Campaign Planning Process 28 Feb 2007 Mission Analysis Brief.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Core Business of UN Police and its Key Partners By Inger & Catheline.
Advertisements

SESSION 1: INTRODUCTION TO HUMANITARIAN ACTION. What guides UNICEFs humanitarian action Characteristics and challenges posed by complex emergencies UNICEFs.
Determine Prioritized Supporting Efforts Ops End States Stable & secured environm ent DP 7 : CTF Organised and Mission-Ready SE 17: Effective force composition.
Unified Land Operations
Unit 1 – Part 2 Fundamental Principles of United Nations Peacekeeping.
Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 3-07; and Army
Defining a Framework. Crisis Stability No peace – No war Human Insecurity Conflict Settlement Transition Stability Human Insecurity Conflict Complex Emergencies.
Campaign Planning Process 28 March 2006 Step 4A – Develop The Campaign Framework UNCLASSIFIED.
POLICY Defining DoD GHE  Coordination and adjudication process: Report on the results from a SACCP tasker review and coordination of DoD GHE definition.
Business Crisis and Continuity Management (BCCM) Class Session
PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security Lecture 9b - Department of Homeland Security Strategic Plan.
Commander’s Intent & Guidance Deployable Joint Task Force Augmentation Cell (DJTFAC) Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) Major Paul Zavislak.
Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force (CTITF) Open Briefing to Member States 27 July 2010 Conference Room 2 NLB.
CORE PROTECTION TRAINING MODULES PROTECTION TRAINING DAY 3: PROTECTION ADVOCACY AND PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE Date and location go here FACILITATORS: Names.
Security Council resolution 1325 Basic Overview
Commander’s Intent & Guidance
Civil-Military Forum Protection of Civilians Kelisiana Thynne Research Manager Australian Civil-Military Centre.
Crisis Action Planning Commander’s Guidance and Intent
Integrated Mission Planning Process (IMPP)
UNCLASSIFIED 1 UNCLASSIFIED Scenario Brief 16 July 05 MPAT TEMPEST EXPRESS-8 HAWAII JULY 2005.
Mitigating the KFC. Stakeholders KFC MPAK MW Mestizo KUH Govt CTF IPM SIS Cadre Materials Sanctuary Public Face ? Terror Actions Incidental Attacks.
Campaign Planning Process Step 3B – System Center of Gravity Analysis
Human Security and Protection of Civilians
Unit 2- Part 1 The Establishment and Operationalization of Security Council Mandates for Peacekeeping Operations.
OPT 1 Decisive Points Analysis (Step 4B) DP 1. Lines of Ops, Decisive Points, S-COG and End States DP 3 : Belligerents’ & Terrorists’ freedom of action.
EVOLVING MODERN PEACE OPERATIONS
Campaign Planning Process 29 March 2006 Step 7 – Prepare Operations Plan (OPLAN) / Operations Order (OPORD) & Assess UNCLASSIFIED.
Providing Security to Forced Migrants and Humanitarian Operations Lydia Mann-Bondat.
SGTM 2: Structure of United Nations Peace Operations Slide 1 SGTM 2: Structure of United Nations Peace Operations.
DP 3 : Hostile Groups’ freedom of action & sanctuary are denied SE 1a TGT/A Lead Supported (Supporting)EntitiesMOEsMOEIs Deny hostile groups’ movement.
CORE BUSINESS OF UN POLICE AND ITS KEY PARTNERS 20 October
Multinational Coordination Center
SESSION 8: SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS. AT THE END OF SESSION 8, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO: Explain the relevance of the work of the UN Security Council.
