Student Growth Percentiles (SGP): A Comparison of Legislative Intent with Implemented Results at one Utah School (Timpanogos Academy)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Report Cards A-F Steven Crawford – CCOSA Ryan Owens - USSA.
Advertisements

PVAAS (The Pennsylvania Value Added Assessment System )
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
Comparing Growth in Student Performance David Stern, UC Berkeley Career Academy Support Network Presentation to Educating for Careers/ California Partnership.
Volume 5, Issue 5 December 20, 2013 NEWSLETTER: January 2014 Graymont Grade School Newsletter Common Core State Standards (The following was taken from.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
Understanding the New Eagle Point School District Grading and Reporting Policy.
PACT Tests Administration Guide. What is the PACT Test? Palmetto Achievement Challenge Test Standards-based accountability For curriculum and teaching.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Friday, February 7 th 8:30am. Conversation 8:30-9:30 1. Welcome 2. Where is Georgia in comparison to other states? 3. What is making the difference? 4.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Florida Standards Assessment
Common Core State Standards CCSS What Parents & Board Members Need to Know.
Springville CSD Where every child will become a successful reader ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2008.
Alpine School District and Utah Core Standards Information for Parents and Employees Updated: July 23, 2014.
Testing Information Session SAGE Testing Information 1 Information for Parents and Schools.
How Can Teacher Evaluation Be Connected to Student Achievement?
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
1 Student Assessment Report One Goal: Support Student Success West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation August 20, 2013.
CHOLLA HIGH MAGNET SCHOOL Plc Workshop
Title I Academic Standards and Testing Informational Meeting September 24, 2014 WELCOME!
Welcome to the TAYLOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Introduction to MCAS.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Grades 6-8 MONITORING REPORT HIGHLIGHTS DECEMBER 2013.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Release of PARCC Student Results. By the end of this presentation, parents will be able to: Identify components of the PARCC English.
SGP Logic Model Provides a method that enables SGP data to contribute to performance evaluation when data are missing. The distribution of SGP data combined.
PROGRESS & & ACHIEVEMENT Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS) The Power of School District School District.
Understanding the Rhode Island Growth Model An Introductory Guide for Educators May 2012.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Vae View Elementary School Improvement Plan
Annual Progress Report Data Ankeny Community Schools.
Understanding and Communicating About New Performance Standards on New Performance Standards on Michigan’s Standardized Tests RAISING EXPECTATIONS.
ACT ASPIRE GROWTH REPORTS. DISTRICTS AND SCHOOLS THAT PARTICIPATED IN ACT ASPIRE ASSESSMENTS (READING, MATH, ENGLISH, SCIENCE AND WRITING) WITH AN N COUNT.
K-5 Curriculum Night Curriculum Arizona Academic Standards Quarterly curriculum maps available online at Our comprehensive curriculum.
Georgia Milestones End of Grade (EOG) Assessment Grades 3, 4, and 5
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October State Assessment Results and Analysis.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
TEACHNJ Proposed Regulations. TEACHNJ Regulations Proposal  Two Terms that are very important to know: SGO – Student Growth Objective (Created in District)
ACCESS for ELLs Score Changes
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
A Growth Measure for ALL Students.
Release of PARCC Student Results
New Statewide Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
South Dakota’s Growth Model
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Understanding Learning Gains
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
Sat night With Your P.H.S Counseling team.
Family SOL Night Agenda 6:00- 6:35 - Dinner and Presentation
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Title I Annual Meeting
Third Grade FSA Parent Meeting
Ohio’s State Tests and the Third Grade Guarantee
Third Grade FSA Parent Meeting
Standards Based Grading
SGP What is it and where did it come from?.
Third Grade FSA Parent Meeting
Lake Bluff Gifted Education Benchmarking Progress Report
Virginia Board of Education’s
English Learner Accountability Component
A Growth Measure for ALL Students.
Presentation transcript:

Student Growth Percentiles (SGP): A Comparison of Legislative Intent with Implemented Results at one Utah School (Timpanogos Academy)

Benchmarks, Old & New: Benchmark 1: Nationwide Comparisons

Section 1: 3 rd Grade Iowa Tests Comparison Note: Alpine School District stopped administering ITBS after , and the State of Utah stopped after

Section 1: 3 rd Grade Iowa Tests Comparison Note: Alpine School District stopped administering ITBS after , and the State of Utah stopped after

Section 1: 5 th Grade Iowa Tests Comparison Note: Alpine School District stopped administering ITBS after , and the State of Utah stopped after

Section 1: 5 th Grade Iowa Tests Comparison Note: Alpine School District stopped administering ITBS after , and the State of Utah stopped after

Section 1: 8 th Grade Iowa Tests Comparison Note: Alpine School District stopped administering ITBS after , and the State of Utah stopped after

Section 1: 8 th Grade Iowa Tests Comparison Note: Alpine School District stopped administering ITBS after , and the State of Utah stopped after

Benchmarks, Old & New: Benchmark 1: Nationwide Comparisons Section 2: Direct Writing Assessments (DWA) Benchmark 2: State CRT Proficiency Levels

Class of 2012 – Language Arts CRT Proficiency Levels

Class of 2012 – Math CRT Proficiency Levels

Class of 2012 – Science CRT Proficiency Levels 2m

Benchmarks, Old & New: Benchmark 1: Nationwide Comparisons Benchmark 2: State CRT Proficiency Levels Benchmark 3: Dibels Reading

School District % at Grade Level 1 (tie) – Wellenman School of Discovery Summitt Academy 95% 3 – Timpanogos Academy94% 4 (tie) – George Washington Academy Liberty Academy Tintic District 93% 7 – Daggett District91% – Alpine District72%

Benchmarks, Old & New: Benchmark 1: Nationwide Comparisons Benchmark 2: State CRT Proficiency Levels Benchmark 3: Dibels Reading Benchmark 4: Grading Utah Schools (GUS)

Some of the grades this year may surprise you. If that happens, the question to ask is, "Why did this school receive this grade?" As you dig deeper, the answers should be illuminating.

Legislative Intent

This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. For a school to get credit, students need to achieve at least a year's worth of learning in the school year; less than that means the student has fallen further behind. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. For a school to get credit, students need to achieve at least a year's worth of learning in the school year; less than that means the student has fallen further behind. The growth component is meant to incentivize schools to get students at grade level and keep them there. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. For a school to get credit, students need to achieve at least a year's worth of learning in the school year; less than that means the student has fallen further behind. The growth component is meant to incentivize schools to get students at grade level and keep them there. In Florida’s model, growth can be achieved in two ways: 1) If a student is below grade level, the school gets credit for moving him towards grade level. 2) If a students is already at grade level or higher, all a school must do is keep that student at grade level the next year. 3) That’s because a year’s worth of learning gains has taken place. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains 4m

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. For a school to get credit, students need to achieve at least a year's worth of learning in the school year; less than that means the student has fallen further behind. The growth component is meant to incentivize schools to get students at grade level and keep them there. In Florida’s model, growth can be achieved in two ways: 1) If a student is below grade level, the school gets credit for moving him towards grade level. 2) If a students is already at grade level or higher, all a school must do is keep that student at grade level the next year. 3) That’s because a year’s worth of learning gains has taken place. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains Scale Scores: 130 to to 199: Advanced Proficiency: 160 to 167: Proficient: 153 to 159: Not Proficient, Level to 152: Not Proficient, Level 1 ____________________________

