The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 1 The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Action Effectiveness Monitoring in the Upper Columbia (Chapter 4) Karl M. Polivka, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.

Advertisements

COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.

Investigate the Life History of Spring Chinook Salmon and Summer Steelhead in the Grande Ronde River Basin Project Brian Jonasson Oregon Department.

Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Project No Tara White, Shannon Jewett, Josh Hanson,

Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Fall Chinook Salmon Released Upstream of Lower Granite Dam Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.

Fluvial Bull Trout Migration and Life History Investigations, Upper Salmon River Subbasin New Project Proposal, No Sponsored by: Shoshone-Bannock.

Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.

Little Canyon Creek Subwatershed Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project Sponsored by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.

Evaluate juvenile salmon residence in the Columbia River Plume using micro-acoustic transmitters John Ferguson, et al. Riverine Ecology Program NWFSC,

Cyndi Baker & Jen Graham. Began in 1998 to document bull trout life history in WSR and SC and monitor population abundance Data from 1998.

Rebecca Buchanan and John Skalski, University of Washington Gregory Mackey, Douglas County PUD Charles Snow, Washington DFW TRIBPIT: ESTIMATING SALMONID.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey New approaches afforded by PIT tag technology have yielded important answers about fish behavior.

Adult entry Allocated to tribs Return to natal stream or IGH — some straying Spawners in trib Females Fry Fingerlings Parr Smolts Ocean entry Fingerlings.

Looking for Pieces of the Puzzle: LIFE HISTORY OF SPRING CHINOOK IN THE WILLAMETTE BASIN Kirk Schroeder Brian Cannon Luke Whitman Paul Olmsted Oregon Department.

Restoring Life History Diversity to Bonneville Cutthroat Trout and Bluehead Sucker in the Weber River Paul Burnett – Trout Unlimited Ben Nadolski – Utah.

Traditionally relied on MWI Random transect aerial survey –Reinecke et al. (1990) –Pearse et al. (2005) –State agencies continuing work MDWFP (2005-present)

Monitoring fluvial bull trout migration and movements in the Lemhi River Subbasin, Idaho: integrating PIT tag technology with radio telemetry Kevin Poole.

A life history framework to understand production of juvenile steelhead in freshwater applied to the John Day River, Oregon Jason Dunham, USGS Forest and.

Redband Trout: Cultural Past, Present and Future

PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh.

Apparent over-winter survival of juvenile coho in three tributaries to the lower Columbia River Trevor Johnson, Mara Zimmerman, Matthew Sturza, Patrick.

Increasing Chloride in Vermont Surface Waters: The tip of the iceberg? Angela Shambaugh Water Quality Division Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation.

In-Stream PIT-Tag Detection of Resident Salmonids in Washington's White Salmon River Watershed: One System ’ s Saga. Ian G. Jezorek 1, Patrick J. Connolly.

Using the minimum distance as a metric for testing is ambiguous when fish have greater than two channels to move into. Fish GPS position during each day.

E FFECT OF S IZE - AT T AGGING ON THE A PPARENT S URVIVAL OF C HINOOK S ALMON IN E NTIAT R IVER, W ASHINGTON PIT Tag Workshop Skamania Lodge, Washington.

Idaho Screen Program 2006 Update. Present Status Most major river corridors have been treated by diversion consolidations, ditch eliminations, passage.

Estimating the Capacity of the Klamath Basin to Rear Coho Technical Memorandum #5 Nicklaus K. Ackerman Thomas E. Nickelson Boedicea.

HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Tributary Junctions

Assessment Of Future Change Stan Gregory Department of Fisheries & Wildlife Oregon State University.

SALMONIDS, (3) There is evidence of runs of Chinook and Steelhead in tributaries above Upper Klamath Lake Evidence of salmon from personal accounts, photos,

Habitat association models  Independent Multinomial Selections (IMS): (McCracken, Manly, & Vander Heyden, 1998) Product multinomial likelihood with multinomial.

A Model for Improved Data Access through an Integrated Data Management System Presented by Samuel Haffey, Dalton Hance, and Josh Murauskas 1 A Model for.

Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations, Yields and Loads in Impaired Streams and Rivers in the Taunton River Basin, Massachusetts, Jeffrey R. Barbaro.

Emigration behavior of resident and anadromous juvenile O. mykiss: exploring the interaction among genetics, physiology and habitat Sean Hayes, Chad Hanson,

Chris Bare, Jim Latshaw, Ian Tattam, Jim Ruzycki, and Rich Carmichael Estimating Chinook escapement to the John Day River basin using a mark-recapture.

Klamath Basin Water Distribution Model Workshop. OUTLINE Brief Description of Water Distribution Models Model Setups Examples of networks and inputs Demand.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluation of Alternative Commercial Fishing Gear in the Lower Columbia River, 2013: Behavior and.

Technical Memo #2 Simulating Fall Redistribution and Overwinter Survival of Klamath River Coho Cramer Fish Sciences Nicklaus K. Ackerman Steve Cramer.

Documenting O. mykiss life histories in the White Salmon River prior to the reintroduction of anadromous fish above Condit Dam. Brady Allen and Patrick.

Report on BPC Special Project Peer Review and Future Study Recommendations of Salmonid Fish Tagging Study (Hearn, et al., 2012) presented by Josh Trotter.

Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)

Growth Trajectories of Wild California Steelhead Parr David Swank 1,2, Will Satterthwaite 1, Michael Beakes 1, Susan Sogard 2, Marc Mangel 1, Rob Titus.

Adult Entry to Summer Juvenile Rearing of Klamath River Coho Randolph Ericksen Steven Cramer Ian Courter Kathryn Arendt Funded by.

PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.

Focus on the Headwaters The Shenandoah Watershed Study / The Virginia Trout Stream Sensitivity Study Rick Webb Department of Environmental Sciences University.

Effectiveness of alternative broodstock, rearing and release practices at Winthrop NFH William Gale and Matt Cooper -USFWS, Mid-Columbia River Fishery.

1 Testing the Ability of Native Cutthroat Trout to Pass Through Small Culverts on Steep Slopes N. Phil Peterson, Ryan K. Simmons, Jeffery T. Light Forest.

A Bayesian Approach to Combine Multiple Sources of Escapement Data to Estimate Wind River Steelhead Abundance Dan Rawding and Charlie Cochran.

Objective Determine how using 9mm tags may affect our current research project in the John Day Basin.

Brook trout population dynamics: Integrated modeling across scales and data types Keith H. Nislow, Jason Coombs Northern Research Station, USDA Forest.

Movement of Resident Trout Transplanted Below a Barrier to Anadromy Peggy Wilzbach Mark Ashenfelter USGS California Cooperative Fish Research Unit, Humboldt.

Yakima Steelhead VSP Project: Resident/Anadromous Interactions Gabriel M. Temple 1913 “Landlocked Steelhead”

Steve Cramer Casey Justice Ian Courter Environmental drivers of steelhead abundance in partially anadromous Oncorhynchus mykiss populations.

Hangman Creek Fisheries Enhancement BPA Project & Hangman Restoration Project: Wildlife BPA Project

Hydraulic and Biological Evaluations. Hydraulic Evaluations  Measuring flow distribution for fixed vertical or rotating drums (with adjustments available).

Technical Memo #1 Estimation of Returns of Naturally Produced Coho to the Klamath River Cramer Fish Sciences Nicklaus K. Ackerman Brian Pyper Ian Courter.

Multiple Detection Methods: Single-season Models.

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES Students will be able to explain how a resource can be conserved or persevered.

Klamath Fish Health Assessment Team Presentation to the Northwest Power & Conservation Council Regional Coordination Forum - May 12, 2016 Sara Borok &

ODOT’s Fish Passage Program Ken Cannon, Aquatic Biology Program Coordinator John Raasch, Environmental Resources Unit Manager Susan Haupt, Geo-Environmental.