ACADEMICS Feb 2012 This brief is classified: UNCLASSIFIED As of: 31 Jan 12 CAMPAIGN ASSESSMENT.
Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Mongolia (Supported Strategic Commander) Warning Order to Commander, Coalition Task Force “Khokh Chono”
Prepare and Issue the Coalition / Combined Task Force OPORD Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) Purpose References Discuss the process of preparing.
CTF PACIFIC Date Course of Action Development Brief UNCLASSIFIED.
UN Mission in Eastern Pacifica UNMEP UN DPKO Plan 16 August 2007.
CTF PACIFIC 1 Mar 07 CPG 1 Course Of Action (COA) Brief UNCLASSIFIED.
Campaign Planning Process 28 March 2006 Step 4C – Campaign Evaluation UNCLASSIFIED.
The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and Civil -Military Cooperation and Humanitarian Coordination.
UNCLASSIFIED Crisis Action Planning 01 January 2006 CTF Operation Order UNCLASSIFIED ing.
UNCLASSIFIED 1 Multinational Coordination Center (MNCC) MPAT TEMPEST EXPRESS (TE) April 2015 Nouméa, New Caledonia.
UNCLASSIFIED As of W Mar 08 1 Course of Action Development (MDMP) 3 Mar 08 Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT)
Campaign Planning Process Guide / Brief Template
COMMANDER’S INTENT & GUIDANCE
Purpose To understand Commander’s Intent & Guidance and their importance in crisis action planning Intent & Guidance and their importance in crisis action.
Campaign Planning Process Step 5 – Linking Planning to Execution
UNCLASSIFIED 1 Gema Bhakti 2015 Lane 4: MNCC Operations Overview 14 September September 2015.
MPAT SECRETARIAT Multinational Force Crisis Action Planning Overview COALITION/COMBINED TASK FORCE TRAINING.
UNCLASSIFIED National Defense University Center for Complex Operations An Initial Framework for Transitional Public Security Bernie Carreau SSE IPR Workshop.
Campaign Planning Process 29 March 2006 Step 4E – Determine Prioritized Supporting Effects UNCLASSIFIED.
C5 Cell Step 4 - Decisive Points (DRAFT). DP 1 : Hostility Between Kuhistan and Sonora has Ceased Ending Conditions Key Components Critical to successful.
Crisis Action Planning (CAP) and The Commander’s Estimate Joint Pub 3-0, Doctrine for Joint Operations Joint Pup , Joint Task Force Planning Guidance.
Center of Excellence PEACE OPERATIONS COMMAND & CONTROL AND COMMAND & CONTROL AND TRANSITION ISSUES Lt Col (R) John Derick Osman Center of Excellence in.
MNF SOP Planning Options & Campaign Planning Process
Some End of Mission Comments Tempest Express 11 Singapore.
1 - Human Rights - Senior Leadership Programme. Contents Human rights, peace and security UN policy framework on human rights Human rights integration.
From Kosovo to Libya: NATO and the Responsibility to Protect (R2P)
MULTINATIONAL FORCES STANDING OPERATING PROCEDURES (MNF SOP)
COALTITION TASK FORCE GOODWILL
Campaign Planning Process Step 4 – Campaign Formulation
OPT 2 Decisive Point Brief (DP 2)
Standing Operating Procedures
OPERATION BLUE SINGA Intelligence
PROTOCOL RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PEACE AND SECURITY COUNCIL OF THE AFRICAN UNION BRIEFING TO THE JOINT STANDING COMMITTEE ON DEFENCE AND THE.
Introduction to United Nations Peacekeeping
Chapter 7: The Operational Dimension
Civil Affairs’ (CA) Role In Stability PKSOI Lead (Liddick)
SECURING THE PEACE BY OUTSIDE FORCE
Presentation transcript:

Campaign Planning Process 28 Feb 2007 Mission Analysis Brief

Scope for Mission Analysis Brief Updates Updates Intelligence Updates Intelligence Updates Operations Updates Operations Updates Mission Analysis Mission Analysis Strategic Commander’s Guidance Strategic Commander’s Guidance CTF Mission Analysis CTF Mission Analysis (Mission, Intent, Objectives & Operational End State) System Centre of Gravity (S-COG) System Centre of Gravity (S-COG) Strategic S-COG Strategic S-COG Schematics of Operational S-COG Schematics of Operational S-COG Operational S-COG Matrix Operational S-COG Matrix Detail Timetable for CPP Step 4 Detail Timetable for CPP Step 4

Campaign Planning Process 28 Feb 2007 Intelligence Updates

Campaign Planning Process 28 Feb 2007 Operations Updates

CTF Components CTF Component Analysis CTF Staff Command Group 30%50%20% Steps 1 to 3 Steps 4 & 5 Steps 6 & 7 1 – Commander’s Scoping 2 – Situation Review 3A – Mission Analysis 3B – S-COG Analysis 3C – Factor Analysis 4E – Determine Prioritized Supporting Effects (SEs) 5 – Linking Planning to Execution 6 – Commander’s Estimate 7 – Prepare OPLAN / OPORD 4A – Develop the Campaign Framework 4B – Decisive Point (DP) Analysis & Supporting Effect (SE) Development 4D – Produce Campaign Plan Directive (C5) & FID (Staff) 4C – Decisive Point (DP) Evaluation WARNO 1OIPEMsn AnalysisWARNO 2Campaign PlanWARNO 3CDR’s EstimateOPORD 1OPLAN 1 Strategic Military Direction (HHQ Warning Order to JTF / CTF) Done prior to TE 11

Understanding & ROE Collectively, the CTF HQ had conducted CPP Step 1 – 3 and produce the Mission Analysis and Warning Order #1 & 2. Collectively, the CTF HQ had conducted CPP Step 1 – 3 and produce the Mission Analysis and Warning Order #1 & 2. Purpose of this brief to establish a common ground for all planners to move forward for CPP Step 4 – 5. Purpose of this brief to establish a common ground for all planners to move forward for CPP Step 4 – 5. Common definition based on MNF SOP for System Centre of Gravity (S-COG). Common definition based on MNF SOP for System Centre of Gravity (S-COG). Feedback on CPP Step 1 – 3 can be highlighted to the After Action Review (AAR) Team. Feedback on CPP Step 1 – 3 can be highlighted to the After Action Review (AAR) Team.

Mission Analysis Brief Strategic Command Guidance 1. Supported Strategic Command Mission Statement. Singapore assumes lead nation responsibilities in establishing a Coalition Task Force no later than 30 April 2007 for the purpose of conducting peace operations in the designated area of operations, ensuring the withdrawal of Sonora forces from Kuhistan, preventing further missile attacks by Kuhistan on Sonora and supporting the United Nations mandate in accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 1569, in order to restore peace and security in the region. On order, transition to a follow-on peacekeeping force. 2. Strategic End State. CTF PACIFIC restores secure and stable environment, alleviate immediate disaster related health issues, substantially restores infrastructure critical to humanitarian assistance efforts, KUHISTAN and SONORA forces redeployed to their respective national territories, CTF tasks effectively transitioned to KUHISTAN authorities and follow-on UN PKF. CTF redeployed.

Mission Analysis Brief CTF Mission Analysis 1. CTF Mission. On order, CTF PACIFIC is to conduct Peace Operations in PACIFICA for a period of 6 months, in order to enforce the peace agreement between KUHISTAN and SONORA, establish a stable and secure environment in KUHISTAN for rebuilding, and set the conditions for the transition to KUHISTAN authorities and UN PKF, in accordance with UN SCR 1569 (2006). 2. CTF Commander’s Intent CCTF’s intent is to speedily establish the CTF PACIFIC in the AO to expedite and enforce the forces separation to respective internationally recognised borders and to exhibit the will of CTF to enforce the peace agreement. Concurrently, security measures are carried out in KUHISTAN to establish a stable and secure environment to facilitate restoration of law and order. Thereafter, within CTF’s capability, to support/conduct humanitarian efforts to alleviate any immediate disaster-related issues and restore critical infrastructure.