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. For a school to get credit, students need to achieve at least a year's worth of learning in the school year; less than that means the student has fallen further behind. The growth component is meant to incentivize schools to get students at grade level and keep them there. In Florida’s model, growth can be achieved in two ways: 1) If a student is below grade level, the school gets credit for moving him towards grade level. 2) If a students is already at grade level or higher, all a school must do is keep that student at grade level the next year. 3) That’s because a year’s worth of learning gains has taken place. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains Scale Scores: 130 to to 199: Advanced Proficiency: 160 to 167: Proficient: 153 to 159: Not Proficient, Level to 152: Not Proficient, Level 1 ____________________________ TB 5 th LA = th LA = 175 NN 5 th LA = th LA = 175

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. For a school to get credit, students need to achieve at least a year's worth of learning in the school year; less than that means the student has fallen further behind. The growth component is meant to incentivize schools to get students at grade level and keep them there. In Florida’s model, growth can be achieved in two ways: 1) If a student is below grade level, the school gets credit for moving him towards grade level. 2) If a students is already at grade level or higher, all a school must do is keep that student at grade level the next year. 3) That’s because a year’s worth of learning gains has taken place. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains Scale Scores: 130 to to 199: Advanced Proficiency: 160 to 167: Proficient: 153 to 159: Not Proficient, Level to 152: Not Proficient, Level 1 ____________________________ TB 5 th LA = th LA = 175 NN 5 th LA = th LA = 175 SGP: 55 (+)

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. For a school to get credit, students need to achieve at least a year's worth of learning in the school year; less than that means the student has fallen further behind. The growth component is meant to incentivize schools to get students at grade level and keep them there. In Florida’s model, growth can be achieved in two ways: 1) If a student is below grade level, the school gets credit for moving him towards grade level. 2) If a students is already at grade level or higher, all a school must do is keep that student at grade level the next year. 3) That’s because a year’s worth of learning gains has taken place. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains Scale Scores: 130 to to 199: Advanced Proficiency: 160 to 167: Proficient: 153 to 159: Not Proficient, Level to 152: Not Proficient, Level 1 ____________________________ TB 5 th LA = th LA = 175 NN 5 th LA = th LA = 175 SGP: 55 (+)SGP: 38 (-)

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. For a school to get credit, students need to achieve at least a year's worth of learning in the school year; less than that means the student has fallen further behind. The growth component is meant to incentivize schools to get students at grade level and keep them there. In Florida’s model, growth can be achieved in two ways: 1) If a student is below grade level, the school gets credit for moving him towards grade level. 2) If a students is already at grade level or higher, all a school must do is keep that student at grade level the next year. 3) That’s because a year’s worth of learning gains has taken place. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains

TB 5 th LA = th LA = 175 NN 5 th LA = th LA = 175 SGP: 55 (+)SGP: 38 (-)

TB 5 th LA = th LA = 175 NN 5 th LA = th LA = 175 SGP: 55 (+)SGP: 38 (-)

TB 5 th LA = th LA = 175 NN 5 th LA = th LA = 175 SGP: 55 (+)SGP: 38 (-) Multiple Trajectories? “COMPLEX ALGORITHYM” from “R” Program

Legislative Intent: “Transparency of the calculation is vital; processes and rules need to be clearly articulated and publicly available.”

Multiple Trajectories? “COMPLEX ALGORITHYM” from “R” Program Legislative Intent: “Transparency of the calculation is vital; processes and rules need to be clearly articulated and publicly available.”

