US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Methods for Determining Maximum Flood Elevations Landward of Failed Levees: An Example from the Great Missouri.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flood Profile Modeling with Split Flows and Weirs
Advertisements

18 October 2012 WATERSHED Science & Engineering WEST Consultants Chehalis River Basin Hydraulic Modeling and Flood Relief Alternatives Evaluation.
BUILDING STRONG ® Do not include this Slide. This template is a guide for preparing power points presentations. The information requested is important.
Use of a hydrodynamic model to
Fort Bend Flood Management Association Flood Risk Reduction Symposium October 3rd, 2014 (Part-A) Brazos River at San Felipe - USGS Gage Fort Bend County.
Applications of the NWS FLDWAV Model. Teton Dam Failure on Snake River.
End of Chapter 4 Movement of a Flood Wave and begin Chapter 7 Open Channel Flow, Manning’s Eqn. Overland Flow.
Hydrology and Hydraulics. Reservoir Configuration.
Processing Geospatial Data with HEC-GeoRAS 3.1
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Application of GIS Tools for Hydraulic Modeling
HEC-RAS.
Modeling River Ice and River Ice Jams with HEC-RAS
Automated “integrated Simplified Inundation Mapping (iSIM)” – CG3i Software Service Johnstown, PA – May 31, 1889 CG3I.
BUILDING STRONG ® South Platte CWMS Model Missouri Basin Forecasters Meeting January 29, 2014 South Platte CWMS Model Missouri Basin Forecasters Meeting.
Hydraulic Screening and Analysis Needed for USACE Review
Texas A&M University, Department of Civil Engineering CVEN 689 Applications of GIS in Civil Engineering Professor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Student: Brad.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: Utilize advanced features in HEC Geo-RAS Handouts: Assignments: Exercise #7 Lecture 8: Advanced.
Kansas City Industrial Council Hydrology and Hydraulics
Hydrology and Water Resources RG744 Institute of Space Technology December 11, 2013.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation 1-Dimensional Modeling CWPPRA Technical Committee and.
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
WinTR-20 Project Formulation Hydrology Computer Program Basic Input and Output Presented by: WinTR-20 Development Team.
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
ASFPM – May 24, 2012 CASE STUDY – 408 PERMITTING AND LEVEE ACCREDITATION FOR WATERLOO, NEBRASKA ASFPM MAY 24, 2012 Presented by Randy Behm, PE, CFM Lalit.
Creating Value … … Delivering Solutions Modeling 72-Miles of the Mississippi on a 2-Mile Budget Mohamed A. Bagha, P.E., CFM Dong Nguyen, P.E., CFM Pradeepa.
River Kelvin Case Study
David Ramirez, P.E. Senior Hydrologist Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center Slidell, LA Real-Time Operation of HEC-RAS at the Lower Mississippi River.
Hydrologic Modeling with SSARR and HEC-HMS
1D Steady State Hydraulic Modelling Bratton Stream Case Study.
Feb 2003HEC-RAS Version 3.11 Slides adapted from HEC Unsteady Flow Course Unsteady Flow Course.
Hydraulic Engineering
MVS Mainstem Forecast Model Update: NETMISS2 by Joel Asunskis, P.E. Hydraulic Engineer, St. Louis District Water Control U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers October.
Taming the Alabama River Patrick Dobbs & Clay Campbell AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc Alabama Water Resources Conference.
Big Horn Lake Sediment Management Study. US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Study Background Bureau of Reclamation and Omaha District Interagency.
by David M. Beekman and Vito A. Cimino
Distributed Flow Routing Surface Water Hydrology, Spring 2005 Reading: 9.1, 9.2, 10.1, 10.2 Venkatesh Merwade, Center for Research in Water Resources.
1 Overview of Unsteady Flow Modeling With HEC-RAS Gary W. Brunner, P.E.
Dynamic Channel Routing Preissmann Scheme. Dynamic Channel Routing Preissmann Scheme unconditionally stable for  >=0.5 second-order accurate if 
DAM BREAK RISK IN COLOMBIA A Geospatial Assessment of Population Vulnerability from Flood Inundation Eugene Derner, GEOG 594a Spring 2014.
Libby Dam June 2006 Spill: Total Dissolved Gas Monitoring.
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers Reference: HEC-RAS Hydraulic Reference Manual, Version 4.1, Chapters 1 and 2 Reading: HEC-RAS Manual pp. 2-1 to 2-12 Applied.
Minnesota Silver Jackets Pilot Project Flood Inundation Map and Warning System for Downtown St. Paul National Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Value Engineering the Termination of the Blue River Flood Conveyance Channel Alan Schlindwein, PE US Army.
Penny Coombes Sarah Wharton Gary Davies Simon White River Bee, Desing FLOOD ALLEVIATION FEASIBILITY.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update Joan Stemler St. Louis District Water Control.
Expected Long Term Site Evolution of Alameda Creek and former Salt Ponds following Tidal Marsh Restoration Matt Wickland Philip.
HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Overview
Analyzing the Effects of Navigation Structures Edward Brauer, P.E. Applied River Engineering Center U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – St. Louis District.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 9A CVFPB MEETING – October 25, 2013.
DAM FAILURE TOOL TRAINING AT THE NERFC National HIC Meeting July 2006.
FLOOD ROUTING Flood Routing Techniques Siti Kamariah Md Sa’at PPK Bioprocess
April 2002HEC-RAS Version 3.0 FY02Slide 1 of 12 HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Troubleshooting.
APPLICATION NO LEVEE DISTRICT No. 1 Of SUTTER COUNTY STAR BEND SETBACK LEVEE SUTTER COUNTY April 17, 2009.
Hydrology and Water Resources RG744 Institute of Space Technology November 13, 2015.
ERT 246 Hydrology & Water Resources Eng.
Watershed Modeling using HEC-HMS and EPA-SWMM ©T. G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E. 25 July 2012 Lesson 14.
CRFS Technical Meeting LC Operations Update November 14, 2012.
Regional to Engineering Scale HUC8 HUC12 Catchment Engineering Hydrology Engineering Hydraulics Personal – a flooded home.
Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601
8/11/2016 Mosquito Creek 2D hydraulic analysis:
Mid-West Electric Consumers Association
Review of Flood Routing
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
Quantifying Flow Reduction Benefit of the Miners Ravine Off-Channel Detention Basin Using HEC-HMS
Floods and Flood Routing
Find: Omax [cfs] Given Data 29,000 33,000 37,000 41,000 inflow outflow
Flood Routing.
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Sacramento Environmental Commission January 2019.
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Methods for Determining Maximum Flood Elevations Landward of Failed Levees: An Example from the Great Missouri River Flood of 2011 Presenter: Lowell Blankers, PE, CFM Flood Risk and Floodplain Management USACE, Omaha District Co Authors: Laurel Hamilton, EI Roger Kay, PE Tony Krause, PE, CFM May 2012

