Abbreviations: RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

Prospective evaluation of candidate SNPs of VEGF/VEGFR pathway in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated with first-line FOLFIRI plus.
Biomarker Analyses in CLEOPATRA: A Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Study of Pertuzumab in HER2- Positive, First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Baselga.
Mizutomo Azuma 1, Michael M. Shi 2, Christian J. Jacques 2, Carl Barrett 2, Kathleen D. Danenberg 3, Syma Iqbal 1, Anthony El-Khoueiry 1, Dongyun Yang.
Casulo C et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 510.
Introduction Materials and Methods Results Conclusions CD133 Polymorphisms are associated with clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Introduction Patients and Methods Results Conclusion Wnt signaling is essential for embryonic development, stem cells and tissue regeneration. Colorectal.
A Meta Analysis of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Treated with Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
Genetic Variations in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR Pathway are Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Chemoradiotherapy.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Efficacy and Safety of Single Agent Sunitinib in Treating Advanced Hepatocelluar Carcinoma Patients After Sorafenib Failure: A Prospective, Open-Label,
An update on biological therapies in colorectal cancer Mount Vernon Cancer Network Sept 05 Mark Harrison.
Cabozantinib (XL184) in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): Results from a Phase II Randomized Discontinuation Trial Hussain M et.
Phase II Presurgical Feasibility Study of Bevacizumab in Untreated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Jonasch E et al. Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer 2005 Daniel G. Haller, M.D. Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
ARTERIAL THROMBOEMBOLIC EVENTS IN A POOLED ANALYSIS OF 5 RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIALS OF BEVACIZUMAB WITH CHEMOTHERAPY JR Skillings Genentech, Inc, South.
A Micro RNA Polymorphism (MiRSNP) in 3’UTR of K-ras gene was associated with clinical outcome in mCRC patients treated with either single agent cetuximab.
Mizutomo Azuma 1, Dongyun Yang 2, Marinella Carpanu 3, Ellen Hollywood 3, Michael Lue-Yat 3, Wu Zhang 1, Kathleen D. Danenberg 4, Peter V. Danenberg 5,
Prospective study of EGFR intron 1 CA tandem repeats as predictive factor of benefit from cetuximab and irinotecan Antoniotti C 1, 2, Loupakis F 3, Cremolini.
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
ICAM-1, GRP-78 and NFkB gene polymorphisms associated with clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first line 5-FU.
Introduction Results Material and Methods Conclusions Genetic variants predict clinical outcome clinical outcome in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal.
Cancer Stem Cell SNPs Have Opposite Prognostic Outcome in Patients with Gastric Cancer Among Asian and Western Countries Melissa J. LaBonte 1, Takeru Wakatsuki.
Impact of age and comorbidities on treatment effect, tolerance and toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated on CALGB
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Response rate using conventional criteria is a poor surrogate for clinical benefit on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal.
S. K. Anderson 1, J. M. Lafky 1, X. W. Carrero 1, T. K. Kimlinger 1, T. M. Halling 1, S. Kumar 1, P. J. Flynn 2, H. M. Gross 3, K. A. Jaeckle 4, J. C.
Intratumoral mRNA expression of genes involved in angiogenesis and HIF-1 pathway to predict outcome to VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in patients.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
Tumor clock protein PER2 as a determinant of survival in patients (pts) receiving oxaliplatin-5-FU- leucovorin as 1st line chemotherapy for metastatic.
Transcription Factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) Polymorphism Was Associated with Worse Survival in Three Independent Cohorts from the USA, Austria, and Japan Rita.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
Introduction Patients and Methods Results Conclusion Pericytes are a key component in the maturation of the VEGF driven tumor angiogenic process 1. Bevacizumab.
Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Study of PD , a Cyclin ‐ Dependent Kinase (CDK) 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination with Letrozole vs Letrozole Alone.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Administered in a Continuous Once-Daily Dosing Regimen in Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Introduction Patients and Methods Results Conclusion Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the 108 patients included in the biomarker analysis. Objectives.
IntroductionPatient baseline characteristics Conclusion The process of EGFR recycling is important mechanism of resistance of cetuximab in colorectal cancer.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
A Discussion on Biologic Agents in Gastric Cancer Treatment Yoon-Koo Kang, MD Professor of Medicine Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Pharmacogenetic analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with second-line irinotecan (IR)+/- cetuximab (CB): The EPIC experience.
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
Microsatellite Instability Predicts Improved Response to Adjuvant Therapy With Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin in Stage III Colon Cancer In association.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Neuropathy Is Not Associated With Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Adjuvant Taxane-Containing Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer Bryan P. Schneider,
What should patients with BRAF mutant melanoma receive as front line therapy? Antoni Ribas, M.D. Professor of Medicine Professor of Surgery Professor of.
