Region 9 Tribal Air Quality Conference Regional Haze Rulemakings: Western Regional Air Partnership Annex July 25, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Excerpts from a Presentation Given to the WRAP Market Trading Form on Recommended Approaches to the Stationary Source NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western.
Advertisements

Update on Regional Haze November 15, 2012 Michele Notarianni EPA Region 4 1.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP IOC NOx Issues Meeting Denver, CO July 28, 2003.
Overview  Origins of the WRAP  Scope of WRAP  Tribal Participation  How Tribes can benefit from WRAP.
1 Tom Acker Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering The WRAP Tribal Renewables Report and The WRAP Tribal Efficiency Report.
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
1 WRAP Fire Tracking Systems Draft Intent of WRAP FTS Policy – Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in.
1 WRAP Policy Fire Tracking Systems Draft December 9, 2002 FEJF Meeting December 10-11, 2002 Jackson, WY.
1 EPA’s Proposed Interstate Air Quality Rule Consideration of Issues Associated with Possible Expansion of IAQR to the West Patrick Cummins, WGA Background.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
Final Amendments to the Regional Haze Rule: BART Rule Making June 16, 2005.
Fire Emissions Joint Forum –Section 308 Strategies for Fire Coordinating efforts of states changing or developing smoke management strategies for regional.
What is the purpose of the Class I Redesignation Guidance? Provides guidance for tribes who are considering redesignating their areas as Class I areas.
Mississippi Air Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality September 12, 2012.
Regional Haze Rule Best Available Retrofit Technology Government to Government Consultation Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
Model Rule/MOU Update Colleen Delaney, Utah DAQ WESTAR Model Rule Working Group September 18, 2002.
1 Potential Impacts of a National SO 2 Program WRAP Forum June 3, 2004.
ALTERNATIVES TO BART -TRADING- Lily Wong USEPA – Region 9 September 1, 2005.
1 Update on the STIP-II Project & Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Meeting Portland, OR April 3, 2003.
Stationary Sources Joint Forum Update Eric Massey Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Lee Alter and Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association.
BART Guideline Overview WESTAR August 31, 2005 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Todd Hawes
REGIONAL HAZE BART – Key Issues For Consideration Eric Massey, Arizona DEQ Lee Alter, WGA SSJF Meeting June 3, 2004 Denver, Colorado.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
Draft Final Annex to the GCVTC Report September 25, 2000.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Tribal Point Source Project Stationary Sources Joint Forum Meeting Tempe, AZ, Dec , 2004 Sarah Kelly, Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals.
Market Trading Forum Update Ira Domsky and Colleen Delaney, Co-chairs.
Update on the STIP-II Project: Draft Model SIP Brian Finneran Oregon Department of Environmental Quality WRAP Air Manager’s Committee Santa Fe, NM March.
WRAP Update Patrick Cummins WESTAR Meeting September 23, 2005.
BART SIP Development: Example from Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park WRAP IWG Meeting, Denver, CO August 29, 2007 Presented by: Ray Mohr and Curt Taipale.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q 1 Regional Haze Update WESTAR September 17-19, 2007 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards.
NSR and Title V Activities WESTAR Business Meeting May 2005.
Recommendations from Regional Haze Workgroup Core Issue 1: 5- Year Progress Reports The RHR requires Comprehensive SIP revision every 10 years (first in.
WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP 2003 Work Plan: Overview and IOC Elements WRAP Board Meeting November 12, 2003 Tempe, AZ Rick Sprott.
Alternatives to BART Rule Discussion with WRAP Nov , 2006.
Summary of June 15, 2005 Revisions to RH BART and BART Guidelines.
Western Emissions Budget (WEB) Trading Program: Model Rule, Model SIP/TIP, MOU Bob Lebens, WESTAR Council Air Managers Committee March 19, 2003.
VISIBILITY SIPS The Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Fire The Role of the RPOs Opportunities for Participation US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Dennis Haddow.
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
Emission Trends and SIP Scenarios for SO2 and NOx Patrick Cummins WRAP Meeting December 14, 2005.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
WRAP WORK PLAN UPDATE NOVEMBER 2001 Submitted to WRAP Board for Approval Andy Ginsburg ODEQ, Co-Chair IOC Forum Mike George ADEQ, Co-Chair TOC Forum.
Proposed “BART Trading” Rule Bill Grantham September 1, 2005.
Significance of Mobile Source Emissions for the Purposes of Section 309 of the Regional Haze Rule Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board.
WRAP Update Patrick Cummins WESTAR Meeting September 23, 2005
Multi-Pollutant Proposals in the 108th Congress
Arizona Regional Haze State Implementation Plan
CAIR Replacement Rule and Regional Haze
BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association
Bill Harnett USEPA NACAA Membership Meeting October 21, 2008
Visibility Coordinator’s Report
U.S. EPA Clean Air Markets Division
Status of Regional Haze Rule
Western Regional Haze Planning and
WRAP Overview and Role of Dust Forum
Market Trading Forum Update
308 VS. 309 DECISION PROCESS November 2001 WRAP Meeting
Stationary Source NOx and PM Report: An Update Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Market Trading Forum Meeting September 19-20, 2002 Snowbird,
Workshop Technical and Policy Studies to Support the Annex
Market Trading Forum Update
RA BART Overview Deb Wolfe 8/9/2019.
Regional Haze Regulatory Developments
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Region 9 Tribal Air Quality Conference Regional Haze Rulemakings: Western Regional Air Partnership Annex July 25, 2002