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Presentation Overview  Background  Modeling Techniques Used ► Steady HEC-RAS ► Unsteady HEC-RAS  Water Surface Elevation Comparison to Gage Data

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District L-575 Missouri River Left Bank 21 Miles 4.8 Miles

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Breach Development  3 Partial Levee Failure Breaches ► June 4 th ► June 5 th ► June 9 th  1 Full Levee Failure Breach ► June 13 th Estimated Width: 300 feet Estimated Depth: 11 feet

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District June 4 th 2011 L st Sign Potential Levee Failure Levee Crest Landward Toe Seepage Berm

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Breach Location Minimum Levee Elevation

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District June 5 th 2011 L nd Sign of Levee Failure

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District June 9 th 2011 L rd Sign of Levee Failure

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District June 13 th 2011 L-575 Full Breach 10:00 AM L-575 Full Breach 5:00 PM

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District HEC-RAS Steady Flow Model  June 5 th 2011 Hydraulic Modeling Begins  Modeling Objectives ► Determine water surface elevations landward of the levee and to determine levee elevations for a secondary levee at Hamburg, IA ► Determine time available to construct temporary levees once a full breach occurs.

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Steady Flow Model Setup Elevation-volume curve for storage area. The curve was already available from a previous study. Add Storage Area to HEC-RAS Model

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Steady Flow Model Setup Add Lateral Weir at the Breach Location

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Steady Flow Model Setup Add Lateral Weir at downstream return

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District L-575 Return Flow 6/16/2011 at 11:00 AM

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Estimate the Elevation Landward of the Levee Estimate an elevation in for storage area. Set in the steady flow file Run model and review the storage area inflow and outflow. Adjust the elevation and rerun to balance the inflow and outflow Steady Flow Model Setup

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Inflow and Outflow from Storage Area should be equal. Steady Flow Model Setup Review Storage Area Results

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Steady Flow Model Results Lower 575 Breach AnalysisScenario 1Scenario 2Scenario 3Scenario 4Scenario 5Scenario 6 Upstream into storage Breach Width Breach Depth (To Grade)~11 Downstream into channel Breach Width Breach Depth Storage Area Elevation NAVD

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Time to Fill Storage Area Elevation-volume curve for storage area was used with weir equation to estimate time to fill the area behind the levee. Manual calculation required since not computed in Steady Flow RAS Model Elevation NAVD88 at approximately 68 hours after breach

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District  Initial set up similar to the Steady Flow Modeling.  The breach data was not set in the geometry of the lateral weirs.  Levee breach parameters entered into the Levee Breach option under the Unsteady Plan File. HEC-RAS Unsteady Flow Model Setup

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Unsteady Flow Model Setup Breach Parameters

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Unsteady Flow Model Setup Breach Progression Parameters

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Unsteady Flow Model Setup Breach Parameters for Downstream Notch

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Unsteady Flow Model Results Elevation NAVD88 Date (June) Elevation NAVD88 Time: 4 to 5 Days or 96 to 120 Hrs

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Gage Data  5 gage locations ► USACE study gage ► 3 Staff Gages set during the flood ► USGS Temporary Gage Set

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Gage Locations Staff Gages USGS Temp Gage USACE Study Gage

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Time of Breach

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Secondary Levee at Hamburg, IA June 18, 2011

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District August 29, 2011

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Post Flood November 2011

BUILDING STRONG ® USACE, Omaha District Questions