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. For a school to get credit, students need to achieve at least a year's worth of learning in the school year; less than that means the student has fallen further behind. The growth component is meant to incentivize schools to get students at grade level and keep them there. In Florida’s model, growth can be achieved in two ways: 1) If a student is below grade level, the school gets credit for moving him towards grade level. 2) If a students is already at grade level or higher, all a school must do is keep that student at grade level the next year. 3) That’s because a year’s worth of learning gains has taken place. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. For a school to get credit, students need to achieve at least a year's worth of learning in the school year; less than that means the student has fallen further behind. The growth component is meant to incentivize schools to get students at grade level and keep them there. In Florida’s model, growth can be achieved in two ways: 1) If a student is below grade level, the school gets credit for moving him towards grade level. 2) If a students is already at grade level or higher, all a school must do is keep that student at grade level the next year. 3) That’s because a year’s worth of learning gains has taken place. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. For a school to get credit, students need to achieve at least a year's worth of learning in the school year; less than that means the student has fallen further behind. The growth component is meant to incentivize schools to get students at grade level and keep them there. In Florida’s model, growth can be achieved in two ways: 1) If a student is below grade level, the school gets credit for moving him towards grade level. 2) If a students is already at grade level or higher, all a school must do is keep that student at grade level the next year. 3) That’s because a year’s worth of learning gains has taken place. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. For a school to get credit, students need to achieve at least a year's worth of learning in the school year; less than that means the student has fallen further behind. The growth component is meant to incentivize schools to get students at grade level and keep them there. In Florida’s model, growth can be achieved in two ways: 1) If a student is below grade level, the school gets credit for moving him towards grade level. 2) If a students is already at grade level or higher, all a school must do is keep that student at grade level the next year. 3) That’s because a year’s worth of learning gains has taken place. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. For a school to get credit, students need to achieve at least a year's worth of learning in the school year; less than that means the student has fallen further behind. The growth component is meant to incentivize schools to get students at grade level and keep them there. In Florida’s model, growth can be achieved in two ways: 1) If a student is below grade level, the school gets credit for moving him towards grade level. 2) If a students is already at grade level or higher, all a school must do is keep that student at grade level the next year. 3) That’s because a year’s worth of learning gains has taken place. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains

Legislative Intent The growth component requires schools to demonstrate that all students, high achieving and low achieving, have made a year’s worth of progress in a year’s time. For a school to get credit, students need to achieve at least a year's worth of learning in the school year; less than that means the student has fallen further behind. The growth component is meant to incentivize schools to get students at grade level and keep them there. In Florida’s model, growth can be achieved in two ways: 1) If a student is below grade level, the school gets credit for moving him towards grade level. 2) If a students is already at grade level or higher, all a school must do is keep that student at grade level the next year. 3) That’s because a year’s worth of learning gains has taken place. This policy was patterned after the Florida Model which has helped propel significant student achievement gains

Therefore, what ??? “I believe such a system is necessary for teachers and administrators to focus their efforts, for parents to understand what¹s happening at their children's schools, and for board members and lawmakers to evaluate policy changes and reallocate resources effectively.”

Therefore, what ??? Growth shows success in the education system because it shows us where positive change is happening for students and schools. 7m

Therefore, what ??? TB 5 th LA = th LA = 175 NN 5 th LA = th LA = 175 SGP: 55 (+)SGP: 38 (-) Growth shows success in the education system because it shows us where positive change is happening for students and schools.

Therefore, what ??? Florida’s model places the most emphasis on the lowest performing students in a school. Growth shows success in the education system because it shows us where positive change is happening for students and schools.

Therefore, what ??? If the accountability system only includes proficiency, then schools will not get credit for moving low-performing students forward. There would be no incentive to work with the students that need the most help. …AND: Florida’s model places the most emphasis on the lowest performing students in a school. Growth shows success in the education system because it shows us where positive change is happening for students and schools. TimpScale Score Advanced (54.2%) Proficient (24.6%) Below (11.9%) Below (9.3%) “Proficient” & “Advanced” = 62% of my “Non Sufficient Growth” scores

Therefore, what ??? If the accountability system only includes proficiency, then schools will not get credit for moving low-performing students forward. There would be no incentive to work with the students that need the most help. …AND: Florida’s model places the most emphasis on the lowest performing students in a school. Growth shows success in the education system because it shows us where positive change is happening for students and schools. TimpScale Score Advanced (54.2%) Proficient (24.6%) Below (11.9%) Below (9.3%) “Proficient” & “Advanced” = 62% of my “Non Sufficient Growth” scores