Mission Analysis Brief CTF Mission Analysis 3. Operational Objectives. Separate KUH and SON forcesSeparate KUH and SON forces Ensure SON forces withdraw from KUH territoryEnsure SON forces withdraw from KUH territory Prevent further attacks by KUH on SONPrevent further attacks by KUH on SON Maintain the integrity of the internationally recognised KUH-SON border (land/maritime/air)Maintain the integrity of the internationally recognised KUH-SON border (land/maritime/air) Help establish peace and security in KUH in order to facilitate social and economic rehabilitation of the KUH populationHelp establish peace and security in KUH in order to facilitate social and economic rehabilitation of the KUH population Support humanitarian assistance operations to assist in the rapid restoration of law and orderSupport humanitarian assistance operations to assist in the rapid restoration of law and order Protect and support civilian elements to facilitate humanitarian operationsProtect and support civilian elements to facilitate humanitarian operations Plan transition to KUH authorities and follow-on UN PKFPlan transition to KUH authorities and follow-on UN PKF Deal with CBRN-related issuesDeal with CBRN-related issues Conduct anti-terrorism measuresConduct anti-terrorism measures

Mission Analysis Brief CTF Mission Analysis 4. Operational End State. A stable and secure environment is established, when: - separation of KUHISTAN and SONORA forces to within their respective internationally recognised borders is achieved; - cessation of hostilities between KUHISTAN and SONORA ; - threats to security are significantly reduced within Kuhistan; - immediate humanitarian and other disaster issues are sufficiently mitigated or reduced; - critical infrastructures are restored for humanitarian effort; - conditions agreed by CTF, KUHISTAN authorities and UN PKF thereafter for transition.

Campaign Planning Process 28 Feb 2007 System Centre of Gravity

Strategic S-COG Analysis Strategic End State – CTF PACIFIC restores secure and stable environment, alleviate immediate disaster related health issues, substantially restores infrastructure critical to humanitarian assistance efforts, KUHISTAN and SONORA forces redeployed to their respective national territories, CTF tasks effectively transitioned to KUHISTAN authorities and follow-on UN PKF. CTF redeployed. S-COG – International diplomatic and domestic political recognition that the peaceful resolution of differences is the desired goal of the current conflict in PACIFICA. Critical Capabilities (CCs): Acknowledgement that peaceful means costs less in many terms will help foster an environment conducive to establishing long-term peace and security in the region. Acknowledgement that peaceful means costs less in many terms will help foster an environment conducive to establishing long-term peace and security in the region. Critical Requirements (CRs): development of mechanisms that build trust development of mechanisms that build trust minimize concerns in the intentions of either of the parties to the conflict minimize concerns in the intentions of either of the parties to the conflict the diplomatic inducements of international peace-makers in helping facilitate the peaceful settlement of disputes the diplomatic inducements of international peace-makers in helping facilitate the peaceful settlement of disputes international pressure on key leaders in Kuhistan and Sonora to end the violence international pressure on key leaders in Kuhistan and Sonora to end the violence a strong international condemnation of the violence that is backed by a credible force able to enforce the will of the international community’s mandate a strong international condemnation of the violence that is backed by a credible force able to enforce the will of the international community’s mandate economic incentives to the belligerents designed to foster cooperation vice competition. economic incentives to the belligerents designed to foster cooperation vice competition. Critical Vulnerabilities (CVs): The leadership of both nations, particularly the hard-liners are vulnerable for various reasons: bowing to pressure to compromise might caused them to be seen as weak with the possibility of attendant loss of authority; bowing to pressure to compromise might caused them to be seen as weak with the possibility of attendant loss of authority; the fear of being subjected to harsher treatment such as war crimes when they compromise might compel them to harden their positions against seeking peaceful resolution. the fear of being subjected to harsher treatment such as war crimes when they compromise might compel them to harden their positions against seeking peaceful resolution.

