GASB’ S N EW P ENSION S TATEMENTS California Society of Municipal Finance Officers February 21, 2013 Michelle Czerkawski, GASB Project Manager The views.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of New Pension Accounting Requirements Under GASB Statements No. 67 and No. 68 September 2013.
Advertisements

Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota GASB 68—The New World of Employer Pension Accounting and Reporting December 17, 2013 Presenter: Dave.
Changes in Accounting and Reporting for Pensions Presented to House Appropriations Committee _____________________________________.
Reporting Pensions Under GASB 68 KASBO - Spring /7/2014.
1 GASB 68 Accounting and Reporting for Pensions an Amendment of GASB Statement No. 27 Presented by: Kevin S. Wong, CPA Gilbert Associates, Inc.
THE NEW PENSION ACCOUNTING AND ITS IMPACT ON FUNDING CSFMO Oakland, California February 21,
GASB 68 In 2006 the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) began a project to examine how Pension Plan liabilities and expense are determined.
Technical Update Presented by Chris Ray Partner - KPMG LLP KPMG LLP.
Florida Government Finance Officers Association Webinar GASB’s New Pension Standards December 18, 2014.
GASB Pension Standards: An Educational Overview PEBA Retirement Division GFOA Fall Conference October 12,
Pat Robertson Executive Director September 2014 GASB Pension Standards Update.
Communicating the Facts on GASB 68
Changes in Accounting and Reporting for Pensions Presented to Senate Finance Committee _____________________________________.
Pension Accounting and Financial Reporting GASB Invitation to Comment The views expressed in this presentation are those of Mr. Bean. Official positions.
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting Clinic VII McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Auxiliary Organizations GASB Statement No. 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions Sheralin Klinthong, Associate Director, FS / SFSR Chancellor’s.
California Society of Municipal Finance Officers Pension Accounting and Financial Reporting: A Work in Progress The views expressed in this presentation.
GASB Technical Update Mark Thomas KPMG LLP Year-End GAAP Training April 18, 2014.
April 8, Statement No. 65, Items Previously Recorded as Assets and Liabilities Statement No. 67, Financial Reporting for Pension Plans-an amendment.
GASB 68 Employer Training Presenters: Shelley Johnson Foster & Foster System Actuary for LASERS and TRSL Artie Fillastre LASERS Chief Financial Officer.
GASB’S REVISED PENSION STANDARDS: What Arizona’s Governmental Employers Need for 2015 DONNA MILLER, ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL NANCY BENNETT,
TECHNICAL UPDATE (Auxiliary Organizations) Mark Thomas KPMG LLP Year-End GAAP Training May 28, 2014.
GASB Update 2015 Brian J. Hemmerle, CPA, CFE Jeffery W. Patterson, CPA, MBA February, 2015.
Upcoming GASB Changes 1 Presented by Darla Iverson Glenna Musselman Chief Financial Officer Senior Accountant Presented by Darla Iverson Glenna Musselman.
©2013 CliftonLarsonAllen LLP cliftonlarsonallen.com See CLA PowerPoint User Guide for instructions to insert an image or change the icon on the business.
Pension Accounting GASB Pension Accounting and Financial Reporting - Overview SAAABA Annual Business Seminar– April 18, 2012 Cindy Peters – Accountant.
Copyright © 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. GASB Statements 67 & 68 – Audit & Budget Committee Discount Rate and Allocation of Assets/Liabilities.
Presented by Frank Crawford, CPA President, Crawford & Associates, P.C. (twitter) 1.
Pension System and Accounting for It Presented by: Kevin Worley, CFO November 19, 2014 Division of Retirement & Benefits AGFOA – Anchorage, AK.
