Power Teams - The Essence of PM Practice. What Makes a Great Team? J. Richard Hackman, Harvard As applies to Project Management Leadership by Linda Clark-Borre,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supervision in Organizations
Advertisements

Improving Public-Sector Productivity APO’s Perspective M. D. Bhattarai Director, Research and Planning Department Asian Productivity Organization.
Texas State University Leadership Institute “Building Effective Teams”
Understanding Work Teams
Chapter 8: Foundations of Group Behavior
GROUPS and TEAMS Roger Dhesi Roger Dhesi Niels Bauer Niels Bauer Yan Huang Yan Huang Derek Sullivan Derek Sullivan Vick Mann Vick Mann.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education
Chapter Learning Objectives
The Nature of Work Groups and Teams
Foundations of Team Leadership
Organizational Behaviour Social Behaviour Groups and Teamwork.
TEAMWORK.
Organizational Factors: The Role of Culture and Relationships
1 New Team Leadership Some Questions Is it leadership of teams and in teams? How far can we go with distributive or shared leadership? What are the effects.
1 The Great Challenges For Top Public Executives The Forum for Executive Public Management Copenhagen, Denmark September 1, 2003 Robert D. Behn Kennedy.
Virtual teams These are teams that work together and solve problems through computer-based interactions. What are some benefits? Drawbacks? They save time,
Chapter 13 Team Work Development Presenters: Kristen Hunt Yanique Reid Latoya Vernon.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
Organizational Behavior MBA-542 Instructor: Erlan Bakiev, Ph.D.
Teamwork Chapter 6.
Group versus Team vs.. Individuals to Group-to-Group Team Continuum Individuals Group Team Degree of Interdependence and Collaboration Commonality of.
© Prentice Hall 2006 CHAPTER FIVE DIRECTIVE LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOR 5-1.
Chapter 10 THE NATURE OF WORK GROUPS AND TEAMS. CHAPTER 10 The Nature of Work Groups and Teams Copyright © 2002 Prentice-Hall What is a Group? A set of.
TEAMWORK WORKSHOP ICOM5047 Design Project in Computer Engineering J. Fernando Vega-Riveros, Ph.D. Associate Professor – ECE Dpt.
TEAMWORK AND TEAM BUILDING KEYS TO GOAL ACHIEVEMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY.
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
Effective Teamwork building Presented by:Manar Abdelghani Raja’ Elayyan Suzan Sharabi British Council TTT
Million Leaders Mandate
 Is there a difference between working as a group and working as a team? Why or why not? What is the difference?
Effective Leadership at the Top IPAC - September 29th, 2005 Dr. François Ducharme.
© Mujtaba, 2007 Workforce Diversity Management Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba.
SEVEN Things Your Executive Coach Wants You to Know Kim McKinnon, PhD.
Effective Groups and Teams
Building Effective Teams The 5 steps of team development.
Creating a goal-driven environment - 3 Barbie E. Keiser University of Vilnius May 2007.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin© 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Groups and Teams Chapter Ten.
Understanding Groups & Teams Ch 15. Understanding Groups Group Two or more interacting and interdependent individuals who come together to achieve particular.
Teamwork, Collaboration and Networking Education and Practice Workshop Suzanne Gordon Co-Editor The Culture and Politics of Health Care Work Series Cornell.
© J. Rudy, Organizational Behavior, FMCU, Fall 2007 Groups In Organization OBJECTIVES: A.GROUPS- DEFINITION AND ROLES -STAGES (EVOLUTION) - TYPES - NORMS.
CPS ® and CAP ® Examination Review ADVANCED ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT By Garrison and Bly Turner ©2006 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper.
Business Leadership and Organizational Behavior Groups & Teams Craig W. Fontaine, Ph.D.
Internal Coach. Who am I and what am I becoming? People’s Greatness Engagement Enablement Execution It’s Simply Leadership.
Leadership Lecture 11.
Unit 1.05 Joint Action between two or more people to reach a common goal Each person: Contributes with different skills Expresses interests and opinions.
Building Relationships that Mean Business Leadership Capability A Practical Guide to Identifying and Developing Leadership Potential Andrew Chantler B.App.Sc.(Computing),
 World Quality Day was introduced by the United Nations in 1990 to increase worldwide awareness of the important contribution that quality makes towards.
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
Organization Development and Change © PAPERHINT.COM.
Chapter 3 The Knowledge Leader
Creating Value through Human Resources
Groups Dynamics and Teams Development. Groups, Teams and Organizational Effectiveness Group –Two or more people who interact with each other to accomplish.
Step up to Action. Levels of Partnership Level 4 - Assimilation Level 3 - Adapting Level 2 - Joint Projects Level - 1 Networking.
Group Dynamics and Teamwork February 28, 2012 MGMT 4000, Class 6 Harvard University.
Groups. After studying this chapter, you should be able to: Define group and differentiate between types of groups. Identify the five stages of group.
A year in the life of a team coach Joanne James Head of Corporate and Executive Development Newcastle Business School.
Organizational Behavior (MGT-502) Lecture-18. Summary of Lecture-17.
Types of Groups in Organizations Type of Formal or Established Degree of Group Informal by Permanence Example Command Formal Organization Permanent Hierarchical.
Unit-5 Employee motivation Presented by N.Vigneshwari.
Team Performance The MANAGEMENT Factor Scott T. Young, Ph.D. Department of Management.
Foundations of Group Behavior Week 6 lecture 11,12.
Copyright ©2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
From Erik Peterson to Slade to Orpheus to …
Week 6: Groups and Teams (10/17) Professor Payal Sharma
Chapter 7.
A-608: Leadership, Entrepreneurship, and Learning
Coaching.
A-608: Leadership, Entrepreneurship, and Learning
What Makes a Group of Executives a Real Team?
The Origins and History of Museums
Presentation transcript:

Power Teams - The Essence of PM Practice

What Makes a Great Team? J. Richard Hackman, Harvard As applies to Project Management Leadership by Linda Clark-Borre, PMP

The Puzzle Groups have access to greater resources, diversity of resources, and more flexibility in deploying those resources. They are more flexible than a single person is in terms of resource deployment, and their potential for synergy is strong. So why is their actual performance typically sub-par?

Problem: Groups are, frankly, often used for work best performed by talented/strong individuals. Groups are often structured in ways that cap their potential.

Hackman’s Approach Focus less on direct causes of team behavior and performance …and more on enabling conditions. (Think of positive/negative enablers) What Are the Specific Positive Conditions, You Ask?

Discussion You have been part of teams, and have, by now studied them. What one or two team organizational conditions most strongly increase the chance that a team will perform effectively? 1) Acceptable (at least) output to those who receive, review or use the deliverable. 2) Capability and desire of team members to work together again 3) Individuals’ growth and well-being are fostered by their work experiences

The conditions to follow were identified through studies of Civilian and military flightdeck crews Symphony and chamber orchestras Hospital and patient care teams Top management groups Analytic teams in intelligence agencies Various other public and private sector teams

There are Five Specific Conditions for Top Team Performance. 1.A REAL team --clearly bonded --members interdependent – not threats to one another --stable over time, whatever their level of contribution* *The longer they work together, the higher their capacity for achievement

Number Two of Five… 2. Compelling direction -Clear -Consequential -Challenging

Ends and Means Are Specified When the Team is Advancing in a Compelling Direction If you are clear on your ends and means, then – you as PM have set the stage for self-managed, goal directed teamwork. If you went with the flow and didn’t take any charge whatever, you risk --anarchy --wasted humanity, I mean human resources --people just being turned off by being part of yet another meaningless, aimless enterprise.

Number Three of Five… 3)A positively enabling team structure Properties of a positive enabling structure – Well designed task Proper group composition Clear norms of conduct

Your enabling team structure doesn’t have to be formal, however. Good teams link up well at many points – could be psychological also

Number Four of Five…. 4. A supportive organizational context --access to rewards, information, education, and resources to help everyone produce the best work possible

Number Five of Five… 5. Available, expert coaching (motivator, consultant, educator) YES YOU CAN!

TEAM CYCLE & COACHING INTERVENTION Start________________Mid-Point___________________End MotivationalConsultativeEducational/Growth

Conditions that Promote Team Effectiveness 1.A real team 2.Compelling direction 3.Enabling team structure 4.Supportive organizational context 5.Available, expert coaching

In Business, We Models