Understanding Changes to Assessments for APPR Purposes Theresa L. Gray, Coordinator Integrated Education Services (IES) Erie 2-Chautauqua-Cattaraugus BOCES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment types and activities
Advertisements

The Journey – Improving Writing Through Formative Assessment Presented By: Sarah McManus, Section Chief, Testing Policy & Operations Phyllis Blue, Middle.
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
1 LAUSD Mathematics Periodic Benchmark Assessments Using Data to Inform Instruction.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
Annual Professional performance review (APPR overview) Wappingers CSD.
MDTP and Formative Assessment Bruce Arnold MDTP Director mdtp.ucsd.edu.
NC K-3 Formative Assessment Process PRINCIPALS’ MEETING MARCH 2015.
Principal Performance Evaluation System
Assessment Cadre #3: “Assess How? Designing Assessments to Do What You Want”
1 Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) Update Holiday Inn Albany, New York October 15, 2010.
PARCC Information Meeting FEB. 27, I Choose C – Why We Need Common Core and PARCC.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Successful Practices Network Annual Professional Performance Review and CTE Carol Ann Zygo, Field Team Associate of Central And Northern.
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
Aligning Priorities, Goals and Initiatives for School and Student Success Presenters: Dr. Regina Cohn Dr. Robert Greenberg January 2013.
ICSD District RtI Committee Agenda 3/13/12 3:45- Review of Our Norms and today’s agenda 4:00- Defining RtI and screening tool criteria 4:30- Begin review.
NYSCEA March 1, 2013 Lawrence M. Paska, Ph.D. Coordinator of Technology Policy New York’s State of Virtual.
Student Achievement Data Data by School Board of Education Presentation October 14,
NECAP DATA ANALYSIS 2012 Presented by Greg Bartlett March, 2013.
Making Demonstrable Improvement: Request for Feedback (Updated) July 2015 Presented by: Ira Schwartz Assistant Commissioner of Accountability.
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
OCM BOCES Day 7 Lead Evaluator Training 1. 2 Day Seven Agenda.
Kindergarten Individual Development Survey (KIDS) District 97 pilot involvement December 11, 2012.
Master Teacher Program Presenters:Ginny Elliott Winifred Nweke.
Measuring Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Name of School.
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
Assessing The Next Generation Science Standards on Multiple Scales Dr. Christyan Mitchell 2011 Council of State Science Supervisors (CSSS) Annual Conference.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
STAR3 Project for WS/FCS. STAR3 All students deserve and thrive under a great teacher that cares for their well being. Our responsibility is to provide.
21 st Century Education A conversation regarding the changes in academic standards, assessment, funding, and accountability.
New York State Staff/Curriculum Development Network S/CDN September 22, 2005.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Riverside County Office of Education November 22, 2013.
Lackawanna City School District Title 1 Program School Year Currently funded through Title 1:Currently funded through Title 1: -Academic Intervention.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Determining Student Mastery: Achieving learning potential using assessment Drew Maerz Asheboro City Schools July 8, 2014.
State Support for Classroom Assessment Fen Chou, Ph.D. Louisiana Department of Education National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
Pretest Workshop February, 2007 Scott Norton Louisiana Department of Education.
1 Georgia’s Changing Assessment Landscape Melissa Fincher Associate Superintendent for Assessment and Accountability Georgia Department for Education GACIS.
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District Program Evaluations A summary of recommendations from the completed program evaluations March 6, 2009.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
SCIENCE Assessment Amanda Cantafio.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
Interim Assessment Information Hope Allen Director of Assessment 4/12/15.
December 4, 2009 State Board of Education adopted:  Oregon Diploma  Modified Diploma  Extended Diploma  Alternative.
Kristen A Condella MCSD Mathematics Coordinator. Mathematics Formative Assessment System (MFAS) Formative assessment is a process used by teachers and.
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
understanding LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
SB 1664 Changes to Personnel Evaluations
Patrick Moses Erie 2 BOCES Staff Development Specialist
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
Student Learning Objective (SLO) Staff Development
Implementing Race to the Top
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
Bethel School District CCSS Plan
Chief School Officers January 2019 State Updates.
Georgia’s Changing Assessment Landscape
Schoolwide Programs.
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Changes to Assessments for APPR Purposes Theresa L. Gray, Coordinator Integrated Education Services (IES) Erie 2-Chautauqua-Cattaraugus BOCES

1% Instructional Time Effective March 2, 2014, any Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) plan submitted to the Commissioner for approval for use in the school year and thereafter must include a signed certification by the superintendent, district superintendent or chancellor attesting that no more than one percent of total instruction time in each classroom or program of the district or BOCES is spent taking any locally determined traditional standardized third party assessment or traditional standardized district, regional, or BOCES-developed assessment for APPR purposes.

1% Instructional Time Effective March 2, 2014, any Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) plan submitted to the Commissioner for approval for use in the school year and thereafter must include a signed certification by the superintendent, district superintendent or chancellor attesting that no more than one percent of total instruction time in each classroom or program of the district or BOCES is spent taking any locally determined traditional standardized third party assessment or traditional standardized district, regional, or BOCES-developed assessment for APPR purposes.

What is a “Standardized Assessment?” Traditional standardized assessments are defined by NYSED for the purposes of this regulation as a systematic method of gathering information from objectively scored items that allow the test taker to select one or more of the given options or choices as their response. Examples include multiple-choice, true-false, and matching items. NYSED defines this term to focus specifically on those assessments that require the student (and not the examiner/assessor) to directly use a "bubble" answer sheet.

But it does NOT include…. Formative assessment is a process used by teachers and students during instruction that provides feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and learning to improve students’ achievement of intended instructional outcomes.

But it does NOT include… Diagnostic assessments are evidence-gathering procedures that provide a sufficiently clear indication regarding which targeted subskills or bodies of enabling knowledge a student possesses or does not possess — thereby supplying the information needed by teachers when they decide how to most appropriately design or modify instructional activities.

But it does NOT include… Performance Assessments Science experiments Extended responses/essays Research papers

But it does NOT include… State Assessments!

How do I determine 1% of instructional time? Need to determine: Maximum amount of time for assessment (not including any mandated time extensions) Number of schools days x Minutes of daily instruction

Turn and Talk Implications? Concerns? Questions?

Removal of Traditional Standardized Testing in K-2 Effective March 2, 2014, no APPR plan shall be approved by the Commissioner for use in the school year or thereafter that provides for the administration of traditional standardized third party or vendor assessments to students in kindergarten through grade two.

Turn and Talk Implications? Concerns? Questions?

Grades 6-8 Social Studies/Science Effective February 11, 2014, for the State Growth or Other Comparable Measures subcomponent, sixth through eighth grade social studies and sixth through seventh grade science have been removed from the definition of core subject areas. Core subject are as are now defined as eighth grade science and high school courses in English language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies that lead to a Regents examination in the school year, or a State assessment in the school year or thereafter.

So What? May now utilize a school-wide, group, or team measure based on one or more State or Regents assessments in sixth through eight social studies and/or sixth through seventh science

Turn and Talk Implications? Concerns? Questions?