11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved1 Post-Processing Geostatistical Realisations - the Spillpoint

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Seismic Method Lecture 5 SLIDE 1

Advertisements

Spatial point patterns and Geostatistics an introduction

Uncertainty in reservoirs

4 June 2014© Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All rights reserved1 Reservoir Connectivity and Fluid Uncertainty Analysis using Fast Geostatistical.

Copyright, © Qiming Zhou GEOG3600. Geographical Information Systems The Nature of Geographical Data.

Basic geostatistics Austin Troy.

GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.

Spatial Interpolation

Mixed Model Analysis of Highly Correlated Data: Tales from the Dark Side of Forestry Christina Staudhammer, PhD candidate Valerie LeMay, PhD Thomas Maness,

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Geographic Information Science Geography 625 Intermediate Geographic Information Science Instructor: Changshan Wu Department.

WFM 6202: Remote Sensing and GIS in Water Management © Dr. Akm Saiful IslamDr. Akm Saiful Islam WFM 6202: Remote Sensing and GIS in Water Management Akm.

Spatial Interpolation

Edge Detection Phil Mlsna, Ph.D. Dept. of Electrical Engineering

Applied Geostatistics

Ordinary Kriging Process in ArcGIS

Geostatistics Mike Goodchild. Spatial interpolation n A field –variable is interval/ratio –z = f(x,y) –sampled at a set of points n How to estimate/guess.

Spatial statistics 2 Stat 518 Sp 08. Ordinary kriging where and kriging variance.

1/2555 สมศักดิ์ ศิวดำรงพงศ์

SEISMIC RESOLUTION. NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER 1  2 = DENSITY.

Spatial Interpolation of monthly precipitation by Kriging method

1 Theoretical Physics Experimental Physics Equipment, Observation Gambling: Cards, Dice Fast PCs Random- number generators Monte- Carlo methods Experimental.

Uncertainty Maps for Seismic Images through Geostatistical Model Randomization Lewis Li, Paul Sava, & Jef Caers 27 th SCRF Affiliates’ Meeting May 8-9.

Explorations in Geostatistical Simulation Deven Barnett Spring 2010.

Geographic Information Science

Geo479/579: Geostatistics Ch16. Modeling the Sample Variogram.

Spatial Statistics in Ecology: Continuous Data Lecture Three.

GEOSTATISICAL ANALYSIS Course: Special Topics in Remote Sensing & GIS Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact: EXT:2257.

Cell a separation distance (km) distance(m)  (h) range of.

Attachments Overview Converting pre-Petrel seismic projects

Seismic – Domain Conversion Objectives

Geo479/579: Geostatistics Ch4. Spatial Description.

Concepts and Applications of Kriging

Seismic Imaging in GLOBE Claritas

Petrel Workflow Tools 5 Day Introduction Course

Uncertainty in contour lines Peter Guttorp University of Washington Norwegian Computing Center.

Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Concepts and Applications of Kriging Eric Krause Konstantin Krivoruchko.

Uncertainty in AVO: How can we measure it? Dan Hampson, Brian Russell

Lecture 6: Point Interpolation

Overview of Stark Reality Plugins for OpendTect Coming soon to a workstation near you.

Short course on space-time modeling Instructors: Peter Guttorp Johan Lindström Paul Sampson.

Interpolation and evaluation of probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) patterns using different methods by: tarun gill.

Esri UC2013. Technical Workshop. Technical Workshop 2013 Esri International User Conference July 8–12, 2013 | San Diego, California Concepts and Applications.

Uncertainty in aerosol retrievals: interaction with the community Adam Povey 1, Thomas Holzer-Popp 2, Gareth Thomas 3, Don Grainger 1, Gerrit de Leeuw.

Tracking with dynamics

Stochastic Hydrology Random Field Simulation Professor Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University.

Geostatistics GLY 560: GIS for Earth Scientists. 2/22/2016UB Geology GLY560: GIS Introduction Premise: One cannot obtain error-free estimates of unknowns.

Geo479/579: Geostatistics Ch12. Ordinary Kriging (2)

Dario Grana and Tapan Mukerji Sequential approach to Bayesian linear inverse problems in reservoir modeling using Gaussian mixture models SCRF Annual Meeting,

Hybrid Bayesian Linearized Acoustic Inversion Methodology PhD in Petroleum Engineering Fernando Bordignon Introduction Seismic inversion.

INTERPOLATION Procedure to predict values of attributes at unsampled points within the region sampled Why?Examples: -Can not measure all locations: - temperature.

Interpolation Local Interpolation Methods –IDW – Inverse Distance Weighting –Natural Neighbor –Spline – Radial Basis Functions –Kriging – Geostatistical.

Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016

Exposure Prediction and Measurement Error in Air Pollution and Health Studies Lianne Sheppard Adam A. Szpiro, Sun-Young Kim University of Washington CMAS.

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 1 Impact of Time Lapse Processing on 4D Simultaneous Inversion The Marlim Field Case Study C. Reiser * 1, E.

Lecture 19: Spatial Interpolation II

Establishing Patterns Correlation from Time Lapse Seismic

Paul D. Sampson Peter Guttorp

Stochastic Hydrology Random Field Simulation

The Relationship between Uncertainty and Quality in Seismic Data

Interpolation & Contour Maps

Initial asymptotic acoustic RTM imaging results for a salt model

Summary: Lateral Resolution

Concepts and Applications of Kriging

SPE DISTINGUISHED LECTURER SERIES

Comparison of Seismic and Well Data

Typical Vertical Resolution

Depth Imaging unfolds complex geology and impacts Reserves

SCRF High-order stochastic simulations and some effects on flow through heterogeneous media Roussos Dimitrakopoulos COSMO – Stochastic Mine Planning.

Concepts and Applications of Kriging

Geostatistical Simulations – Preparing for Worst-Case Scenarios

Presentation transcript:

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved1 Post-Processing Geostatistical Realisations - the Spillpoint Presented at SEG Development & Production Forum, th July 1999, Kananaskis, Calgary, Canada

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved2 Prospect Generation Interpret 2D seismic - horizon and faults Map TWT Map Stacking Velocity Depth Convert Find lowest closing contour Report volumes Propose well location

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved3 Variograms

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved4 Observed Variograms Time Velocity Depth X=

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved5 Observed Variograms Prospect Analysis Spillpoint :1844 m Volume :882.2 x 10 6 m 3 Area :34.7 x 10 6 m 2 Thickness:25.4 m Prognosis :1775 m Connection:100%?

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved6 Observed Variograms Conditional Simulation/Spillpoint

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved7 Observed Variograms Isoprobability Map/GRV Curve Spillpoint :1834 m Volume :717.3 x 10 6 m 3 Area :23.1 x 10 6 m 2 Thickness:30.4 m Prognosis :1776 m Connection:79%

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved8 Observed Variograms Isoprobability Map/GRV Curve (all) Spillpoint :1834 m Volume :791.5 x 10 6 m 3 Area :25.8 x 10 6 m 2 Thickness:30.1 m Prognosis :1776 m Connection:79%

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved9 Variogram Problems Horizon time data - Gaussian model variogram? – Parabolic variogram behaviour at origin – Horizon times continuous surfaces? – Fresnel zone spatial averaging - “support effect” Stacking velocity data is noisy – Large nugget component on variogram – Expect Stacking Velocities to be noisy – Nugget inferred to be random error – Filter nugget during kriging or simulation

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved10 DEM DATA for SE England (Data courtesy Nigel Press Associates. EuroDEM ©NPA 1997)

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved11 DEM Variogram

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved12 DEM Variogram (Detail)

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved13 DEM Smoothing Correction

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved14 DEM Smoothing Correction (detail)

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved15 Fresnel Zone Support Effect

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved16 “Support” Effect Support is a sample volume concept Variance decreases with increasing sample volume “Regularisation” - no overlap between samples Fresnel zone/Vertical resolution is spatial mixing Not strictly “support”.

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved17 Time Variogram Corrected Time Velocity Depth X=

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved18 Time Variogram Corrected Prospect Analysis Spillpoint :1844 m Volume :886.6 x 10 6 m 3 Area :34.7 x 10 6 m 2 Thickness:25.5 m Prognosis :1775 m Connection:100%?

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved19 Time Variogram Corrected Conditional Simulation/Spillpoint

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved20 Time Variogram Corrected Isoprobability Map/GRV Curve Spillpoint :1834 m Volume :654.8 x 10 6 m 3 Area :20.6 x 10 6 m 2 Thickness:31.4 m Prognosis :1774 m Connection:68%

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved21 Time Variogram Corrected Isoprobability Map/GRV Curve (All) Spillpoint :1834 m Volume :802.0 x 10 6 m 3 Area :25.5 x 10 6 m 2 Thickness:30.8 m Prognosis :1774 m Connection:68%

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved22 Time/velocity Variograms Corrected Time Velocity Depth X=

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved23 Time/velocity Variograms Corrected Prospect Analysis Spillpoint :1843 m Volume :849.5 x 10 6 m 3 Area :33.8 x 10 6 m 2 Thickness:25.1 m Prognosis :1772 m Connection:100%?

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved24 Time/velocity Variograms Corrected Conditional Simulation/Spillpoint

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved25 Time/velocity Variograms Corrected Isoprobability Map/GRV Curve Spillpoint :1839 m Volume :807.8 x 10 6 m 3 Area :28.9 x 10 6 m 2 Thickness:27.5 m Prognosis :1774 m Connection:92%

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved26 Time/velocity Variograms Corrected Isoprobability Map/GRV Curve (All) Spillpoint :1939 m Volume :844.2 x 10 6 m 3 Area :30.3 x 10 6 m 2 Thickness:27.5 m Prognosis :1774 m Connection:92%

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved27 Volume Summary

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved28 Recovering the Variogram Smoothing will be a function of: – Frequency/Bandwidth – Migration (Collapse of Fresnel zone) Smoothing effect is “locked in” to data set. Correction is not a nugget - additional variance is spatially correlated Effect of smoothing is quite small in this example Effect of spillpoint criteria is more significant

11-16 July, 1999© 2001 Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All Rights Reserved29 How can we condition to a known hydrocarbon contact? Discard realisations with “wrong” spillpoint? – Discard all realisations? (Precision) Discard realisations with too deep spillpoint? Discard realisations with too shallow spillpoint? Condition to a spillpoint level? How do we know the control on spillpoint?