1 Case Title: Training for Contractor Personnel Interacting with Detainees (DFARS Case 2005-D007)  Type:Final Rule Published 9/8/06 -Received one response.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Changes to USACE s Continuing Contract Authority U.S. Army Corps of Engineers National Dredging Meeting June 13, 2007.
Advertisements

0 New Specialty Metals Restriction 10 U.S.C. 2533b (as enacted by Section 842 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007)
Acquisition Planning and Adequate Market Research National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Acquisition and Grants Office Oversight and Compliance.
Fixed price contract: A contract that provides a price for each procurement item obtained under the contract.
BERRY AMENDMENT TRAINING
Policies and Procedures for Proper Use of Non-DoD Contracts Revised April 19, 2005 Deidre A. Lee Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy Office.
0 Cost, Price, and Finance FAR Cases of Interest Date: 24 October 2006 Bill Sain Senior Procurement Analyst Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy,
Procurement Integrity Act (PIA) Overview
FEDERAL TECHNICAL DATA SOLUTION (FedTeDS) - FINAL RULE FAR 5.102, Availability of solicitations Implements President’s Management Agenda & eGov Initiative.
Hot Compliance Topics in the Supply Chain 1.Human trafficking 2.Conflict minerals 3.Counterfeit goods 4.Whistleblower / Suspension /Debarment Topic overview.
0 Cost, Price, and Finance DFARS Cases of Interest Date: 24 October 2006 Bill Sain Senior Procurement Analyst Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy,
Overview of New Rules Keith Waye Government Contracting Small Business Administration.
Federal Awardee Performance & Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) Overview J. Lisa Romney Defense Procurement & Acquisition Policy.
CENTRAL CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION (CAGE CODES) DFARS Case 2003-D040 DFARS Parts 204, 212, 213 and 252 are amended to remove policy on Central Contractor.
1 Case Title: Combating Trafficking in Persons ( Implementation of Section 3(b) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2003) (FAR.
Policies and Procedures for Proper Use of Non-DoD Contracts September 29, 2004 Deidre Lee Director, Defense Procurement and Policy Office of the Under.
SEWP Program Manager Meeting June 4, Terms and Conditions  Text A.1.2 Procedures for Orders permits the Government Contracting Officer to negotiate.
Berry Amendment Background NDIA Sarasota, FL February 21, 2006 Terry L. Albertson.
COMMERCIAL “SOLE SOURCE” PROPOSAL ANALYSIS ROADMAP 1. Is information available within the Government? Step 1 – Information within the Government If Yes.
Office of Business Development Training
Partnership Agreements Delegation of SBA’s Contract Execution Authority to other Federal Government Agencies.
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration 1.
Contingency Contracting Training Agile Contracting Support…Anytime…Anywhere Types of Contingencies.
Contractual Assistance Procurement Methods 4 Set-aside awards 4 Sole source awards 4 Awards through full and open competition using the price preference.
Company Commander Course- Fiscal Law Fiscal Law for the Company Commander & 1SG.
1 Amy Williams, Senior Procurement Analyst February 5, 2008 Defense Acquisition Regulations System
FAR Part 2 Definitions of Words and Terms. FAR Scope of part (a)This part – (1) Defines words and terms that are frequently used in the FAR; (2)
Rabbanai T. Morgan Chief, Contingency Contracting Team Revised 6 July 2005 Lease vs. Purchase.
SERVICES ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2003 A STATUS REPORT Alan Chvotkin Senior Vice President and Counsel Professional Services Council DEFENSE ACQUISITION.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Fulfilling Air Force R&D Mission Needs William H. Anderson Associate.
0 Defense Acquisition Regulations System (DARS): The Rule-Making Process How It Works and How You Can Get Involved Presented to: Pax River, MD Date Friday,
JFS 3/31/08 COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCUREMENT NDIA Educational Seminar March 31, 2008.
Don Mansfield Professor of Contract Management Defense Acquisition University.
FAR Part 10 Market Research. FAR Part 10 - Prescribes policies and procedures for conducting Market Research.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Chief, Contingency Contracting 26 May 2005 Commercial Contract Financing.
Policies and procedures for developing acquisition plans; determining whether to use commercial or Government resources; whether it is more economical.
Small Business Regulation and Legislation Update
NOAA Aviation Safety Board Meeting May 16, 2006 Lieutenant Commander Debora Barr NOAA Aviation Safety Program.
1 Felisha Hitt, Senior Procurement Analyst March 18, 2008 Defense Acquisition Regulations System
1 DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA’S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA’S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY WARFIGHTER SUPPORT.
Policies and Procedures for Proper Use of Non-DoD Contract Vehicles July 13, 2004 Deidre Lee Director, Defense Procurement and Policy Office of the Under.
1 Amy Williams, Senior Procurement Analyst March 25, 2008 Defense Acquisition Regulations System
1 Amy Williams, Senior Procurement Analyst Friday, October 26, 2007 Defense Acquisition Regulations System
S.B Municipality Fees. S.B – Environment Budget Reconciliation Bill Enacted during the 2011 regular legislative session and becomes effective.
Naval Inventory Control Point 1  Work with all stakeholders early in the PBL formulation process to develop system support strategy  Develop SOW and.
NAVAIR Patuxent River Services Contracting February 2008 Pam Gray.
1 Timothy Sullivan Thompson Coburn LLP 1909 K Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, DC (202)
Regulation Highlights Kimberly Heifetz May 15, 2012.
Final Rule for Sanitary Transportation. Background Proposed Rule: February 5, 2014 Public Comments: More than 200 Final Rule: On Display April 5, 2016.
Office of Management and Enterprise Services Central Purchasing Division Keith Gentry Contract Manager
1 Consent to Subcontract Breakout Session # D12 Name: Rita Wells Daniel Johnson Anthony Simmons Date:July 12, 2011 Time:11:15 – 12:30.
The OA Guide: Implementing a New Paradigm in the Allocation of Rights in Data and Software?
Small Business and Subcontracting. Subcontracting for Small Business 6 steps to successful subcontracting 6. Report Contractor performance 1. Consider.
1 Changes to Regulations Governing Personal Conflicts of Interest and Organizational Conflicts of Interest Breakout Session # C08 Name: Barbara S. Kinosky,
SERVICES ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2003 A STATUS REPORT
Commercial Item Acquisitions: A Brief Update
Skyway Insight© Webinar
Consent to Subcontract
FAR Part 2 - Definitions of Words and Terms
Administrivia Settings Controls Attendees Record
Making the Most of Your Debriefing
Small Business and Subcontracting.
DRAFT FOUO PRE-DECISIONAL
Commercial Contract Financing
A Pricing Perspective on Contract Cost/Price Analyst
Understanding the New Micro-Purchase Thresholds
Procurement Updates Lynn Rodgers, USDA, FNS
Export Controls – Export Provisions in Research Agreements
Type: Final Rule Published 9/8/06
DLAD Procurement Notes & Tech/Quality Requirements
Presentation transcript:

1 Case Title: Training for Contractor Personnel Interacting with Detainees (DFARS Case 2005-D007)  Type:Final Rule Published 9/8/06 -Received one response on the interim rule published 9/1/05  Source: Section 1092, National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2005 (Pub. L )  Synopsis:  DoD contractor personnel who will interact with detainees must receive training regarding treatment of detainees.  The Combatant Commander responsible for the area where the detention or interrogation facility is located will arrange for the required training.

2 Case Title: Contractor Personnel Supporting a Force Deployed outside the United States (DFARS Case 2003-D087)  Type:Final rule effective 6/6/05 (published 5/5/05) -26 respondents to the proposed rule  Source: DoD Policy  Synopsis of rule:  Provides DoD policy relating to contracts that require contractor personnel to deploy with or otherwise provide support in the theater of operations to U.S. military forces deployed outside the United States.  New clause at , Contractor Personnel Supporting a Force Deployed outside the United States.

3 Case Title: Contractor Personnel Authorized to Accompany U.S. Armed Forces (DFARS Case 2005-D013)  Type:Interim rule published 6/16/ respondents to the interim rule  Source: DoDI , Contractor Personnel Authorized to Accompany the U.S. Armed Forces (10/3/05)  Synopsis of rule:  Revised the final rule under 2003-D087 to— o Implement final version of DODI ; and o Conform to FAR proposed rule  Significant concerns of respondents: Contractor use of deadly force; Force protection by Government; Contractor acceptance of risk and liability for use of any weapon by contractor personnel.

4 Case Title: Acquisition of Ball and Roller Bearings (DFARS Case 2003-D021)  Type:Final rule published 3/21/ respondents to the proposed rule  Source: Annual defense appropriations act; and Expiration of the restrictions on ball and roller bearings in 10 U.S.C  Synopsis of rule:  Annual defense appropriations acts restrict the acquisition of nondomestic ball and roller bearings.  Similar (but not identical) restrictions in 10 U.S.C expired on October 1,  The final rule removes the exceptions and waiver procedures that were imposed by 10 U.S.C  DFARS Case 2006-D029 has been opened to consider further changes to the restriction.

5 Case Title: Prohibition on Acquisition from Communist Chinese Military Companies (DFARS Case 2006-D007)  Type:Interim rule published 9/8/2006 -Public comment period closes 11/7/2006  Source: Section 1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2006 (Pub. L ).  Synopsis of rule:  Prohibits DoD from acquiring U.S. Munitions List items from Communist Chinese military companies.  Does not apply to components and parts of covered items unless the components and parts are themselves covered by the U.S. Munitions List.  Exceptions: Supplies or services acquired— In connection with a visit to the People’s Republic of China by a vessel or an aircraft of the U.S. armed forces; for testing purposes; or for the purposes of gathering intelligence.

6 Case Title: Prohibition on Foreign Taxation on U.S. Assistance Programs (DFARS Case 2004-D012)  Type:Final rule published & effective 4/12/06 -No comments received on the interim rule published and effective on 9/30/05  Source: Statutory (Pub. L. Nos , and )  Synopsis:  Added Sections thru and an associated clause at  Prohibits foreign governments from taxing commodities acquired under contracts funded by U.S. assistance appropriations in the annual foreign operations appropriations act.

7 Case Title: Incentive Program for Purchase of Capital Assets Manufactured in the United States (DFARS Case 2005-D063)  Type:Final rule published 3/21/ respondents to the interim rule  Source: Sec. 822 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 04 (Pub. L )  Synopsis of rule:  Establish an incentive program for contractors to purchase capital assets manufactured in the United States for major defense acquisition programs.  Provide consideration for offers with eligible capital assets in source selections for major defense acquisition programs.

8 Case Title: Berry Amendment— Notification Requirement (DFARS Case 2006-D006)  Type:Interim rule published 10/4/2006 -Comment period will close on 12/4/2006.  Source: Section 833(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2006 (Pub. L )  Synopsis of rule:  Must post a notice on FedBizOps within 7 days after award of contract exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold for the acquisition of— o Certain clothing fiber, yarn, or fabric items, when DoD has determined that adequate domestic items are not available; or o Chemical warfare protective clothing, when acquiring from a qualifying country.

9 Case Title: Berry Amendment Exceptions—Acquisition of Perishable Food, and Fish, Shellfish, or Seafood (DFARS Case 2006-D005)  Type:Interim rule published 6/16/2006 -No responses to the interim rule  Source: Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act of FY 2006 (Pub. L ); and Sec 8118 of the Defense Appropriations Act for FY 2005 (Pub. L )  Synopsis of rule: Amends two exceptions to the Berry Amendment, which requires DoD to acquire certain items from domestic sources.  Sec 831: Expands the exception that permits the acquisition of non-domestic perishable foods by activities located outside the U.S., to also permit acquisition of such foods by activities that are making purchases for activities located outside the U.S.  Sec 8118: Established a permanent requirement for the acquisition of domestic fish, shellfish, or seafood, including fish, shellfish, or seafood contained in foods manufactured or processed in the U.S.

10 Case Title: PAN Carbon Fiber –Restriction to Domestic Source (DFARS Cases 2004-D002)  Type:Final rule published 2/7/2005 -No responses to the proposed rule  Source: Request of aerospace industry and Section 832 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2005 (Pub. L )  Industry requested time for U.S. companies to maintain the capability to support a critical material used in advanced aerospace weapons programs.  Sec 832 required a delay in phase-out of the restriction until DoD performs an assessment of the PAN-Carbon fiber industry and submits the report to Congress.  Synopsis of rule: –Extended the ending date for phasing out domestic source restrictions on the acquisition of PAN-carbon fiber from May 31, 2005, to May 31,  Currently processing DFARS Case 2006-D033, PAN-Carbon Fiber—Deletion of Obsolete Restriction.

11 Case Title: Reporting Contract Performance Outside the United States (DFARS Case 2004-D001)  Type:Final rule published 4/22/ response to the proposed rule  Source: DoD – Clarification. DFARS had merged two separate requirements: –DoD policy for contractor reporting of performance outside the U.S. under contracts exceeding $500,000. –10 U.S.C. 2410g requirement for offerors and contractors to notify DoD of any intention to perform a DoD contract outside the U.S. and Canada, when the contract exceeds $10 million and could be performed in the U.S. or Canada.  Synopsis of rule:  Separates out the two reporting requirements in the text and creates two separate clauses to implement, instead of one.