Where the Rivers Meet: Salvelinus confluentus Migrations in the Upper Mid-Columbia River Mark Nelson USFWS Mid-Columbia River FRO WA/BC AFS AGM March 29,

Changes in Production of one and two year old Steelhead Trout Smolts during Drought Conditions in a Northern California Stream Michael D. Sparkman (CDFW)

Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data

MPG Spring-Summer Chinook

Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary

Yakima River Steelhead Status and Trends RM&E Project Overview:

Pinole Creek Watershed Fish Passage Improvement Project

Watershed Restoration on the Lolo NF Benefits for the Clark Fork Watershed Taylor Greenup, Hydrologist, Lolo National Forest Jennifer Mickelson,

Taneum Creek PIT Tag Interrogation Site

Ken Smith, IT Manager Oregon Water Resources Department

Presentation transcript:

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 1 The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented by Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas January 29, 2015

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 2 PIT Tags in Migratory Fish The beauty of asymmetry: no looking back Detection events are “instantaneous” If you never see ‘em again, it’s probably because they’re dead Schematic courtesy of SURPH 3.5 user manual. Lady, et al. 2013

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 3 The Problem with Non-migratory Fish So long, asymmetry Now you see ‘em, now you see ‘em again, and again… OR you never see ‘em at all, BUT that doesn’t mean they’re not out there

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 4 Some (Partial) Solutions Find the right question Carefully pick the time and place Embrace your assumptions

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 5 West Fork Smith River, Oregon Case Study 1 Dalton Hance, Anchor QEA Lisa Ganio, Oregon State University Kelly Burnett, U.S. Forest Service Joe Ebersole, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 6 Juvenile coho salmon tagged in late summer over 4 years. Fall Movement of Coho Salmon

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 7 Pick your time and place Juvenile coho salmon in coastal streams redistribute in the fall. We selected fish tagged in tributaries and mainstem before the start of fall and detected at tributary confluences during fall. Stream Flow

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 8 Out In ≥ ? Are fish more likely to be detected immigrating into a tributary than emigrating out of a tributary after accounting for the distance of movement at multiple tributaries in a stream network? Find the Right Question

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 9 Embrace Your Assumptions

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 10 Upper Mainstem Gold Creek Results Out In <

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 11 Results Moore Creek Beaver Creek Crane Creek Out In =

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 12 Siuslaw National Forest, Oregon Case Study 2 Dalton Hance, Anchor QEA Jason Dunham, U.S. Geological Survey Bruce Hansen, U.S. Forest Service John Speece, Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 13 Bays Creek Antenna Reach ABCDEF Downstream referenceUpstream referenceCulvert crossing 1234

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 14 Reach Do Culvert Stream Crossings Inhibit Fish Movement Compared to Reference Crossings?

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 15 Independent movement and detection. We only care whether a fish arrives at the antenna once during the monitoring period. No mortality/tag loss (or constant among groups). All fish have equal detection probability at each individual antenna. Embrace Your Assumptions Detection Bays Creek (Passive) History Total

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 16 Reach

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas Can translocation improve estimates by changing fish motivation to move? Find the Right Question

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 18 Results: Translocation The takeaway: Translocation resulted in more detections of movement and narrower credible intervals, but this changed the scope of inference to translocated fish.

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 19 Malheur National Forest, Oregon Case Study 3 Dalton Hance, Anchor QEA Bruce Hansen, U.S. Forest Service John Speece, Jefferson Soil and Water Conservation District Jason Dunham, U.S. Geological Survey

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 20 Translocation and Mobile Tracking

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 21 Translocation and Mobile Tracking Site 1: 135 Redband trout tagged and translocated; 131 detected at least once by either mobile tracking or gate readers Site 2: 139 Redband trout tagged and translocated; 130 detected at least once by either mobile tracking or gate readers Release Reach 2 Release Reach 4 Release Reach 6 Release Reach 8 Site Site

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 22 Translocation and Mobile Tracking

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 23 Develop formal model framework Embrace limiting assumptions (more than 600 possible parameters in the fullest possible model) Focus on the scale of management problem (i.e., don‘t find an overly complicated answer for a simple question) Next Steps

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 24 Summary

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 25 PIT tags + small streams + non-migratory fish = potentially messy data The hardest part is finding the right question to ask We have the technology; what we need are good designs Take-home Messages

The Use of PIT Tags in Small Streams and Non-migratory Fish Presented By Dalton Hance and Josh Murauskas 26 Questions/Discussion