OPERATIONAL S-COG ANALYSIS

Operational S-COG Analysis A stable and secure environment is established, when: - separation of KUHISTAN and SONORA forces to within their respective internationally recognised borders is achieved; - cessation of hostilities between KUHISTAN and SONORA ; - threats to security are significantly reduced within KUHISTAN ; - immediate humanitarian and other disaster issues are sufficiently mitigated or reduced; - critical infrastructures are restored for humanitarian effort; - other conditions agreed by CTF, KUHISTAN authorities and UN PKF thereafter for transition. S-COG – Cessation of hostility among conflicting parties. Between SONORA & KUHISTAN military forces Between SONORA & KUHISTAN military forces Conflicting parties within KUHISTAN (MPAK, KFC, MW & IPM) Conflicting parties within KUHISTAN (MPAK, KFC, MW & IPM) Critical Capabilities (CCs): Trust among stakeholders Trust among stakeholders Stability for rebuilding & economic recovery Stability for rebuilding & economic recovery Capacity for immediate Disaster Crisis Management Capacity for immediate Disaster Crisis Management Credible CTF Credible CTF Critical Requirements (CRs): Violence ceased / diminished Violence ceased / diminished Sovereignty assured Sovereignty assured Isolation of KFC & IPM Isolation of KFC & IPM Entice MPAK & Free Mojave to support the peace process Entice MPAK & Free Mojave to support the peace process Empower local civil sector to be self sustainable Empower local civil sector to be self sustainable Engage local population Engage local population Early intro of UN/IO/NGO for reconstruction and rehabilitation Early intro of UN/IO/NGO for reconstruction and rehabilitation Introducing economic incentives to encourage progressive economic development Introducing economic incentives to encourage progressive economic development HA situation is resolved to a degree that is signicant to reduce internal unrest HA situation is resolved to a degree that is signicant to reduce internal unrest Continued resources commitment from TCC Continued resources commitment from TCC Robust force protection Robust force protection Unity within CTF Unity within CTF Critical Vulnerabilities (CVs): Non-compliance to peace agreement Non-compliance to peace agreement Factions within leadership of stakeholders Factions within leadership of stakeholders Inability to deal with hostile acts by KFC, IPM Inability to deal with hostile acts by KFC, IPM Loss of confidence of local populace Loss of confidence of local populace Lack of capability of local gov / authorities Lack of capability of local gov / authorities Inability to deal with humanitarian crisis Inability to deal with humanitarian crisis Lack of support for HA agencies Lack of support for HA agencies Inability to sustain CTF operations Inability to sustain CTF operations Compromised impartiality Compromised impartiality Loss of Int’l / TCC support Loss of Int’l / TCC support

Campaign Planning Process 28 Feb 2007 Timetable for CPP Step 4

0930 – 1030Step 4A (Comd Core Gp) 0930 – 1030Step 4A (Comd Core Gp) 1030 – 1200Prep for 4B & 4C (OPT 1 – 4) 1030 – 1200Prep for 4B & 4C (OPT 1 – 4) 1200 – 1300Lunch 1200 – 1300Lunch 1300 – 1430Presentation for 4B & 4C (All) 1300 – 1430Presentation for 4B & 4C (All) 1430 – 1500Break / Prep for 4E 1430 – 1500Break / Prep for 4E 1500 – 1600Step 4E: Prioritization of Effort / WARNO 3 (Comd Core Gp) 1500 – 1600Step 4E: Prioritization of Effort / WARNO 3 (Comd Core Gp) 1600 – 1630Break 1600 – 1630Break 1630 – 1700Brief Campaign Plan Framework to CCTF 1630 – 1700Brief Campaign Plan Framework to CCTF 1700 – 1730CCTF Guidance / SR Mentor 1700 – 1730CCTF Guidance / SR Mentor