GASB Standards on Pensions
Precision Experience Assurance The New Pension Standards GASB Statements 67 and 68 Milestone Professional Services, CPE Day September 13, 2013, Kissimmee.
1 Your Tilted Balance Sheet – GASB 68 Overview Presented by: Kevin S. Wong, CPA Gilbert Associates, Inc. September 12, 2013.
TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008.
GASB UPDATE John DeBurro, CPA. Agenda What’s Applicable in FY14? 1.Statement No. 65** 2.Statement No Statement No Statement No. 70 What Applicable.
Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota An Overview of GASB 68 for Cost-Sharing Plans Dave DeJonge Assistant Executive Director, PERA.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
GASB 45 at SMCCCD District Committee on Budget and Finance October 3, 2006.
Inside the New GASB Pensions Standards Municipal Analysts Group of New York February 15, 2013 Thad Calabrese, Assistant Professor, NYU Dean Michael Mead,
GASB 68 & 71, PERS and the Impact on Mississippi Entities
Presented by: G.S. Curran & Co. GASB 68 FOR COST SHARING EMPLOYERS OF THE ASSESSORS’ RETIREMENT FUND.
Unit 6 Seminar Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.
KDE Finance Officer Workshop GASB 68 New reporting requirement that will affect this year’s audit. It is highlighted in the audit contract. Purpose.
Cavanaugh Macdonald C O N S U L T I N G, L L C The experience and dedication you deserve MAPERS 2012 Conference GASB Update July 12, 2012 Presented by:
Joint Presentation of the Auditor of Public Accounts and the Virginia Retirement System GASB 68 Implementation Virginia Association of School Business.
Chapter 10 Objectives: Learn about permanent funds Learn about fiduciary funds Learn how gains and losses are treated How trusts guard against inflation.
James Marta CPA, CGMA, ARPM Ken Hearnsberger, Finance Manager NBSIA Matt Nethaway, CPA 1.
GASB 67 & 68 Disclosures Implementing and Auditing GASB’s New Pension Standards.
Governmental Accounting Pensions and Other Postemployment Benefits Local Government Corporation.
Financial Reporting and Auditing - GASB Update Krista Edoff, Partner.
Prepared by Aon Hewitt Retirement and Investment Consulting Presentation to Iowa School Districts Changes in Postemployment Benefit Accounting July 2015.
April 14, 2016 TECHNICAL UPDATE Mark Thomas, Partner, KPMG LLP.
Presented by: Chris Pembrook, CPA, MBA, CGAP, Cr.FA Frank Crawford, CPA @fcrawfordcpa.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. MGFOA Annual Meeting 2016 OPEB and GASB 74/75 May 11, 2016 Daniel J. Rhodes, FSA, MAAA Vice.
THE BASICS OF THE GASB OPEB CALCULATION PRESENTED BY: MARK VAN BUSKIRK, PHD, ASA, MAAA HOLMES MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBER 23,
GASB’s OPEB Changes - Will they impact public sector health care benefits? November 7, 2014 Eric Gary, FSA, FCA, MAAA Chief Health Actuary.
GASB 74 and 75: Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB)
Senior Vice President, Assurance Services
GASB 67 and 68 and PERA’s Schedule of Employer Allocations
OPEB Just Like Pensions but Not! October 12, 2017
The New GASB 74/75 StandardS
GASB 68-Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions
Other Post Employment Benefits
GASB 75 Employer Reporting Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB)
10/28/2014 The Municipal Analysts Group of New York What’s New With the GASB and What Does It Mean for Municipal Credit? Mr. Bean.
Beth Wright Managing Director
GASB Update Presented by:
GASB 67 and 68: Pension Fund Reporting
Pension Regulations Presented by David Maccoux, CPA, Shareholder
GASB Update Colorado pera
Presentation transcript:

GASB’ S N EW P ENSION S TATEMENTS California Society of Municipal Finance Officers February 21, 2013 Michelle Czerkawski, GASB Project Manager The views expressed in this presentation are those of the speaker. Official positions of the GASB are determined only after extensive due process and deliberation.

O VERVIEW OF THE SESSION Statement 68 (employers) Statement 67 (plans)—highlights Looking ahead 2

S TATEMENT N O. 68, A CCOUNTING AND F INANCIAL R EPORTING FOR P ENSIONS AN AMENDMENT OF GASB S TATEMENT N O. 27 3

H IGHLIGHTS Scope limited to pensions provided through trusts that meet certain criteria Revises recognition, measurement, disclosure requirements for all employers Liability Measured net of pension plan’s fiduciary net position Fully recognized in accrual-basis financial statements Changes in the liability Some recognized as expense in the period of the change Others recognized as deferred outflows/inflows of resources with expense recognized over defined future periods Effective for FYs beginning after June 15,

S COPE & APPLICABILITY Defined benefit and defined contribution pensions provided through trusts that meet the following criteria: Employer/nonemployer contributions irrevocable Plan assets dedicated to providing pensions Plan assets legally protected from creditors Excludes all OPEB Applies to employers and nonemployer contributing entities that have a legal obligation to make contributions directly to a pension plan Special funding situations Other circumstances 5

D EFINED BENEFIT PENSIONS Two potential liabilities 1. Liability to the pension plan (payables) Short-term amounts Example—contributions payable at FYE Long-term amounts Example—installment contract for individual past service liability upon joining a cost-sharing plan Formerly referred to as “pension-related debt” 6

D EFINED BENEFIT PENSIONS Two potential liabilities (cont.) 2. Liability to employees for pensions “Net pension liability” (NPL) Total pension liability (TPL), net of pension plan’s fiduciary net position TPL = actuarial present value of projected benefit payments attributed to past periods Fiduciary net position as measured by pension plan Single/agent employers recognize 100 percent of NPL Cost-sharing employers recognize proportionate shares of “collective” NPL (NPL for all benefits provided through cost- sharing pension plan) 7

NPL: M EASUREMENT — TIMING Potentially 3 different dates FYE Measurement date (of NPL) As of date no earlier than end of prior fiscal year Both components (TPL/plan net position) as of the same date Actuarial valuation date (of TPL) If not measurement date, as of date no more than 30 months (+1 day) prior to FYE Actuarial valuations at least every 2 years (more frequent valuations encouraged) Coordination with pension plan 8

NPL: M EASUREMENT — GENERAL APPROACH Three broad steps Project benefit payments Discount projected benefit payments to actuarial present value Attribute actuarial present value to periods Methods and assumptions Generally, assumptions in conformity with Actuarial Standards of Practice Fewer alternatives than in Statement 27 for methods and assumptions for GAAP reporting purposes No changes required to actuarial methods and assumptions used to determine funding amounts 9

NPL: M EASUREMENT — PROJECTION Benefit terms/agreements at measurement date Current active and inactive employees Incorporate expectations of: Salary changes Service credits Automatic postemployment benefit changes (including COLAs) Ad hoc postemployment benefit changes if substantively automatic 10

NPL: M EASUREMENT — DISCOUNTING Single discount rate Reflects: LTeRoR on pension plan investments, to extent that plan net position: Projected to be sufficient to pay benefits Plan assets expected to be invested using a strategy to achieve that return Yield or index rate for 20-year, tax-exempt general obligation municipal bond rate to extent that conditions for LTeRoR not met 11

D ISCOUNT RATE — DETERMINING THE SINGLE RATE Compare projected benefit payments to plan’s projected fiduciary net position in each period Includes: Employer contributions for current and former employees Contributions from current employees Projected earnings on plan investments Projected benefit payments and administrative expenses Does not include: Employer contributions for service costs of future employees Contributions of future employees, unless expected to exceed their own service cost Apply relevant rate to each period’s projected benefit payments Total the present values of all projected benefit payments Calculate single discount rate that results in same present value (if applied to all projected benefit payments) as use of the two rates 12

NPL: M EASUREMENT — ATTRIBUTION Single method Entry age actuarial cost method Level percentage of pay Individually applied Beginning = 1 st period of benefit accrual Ending = Expected retirement DROPs—entry date into DROP = retirement date Same benefit terms to determine service cost as to determine actuarial present value of projected benefit payments 13

C HANGES IN NPL Calculated from measurement date to measurement date (“measurement period”) NPL recognized in current reporting period (NPL recognized in prior reporting period) Change in NPL for current reporting period Examples: service cost, interest on TPL, earnings on pension plan investments, benefit payments, contributions, effects of benefit changes, effects of assumption changes 14

