Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). What is Truth? Major Theories of Truth From Geisler.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WORLD VIEWS: WHAT IS TRUE?
Advertisements

Anthony Flew and A. J. Ayer
REALITY AND BEING Chapter 3. What is real? Metaphysics attempts to answer the question: What is real? Are spirits real? Is power real? Is justice real?
Leibniz Part 1. Short Biography Leibniz ( ) was the son of a professor of philosophy who had earned his doctorate in law by 21. He invented.
Chapter Twelve: The Fact-Value Problem Chapter Twelve: The Fact-Value Problem Metaethics ► Philosophizing about the very terms of ethics ► Considering.
Meta-ethics. What do we mean when we say “stealing is wrong”? Is morality objective or subjective (up- to-me)? Is morality a natural feature of the world.
John 18:37-38 WHAT IS TRUTH? The Truth About Reality is Knowable The Opposite of True is False The Truth Matters.
Popper On Science Economics Lawlor. What is and inductive inference? Example: “All Swans are white” Needs an observation to confirm it’s truth.
Pragmatism: metaphysics is meaningful only if it has practical consequences What we mean by reality is the product of our ideas and ideals, all of which.
What do you see? According to logical positivism, do your statements have meaning? What do you see? According to logical positivism, do your statements.
Philosophy 1010 Class #7 Title:Introduction to Philosophy Instructor:Paul Dickey TodayTurn In Video.
Epistemology revision Responses: add a ‘no false lemmas’ condition (J+T+B+N) Responses: replace ‘justified’ with ‘reliably formed’ (R+T+B) (reliabilism)
Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1 Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1 Hassan Ismail.
LECTURE 12 ANTI-REALISM AND VERIFICATIONISM. WILLIAM ALSTON CLAIMS THAT MANY KINDS OF ANTI-REALISM ARE BASED ON VERIFICATIONISM VERIFICATIONISM IS A PHILOSOPHICAL.
A. J. Ayer and Emotivism Jon Sanders. Sir Alfred Jules “Freddie” Ayer 1910 – 1989 Language, Truth and Logic (1936) Educated: Eton; Christ Church, Oxford.
Religious Language Speaking about God Part 1. Why Religious language? The concept of a God is: Something other Something timeless We talk of things using.
Metaphysical Idealism: All reality is comprised of minds and ideas Western Idealism: Physical objects are real only insofar as they are intelligible as.
THE PROCESS OF SCIENCE. Assumptions  Nature is real, understandable, knowable through observation  Nature is orderly and uniform  Measurements yield.
MONISM By: Nadia R. Angelita U. Jamila B. Katalina.
See no evil Learning Objectives for today : 1. Understand how Religious education is different. 2. Identify what Religion is. 3. Have an understanding.
Ludwig Wittgenstein EARLY: PICTURE THEORY LATER: LANGUAGE GAMES.
Chapter 12 Common Sense and Anglo- American Philosophy.
Parsing Categories of Belief Why Early Modern M&E divides belief into two types: Sensory & Mathematical.
Religious Language  Language is about communication  Religious language is a means of communicating about religion  This can be within three contexts:
Positivism -v- Pragmatism. MMUBS Mres Epistemology, session 4, slide-1 Positivism -v- Pragmatism Is knowledge composed of a correct.
Perception & Truth Is it true that: “Beauty is truth, truth beauty,” --that is all Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know. (Keats, “Ode on a Grecian.
Philosophy of science II
1 Foundations of American Education, Fifth Edition L. Dean Webb, Arlene Metha, & K. Forbis Jordan L. Dean Webb, Arlene Metha, & K. Forbis Jordan. Foundations.
Definitions of Reality (ref . Wiki Discussions)
Ethics Lesson #3 Challenges to Ethics Much of this presentation comes from Questions that Matter, by Miller (Chapter 16)
Positivism -v- Pragmatism. MMUBS Mres Epistemology, session 4, slide-1 Positivism -v- Pragmatism Is knowledge composed of a correct.
ToK - Truth Does truth matter?.
KNOWLEDGE What is it? How does it differ from belief? What is the relationship between knowledge and truth? These are the concerns of epistemology How.
2 + 2 = 4 Your mother loves you. Death is a part of life. The sky is blue.
1/54 The Relation Between Christian Faith and the Natural Sciences Steve Badger and Mike Tenneson Evangel University.
TRUTH. "To say of what is that it is not, or of what is not that it is, is false, while to say of what is that it is, and of what is not that it is not,
MIDTERM EXAMINATION THE MIDTERM EXAMINATION WILL BE ON FRIDAY, MAY 2, IN THIS CLASSROOM, STARTING AT 1:00 P.M. BRING A BLUE BOOK. THE EXAM WILL COVER:
CHAPTER THREE: REALITY AND BEING P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings TENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
Meta-Ethics Non-Cognitivism.
LO: I will know how thinkers have solved the problem of speaking meaningfully about God by making negative statements of what God is not.
Epistemology revision Concept empiricist arguments against concept innatism:  Alternative explanations (no such concept or concept re- defined as based.
What does this all have to do with critical thinking?!? Can you reflect on how these “exercises” (from yesterday) relate to the critical thinking processes?
Science News. Science (?) News Demarcation “We [scientists] believe that the world is knowable, that there are simple rules governing the behavior of.
Is it possible to verify statements about God? The Logical Positivists would say no – God is a metaphysical being and it is impossible to empirically verify.
Alister McGrath, Christian Theology: An Introduction Chapter 8 Philosophy and Theology: Dialogue and Debate Wiley-Blackwell 2010.
Epistemology ► Area of Philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge ► Philosophy of Knowledge.
CHAPTER SIX: TRUTH P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings ELEVENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
Cartesian Rationalism: A Critical Analysis Lecture 5: (fin) Philosophy of Knowledge.
METAPHYSICS What is Reality?. Pragmatism and Metaphysics Reality is pluralistic. There is no one reality. Reality is pluralistic. There is no one reality.
Presuppositionalism Truth Talks Apologetics Series: Week 6.
Epistemology (How do you know something?)  How do you know your science textbook is true?  How about your history textbook?  How about what your parents.
Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980) What is Philosophy? Excerpted from Geisler & Feinberg’s.
Excerpted from Dallas Roark’s Introduction to Philosophy, 1982 Epistemology: How do we know? Excerpted Dallas Roark’s Introduction to Philosophy, 1982.
Philosophy of Science Lars-Göran Johansson Department of philosophy, Uppsala University
Philosophy of science What is a scientific theory? – Is a universal statement Applies to all events in all places and time – Explains the behaviour/happening.
Meta-ethics What is Meta Ethics?.
Criticisms of Flew Possible responses Hare – religious statements are unfalsifiable and non-cognitive but still play a useful role in life (parable of.
Seeing the Father John 14:5-11.
Metaphysics: The Study of the Nature of Existence or Reality I
Verificationism on religious language
Ludwig Wittgenstein EARLY: PICTURE THEORY LATER: LANGUAGE GAMES.
Philosophy 1010 Class #8 Title: Introduction to Philosophy
Daniel W. Blackmon Theory of Knowledge Coral Gables Senior High
Philosophy of Religion Revision: Religious Language
Flying pig spotted in Amazon Jungle…
Discussion: Can one meaningfully talk of a transcendent metaphysical God acting (creating sustaining, being loving) in a physical empirical world? Ayer.
On your whiteboard: What is Naturalism?
By the end of today’s lesson you will
Verification and meaning
A guide for the perplexed (who think it is all meaningless)
Presentation transcript:

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). What is Truth? Major Theories of Truth From Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). 1.The Coherence Theory of Truth Spinoza, Leibniz, Hegel, and F.H. Bradley. A statement is true if and only if it coheres (is consistent) with all of the other statements of that system.

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). 1.The Coherence Theory of Truth Rationalists—the system is a comprehensive account of the entire universe (or of reality) Logical positivists—the system includes all of the statements in the scientific picture of the world (as described by the contemporary sciences).

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). 1.The Coherence Theory of Truth This has some merit…we do tend to reject a statement that contradicts what we have already embraced as truth (or contradicts our experiences/observations).

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). 1.The Coherence Theory of Truth Coherence is a necessary condition of truth, but not a sufficient condition. A statement may be coherent with one system and incoherent with another. A statement may be coherent with a system but not applicable to the real world. Two different—mutually exclusive, but coherent—systems are logically possible.

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). 2.The Pragmatic Theory of Truth Charles Sanders Pierce, William James, and John Dewey. Pierce—truth is related to (observable) practice(s) [“Opinion that is fated to be ultimately agreed to”] Truth is related to practical consequences

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). 2.The Pragmatic Theory of Truth James—concerned with the effects of a belief in the private and personal life of an individual So…an individual could regard… religious beliefs as true if they provide “vital benefits” Truth is determined by consequences

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). 2.The Pragmatic Theory of Truth Dewey “Warranted assertibility” An idea becomes true when their “draft upon experience” is verified by the promised facts. Thus, truth follows inquiry—and “happens to an idea” when it is verified (“warranted”)

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). 3.The Performative Theory of Truth P.F. Strawson True and false are not descriptive words, but performative expressions—one is not making a statement, but performing an action. When you say, “It is true that…”, you are agreeing with, accepting, or endorsing a statement.

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). 3.The Performative Theory of Truth Later Strawson admitted that “true” has an “expressive” meaning as well as a “performative” meaning. Strawson modified his position after hearing criticisms of it.

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). 4.The Correspondence Theory of Truth Aristotle, G.E. Moore, and Alfred Tarski. Truth consists in some form of correspondence between 1. a belief or a sentence and 2. a fact or a state of affairs.

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). 4.The Correspondence Theory of Truth Moore—a proposition is identified with the meaning of an indicative sentence. Something is apprehended (in understanding a sentence) by us that is more than the mere sentence. The proposition is the bearer of truth or falsity.

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). 4.The Correspondence Theory of Truth When a belief is true, that which is believed is a fact. When a belief is false, that which is believed is not a fact.

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). 4.The Correspondence Theory of Truth Tarski—truth is a property of sentences— in a particular language…and involves a relationship (correspondence) between a sentence and reality.

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). Verification Principle A J Ayer ( ) For a statement to be meaningful (true) it must be either 1) purely definitional or else 2) verifiable by onor of more of the five senses. All other statements (ethical, theological, metaphysical) are nonsense or meaningless. Logical Positivism Self-refuting

Excerpted from Geisler and Feinberg’s Introduction to Philosophy: A Christian Perspective (Baker, 1980). Falsification Principle Anthony Flew and Karl Popper Any statement or proposition is meaningless unless it is subject to falsification (at least in principle) Flew used it to challenge a belief in God Self-refuting But Flew recently changed his mind…