U.S. Market for SO2 Allowances

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting More for Four Principles for Comprehensive Emissions Trading Jan Mazurek, Director Center for Innovation and the Environment 2002 Environmental.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Stationary-Source Local Air Pollution.
Hal T. Interactions between Carbon Regulation & Renewable Energy Policies  Thoughtpiece: The CATF is in a position to consider program.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
1 Chapter 14 Practice Quiz Environmental Economics.
Moving toward Stringency in Emissions Trading Professor Lesley McAllister University of San Diego School of Law.
1 Topic 3.c: Tradable emission permits We have seen that tradable pollution permits compare favorably with other policy instruments we have considered.
Pollution Control ECON 373 March 28, Pollution Control Federal Water Pollution Control Policy ▫Types of pollutants ▫Regulations ▫Efficiency effectiveness.
Pollution Credits By: Luke Jeseritz. What is a pollution credit? A pollution credit is a set amount of pollutants a privately owned corporation, utility,
An Experimental Economic Analysis of Carbon Trading Options for Australia John Tisdell and Corinne Grainger Atmospheric Environment Research Centre Griffith.
In chapter 10, we look for the answers to these questions:
Cap and Trade Basics Acid Rain Program’s SO 2 Trading Claire Schary EPA – Region 10 Climate Change Policy Advisor Sep. 25, 2009.
1 Chapter 3 Externalities and Public Policy. 2 Externalities Externalities are costs or benefits of market transactions not reflected in prices. Negative.
1 Topic 3.c: Transferable emission permits We will start analyzing the last policy we will look at for pollution control. –Tradable/transferable emission.
Economic Strategies to Reduce Acid Deposition Ecological Economic Theory Fall 2003.
Emissions Trading The Economics of Emissions Trading The Market for Sulfur Dioxide Emissions.
How can capitalism save us? Put a price on pollution!
Overview of Stationary Source Pollution Control and Management in the U.S. Barbara A. Finamore Senior Attorney Natural Resources Defense Council Better.
The Cost and Benefits of Reducing Acid Rain By Sarah Abdulkarim.
AGEC/FNR 406 LECTURE 19. Acid Rain Name derives from a chemical reaction between SO 2 (sulfur dioxide) NO 2 (nitrogen dioxide) and H 2 O (water)
    Numerical Example of the Cost Savings Associated with Cap-and-Trade Systems Firms Historical Emissions (Tons/Yr) Marginal Abatement Cost ($/Ton) Alkyone.
Improving Air Quality: Controlling Stationary Sources Chapter 13 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternThomas and Callan, Environmental Economics.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
How the U.S. judges air quality Clean Air Act of 1970 – First Federal Act to set air quality standards National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS):
Carbon markets An international tool for cost-effective GHG mitigation.
How can capitalism save us? Put a price on pollution!
Success of Market-Based Approaches The Success of Market-Based Approaches in Air Quality Management in the United States Kevin Rosseel Office of Atmospheric.
Questions on Green Taxes
Taxes, Standards and Tradable Permits
Regulatory Approaches to Address U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rebecca Stanfield Shriver Center Climate Change Symposium September 30, 2009.
Econ 201 Chpt. 10 Coase Theorem: Establishing Property Rights & Tradable Permits.
Cap and Trade 101 Marlon G. Boarnet Professor of Public Policy Director of Graduate Programs in Urban Planning and Development University of Southern California.
1 Cap and Trade for Regulating Greenhouse Gases Presented by Scott Murtishaw Advisor to President Peevey, CPUC NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Francisco June.
SEA at ASU Student Economics Association. Economics and the Environment.
Permits and the U.S. Acid Rain Program (ARP). Acid Rain Caused primarily by SO2 and Nox, which is generated largely by coal fired plants Harmful to trees,
Emissions trading end of the world Greg Barrett Economics Lecturer University of Canberra Carbon cycle ecology Objectives Theory Practice.
Section 6 API-135 / Econ 1661 April 5, 2013 Rich Sweeney 0.
Class 7 Environmental Policy Tools
California Cap on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Market-Based Compliance Mechanisms Edie Chang California Air Resources Board September 2015 California.
1 “Using Carbon Markets to Encourage the Uptake of Low Carbon Vehicles” Meeting the Low Carbon Challenge The Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership Third Annual.
Research on ‘Emissions Trade’ By Sarah Jang Research on ‘Emissions Trade’ By Sarah Jang.
Air Quality Programs.
Dr. Laura Dawson Ullrich March 25, Q per year $ MB MD MPC MSC = MPC + MD Q1Q1 Q* Actual output Socially efficient output b a c.
Externalities and Public Policy
AGEC/FNR 406 LECTURE 17. Tradable Pollution Permits 1975 the U.S. EPA started an Emissions Trading Program to reduce air pollution. Support for this market-based.
Improving Air Quality: Controlling Stationary Sources Chapter 12.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Model Cap and Trade Rules: Unique Elements and Flexibilities Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
What is Acid Rain? Deposited material from the atmosphere containing high amounts of nitric and sulfuric acids Comes from both natural and man-made sources,
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 14 Stationary-Source Local Air Pollution.
Sometimes externality problems can’t be solved by private bargaining (transaction costs are too big). Public policy toward externalities. “Command-and-control”
Across the country, countless people have protested, even risking arrest, against the Keystone XL Pipeline. (Credit: modification of image by “NoKXL”/Flickr.
Air Quality Management Comparison of Cap-and-Trade, Command-and Control and Rate-Based Programs Dr. Ruben Deza Senior Environmental Engineer Clean Air.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
By Kelsey Neichin Draft Year: 1963 Amendment Years: 1965, 1970, 1977, 1990 National Law.
Regulatory Platforms for CO2 trading regulation Last Week Discussion of Agencies, Purpose and How Operate that may be in charge of Carbon Trading at the.
Improving Air Quality: Controlling Stationary Sources Chapter 12 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Environmental Policy: Cap and Trade. Introduction  Environmental policy in US is adversarial  Federal standards, state and local governments can require.
ExternalitiesExternalities. Overview Externalities –Negative: Action by one party imposes a cost on another party –Positive: Action by one party benefits.
Econ 201 Chpt. 10 Coase Theorem: Establishing Property Rights & Tradable Permits.
Coase Theorem: Establishing Property Rights & Tradable Permits
CURRENT STATUS AND ISSUES OF THE KOREAN EMISSION TRADING SCHEME
Clean Air Act Glossary.
C h a p t e r 3 EXTERNALITIES AND GOVERNMENT POLICY
The Failure of Cap and Trade in GHG Emissions Controls
Carbon Pricing Telling Canada’s story in numbers
Markets and Regulation: Alternative or Complements?
Acid Rain Web Quest Answers
Acid Rain Web Quest Answers
Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008
Incentive Based Strategies: Transferable Discharge Permits
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Market for SO2 Allowances Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a primary product of coal-burning power plants. SO2 pollution lowers the pH scale of rainfall, leading to the problem commonly known as acid rain. Increased acidity of lakes and rivers. Slower growth, injury or death of forests. Visibility impairment. SO2 can impair respiratory function and is linked to a variety of respiratory ailments.

U.S. Market for SO2 Allowances What Are Allowances? An allowance authorizes a unit within a utility or industrial source to emit one ton of SO2 during a given year or any year thereafter. At the end of each year, the unit must hold an amount of allowances at least equal to its annual emissions, i.e., a unit that emits 5,000 tons of S02 must hold at least 5,000 allowances that are usable in that year. Allowances are fully marketable commodities. Once allocated, allowances may be bought, sold, traded, or banked for use in future years. Allowances may not be used for compliance prior to the calendar year for which they are allocated.

U.S. Market for SO2 Allowances The process of setting up a market for pollution emissions involves three steps: Establish an overall cap on pollution (i.e. Q’) For the U.S. SO2 market the cap was set in the 1990 Clean Air Act amendment. Reduce SO2 emissions from fixed sources by 50% from 1980 levels (17.3 million tons). Allocate permits (allowances) to polluters In the U.S. SO2 market, a ‘grandfathering’ scheme was used. Allocated to polluters based on their 1985-87 pollution. Facilitate trading between polluters In the U.S. SO2 market the trading was generally unrestricted. Stiff penalties to those firms who exceeded their allowances.

U.S. Market for SO2 Allowances How Are Allowances Allocated? Allowances are allocated for each year beginning in 1995. In Phase I, EPA allocates allowances to each unit at an emission rate of 2.5 pounds of SO2/mmBtu (million British thermal units) of heat input, multiplied by the unit's baseline mmBtu (the average fossil fuel consumed from 1985 through 1987)…Roughly 440 units are involved in Phase 1

U.S. Market for SO2 Allowances …In Phase II, which began in 2000, the limits imposed on Phase I plants are tightened, and emissions limits are also imposed on all SO2 emitting units (another 2000 or so units). EPA allocates allowances to each unit at an emission rate of 1.2 pounds of SO2/mmBtu of heat input, multiplied by the unit's baseline, which effectively places a cap at 8.95 million on the number of allowances issued to units each year.

Market for SO2 Allowances

Market for SO2 Allowances How is Compliance Determined? At the end of the year, units must hold a quantity of allowances equal to or greater than the amount of SO2 emitted during that year. What Is The Penalty for Noncompliance? Penalty for noncompliance: $2000 per ton over, with inflation it is now about $3000 per ton. Firms have a year to offset excess emissions by purchasing permits. Very rarely are firms out of compliance.

Market for SO2 Allowances

Market for SO2 Allowances Reasons why the program resulted in a robust market There were wide differences in the cost of abating emissions. The policy was flexible. The implementation was simple. The provisions were enforced => the government’s property right to no pollution above the standard is secure.

Market for SO2 Allowances Two questions: Has the SO2 trading program reduced emissions? Has the program reduced the cost of emissions control?

But there’s more to the story (next time)…

Is the SO2 allowance program cheaper than the usual regulatory approach? Can be highly successful at obtaining emissions reductions cost-effectively; Stavins: “Trading volume has increased over the life of the program, and the robust market has resulted in an estimated cost savings of up to $1 billion annually, compared with the cost of command-and-control regulatory alternatives that were considered by Congress in prior years, representing a 30-50% cost savings.”

SO2 Trading: That was then… 1990: Title IV of the Clean Air Act established trading 1995: Phase I (374 large units) 2000: Phase II (1,420 more units) National Cap with no spatial restrictions on trading. By 2000 emissions were 40% lower than 1980 levels Continuous monitoring of emissions1 allowance used for each ton emitted Very low transaction costs (0.1% in 1999)

SO2 Spot Prices & Volume (2003-2007) (courtesy Rich Woodward)

SO2: Poster Child of Cap-and-Trade “The allowance trading program has had exceptionally positive welfare effects, with estimated benefits being as much as ten times greater than costs.”Stavins (2005) “The EPA and other governments have looked upon the Acid Rain Program as the standard of how a market-based system can control emissions at reasonable cost.” Tesoriero (2010)