C HANGES IN NPL Recognize most changes as expense in full in reporting period of change Exceptions: Differences between expected and actual experience (TPL) Changes of assumptions (TPL) Difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments Employer contributions 15

C HANGES IN NPL—TPL EXCEPTIONS Expense recognized in current and future periods Systematic and rational method Closed period Average of expected remaining service lives of all employees (active and inactive, including retirees) Portion not recognized in expense = deferred outflow of resources/deferred inflow of resources related to pensions 16

C HANGES IN NPL— INVESTMENT EARNINGS EXCEPTION Expense recognized in current and future periods Systematic and rational method Closed, 5-year period Portion not recognized in expense = deferred outflow of resources/deferred inflow of resources related to pensions Report net deferred outflow of resources/deferred inflow of resources from this source 17

NPL: E MPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS During the measurement period Directly reduce NPL (no expense impact) Subsequent to measurement date Deferred outflow of resources related to pensions Directly reduce NPL in next reporting period (no expense impact) 18

NPL: N OTE DISCLOSURES — EMPLOYERS Descriptive information Type of plan, identification of administrator Benefit terms—types of benefits, key elements of benefit formula, classes of employees covered, legal authority Contributions—basis, authority, rates ($ or % of pay), contributions in reporting period Availability of plan report Significant assumptions/other inputs in TPL Inflation, salary changes, postemployment benefit changes, mortality assumptions, dates of experience studies Discount rate, plus LTeRoR & how determined If applicable, municipal bond rate, assumptions re: cash flows, & periods to which each rate applied Assumed asset allocation/expected real rates of return NPL at discount rate +/- 1% 19

NPL: N OTE DISCLOSURES — EMPLOYERS ( CONT.) Info re: pension plan’s fiduciary net position or reference to plan report Measurement date, actuarial valuation date Changes of assumptions/other inputs and changes of benefit terms Changes subsequent to measurement date 20

NPL: N OTE DISCLOSURES — EMPLOYERS ( CONT.) Pension expense in current reporting period Deferred outflows/deferred inflows of resources Balances by source Net impact on pension expense in each of the next 5 years and thereafter in the aggregate Amount that will be reduction of NPL 21

E XPENSE AND DEFERRED OUTFLOWS / INFLOWS OF RESOURCES DISCLOSURES — EXAMPLE Deferred Outflows of Resources Deferred Inflows of Resources Differences between expected and actual experience $ 2,657 $ 142 Changes of assumptions 1, Net difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments — 2,188 Changes in proportion and differences between City contributions and proportionate share of contributions City contributions subsequent to the measurement date 1,065 — Total $ 6,183 $ 2, For the year ended December 31, 20X9, the City recognized pension expense of $2,395. At June 30, 20X9, the City reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resource related to pensions from the following sources: Year ended June 30: 20Y0 $ (269) 20Y Y Y Y4 551 Thereafter 1,300 $1,065 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from City contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended June 30, 20Y0. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as shown at right:

NPL: N OTE DISCLOSURES — EMPLOYERS ( CONT.) Single/agent only Number of employees covered—inactive receiving benefits, inactive not receiving benefits, active Allocated insurance contracts Schedule of changes in NPL by source for current period Service cost, interest, benefit changes, contributions by source, plan investment income, etc. 23

C HANGES IN NPL BY SOURCE — EXAMPLE 24

NPL: RSI— SINGLE / AGENT EMPLOYERS 10-year schedules Changes in NPL by source TPL, pension plan fiduciary net position, NPL, plan net position as % of TPL, covered-employee payroll, NPL as % of covered-employee payroll May be presented with changes in NPL by source 25

COMBINED PRESENTATION —E XAMPLE ONLY 5 OF 10 REQUIRED YEARS ILLUSTRATED 26

10-year schedules (cont.) If actuarially determined employer contribution (ADEC) Example (only 5 of 10 required years illustrated) If no ADEC, but statutory or contractual contribution requirements, schedule similar to ADEC schedule NPL: RSI— SINGLE / AGENT EMPLOYERS ( CONT.) 27

