August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary1 Global Group 5 Summary Tetsuo Shidara Co-conveners: Bob Kephart, Wilhelm Bialowons.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 15 Closing the Bid. Objectives Upon completion of this chapter, you will be able to: –Describe the estimate summary process –Describe items that.
Advertisements

Software Quality Assurance Plan
CSCU 411 Software Engineering Chapter 2 Introduction to Software Engineering Management.
Discussion on EUROTeV and ILC Nick Walker (DESY) EUROTeV Kick-off Meeting DESY 1 November 2004.
T /5115 Software Development Project I/II Project Planning Jari Vanhanen Ohjelmistoliiketoiminnan ja –tuotannon laboratorio Software Business and.
Projmgmt-1/33 DePaul University Project Management I - Risk Management Instructor: David A. Lash.
GDE Meeting B Barish 16-Aug-05 The GDE – who, what and how? The BCD – what is it? Internal Organization toward BCD What do we want out of Snowmass? How.
Health Informatics Series
Iterative development and The Unified process
Development and Quality Plans
Sharif University of Technology Session # 4.  Contents  Systems Analysis and Design Sharif University of Technology MIS (Management Information System),
IT Job Roles Task 20. Software Engineer Job Description Software engineers are responsible for creating and maintaining software of various different.
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
IT Project Management Cheng Li, Ph.D. August 2003.
Report from ILC GlobalGroup 5: Cost and Engineering (Updates since Snowmass) Wilhelm Bialowons, Peter Garbincius and Tetsuo Shidara · GDE December 8, 2005.
Project Risk Management. The Importance of Project Risk Management Project risk management is the art and science of identifying, analyzing, and responding.
10 Aug 2010 ECE/BENG-492 SENIOR ADVANCED DESIGN PROJECT Meeting #2.
Global Design Effort 1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Overview A. Enomoto, J-L. Baldy, V. Kuchler GDE.
1 Albrecht Wagner, Snowmass 0805 Albrecht Wagner DESY and Hamburg University Challenges for Realising the ILC.
Global Design Effort U.S. ILC Cost Translation R. Stanek, et al. Vic Kuchler 1/26/07.
Report from GG5, Dec. 20, 2005 Report from ILC GG 5: Cost and Engineering (Updates since Snowmass) Wilhelm Bialowons, Peter Garbincius and Tetsuo Shidara.
Peter H. Garbincius November 20, 2008 Cost Management LCWS08 - UIC 1 ILC Cost Management J. Carwardine, T. Himel, F. Lehner,T. Shidara, L. Hagge, P. Garbincius,
TBM Costing Lessons from Recent ITER Activities Scott Willms Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented at INL August 10, 2005.
Yazd University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Course Title: Advanced Software Engineering By: Mohammad Ali Zare Chahooki The Project.
Global Group 4 – Conventional Facilities and Siting V. Kuchler1 of 17 Fermilab R&D Meeting Fermilab R&D Meeting Vic Kuchler Conventional Facilities.
LCFOA Meeting at SLAC Linear Collider Forum of the Americas 1 LINEAR COLLIDER FORUM OF THE AMERICAS CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES OVERVIEW Victor R. Kuchler.
International Linear Collider The ILC is the worldwide consensus for the next major new facility. One year ago, the choice was made between the two alternate.
Copyright © 1994 Carnegie Mellon University Disciplined Software Engineering - Lecture 3 1 Software Size Estimation I Material adapted from: Disciplined.
Cryomodule Design and R&D during the EDR phase Robert Kephart With input from the T4 CM Collaboration.
Applied Software Project Management
M. Ross, N. Walker, A. Yamamoto ILC Cost Review, (updated for TB) and Cost Drivers  Future R & D ILC Cost Review (M. Ross,
~ pertemuan 9 ~ Oleh: Ir. Abdul Hayat, MTI April 2009 [Abdul Hayat, Project Cost Management-1, Semester Genap 2008/2009] 1 PROJECT COST MANAGEMENT (1)
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
