCB-153 over Central Asian (CA) countries within CAPACT project (preliminary results) Ilia Ilyin, EMEP/MSC-E.
D. Gay, Schmeltz, Sharac, Nat. Tribal Conf. for Env. Management, Billings, MT, June 26, 2008, Slide 1 Current Mercury Monitoring Approaches in Tribal Country.
Joint EMEP/WGE meeting, Geneva, 2015 Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP Oleg Travnikov on behalf of MSC-E and CCC.
Estimating background ozone in surface air over the United States with global 3-D models of tropospheric chemistry Description, Evaluation, and Results.
SOURCE ATTRIBUTION OF MERCURY EXPOSURE FOR U.S. SEAFOOD CONSUMERS: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY Noelle Eckley Selin Joint Program on the Science and Policy.
TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling Oleg Travnikov, Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor.
Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland
The Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of Mercury to the Great Lakes Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland Collection.
Organization of Course INTRODUCTION 1.Course overview 2.Air Toxics overview 3.HYSPLIT overview HYSPLIT Theory and Practice 4.Meteorology 5.Back Trajectories.
MERCURY IN THE ENVIRONMENT
Hemispheric transport – Why is EMEP interested? Peringe Grennfelt, Jurgen Schneider.
Source-apportionment for atmospheric mercury deposition: Where does the mercury in mercury deposition come from? Mark Cohen, Roland Draxler, and Richard.
EMEP/WGE Bureaux, March 2015 MSC-E work plan, 2015 TaskItem Calculations of HMs/POPs for b Testing of HM/POP models in the new EMEP grid1.3.4.
THE ATMOSPHERIC CYCLE OF MERCURY AND THE ROLE OF COAL-BASED EMISSIONS Noelle Eckley Selin Harvard University Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences.
UNEP Global Partnership on Mercury Air Transport and Fate Research - Canadian Contribution - Grace Howland Environment Canada, Chemicals Management Division.
TF HTAP Workshop, Potsdam, 2016 GMOS: Multi-model assessment of mercury pollution and processes Environment Canada Oleg Travnikov, Johannes Bieser, Ashu.
Trends in atmospheric mercury and implications for past and future mercury accumulation in surface reservoirs Daniel J. Jacob with Anne Sørensen, Hannah.
CONSTRAINTS FROM RGM MEASUREMENTS ON GLOBAL MERCURY CHEMISTRY Noelle Eckley Selin 1 Daniel J. Jacob 1, Rokjin J. Park 1, Robert M. Yantosca 1, Sarah Strode,
Japan’s recent activities on mercury
GLOBAL CYCLING OF MERCURY
Building a Global Modeling Capability for Mercury with GEOS-CHEM
Biogeochemical Cycle of Mercury (Hg)
Model assessment of heavy metal pollution from global to local scales
Heavy metal pollution assessment within EMEP
POPs and HMs Summary , EMEP TFMM.
John Munthe and Ingvar Wängberg
From hemispheric to local scale air pollution: Mercury
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)
From hemispheric to local scale air pollution: Mercury
Assessment of heavy metal pollution within EMEP
Presentation transcript:

Mercury - overview of global emissions, transport and effects John Munthe IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

1 Presentation topics  Introduction  Emissions  Main transport pathways - modelling  Contribution of global cycling on deposition in Europe and the USA  Monitoring  The Arctic  Research with hemispherical and/or global focus  Main uncertainties in quantifying the global mercury cycle

2 Mercury basics  Natural component of earth´s crust in the form of Cinnabar (HgS)  Global burden increased from natural background by about a factor 3 (air, soils, sediments, fish)  Sources include both intentional use and fuel contamination  UNEP Global Assessment Report and UNEP Governing Council have stated " Mercury is a pollutant of global concern"  Main human impact is via consumption of fish contaminated with methylmercury