Higher Vitamin D Levels Associated With Improved Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual.
TBCRC (the translational breast cancer research consortium) 005 Prospective study
Figure 1. (A) Forest plot of common odds ratios (adjusted for ECOG PS) for best overall response by a priori subgroups in patients with KRAS wild-type.
VEGF and VEGFR1 Gene expression levels predict tumor recurrence in adjuvant colon cancer Yan Ning1, Georg Lurje1, Kathleen Danenberg2, Janine Cooc2, Dongyun.
Genetic variants of kinases suppressors of Ras (KSR)in KRAS-BRAF
by Donna Nichol, and Heidi Stuhlmann
Published online September 20, 2017 by JAMA Surgery
Martin M et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-7.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
Primary side of origin affects the outcome of mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab independently of BRAF status and mucinous.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy
KSR1 gene polymorphism in mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI and bevacizumab Marta Schirripa1, Fotios Loupakis1, Chiara Cremolini1, Dongyun.
Presentation transcript:

Abbreviations: RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; mos, months; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. * P value was based on Cochran-Armitage test for response, log-rank test for PFS and OS in the univariate analysis (†) and Wald test for PFS and OS in the multivariable Cox regression model (‡). EGFL7 Polymorphism Predicts Tumor Response in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab Joseph E. Li 1, Wu Zhang 2, Fotios Loupakis 3, Dongyun Yang 2, Takeru Wakatsuki 2, Yan Ning 2, Sebastian Stintzing 2, Rita E. El-Khoueiry 2, Nico B. Volz 2, Federica Marmorino 3, Marta Schirripa 3, Lisa Salvatore 3, Carlotta Antoniotti 3, Chiara Cremolini 3, Heinz-Josef Lenz 2 1 Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA; 2 USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; 3 U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Pisa, Italy Introduction Methods Conclusion This study tested whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in EGFL7 (rs , rs ) and ALK1 (rs , rs , rs706819) could predict efficacy of BV-based therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. References Angiogenesis is the formation of new vessels from preexisting vascular plexuses. This process involves endothelial cells (ECs) loosening intercellular adhesions, proliferating, and sprouting, while the extracellular matrix (ECM) undergoes remodeling. Nascent vessels are stabilized by the recruitment of mural cells, such as pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), which provide structural and functional support. 1 This system is critical for tumor cell survival. The proteins Epidermal Growth Factor Domain- Like 7 (EGFL7) and Activin Receptor-like Kinase 1 (ALK1) play critical roles in this process. EGFL7 is predominantly expressed by sprouting ECs and associates with the ECM after secretion. 2,3 The protein modulates Notch signaling to promote EC proliferation, sprouting, and migration. 4 It also regulates ECM deposition and the recruitment of VSMCs. 3,5 ALK1 is an EC-specific TGF-β Type 1 receptor with downstream repression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) response. ALK1 is also required for mural cell recruitment. 6 ALK1 and EGFL7 are overexpressed in many tumors, including colon cancer. 7,8 Importantly, the inhibition of either protein enhances anti-tumor efficacy when combined with bevacizumab (BV) in murine models. 9,10 EGFL7 and ALK1 may be critical for the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy. BV has been shown to yield advantages in terms of survival for metastatic colorectal cancer patients. 11 However, from a clinical perspective, the relatively small absolute benefit provided by this agent highlights the need for predictive biomarkers. There are currently no biomarkers available for BV-based therapies. Colorectal cancer was the third-leading cause of cancer-related incidence and death with 143,460 new cases and 51,690 deaths in Carmeliet, P (2003) Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nature Med. 9: Fitch MJ, Campagnolo L, Kuhnert F, Stuhlmann H (2004) EGFL7, a novel epidermal growth factor-domain gene expressed in endothelial cells. Dev Dyn. 230(2): Soncin F, Mattot V, Lionneton F, et al. (2003). VE-statin, an endothelial repressor of smooth muscle cell migration. EMBO J. 22(21): Nichol D, Shawber C, Fitch MJ, et al. (2010) Impaired angiogenesis and altered Notch signaling in mice overexpressing endothelial Egfl7. Blood (115(26): Lelievre E, Hinek A, Lupu F, Buquet C, Soncin F, Mattot V (2008) VE-statin/egfl7 regulates vascular elastogenesis by interacting with lysyl oxidases. EMBO J. 27(12): Larrivée B, Prahst C, Gordon E, et al. (2012) ALK1 signaling inhibits angiogenesis by cooperating with the Notch pathway. Dev Cell. 22(3): Nichol D, Stuhlmann H (2012) EGFL7: a unique angiogenic signaling factor in vascular development and disease. Blood 199: Olivier Nolan-Stevaux and H. Toni Jun (2012). Beyond VEGF: The NOTCH and ALK1 Signaling Pathways as Tumor Angiogenesis Targets, Tumor Angiogenesis, Dr. Sophia Ran (Ed.), ISBN: , InTech, DOI: / Hu-Lowe DD, Chen E, Zhang L, et al. (2011) Targeting Activin Receptor-Like Kinase 1 inhibits angiogenesis and tumorigenesis through a mechanism of action complementary to anti-VEGF therapies. Cancer Res 71: Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W et al. (2004) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 350(23): American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures, Results Objective Table 1. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Analyzed Table 2. Patient Characteristics and Clinical Outcome Table 3. rs and Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with FOLFIRI+BV Currently, there are no predictive biomarkers for BV-based therapies. This study demonstrates for the first time that the EGFL7 SNP rs predicts tumor RR in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRI+BV, which may be clinically important in patients with borderline resectable disease. The association between rs and RR but not PFS or OS may be explained by the fact that the depth of response influences the occurrence of RECIST defined “progression”. Importantly, this is the first study evaluating polymorphisms in genes responsible for blood vessel sprouting and maturation beyond VEGF and examining their relationship to cancer therapy. Prospective validation of this result and analysis of BV-free patient cohorts is warranted. This study analyzed patients combined from a phase III trial (TRIBE NCT ) and a phase II trial (PROVETTA NCT ). Trial participants had histologically confirmed metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma with at least one measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0. Patients received BV and FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan). The primary endpoint of these studies was progression-free survival (PFS). The trials were approved by the local Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was collected from all patients. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples from all patients. SNPs were analyzed by PCR-based direct DNA sequencing. The Cochran-Armitage test was used to test for association with tumor response rate (RR). Logistic regression was used to adjust for baseline patient characteristics. Association between SNPs with overall survival (OS) and PFS was tested with Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox regression. PFS was defined as the time from the first administration of study treatment until the first documentation of objective disease progression according to RECIST 1.0, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the first administration of study treatment until the date of death due to any cause. Figure 1. EGFL7 rs and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLIFIRI+BV. (A) rs and progression-free survival. (B) rs and overall survival. P-value based on multivariable Cox regression. Figure 2. EGFL7 rs and RR in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI+BV. P-value based on univariate Cochran-Armitage trend test. Patients carrying the EGFL7 rs G/G alleles had a 62% RR versus 55% in patients with A/G and 29% in patients with A/A (p=0.008, Cochran-Armitage trend test). The result remained significant after adjustment for baseline patient characteristics (p=0.035, Multivariable logistic regression test). There was no statistically significant association between the tested polymorphisms and OS or PFS. Geners-numberBase ExchangeRegionFunction EGFL7rs G>A3’UTRUnknown rs G>AnsCodingProtein coding, Splicing regulation ALK1rs T>CIntronUnknown rs C>TIntronTranscriptional regulation rs706819C>TIntronUnknown Abbreviations: UTR, untranslated region; nsCoding; nonsynonymous coding N% Age, years Median (range)62 (25-81) ≤ > Sex M F Caucasian Follow-Up, Median (range), mos45.1 ( ) RR Survival, mos OS, Median (95% CI)27.3 ( ) PFS, Median (95% CI)10.4 ( ) Abbreviations: mos, months; RR, response rate; OS, overall survival; CI, confidence interval; PFS, progression-free survival; ECOGPS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase Tumor Response, RECIST Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Overall Survival (OS) NCR+PRSD+PD Median, mos (95%CI) HR (95%CI)†HR (95%CI)‡ Median, mos (95%CI) HR (95%CI)†HR (95%CI)‡ rs G/G (62%)103 (38%) 10.2 (9.6, 10.9)1 (reference) 29.1 (23.9, 33.0)1 (reference) G/A (55%)54 (45%) 10.8 (9.7, 11.6)0.95 (0.75, 1.20)1.00 (0.78, 1.27) 26.1 (23.5, 31.6)1.02 (0.79, 1.32)1.17 (0.90, 1.52) A/A 17 5 (29%)12 (71%) 8.6 (2.8, 11.5)1.02 (0.59, 1.75)0.92 (0.52, 1.65) 21.8 (11.8, 43.9)1.05 (0.58, 1.90)0.91 (0.48, 1.71) P value* Progression-Free Survival: EGFL7 rs P-value = 0.90 A Overall Survival: EGFL7 rs B P-value = 0.98 N% ECOGPS Primary tumor site Right colon Left colon Rectum Colon, rectum10.2 Unknown143.3 High LDH Yes No NA Response Rate: EGFL7 rs Abstract ID: 3565