Status Update Outline  General remarks - reminder  Progress since last Annual Meeting – June 2010  Next steps - timeline EUROnu Costing Ilias Efthymiopoulos.
EDMS for CFS Discussion: How to best use EDMS for CFS in ILC preparation? Lars Hagge, Benno List Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY LCWS13, Tokyo,
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Hall 180 Cryogenic test facility: Project management: Project Change Request, EVM and Interface Sheet L. Serio.
D.Proch, DESY; GDE meeting Vancouver 06 Technical systems: Cavity Report Overview on costing activities for ILC –European costing method Overview industrial.
Report from ILCSC Shin-ichi Kurokawa KEK ILCSC Chair GDE meeting at Frascati December 7, 2005.
1 ILC Internal Cost Review Major Points from External Reviewers T. Elioff, J. Marx, V. Soergel, M. Yoshioka, and A. Yamamoto, (C. Wyss, absent) To be presented.
Software Prototyping Rapid software development to validate requirements.
Status Report on ILC Project in Japan Seiichi SHIMASAKI Director, Office for Particle and Nuclear Research Promotion June 19, 2015.
Project Risk Management Planning Stage
Harry Carter – LCFOA Meeting 5/1/06 1 LCFOA Technical Briefings: Cryomodules H. Carter Fermilab Technical Division.
Nick Walker – SA meeting KEK Treaty Points and Costing Guidance Nick Walker 1 st System Area Managers Meeting KEK –
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
Project & Risk Management
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
1 Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Controls & LLRF Working Group: Tuesday Session (29 May 07) John Carwardine Kay Rehlich.
InterActions Peer Review Improving science communication Christian Mrotzek Joint EPPCN and InterActions Meeting at CERN Geneva, 6 November 2014.
Yazd University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Course Title: Advanced Software Engineering By: Mohammad Ali Zare Chahooki The Project.
Introduction and Charge Barry Barish GDE Meeting Frascati 7-Dec-05.
Global Design Effort - CFS DESY Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ACCELERATOR INTEGRATION AND DESIGN MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
Evaluating EVM January 13, EVM Issues and Opportunities ▪ EVM Basics ▪ EVM Issues ▪ EVM ETC and EAC Calculations ▪ EVM Cost and Schedule Value Calculations.
Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 1 The S0S1 Taskforce: an Example of the Complexity for the ILC R&D Environment Lutz Lilje DESY.
Tor Raubenheimer KEK Mtg Goals KEK January 19 th, 2006.
Global Design Effort Main Linac Technology System Kick-off Meeting Cavity Summary 20 Sept 2007 DESY Marc Ross.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
PM Report AS ILC PAC (19-20 May) Agenda: –Akira, Rongli, Hitoshi H, Marc, Nick, Toshiaki, Mark P., Peter G. –Nick will report on Design –Marc.
The Marketing Plan Chapter 2. Section 2.1: Marketing Planning  Good marketing requires good planning Research your company Study your business environment.
ILC EDMS Selection Committee Progress Report Tom Markiewicz SLAC 29 November 2005.
CFS / Global – 09 June, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –4 two-day workshops form the core of ‘TOP LEVEL CHANGE CONTROL’ –  as advised by AAP, PAC and etc –Written.
IDR Costing Exercise My presentation today  Some general remarks  What needs to be done for the IDR costing?  What we can realistically expect for the.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 1 European Regional R&D plan Brian Foster (Oxford & GDE) MAC Meeting.
Tests on production cryomodules Bob Kephart Sept 30, 2006.
ACD Down-Select Criteria and Time Scales for HLRF ML-KOM FNAL September 27 、 2007 S. Fukuda, KEK & Ray Larsen, SLAC For the ILC HLRF Collaboration.
Evolving an ILC focused SCRF Facility from the XFEL Infrastructure
Presentation transcript:

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary1 Global Group 5 Summary Tetsuo Shidara Co-conveners: Bob Kephart, Wilhelm Bialowons

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary2 Outline Charge to GG5 and organization of sessions Engineering Standards session Cost/Schedule Methodology session Industrial Issues session Summary I didn’t attend the 2 nd week sessions; ask the details of these sessions to Toge-san or Enomoto-san

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary3 Charge to GG5: Cost & Engineering Develop engineering and costing standards Develop cost model for BCD selection Develop process to arrive at cost and schedule for RDR Organized 3 sessions around the following topics: –Establishing ILC Project Standards (Tuesday) –Cost & Schedule Methodology ( Wednesday) –Industrial Issues (Thursday) Speakers were asked to address a series of question for each session

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary4 Establishing ILC Standards Presentations –US Project Standards Harry Carter (FNAL) –European Project Standards Lars Hagge (DESY) –Asian Project Standards Hitoshi Hayano (KEK) –LHC experience Jean Pierre Delahaye (CERN) Speakers from each region should address: – Engineering standards – Safety codes, reviews, and standards – CAE software (mechanical, RF, accelerator modeling, etc) – CAD software packages & drawing exchange – Software license issues – Project information exchange (EDMS, etc) – Change control in a multi-regional project

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary5 Establishing ILC Standards Project Standards very important –Have a strong influence on how we work and communicate  Need standard ILC Terminology –A lot of people are/will work on ILC we must speak the same “language” (I don’t mean.. English, German, Japanese, etc… but rather “ILC”ese ) –GDE & the WG’s should create a “dictionary” of ILC Terms posted on the web that define crisply what is meant by RDR, BCD, ACD, TDR, change control, example civil site, core cost estimate, “operating” cavity gradient…. etc, etc… Explain what it is. Explain what it is NOT. Engineering standards are important –There are significant issues that must be resolved –These issues are largely orthogonal from the issues of cost and schedule methodology standards, cost modeling, etc. and probably don’t have a big impact on the costs –Create a more specialized group whose focus is Engineering Standards

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary6 Establishing ILC Standards It is important that the ILC make choices early –We won’t know the ILC site for some time  Must establish internal “ILC Project Standards” because we don’t know which “regional” standards to adopt. –Standards are captured as “codes” in use in the various regions –Make a matrix of codes vs region Pressure vessel codes, electrical codes, life safety & fire codes, radiation protection, units, drawing standards, etc Adopt “Internal Project Standards” with these in mind –Consider the impact of any choice on each region –Then PICK something as the ILC standard! –Everyone will have to make compromises –In general the regions and industry will adapt –ILC “Project” will make specific adjustments to insure we obey relevant regional codes and laws when the site is known

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary7 Establishing ILC Standards Need to define the “depth” of ILC standardization 1)Component Standardization: (Build-to-print, all items interchangeable regardless of where they are made) 2)Module level Standardization: ( modules with well specified interfaces, but internals may vary depending on who makes it) 3)Machine Segment: ( Regions take responsibility for all components in entire sections of the machine) Somewhere between 1) and 2) makes sense, but its probably worth discussing 3)

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary8 Establishing ILC Standards Fortunately we have examples to follow –CERN system for LHC (Impressive! talk by Jean Pierre Delahaye) –Other international projects (e.g. ITER) Specific near-term Recommendations –Examine the CERN LHC system and its applicability to ILC –EDMS (Electronic Document Management System) Appoint a group to collect requirements for ILC document management Survey available systems Make a recommendation to GDE very soon ( already the GDE plan) –Engineering Drawings Collect requirements for ILC Standard CAD systems Use 3-D CAD modeling for all drawings including Civil! Establish Drawing standards (including units and language) Survey existing CAD software, including interoperability across regions Recommend a standard ILC system to GDE

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary9 Cost & Schedule Methodology Presentations –XFEL Costing and Standards Reinhard Brinkmann (DESY) –Methodology for TESLA TDR Wilhelm Bialowons (DESY) –US cost estimates Rich Stanek (FNAL) –Cost estimates in Japan Tetsuo Shidara (KEK) Speakers from each region should address: –1) Current methodology for Project cost and schedule estimates –2) Process for establishing a set of “rules” for ILC cost & schedule estimates –3) How to handle contingency, overheads, “in kind” contributions, lab or university contributions etc. Each region is different. –4) Include actual estimates for industrial work in a public cost estimate? Current practice is yes in US, but no in Europe & Japan –5) What is the correct methodology to include industrial profit in estimates ? –6) Should ILC commission industrial cost studies of ILC in all 3 regions? –7) How do we develop a cost model for ILC?

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary10 Cost & Schedule Methodology We heard 4 excellent talks describing the methods used by each region to estimate Project Cost and schedule Significant differences in C/S methodology in the 3 regions –Labor in or out of the cost estimate –Contingency explicitly calculated or imbedded in the task estimates –Industrial cost estimates public or not –Different overheads, or “taxes”, etc applied to final numbers –General emphasis/goals of the process are sometimes different Is it hopeless to have a common ILC cost estimate? –No ! The similarities are larger than the differences in the methods. –Similar methods to estimate the numbers (Basis of Estimate) –Differences are more in how these numbers are used and presented to the regional funding agencies

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary11 Cost & Schedule Methodology Need to agree on a standard method for the “Basis of estimate” for the ILC project. –Use this method to identify the “core cost” of the project –Core cost = best guess of the cost of all materials, labor, and resources the Project will need to be built on an agreed upon schedule (50/50 that cost will be this number) –An all inclusive estimate. “Public” with nothing hidden or assumed –Industrial costs included, but encrypted in a way that the numbers will not be useful for “rigging” subsequent bids –No “hidden” contingency or risk management funds Regions can then “interpret” these numbers in the way the regional funding agencies are used to seeing –Example: increase task prices or add contingency to manage risk –Adjust labor costs as appropriate for the region, etc.

