Botox® for the overactive bladder -The evidence Philip Toozs-Hobson Consultant Urogynaecologist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Darifenacin Hydrobromide
Advertisements

Onabotulinum toxin for Pelvic pain Philip Toozs-Hobson Consultant Urogynaecologist Birmingham UK.
Revolution in Asian drug development: A Korea and Japan experience Henk de Koning Gans, MD VP, Process Management Global Development Japan Pharmacia KK,
Botulinum toxin-A for overactive bladder and detrusor overactivity Douglas Tincello Professor of Urogynaecology Prolapse & Incontinence Group, University.
Urinary Incontinence Kieron Durkan GPST 1.
Incontinence in children, a symptom complex Daytime incontinence (OAB), enuresis Dyschezia, incontinence for stools Pain 30-35% of these children with.
1 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 29 Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction and the Nervous System Amit Batla and Jalesh N. Panicker.
OnabotulinumtoxinA for Urinary Incontinence from Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity.
Urinary Incontinence NICE Guidance. Urinary incontinence  Involuntary leakage of urine  Common condition  Affects women of different ages  Physical/psychological/social.
Overactive Bladder: Diagnosis and Treatment Chase Kenyon Sovell, MD Urology Associates May 30 th, 2007 Pearls of Plumbing Seminar.
Urinary incontinence in women October Changing clinical practice NICE guidelines are based on the best available evidence The Department of Health.
OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder
“URINARY INCONTINENCE IN WOMEN 2013” NICE guidelines implementation in Primary Care Tony Smith Urogynaecologist St Mary’s HospitalAnson Medical CentreManchester.
Physiotherapy approaches for urgency and urge incontinence Liz Childs Pelvic Health Physiotherapist.
Nursing approaches for urgency and Urge Incontinence
Urinary Incontinence in women. Urinary incontinence Stress – involuntary leakage of urine on effort, sneezing or coughing Urgency – involuntary leakage.
Medical Therapy of Prostate Symptoms (MTOPS) Jeannette Y. Lee, Ph.D. University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Disability and Incontinence Patient assessment Patient management.
LUTS Shawket Alkhayal Consultant Urological Surgeon Benenden Hospital Tunbridge Wells Nuffield Hospital.
Slide 1 Effect of Combination Therapy with PROSCAR ™† (finasteride, MSD) and Doxazosin on the Risk of Clinical Progression of BPH by Total Baseline Prostate.
Slide 1 EZT 2002-W-6022-SS Ezetimibe Co-administered with Statins: Efficacy and Tolerability Copyright © 2003 MSP Singapore Company, LLC. All rights reserved.
Ultrasound Guided Botulinum Toxin Injection for Sialorrhoea in Parkinson’s Disease; Evidence, Technique and Outcomes Background Sialorrhoea: inability.
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Calcium Glycerophosphate Dietary Supplement in Patients with Overactive Bladder Michael J. Kennelly,
GERIATRICS : UI Dr. Meg-angela Christi Amores. URINARY INCONTINENCE  major problem for older adults, afflicting up to 30% of community-dwelling elders.
Best first ? The ATAC completed treatment analysis Professor Jack Cuzick Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, UK.
Urinary Incontinence (UI) Management in Family Practice References: Can Fam Physician 2003;49: Can Fam Physician 2003;49: SOGC Clinical.
11 One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al.
Keeping the right patients away from hospital
The COMBINE Study: Design and Methodology Stephanie S. O’Malley, Ph.D. for The COMBINE Study Research Group JAMA Vol. 295, , 2006 (May 3 rd.
Sharon English Urologist Christchurch
ROLE OF PERCUTANEOUS TIBIAL NERVE STIMULATION (PTNS) IN THE TREATMENT OF NEUROGENIC OVERACTIVE BLADDER SYNDROME Perugia G., Corongiu E., Borgoni.
Over active bladder drug treatment Mark Weatherall University of Otago Wellington.
ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE USE OF OXYBUTYNIN, TOLTERODINE AND SOLIFENACIN IN PATIENTS WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER February 6, 2009.
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
Dr Stephen Jeffery Groote Schuur Hospital Cape Town
Update On OAB Joon Chul Kim The Catholic University of Korea.
PROF. Rosita Aniuliene LITHUANIAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES President of Lithuanian Association of Urogynecology.
Tresiba- insulin degludec
Prescribing information is available at this meeting MODULE 3 TREATMENT OPTIONS AND EXPECTATIONS 1 DET 808.
OFEV ® (nintedanib) TOMORROW trial results Last updated These slides are provided by Boehringer Ingelheim for medical to medical education only.
Augmentation of Exposure-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with D-cycloserine in Patients with Panic Disorder Sean Donovan, Meenakshi Shelat, Corrinne.
Manufacturer: Amgen Inc FDA Approval Date: August 27, 2015
Effects of Memantine on behavioural symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease patients: an analysis of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) data of two randomised,
Safety, Efficacy and Duration of Effect of RT002, a Botulinum Toxin Type A for Injection, to Treat Glabellar Lines: The Phase 2 BELMONT Study Authors:
International Neurourology Journal 2015;19: Practical Aspects of Botulinum Toxin-A Treatment in Patients With Overactive Bladder Syndrome Chun-Hou.
URINARY INCONTINENCE Urology Division, Surgery Department Medical Faculty, University of Sumatera Utara.
โดย เภสัชกรณัฐวุฒิ จรีบุญ สมโภช. OAB affects 33 million people in the United States (17% of American adults) more common in women and in older people.
OAB / LUTS Urology Pathway for Primary Care within Frimley Health locality Developed with key local stakeholders including Urologists, Gynaecologists,
Urinary incontinence (UI) Niazy B Hussam Aldin PhD Clinical Pharmacy
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Algorithms of Incontinence Management Men
Current Management of OAB
Success of a repeated tined lead trial in a refractory OAB population
497 MIRABEGRON IS A SAFE AND EFFECTIVE TREATMENT FOR PARKINSON’S DISEASE PATIENTS WITH STORAGE SYMPTOMS REFRACTORY TO ANTIMUSCARINICS Soto Troya I1 , Park.
Management of Male OAB; Current Status in Japan
OB,GYN / Fellowship of Pelvic Floor
Bladder dysfunction in ALD and AMN
Bladder Dysfunction Associated With Parkinson’s Disease
Long-Term Management of Overactive Bladder with Antimuscarinic Agents
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Macitentan in Pulmonary Hypertension Due To Left Ventricular Dysfunction: MELODY-1 Jean-Luc Vachièry, Marion Delcroix, Hikmet Al-Hiti, Michela Efficace,
Philip Toozs-Hobson, Pallavi Latthe  European Urology Supplements 
Initial Office Evaluation
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
Understanding the Role of Botulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of the Overactive Bladder—More than Just Muscle Relaxation  Apostolos Apostolidis, Axel Haferkamp,
The efficacy and safety of omalizumab in pediatric allergic asthma
Difference between the groups
Comparison of protocols for tibial nerve electrical stimulation for the treatment of overactive bladder: clinical trial randomized blind Pierre ML, Toscano.
Initial Office Evaluation for OAB
How Should We Select and Define Trial Estimands
Presentation transcript:

Botox® for the overactive bladder -The evidence Philip Toozs-Hobson Consultant Urogynaecologist

Declaration I was sponsored by Allergan to travel to and attend this meeting I work as a consultant for Allergan and Astellas I was an author on the RELAX study I have been involved in Allergan and Astellas sponsored trials I undertake private practice

Almost 70–90% of patients stop their treatment within 1 year 1 Discontinuation after first prescription 2 Most common reasons for switching are lack of effectiveness and side effects 3 What’s wrong with anticholinergic medication *Not all anticholinergic treatments listed may be licensed in Ireland ER, extended release; IR, immediate release. 1.D'Souza AO, et al. J Manag Care Pharm 2008;14:291– Kelleher C, et al. B J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;104:988–93. 3.Castro D, et al. Acta Urol Esp 2011;35:73–9. 4.Wagg A, et al. BJU Int 2012;110:1767–74. Propiverine (n=97) Trospium (n=352) Darifenacin (n=23) Flavoxate (n=89) Percentage of patients remaining on each anticholinergic over 12 months 4 Solifenacin (n=1,381) Tolterodine ER (n=1,758) Tolterodine IR (n=482) Oxybutynin ER (n=590) Oxybutynin IR (n=1,371) Patients (%) Months Adapted from: Wagg A, et al. BJU Int 2012;110:1767–1774

Other options Pharma Mirabegron multiple therapy Oestrogens Desmopressin Non pharma BOTOX PTNS SNS Clam/diversion

CompoundMW Acetylsalicylic acid180 Da 3 Trospium chloride430 Da 3 Tamsulosin445 Da 3 Sildenafil citrate667 Da 3 BOTOX ® complex (botulinum toxin type A) ~900,000 Da 4 Botulinum toxin type A: A large three- dimensional protein BoNT-A (core) 149,500 Da 1,2 C 6763 H N 1744 O 2011 S 33 Zn Ibuprofen Da C 13 H 18 O 2 Atorvastatin Da C 33 H 35 FN 2 O 5 BoNT-A, botulinum toxin type A; MW, molecular weight. 1. Lacy DB, et al. Nat Struct Biol 1998;5:898– Lacy DB, Stevens RC. J Mol Biol 1999;291:1091– DrugBank. Available from Last accessed February Schantz EJ, Johnson EA. Perspect Biol Med 1997;40:317–27.

Botulinum toxins are non-interchangeable from one product to another 1 Cell-based potency assayLethal dose 50 Batch release assay: It is the first cell-based potency assay (CBPA) using an established cell-line to measure the biological activity of BOTOX ®2 This assay has sensitivity equal or superior to the mouse bioassay 2 This ensures the quality and consistency of neurotoxic activity in the product that is delivered to the clinic Approved by the FDA and Irish Medicines Board for the potency testing of BOTOX ®2 ~900 kDa~400 kDa150 kDa FDA, United States Food and Drug Administration. *LD50 is the amount of a material, given all at once, which causes the death of 50% of a group of test animals 1.BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan 2.Fernandez-Salas E, et al. PLoS One 2012;7:e49516.

SNARE proteins Synaptobrevin (VAMP) SNAP-25 Syntaxin SYNAPTIC CLEFT PRE-SYNAPSE Receptor requires SNARE complex for membrane expression 2. Vesicle and terminal membranes fuse 3a. Receptors delivered to membrane insertion sites 3b. Neurotransmitter released 4. Mediators (e.g. SP) bind to inserted receptors 1. SNARE proteins form a complex MM M M Neurotransmitter release requires interaction of synaptic vesicles with nerve terminal membranes SP, substance P. Adapted from Arnon SS, et al. JAMA 2001;285:1059–70.

3. Light chain cleaves specific SNARE proteins Types B, D, F, G: VAMP Types A, C, E: SNAP SNARE complex does not form 1. Botulinum toxin binds to receptor 2. Botulinum toxin endocytosed MM M M Inhibition of interaction of synaptic vesicles with nerve terminal membranes is key to the sensorimotor action of BOTOX ® Adapted from Arnon SS, et al. JAMA 2001;285:1059–70.

Muscle contraction Peripheral sensitisation Central sensitisation BOTOX ® : An innovative treatment for OAB with a dual mechanism of action 1–3 Blocks peripheral release of neurotransmitter at presynaptic cholinergic nerve terminals Blocks release of neurotransmitters and down regulates expression of receptors associated with sensory afferent pathway BOTOX ® Targets both the efferent and afferent pathway Treatment benefit: Detrusor muscle relaxation Treatment benefit: Reduced urgency BOTOX ® targets both the afferent and efferent pathways Acetylcholine Sensory neuropeptides and receptors Sympathetic nervous system activity maintained as bladder fills Reduced parasympathetic nervous system activity in response to bladder distension Efferent pathway Afferent pathway OAB, overactive bladder. 1. BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan 2. Purves D, et al. Autonomic Regulation of the Bladder. Neuroscience. 2nd edition Apostolidis A, et al. Eur Urol 2006;49:644–50.

Idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) BOTOX ® development programme OAB clinical development programme Phase II: Study (N=313) Began: July 2005 Ended: June 2008 Phase III: EMBARK 2,3 Pivotal study 095 (N=557) 72 sites; Canada and USA Began: Sept 2009 Ended: July 2011 Phase III: EMBARK 3,4 Pivotal study 520 (N=548) 64 sites; Belgium, Czech Republic, Germany, Poland, Russia, UK, USA Began: Oct 2009 Ended: Aug 2011 Phase III: 096 EMBARK long-term extension 5 (N=839) Began: Feb 2010 Ends: Sept Fowler CJ, et al. Eur Urol Jul;62(1): Epub 2012 Mar Nitti VW, et alJ Urol Jun;189(6): BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan 4. Chapple C, et al. Eur Urol Aug;64(2): ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT Available from Last accessed July RELAX study 200 u BOTOX vs palcebo 320 patients randomised 1:1

EMBARK: phase III trials Efficacy and safety assessment: Weeks 2, 6, 12 Quality-of-life assessment: Week 12 Primary endpoint Earliest time for re-treatment Pre-screen/ randomisation BOTOX ® 100 U Placebo BOTOX ® 100 U Placebo –302*6*12*1824 Study 095 (N=557) Study 520 (N=548) Long-term extension: Study 096 Up to 3 additional years Weeks Study exit unless re-treatment occurred *Placebo-controlled comparison period. 1. Nitti VW, et al. J Urol 2013;189:1388–95 2. BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan 3. Chapple C, et al. Eur Urol Aug;64(2):249-56

Population of patients with OAB – ≥3 urinary urgency incontinence episodes in 3-day diary – ≥8 micturitions/day – Post-void residual urine ≤100 mL – Inadequately managed by anticholinergics Washout period 2 weeks No anticholinergic use permitted during the trial Inclusion criteria 1. Nitti VW, et alJ Urol Jun;189(6): Chapple C, et al. Eur Urol Aug;64(2):249-56

Study endpoints EndpointMeasure Primary Number of urinary incontinence episodes Proportion of patients with positive treatment response on the Treatment Benefit Scale Secondary Number of urgency episodes Number of micturition episodes Volume voided per micturition I-QOL total summary score KHQ domains (role limitations and social limitations) 1. Nitti VW, et alJ Urol Jun;189(6): Chapple C, et al. Eur Urol Aug;64(2):249-56

Randomised in a 1:1 ratio: – BOTOX ® 100 U – Placebo Re-treatment permitted: – after ≥12 weeks Treatment paradigm 1 PVR, post-void residual. 1.. BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan

Demographics and baseline characteristics 1 095/520 Pooled Parameter BOTOX ® 100 U (N=557) Placebo (N=548) Age (years) Sex (%) Male Female Race (%) Caucasian Non-Caucasian BMI (mean, kg/m 2 ) Duration of OAB (years) Number of prior anticholinergics used (mean) Urinary incontinence episodes (per 24 hours) Urgency episodes (per 24 hours) Micturition episodes (per 24 hours) Nocturia episodes (per 24 hours) Volume voided per micturition (mL) Groups were well balanced with no significant differences between treatment groups. BMI, body mass index; OAB, idiopathic overactive bladder; OAB, overactive bladder. 1. Allergan Data on File Baseline Patient Characteristics

Incontinence episodes Baseline values Placebo: 5.39/day BOTOX ® 100 U: 5.49/day 0 –1.13 –0.95 –2.66** –2.97** –2.74** Placebo (n=548) BOTOX ® 100 U (n=557) At Week 12, BOTOX ® led to a 51% reduction from baseline in UI episodes versus 18% with placebo (p<0.001) **p<0.001 vs. placebo. UI, urinary incontinence. Adapted from: BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan –1 –2 –3 –4 –1.05

Patient response 76% Patients with ≥50% or ≥75% decrease in urinary incontinence ≥75% reduction Patients with 100% decrease in urinary incontinence (‘DRY’)* Patients (%) ≥50% reduction Placebo (n=548) BOTOX ® 100 U (n=557) Placebo (n=548) Placebo (n=548) BOTOX ® 100 U (n=557) *Patients must have had no incontinence episodes in the 3 days preceding the 12-week time point. Adapted from: BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan

urgency episodes Baseline values Placebo: 8.31/day BOTOX ® 100 U: 8.82/day **p<0.001 vs. placebo. At Week 12, BOTOX ® led to a 37% reduction from baseline in daily urgency episodes versus 15% with placebo (p<0.001) Placebo (n=548) BOTOX ® 100 U (n=557) Adapted from: BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan

Daily micturition frequency and nocturia Week 2 Week 6 Week 12 Placebo (n=548) BOTOX ® 100 U (n=557) Baseline values: Placebo: 11.48/day BOTOX ® 100 U: 11.99/day ** * Baseline values: Placebo: 2.04/day BOTOX ® 100 U: 2.17/day At Week 12, BOTOX ® led to a 20% reduction from baseline in daily micturition frequency versus 8% with placebo (p<0.001) and a 21% reduction from baseline in nocturia versus 12% with placebo (p<0.05) *p≤0.05; **p<0.001 vs. placebo. 1. Adapted from BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Alleragan 2. Data on File-003 – BOTOX ® Daily Average Frequency of Nocturia Episodes During Treatment Cycle 1 Daily micturition frequency 1 Nocturia 2 Mean change from baseline (episodes/day)

Subjective outcomes 095/520 Pooled ** BOTOX ® 100 U (n=557) Placebo (n=548) **p<0.001 vs. placebo. Significantly more BOTOX ® patients reported their symptoms as “Greatly improved” or “Improved” Adapted from: BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan

Median time to patient request for re-treatment is ~6 months The median duration of response following BOTOX ® treatment, based on patient request for re-treatment, was 166 days (~24 weeks) Adapted from: BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan

Adverse events 1 EMBARK study Urinary tract infection Bacteriuria count of >10 5 CFU/mL and leukocyturia of >5/HPF Urinary retentionElevated PVR ≥200 mL requiring CIC CIC to be initiated either: If PVR between ≥200 mL and <350 mL and patient has associated symptoms that require CIC PVR ≥350 mL (regardless of symptoms) CFU, colony-forming units; CIC, clean intermittent catheterisation; HPF, high-power field; PVR, post-void residual; UTI, urinary tract infection. 1.Allergan Data on File Summary of clinical Efficacy

Adverse events Adverse event ≥3%, n (%) First 12 weeksAny time in treatment cycle 1 BOTOX ® 100 U (N=552) Placebo (N=542) BOTOX ® 100 U (N=552) Placebo (N=542) Urinary tract infection99(17.9)30 (5.5)141(25.5)52 (9.6) Dysuria50 (9.1)36 (6.6)60 (10.9)38 (7.0) Urinary retention31 (5.6)2(0.4)32 (5.8)2 (0.4) Bacteriuria24 (4.3)11(2.0)44 (8.0)19 (3.5) Haematuria17 (3.1)16 (3.0)18 (3.3) Residual urine volume17 (3.1)1(0.2)19 (3.4)2 (0.4) Sinusitis12 (2.2)2(0.4)18 (3.3)6 (1.1) Leukocyturia11 (2.0)2(0.4)18 (3.3)2 (0.4) 1.Allergan Data on File Adverse Events

Patients with absolute PVR at different thresholds at Week 12 Post void residuals ® Patients (%) PVR Adapted from Allergan Data on File PVR Tables PVR, post-void residual.

2.5% 1.3% 0.4% 1.4% 0.9% Self Cath rates % of Patients 6.5% CIC = 6.5% (36/552 patients)* Adapted from: BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan and Allergan Data on File Summary of Clinical Safety. *Patients requiring CIC at any point during treatment cycle 1. CIC, clean intermittent catheterisation.

Discontinuation due to adverse events Parameter 095 Study520 Study BOTOX ® 100 U PlaceboTotal BOTOX ® 100 U PlaceboTotal Randomised (N) Discontinued Any reason Full treatment cycle 1 1st 12 weeks 31 (11.1%) 13 (4.6%) 34 (12.3%) 21 (7.6%) 65 (11.7%) 34 (6.1%) 20 (7.2%) 11 (4.0%) 24 (8.9%) 16 (5.9%) 44 (8.0%) 27 (4.9%) Due to adverse events Full treatment cycle 1 1st 12 weeks 5 (1.8%) 4 (1.4%) 2 (0.7%) 9 (1.6%) 6 (1.1%) 6 (2.2%) 4 (1.4%) 1 (0.4%) 7 (1.3%) 5 (0.9%) 1. Data on File-004 – BOTOX ® Cumulative Patient Disposition by Scheduled Visit Data on File-005 – BOTOX ® Cumulative Patient Disposition by Scheduled Visit

Change in I-QOL scores Week 12 Clinically important difference = + 10 points ** Adapted from Data on File Incontinence Quality of Life Domain & Total summary Score (2). **p< vs. placebo. I-QOL, Incontinence quality-of-life questionnaire. ®

Change in KHQ scores Week 12 ** * Clinically important difference = –5 points ® Adapted from Data on File-002 – BOTOX ® King’s Health Questionnaire (KHQ). *p≤0.005; **p≤0.001 vs. placebo. KHQ, King’s Health Questionnaire; OAB, idiopathic overactive bladder.

Repeat treatment Adapted from: BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan.

Proportion of patients with positive treatment response on treatment benefit scale Repeat treatment Adapted from: BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan.

Long term study 1st BOTOX ® (N=814) 2nd BOTOX ® (N=546) 3rd BOTOX ® (N=253) 4th BOTOX ® (N=88) Overall incidence of adverse events (%) Incidence of individual adverse events ≥5% in any cycle (%) Urinary tract infection Dysuria Bacteriuria PVR, urinary retention and use of CIC Mean change in PVR (at Week 2, mL) Urinary retention (%) Patients using CIC (%) BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan 2. Allergan Data on File Summary of clinical Safety CIC, clean intermittent catheterisation; PVR, post-void residual.

Our data Voiding difficulties reproducible (90%) OP flexible injections well tolerated Not using exponentially – Moderating effect?

Conclusions Embark programme comprehensive – Results consistent with previous studies – Lower dosage than initial (RELAX) studies BOTOX® adds to our treatment options Long term data reassuring

NDO, neurogenic detrusor overactivity NB: Not all treatments mentioned here are licensed for NDO in Ireland Pannek J. European Association of Urology. Guidelines on neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction Available from: Last accessed July BOTOX ® Summary of Product Characteristics, Allergan Less invasiveMore invasive Neurostimulation Peripheral tibial nerve stimulation Sacral nerve stimulation Surgery Augmentation cystoplasty Urinary diversion Assisted emptying Voiding by abdominal straining Triggered reflex voiding Containment Urinary incontinence products Intermittent self-catheterisation Pharmacotherapy Antimuscarinics Beta-3 adrenoreceptor agonists Flavoxate, Imipramine, Oestrogens Spectrum of treatments for NDO BOTOX ® Lifestyle advice/behavioural approaches Regular voiding schedule Pelvic floor muscle exercises