Therefore, what ??? If the accountability system only includes proficiency, then schools will not get credit for moving low-performing students forward. There would be no incentive to work with the students that need the most help. …AND: Including both proficiency and growth provides a much clearer picture of how the school is performing.. Florida’s model places the most emphasis on the lowest performing students in a school. Growth shows success in the education system because it shows us where positive change is happening for students and schools. 8m

Therefore, what ??? If the accountability system only includes proficiency, then schools will not get credit for moving low-performing students forward. There would be no incentive to work with the students that need the most help. …AND: Including both proficiency and growth provides a much clearer picture of how the school is performing.. Florida’s model places the most emphasis on the lowest performing students in a school. Growth shows success in the education system because it shows us where positive change is happening for students and schools.

Therefore, what ??? * 61% = Sufficient * 39% = Not Sufficient If the accountability system only includes proficiency, then schools will not get credit for moving low-performing students forward. There would be no incentive to work with the students that need the most help. …AND: Including both proficiency and growth provides a much clearer picture of how the school is performing.. Florida’s model places the most emphasis on the lowest performing students in a school. Growth shows success in the education system because it shows us where positive change is happening for students and schools.

Therefore, what ??? * 61% = Sufficient * 39% = Not Sufficient If the accountability system only includes proficiency, then schools will not get credit for moving low-performing students forward. There would be no incentive to work with the students that need the most help. …AND: Including both proficiency and growth provides a much clearer picture of how the school is performing.. Florida’s model places the most emphasis on the lowest performing students in a school. Growth shows success in the education system because it shows us where positive change is happening for students and schools.

Therefore, what ??? * 61% = Sufficient * 39% = Not Sufficient If the accountability system only includes proficiency, then schools will not get credit for moving low-performing students forward. There would be no incentive to work with the students that need the most help. …AND: Including both proficiency and growth provides a much clearer picture of how the school is performing.. Florida’s model places the most emphasis on the lowest performing students in a school. Growth shows success in the education system because it shows us where positive change is happening for students and schools.

Therefore, what ??? * 61% = Sufficient * 39% = Not Sufficient If the accountability system only includes proficiency, then schools will not get credit for moving low-performing students forward. There would be no incentive to work with the students that need the most help. …AND: Including both proficiency and growth provides a much clearer picture of how the school is performing.. Florida’s model places the most emphasis on the lowest performing students in a school. Growth shows success in the education system because it shows us where positive change is happening for students and schools.

Therefore, what ??? * 61% = Sufficient * 39% = Not Sufficient If the accountability system only includes proficiency, then schools will not get credit for moving low-performing students forward. There would be no incentive to work with the students that need the most help. …AND: Including both proficiency and growth provides a much clearer picture of how the school is performing.. Florida’s model places the most emphasis on the lowest performing students in a school. Growth shows success in the education system because it shows us where positive change is happening for students and schools.

Therefore, what ??? * 61% = Sufficient * 39% = Not Sufficient If the accountability system only includes proficiency, then schools will not get credit for moving low-performing students forward. There would be no incentive to work with the students that need the most help. …AND: Including both proficiency and growth provides a much clearer picture of how the school is performing.. Florida’s model places the most emphasis on the lowest performing students in a school. Growth shows success in the education system because it shows us where positive change is happening for students and schools.

The Take away: #1: “COMPLEX ALGORITHYM” from “R” Program #4 Upcoming SAGE testing will only make things more Opaque #2: #3:

Some of the grades this year may surprise you. If that happens, the question to ask is, "Why did this school receive this grade?" As you dig deeper, the answers should be illuminating. 9m

Some of the grades this year may surprise you. If that happens, the question to ask is, "Why did this school receive this grade?" As you dig deeper, the answers should be illuminating. “I expect resistance from some who are uncomfortable with transparency or opposed to reform”

1) Please look at helping to fix this during this session 2) We welcome any opportunities to work with the Legislature towards fixing this