General Methodology Create Technical Requirements Document Develop Technical Conceptual Design Create the WBS Establish C/S Coordinator for each Work Package Establish rules for C/S & define assumptions Set up tools and format for data input Develop the RLS and Mgm’t Docs Estimate Cost & Schedule and create the BOE Review No Yes Fun Starts C/S = Cost & Schedule WBS = Work Breakdown Structure BOE = Basis of Estimate RLS = Resource Loaded Schedule Interpret this Core Cost in each Region

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary13 Tools & Process Need Standard Project wide tools –Data/Information Manager (web accessible) –WBS development software –Spreadsheet (or equivalent) for cost estimate (MS Excel…) –Schedule Software ( e.g. Open Plan, Primavera…) –All must be interoperable –Simple user interface for data input and monitoring Then… –Machine Design Parameters  requirements database –Reference Design –Develop parametric cost models –Develop risk assessment software Finally: Input actual cost estimates & iterate

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary14 Industrial Issues Presentations US Industrial Forum: Tony Favale (AES) Euro Industrial Forum: Michael Peininger (ACCEL) Japanese LC Forum: Norihiko Ozaki Speakers should address: 1)Principle issues in industry for a multi-regional project? 2)Companies vs different engineering and design standards? 3) Technical information sharing 4)Revealing costs for estimates vs competition for contracts 5)intellectual property rights for industrial processes 6)Design drawings, CAD packages, etc. 7)Build to performance specification vs build to print? 8)Infrastructure Issues 9)Industrial studies.

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary15 Industrial Issues Again we heard 3 very interesting talks that provoked a lot of discussion Industrial point of view is that “ ILC is a Project, not a business” –There is no follow-on business in SCRF cavities of this scale –This has impacts for the required infrastructure –Big industry typically has a Business Plan and stock holder demand a plan for 5-7 years in the future –Uncertain, one-time projects do not fit well in this scheme –It may be that Big Industry in the US and Europe will not be interested in the ILC. ( probably not true in Japan) –ILC may have to depend on small and medium scale industry which has implications on cost & schedule

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary16 Industrial Issues Infrastructure Issues: –For industry to invest in the large infrastructure required for ILC there would have to be a follow-on business or market  that the ILC project should plan on paying for all the required infrastructure wherever it is built. –Unlikely that Industry will invest in cryomodule infrastructure before the project receives final approval  it may take year to build this up before production can begin –These issues need to be included in the ILC cost and schedule estimates –Possible ideas for getting around these problems ( A region might be able to buy the infrastructure beforehand and industry bids to use it)

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary17 Industrial Issues Intellectual Property rights seem not to be a significant issue for industry –Not clear there all that many marketable ideas in ILC –Trans-regional information exchange is not an issue –They are used to dealing with this ( license technology) Shared Costs estimates –Not a problem for industry –Common in US cost estimates and not a problem –Recommend that TESLA reevaluate its position on releasing costs for the ILC cost estimate Early standardization is important –Can deal with whatever standards ILC chooses

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary18 Industrial Issues Industrial Studies –Important to understand industrial costs –Important to examine potential cost reductions –Need to think about what studies are needed and when –Focus on the cost drivers for ILC, important for cost estimate –Focus on places where there is technical risk to the project goals –ILC need a point-of-contact and a plan for industrial studies Risks –Let industry make up its mind on risks, then ILC should LISTEN –Perceived risks will influence the actual cost of contracts from industry. ( Cavity Gradient !!! Be careful not to set this too high)

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary19 Industrial Issues Performance guarantees ? –Industry is prepared to guarantee performance of cryomodules –Low risk = low price, high risk = high price –Very High Risk  no bid or build-to-print with ILC project accepting the risk or minimum performance guarantee with incentives for improved performance Industry will build the cavity using the best known techniques at the start of the project Know-how exists in small and medium industry to deliver the cryomodules that ILC will require (Peininger)

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary20 Industrial Issues In Kind Contributions: ( Ozaki-san) –Model is regions provide large components or sub systems –Follow the ITER system –Components categorized as “Key” or “conventional” “Key” components allocated fairly across the 3 regions “conventional” components shared across the 3 regions –Host Country assumes cost of infrastructure & civil engineering For Cost estimate, ILC should compute the “equivalent value” of in kind contributions –Recommend a system like the ITER system

T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary21 Unified Cost in ITER Responsible Laboratory Industry Engineering cost data ITER Entity Regional cost data Responsible Laboratory Industry Engineering cost data Globally unified components cost (in virtual money) Regional cost data

August 30, 2005 T. Shidara Snowmass - GG5 Summary22 Summary Lots of things to consider Lots of work to do Situation is complicated, but not hopeless Establishing ILC internal Standards is important Near-term actions –Choose an EDMS system –Choose cost and schedule software –Establish an engineering standards group –Choose common engineering tools (e.g. CAD system) –Define the cost & schedule methodology for ILC –Develop parametric models to guide the design Study other large international projects and LEARN !