3 Atmospheric mercury speciation  Main form in air is elemental mercury vapour (Hg 0 )  Is relatively stable towards oxidation and has an atmospheric lifetime of around 1 year  Deposition (dry and wet) is controlled by presence of oxidised gaseous mercury (e.g. HgCl 2 ) and particulate mercury forms.  Oxidised mercury is emitted from some point sources and is also formed in the atmosphere via oxidation (OH, halogens, O 3 )  Operationally defined mercury species: - RGM = Reactive Gaseous Mercury = Oxidised gaseous mercury, Hg(II) - TPM = Total Particulate Mercury, HgP - GEM = Gaseous Elemental Mercury - TGM = Total Gaseous Mercury = GEM + RGM

4 Methylmercury  The most toxic form of mercury in the environment  Present in air, water, soils, sediments as a small fraction of the total mercury (0.1 to 5 %)  Bioaccumulates and biomagnifies in aquatic food chains  Methylmercury % of total mercury in fish  Biotic formation e.g. via methylation of mercury by sulphate reducing bacteria

5 Air 26 Mmole +17 Hg p 98% Hgº Hgº 2% Hg p Hgº CH 3 Hg + Hg 2+ Hg p Wet & Dry Deposition Natural Emissions Anthropogenic Emissions Particle Removal 100m Mixed Layer Mmole G.R.I.M.M. Oceanic Evasion 3.5 Air 8.6 Mmole Hg p 98% Hgº Hgº 2% Hg p Deposition Hg 2+ Hgº CH 3 Hg + Hg 2+ Hg p Wet & Dry Deposition Natural Emissions Particle Removal 100m Mixed Layer 28.5 Mmole All Fluxes in Mmole/y Oceanic Evasion CurrentPre-Industrial Burial 1.7 Upwelling 2.7 Burial 1.5 Upwelling 3.1 Deposition Hg 2+ Thermocline Mmole 1000m Thermocline 902 Mmole Figure Style Adapted from Mason et al., 1994 Deep Ocean Seds. +9 Terr. Seds (58%) LAMBORG et al., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 66, 1105–1118, 2002

6

7 Geographical distribution Slide courtesy of Jozef Pacyna, NILU

8 Emission categories Slide courtesy of Jozef Pacyna, NILU

9 Speciation of emitted mercury Hg 0 RGM HgP Slide courtesy of Jozef Pacyna, NILU

10 Point source emissions - speciation  Combustion processes emit Hg 0, oxidised mercury (RGM) and small fractions of HgP  RGM and HgP will deposit on local to regional scales whereas Hg 0 will add to the global background  Measurement methods for speciation exist but are not frequently applied - inventories rely on estimates  Uncertainties in available data on speciation are large

11 Natural sources and re-emissions  Natural sources believed to be of same order of magnitude as anthropogenic  Main source areas associated with cinnober deposits and other Hg-containing minerals, volcanos  Re-emissions occur from water bodies as well as soils and vegetation  For water surfaces, re-emissions may be of same magnitude as deposition  Uncertainties very large for both natural emissions and re-emissions

12 Atmospheric chemistry of mercury - schematic description Slide courtesy of Christian Seigneur, AER

13 Global transport modelling GRAHM (Global/Regional Atmospheric Heavy Metals Model) simulation – Ashu Dastoor, Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment Canada Average elemental mercury surface concentrations for Jan 2001 (ng/m 3 )

14 Global transport modelling Average elemental mercury surface concentrations for July 2001 (ng/m3) GRAHM (Global/Regional Atmospheric Heavy Metals Model) simulation – Ashu Dastoor, Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment Canada

15 Contribution of sources other than U.S. anthropogenic sources to Hg deposition AER/EPRI Modeling System for Atmospheric Mercury Christian Seigneur

16 Experimental modelling results courtesy of Russell Bullock, US EPA

17 MSC-East Hemispherical model. Spatial distribution of mean annual concentration of elemental mercury in the surface air of the Northern Hemisphere Travnikov and Ryaboshapko, MSC-E Technical Report 6/2002

18 Annual deposition field of mercury from European anthropogenic sources. The red rectangle depicts the EMEP domain Travnikov and Ryaboshapko, MSC-E Technical Report 6/2002

19 Spatial distribution of annual mercury deposition to the EMEP domain From European anthropogenic sources From external anthropogenic and global natural sources Travnikov and Ryaboshapko, MSC-E Technical Report 6/2002

20 Relative contributions of different regions to the entire mercury deposition to Europe. Travnikov and Ryaboshapko, MSC-E Technical Report 6/2002

21 Contribution of Natural, global and re-emission sources to wet deposition of Hg, 2001 Data from: hms/results_relation.html

22 Monitoring  Atmospheric mercury is not included in existing global or hemispheric monitoring networks  Mercury monitored at < 10 EMEP stations located in Northern Europe  More extensive networks exist in USA and Canada  Methods have existed for >2 decades, modern automated methods > 5 years

23 Total Gaseous Mercury at Swedish West Coast 1979 to 2002 Large influence from European emissions and regional transport Mainly global background

24 TGM from Mace Head 1991 to 1997 Slide courtesy of Dr Ralf Ebinghaus, GKSS Research Centre

25 Hg in blood of mothers and women of reproductive age Biomagnification and human exposure Slide courtesy of the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme - AMAP

26 Mercury Depletion Events - example from Ny Aalesund Slide courtesy of Torunn Berg, NILU

27 Mercury Depletion Events - mechanisms Slide courtesy of the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme - AMAP

28 Mercury Depletion Events  Large research efforts have been made on mechanisms and occurrence including re-emission from snow pack  Model calculations to estimate net input to Arctic ecosystems - twice expected amount without depletion events  Source of mercury is "Global background"

29 Mauna Loa, Hawaii Monitoring Site Slide courtesy of Dr Matthew Landis, US EPA

30 Mauna Loa Hg Time Series 2001 “Downslope” Slide courtesy of Dr Matthew Landis, US EPA

31 Spring 2004 Experiment: Simultaneous Hg Observations at Mt.Bachelor and Okinawa Okinawa MBO Slide courtesy of Eric Prestbo Ph.D. and Professor Dan Jaffe

32 Slide courtesy of Eric Prestbo Ph.D. and Professor Dan Jaffe From: Jaffe D.A, E. Prestbo, P. Swartzendruber, P. Weiss-Penzias, S.Kato, A.Takami, S.Hatakeyama and Y.Kajii. Export of Atmospheric Mercury from Asia. Atmospheric Environment 39, , Hg 0 vs CO at Okinawa

33 Pollutant transport to US west coast from Asia April 25, 2004 Slide courtesy of Eric Prestbo Ph.D. and Professor Dan Jaffe

34 Current knowledge  Global emission inventory for mercury species  Modelling tools to calculate atmospheric transport and deposition on hemispherical and global scales  Basic understanding of some main chemical processes of atmospheric mercury  Observational evidence of global background mercury levels and influence of regional emissions  Observational evidence of Mercury Depletion Events in the Arctic (and Antarctic)  Observations of transport from Asia to North America

35 Main uncertainties in quantifying the global mercury cycle  Emission inventories for anthropogenic sources: Needs continuous updating and better information on speciation  Natural emissions: High level of uncertainty. Mainly in the form of Hg 0 which mainly influences global background.  Re-emissions: Very high level of uncertainty. Data available only from a few specific sites. Need estimates of e.g. oceanic emissions.  Atmospheric chemistry: Basic facts are known but there are indications of major gaps in e.g. rapid processes in free troposphere

36 Main uncertainties in quantifying the global mercury cycle  Atmospheric models need continuous updating and testing.  Models need to take into account both a) direct transport - trajectories from source to receptor over shorter time period e.g. from Asia to NA b) additions to/contributions from "global background" which will influence deposition at remote sites and for long time periods  Many current regional models have tendency (or are forced to due to lack of data) to lump or completely ignore natural emissions and re-emissions. This may be acceptable for regional applications but for hemispherical/global applications over longer time periods, better descriptions are needed.