Tyrosine kinase signalling (review) TGF signalling Notch signalling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Part IV Cellular Communication Cellular signal transduction The cell cycle and programmed cell death Germ cells and fertilization Cell interactions in.
Advertisements

MDM2: Oncogene Chan Lee. Discovery of MDM2: starting with tumor suppressor p53.
TGF-β receptor 1 Anshul Badhwar. Transforming Growth Factor β - receptor type I / ALK5 Serine/Threonine kinase receptor.
Gene Sleuthing Lorraine Sartori Majid Masso Paul R. McCreary.
RanBP3 enhances nuclear export of active β-catenin independently of CRM1 Hendriksen et al., JCB(2005)
Figure 1 Simplified scheme of TGFβ signalling
Copyright © 2015 by the American Osteopathic Association.
Figure 1 Number of somatic mutation rates across The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) projects Figure 1 | Number of somatic mutation rates across The Cancer.
Figure 2 Recruitment of experts to the Delphi study
Figure 2 Crosstalk between TGF-β/Smad and other pathways in tissue fibrosis Figure 2 | Crosstalk between TGF-β/Smad and other pathways in tissue fibrosis.
Figure 1 Cellular processes involved in cancer development
Figure 1 Induction of immune tolerance
HER2/HER3 heterodimers in prostate cancer
Figure 5 Defects in the JAK–STAT signalling pathway
c-Kit as a Novel Potential Therapeutic Target in Colorectal Cancer
Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. doi: /nrendo
Figure 1 Key elements of the proposed modified Delphi study
Figure 4 Possible combination therapies CDK4/6 inhibitors
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Dan Gordon  Gastroenterology  Volume 114, Issue 4, (April 1998)
I. Protein export II. Structure and composition of the nuclear pore complex (NPC) III. Mechanism of translocation through the NPC.
Figure 1 A schematic representation of the HER2 signalling pathway
Figure 3 Defects in the T cell receptor signalling pathway
Figure 1 Overview of canonical TGF-β/Smad signalling in tissue fibrosis Figure 1 | Overview of canonical TGF-β/Smad signalling in tissue fibrosis. Once.
Figure 2 Molecular pathways involved in the regulation of T-cell differentiation and cytokine production Figure 2 | Molecular pathways involved in the.
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. doi: /nrrheum
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
therapy and to block androgen action
Combined inhibition of MAP kinase and KIT signaling destabilizes ETV1 protein and results in enhanced growth suppression of human GIST cells. Combined.
Figure 5 Drugs that target WNT signalling
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Figure 3 Physiological regulation of autophagy in the heart
Figure 3 Algorithm for the determination of the clinical
Figure 4 Potential therapeutic strategies to inhibit TGF-β1/Smad-induced tissue fibrosis Figure 4 | Potential therapeutic strategies to inhibit TGF-β1/Smad-induced.
Reduction of Sca-1 increases PPARγ expression.
Figure 1 WNT signalling pathways
Coordinate Transcriptional Regulation by ERG and Androgen Receptor in Fusion- Positive Prostate Cancers  Yu Chen, Charles L. Sawyers  Cancer Cell  Volume.
Volume 142, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
The Role of Smads in Skin Development
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 3 Differences in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) between genders
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
the SNP profile using 26 prostate cancer GWAS risk SNPs
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Figure 4 Mechanisms of leptin function on kidney injury
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Figure 1 The VEGF family of growth factors
Figure 3 Regulation of TGF-β1/Smad signalling by microRNAs (miRs) in tissue fibrosis Figure 3 | Regulation of TGF-β1/Smad signalling by microRNAs (miRs)
Figure 2 A model of TNFR–complex I signalling
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Control of Smad7 stability by competition between Acetylation and Ubiquitination Gronroos et al., 2002, Mol Cell.
Figure 4 The grey zone between active
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Canonical gliomagenesis mediators EGFR, P53, and retinoblastoma protein (RB1) are important for cancer signaling. Canonical gliomagenesis mediators EGFR,
Figure 2 Signalling downstream of the IL-6 receptor
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Protein expression profile in a dasatinib-resistant cell line.
NOTCH1 and MYC regulate leukemia cell growth.
A schematic representation of NOTCH signaling through DAB1–ABL–TRIO–RHO that stimulates colorectal cancer invasion and metastasis. A schematic representation.
Gankyrin: An intriguing name for a novel regulator of p53 and RB
The critical roles of miR-23a and miR-27a in colorectal cancer progression. miR-23a primarily increases cell motility through downregulation of its target.
Compartmentalized cellular functions of KDM4A.
PTEN and p53: Who will get the upper hand?
Macropinocytosis in PTEN-deficient prostate cancer cells drives the uptake of necrotic cell debris to support tumor cell fitness. Macropinocytosis in PTEN-deficient.
Presentation transcript:

Tyrosine kinase signalling (review) TGF signalling Notch signalling

TGF signalling Receptor Serine/threonine kinase Activation/repression of gene expression SMAD transcription factors and regulators RanGTP, importins and exportins

Flores, A. N. et al. (2014) NUMB inhibition of NOTCH signalling as a therapeutic target in prostate cancer Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol

Flores, A. N. et al. (2014) NUMB inhibition of NOTCH signalling as a therapeutic target in prostate cancer Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol

Numb expression in human mammary tumors. Pece S et al. JCB 2004;167: © 2004 Rockefeller University Press

Loss of Numb expression in tumors is due to enhanced ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Pece S et al. JCB 2004;167: © 2004 Rockefeller University Press

Re-expression of Numb selectively suppresses growth in Numb-negative tumors. Pece S et al. JCB 2004;167: © 2004 Rockefeller University Press

Increased Notch signaling in Numb-negative tumors. Pece S et al. JCB 2004;167: © 2004 Rockefeller University Press

Effects of perturbation of Numb or Notch activity in mammary tumor primary cells. Pece S et al. JCB 2004;167: © 2004 Rockefeller University Press