Presentation Overview Background WRAP Annex WRAP & Tribal views on Annex –Integration w/ “Clear Skies”

Background July 1, 1999 regional haze Rule requires States and provides for Tribes to establish goals for improving visibility in 156 Class I areas. Regional haze is caused by fine particles or gases (primarily SO2, NOx) that form particles. Sources causing regional haze include power plants, auto emissions, burning, etc.

Background (cont.) States are required and Tribes may establish ambitious reasonable progress, long-term goals to reach natural background conditions in 60 years. Regional Planning Organizations have been established to assist in developing milestones to address regional haze pollutants.

Background (cont.) State and Tribal long-term goals are to be reassessed and revised in 2018 and every 10 years thereafter. In setting these goals, States and Tribes should address all types of manmade emissions including stationary, mobile sources, and area sources. Regional haze milestones coincide with PM2.5 milestones.

Tribal Opportunities To work with other Tribes and States to remedy a regional problem. To establish or augment your monitoring program to characterize visibility impairment. To establish or strengthen air program to address visibility impairment issues.

WRAP Annex In September 2000, the WRAP submitted to EPA a plan containing recommendations for implementing the stationary source portion of regional haze rule in the west. The member tribes are: Pueblo of Acoma, Campo Band of Kumeyaay Indians, Cortina Indian Rancheria, Hopi Tribe, Hualapai Nation of the Grand Canyon, Nez Perce Tribe, Northern Cheyenne Tribe, Salish and Kootenai Confederated Tribes, Pueblo of San Felipe, and Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of Fort Hall.

WRAP Annex (cont.) The plan contains a set of recommended regional emission reduction measures for SO2; one of the primary visibility impairment pollutants. The plan also includes a backstop emissions trading program for member States and Tribes to ensure that the emission milestones are achieved.

WRAP Annex (cont.) The rule contains SO2 emission reduction milestones for each year between 2003 and The rule also contains an annual process to determine whether the voluntary emission reduction measures meet the milestones. There is an emission pool of 20,000 tons set aside for tribal sources.

WRAP Annex (cont.) Comment Period –Rule was proposed on April 25, –Public hearing was held June 4, 2002 in Phoenix, AZ –Public comment period closed July 5. WRAP Submitted Comments July 3 –Per consensus of IOC –Includes comments on Tribal set aside and model Tribal Implementation Plans, developed by the tribes. –Available on WRAP web site

Recent Court Decision on RHR American Corn Growers vs. EPA – May 24, 2002 Upheld general structure/Goals of RHR Invalidated BART Provisions –Held EPA infringed on states authority Can’t require states to consider visibility impacts from BART sources on cumulative basis when setting controls for individual sources

WRAP Implementation Activities for Annex Establishment of Workgroup for MOU & Model Rule MTF/AMC Workshop (5/21-5/22/02) MOU/Model Rule Workshop Aug/Sept. –Follow-up meetings? NTEC – working with ICF on analysis to provide info for tribal set-aside allocation decision –Decision itself years off – ?

Court Decision (Cont.) Does not appear to affect Annex –Annex is voluntary and method of setting cap was determined by WRAP, not EPA EPA letter to WRAP June 7 –“EPA believes strongly that the... WRAP Process is fully consistent with the Court’s Ruling.” State/Enviro/NTEC intervenors have petitioned for rehearing en banc.

The Annex vs. the “Clear Skies Initiative” (CSI) Issue: How does Annex cap on Western SO2 emissions fit with national cap proposed in CSI?

WRAP on Annex & “CSI” Consensus of WRAP: Any national program must preserve integrity of Annex –Annex Milestones as a “hard” cap for the 9-state region including interim milestones –Allowance set-asides for tribes, renewable energy, and new sources –Backstop nature of program –States and tribes retain the ability to address localized visibility impairment problems at Class I

WRAP on Annex & CSI IOC Discussion Paper -- 2 concepts for integrating programs –Annex is the national SO2 program for the West –National program has regional cap for West per Annex milestones Available on web site, comments and ideas sought

WRAP on Annex & CSI No WRAP Consensus on: –Nox levels for West –Hg levels & trading of Hg –Inclusion of CO2 –Effect on other programs (e.g., NSR)

Tribal Letter to Bush on CSI From Gov. Chino (Acoma) on behalf of WRAP member tribes Commends President for commitment to honoring Annex Calls for CSI to address transport/local issues Opposes termination of NSR Calls for re-examination of Nox & Hg levels (to make more stringent)

For More Information Bill or ext. 103 Bob or ext. 106 You can also check out the NTEC website at: