Pump and Treat Permeable Reactive Barrier Former Intersil, Inc. Site Sunnyvale, California Presented by Daniel Cheung
Outline of Presentation Site Background Geotechnology Alternatives Science/Principles Involved (PRB) Evaluation on Remediation Conclusion
Site Background Historical Activities Former Intersil, Inc. (Sunnyvale, California) Former Intersil, Inc. (Sunnyvale, California) 1970s–1983 Semiconductor manufacturing 1970s–1983 Semiconductor manufacturing 1972 Concrete, epoxy-lined, in-ground neutralization system installed 1972 Concrete, epoxy-lined, in-ground neutralization system installed 1986 Identified as potential contaminant source 1986 Identified as potential contaminant source 1987-Present Remediation 1987-Present Remediation
Site Background
Hydrogeology of the Site (2.4 acres) Semi-confined aquifer Semi-confined aquifer Upper silty clay (9-12 feet)Upper silty clay (9-12 feet) Lower clay and silty clay (~65 feet)Lower clay and silty clay (~65 feet) Interfingering zones of (~1-8 feet, porosity = 0.3) Interfingering zones of (~1-8 feet, porosity = 0.3) Silty fine grained sandSilty fine grained sand Fine to medium grained sandFine to medium grained sand Gravelly sandGravelly sand Average flow rate = 0.8 ft/dayAverage flow rate = 0.8 ft/day Not usable for consumption (high TDS) Not usable for consumption (high TDS)
Site Background Contamination Halogenated volatile organic compounds (VOCs) Halogenated volatile organic compounds (VOCs) Maximum concentrations in 1986 Maximum concentrations in 1986 Halogenated VOCs μg/L Halogenated VOCs μg/L Trichlorethene (TCE) 13,000Trichlorethene (TCE) 13,000 cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1,2-DCE) 19,000cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1,2-DCE) 19,000 Vinyl chloride (VC) 1,800Vinyl chloride (VC) 1,800 Freon-13316,000Freon-13316,000 Only detected in the upper aquifer Only detected in the upper aquifer
Geotechnology Alternatives Pump and Treat, P&T (11/87 – 02/95) 4 extraction wells (pump) 4 extraction wells (pump) 13 monitoring wells 13 monitoring wells 1 Air stripper (treat) → Storm sewer (discharge) 1 Air stripper (treat) → Storm sewer (discharge) 2 Carbon adsorption (unused) 2 Carbon adsorption (unused) Permeable Reactive Barrier, PRB (02/95 – Ongoing) Granular iron treatment zone Granular iron treatment zone Flow control zone Flow control zone Hydraulic barrier system (2 slurry walls) Hydraulic barrier system (2 slurry walls)
Science/Principles Involved (PRB)
Abiotic Reductive Dehalogenation
Evaluation on Remediation Pump and Treat HVOCs < MCLs (NPDES) HVOCs < MCLs (NPDES) Inward hydraulic gradient contained the plume Inward hydraulic gradient contained the plume Removal rate declined exponentially Removal rate declined exponentially $1,343,800 (24% capital cost, 76% O/M cost) $1,343,800 (24% capital cost, 76% O/M cost) $24,000/kg of total contaminant $24,000/kg of total contaminant 1993 evaluation Minimise cost & Increase effectiveness Minimise cost & Increase effectiveness Return the site to leasable conditions Return the site to leasable conditions
Evaluation on Remediation Permeable Reactive Barrier TCE & Freon-133 < MCLs (California & EPA) TCE & Freon-133 < MCLs (California & EPA) Cis-1,2-DCE & VC >> MCLs (California & EPA) Cis-1,2-DCE & VC >> MCLs (California & EPA) Natural attenuation & Non-migrated Natural attenuation & Non-migrated Plume has been contained Plume has been contained $762,000 (78% capital cost, 22% O/M cost) $762,000 (78% capital cost, 22% O/M cost) $108,900/kg of total contaminant $108,900/kg of total contaminant The site was released in 1995 The site was released in 1995
Evaluation on Remediation PRB 2M gallons 7kg in 1.5yrs P&T 36M gallons 56kg in 7.25yrs 98% Total Removal
Conclusion Both P&T and PRB were used Satisfactory overall clean up performance Appropriate methods were adopted Hydrogeology Hydrogeology Seriousness of contamination Seriousness of contamination Cost effectiveness Cost effectiveness Legal requirement Legal requirement
Q&A