NPL: C OST - SHARING EMPLOYERS Recognize proportionate shares of collective NPL, pension expense, deferred outflows of resources/ deferred inflows of resources Proportion (%) Relationship of the employer to the total of all contributing entities Basis required to be consistent with assessed contributions Consider separate rates related to separate portions of collective NPL Use of relative long-term projected contribution effort encouraged 28

NPL: C OST - SHARING EMPLOYERS — ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS Potentially three items Net effect of change in proportion Difference between: Employer’s proportionate share of all employer contributions included in collective plan net position Contributions recognized by the employer in the measurement period Employer contributions subsequent to measurement date Deferred outflow of resources in current period Reduction of collective NPL in next period (part of comparison of actual contributions to share of collective contributions) 29 Deferred outflow/inflow of resources with expense in current & future periods, systematic/rational method, closed period equal to average of expected remaining service lives (actives & retirees)

N OTE DISCLOSURES —C OST - SHARING EMPLOYERS All disclosures noted earlier except those specific to single/agent Employer’s proportion, basis for proportion, change in proportion Employer’s proportionate share (amount) of collective NPL If special funding situation: Nonemployer contributing entity’s proportionate share Total of employer’s and nonemployer entity’s proportionate shares 30

NPL: RSI— COST - SHARING EMPLOYERS 10-year schedules Employer’s proportion (%), proportionate share (amount) of collective NPL, covered-employee payroll, proportionate share as % of covered-employee payroll, pension plan’s net position as % of TPL If special funding situation, also (1) nonemployer contributing entity’s proportionate share and (2) total of employer’s and nonemployer entity’s proportionate shares If statutory or contractual contribution requirements Required contribution, contributions in relation to required, difference, covered-employee payroll, contributions as % of covered-employee payroll Notes to RSI with significant changes 31

NPL: I NVOLVEMENT OF NONEMPLOYER CONTRIBUTING ENTITIES Legal requirement to contribute directly to the pension plan Special funding situations Contribution amount not dependent upon events unrelated to pensions OR nonemployer is only entity with legal obligation to contribute Similar to cost-sharing accounting Nonemployer expense classified in same manner as similar grants to other entities Employer recognizes additional expense and revenue = nonemployer contributing entity’s proportionate share of collective expense (portion related to the employer) Not special funding Employer Follows applicable requirements for single, agent, or cost-sharing employer Recognizes revenue equal to change in NPL from contributions from nonemployer contributing entities Nonemployer entity classifies expense for contributions in same manner as similar grants to other entities 32

D EFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSIONS Pension expense for amounts defined by benefit terms as attributable to the reporting period Net of forfeited amounts removed from employee accounts Liability for difference between pension expense and contributions Note disclosures Descriptive information about plan, benefit terms, contribution rates, amount of expense, amount of forfeitures, amount of liability Nonemployer contributing entities with legal requirements to contribute directly to pension plan also addressed 33

E FFECTIVE DATE AND TRANSITION Fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2014 Beginning deferred outflows/deferred inflows of resources balances all or nothing at initial implementation RSI schedules prospective if information not initially available 34

S TATEMENT N O. 67, F INANCIAL R EPORTING FOR P ENSION P LANS AN AMENDMENT OF GASB S TATEMENT N O

H IGHLIGHTS Scope limited to defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans administered through trusts that meet certain criteria (same as criteria in Statement 68) Few changes from Statement 25 for financial statement recognition Notes/RSI Changes primarily to reflect changes in measurement of liabilities of employers Aggregated employer-related information not required for agent pension plans Annual money-weighted rate of return (1 year in notes; 10 years in RSI) Effective for FYs beginning after June 15,

L OOKING AHEAD 37

GASB—2013 AND BEYOND Two Implementation Guides Statement 67 guidance tentatively Q Statement 68 guidance tentatively Q Phase 2 of project OPEB Pensions not within scope of Statements 67/68 38

I MPLEMENTATION Education Coordination with pension plan Identification of measurement date Communication of information Facilitation of attest services 39

GASB R ESOURCES Technical inquiry system Podcast series Plain-language overviews And more …