INSETA Western Cape Stakeholder Forum Workshop – 4 October 2005 FSC Learnership Implementation Lessons Learnt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Employability and Employer Engagement
Advertisements

Tips and Resources IASC Cluster/Sector Leadership Training
Lifelong learning: Taking Bologna to the labour market Lars Lynge Nielsen President of EURASHE Leuven Ministerial Conference 28 April 2009.
WACE Roundtable Discussions Feedback. 1. Employability Issues debated: Terms: employability vs. work-readiness Generation Y students, academics to keep.
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Closing Thoughts Reflections and implications for policy, systemic change and partnerships …in the context of the continuous change towards improvement.
LEVY IMPLEMENTATION 27 JANUARY TO 14 FEBRUARY 2014.
OCCUPATION SPECIFIC DISPENSATION FOR EDUCATORS: ELRC COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 1 OF 2008 – 3 APRIL 2008 PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON ENSURING.
INSETA COUNCIL ANNUAL REPORT BACK TO STAKEHOLDERS 2002/2003 Presented 10 th September 2003.
The new Grant Regulations How will it impact on the FP&M Sector?
Building Capacity for WIL in the TVET Colleges
SACPO PRESENTATION ON WORK INTEGRATED LEARNING WORKSHOP 19 MARCH 2015.
Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.
Introduction to Human Resource Development
Introduction to Human Resource Development Moving from HRM to HRD Contd…. Lecture 10.
Lecture 32.
Training and Learning Needs Analysis (TLNA) a tool to promote effective workplace learning & development Helen Mason, Project Worker, Unionlearn Representing.
Strategic, Annual Performance & Operational Planning Process
Welcome Maria Hegarty Equality Strategies Ltd. What ? Equality/Diversity Impact Assessment A series of steps you take that enable you to assess what you.
Fasset Learnership Induction Template March 2005.
BALANCED SCORECARD WORKSHOP ROLLOUT FOR SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL PARKS.
Homelessness 2020 The Lift We Need on the Long Road Home? Michelle Burrell Council to Homeless Persons.
Overview of the Charter November WhiteBlackWomen Men 90% 6% 94% 10%
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Janice Shiner Chief Executive, TEC Thursday 27 July 2006 Industry Training Federation.
BALANCED SCORECARD WORKSHOP ROLLOUT
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Children’s Trust Network 19 October 2011 Developments in Safeguarding Anthony May Corporate Director for Children, Families and Cultural Services.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES AGRIBEE CHARTER COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN AND BUDGET FOR 3 YEARS 2015/16 –
Promoting Employment Equity in the Public Service Presentation to the Portfolio Committee, Parliament Briefing by the Department of Public Service and.
Presentation to Parliamentary Committee on Education 15 April 2003 Presenter: Dhaya Govender (GS)
INSETA Funding Policy Learnerships Funding Policy Speaker: Aubrey Maseko – Learnerships Manager.
Sector Skills Plan (SSP) ANNUAL UPDATE.
©BANKSETA 2008 CABINET PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 27 OCTOBER 2010 ENABLING SKILLS DEVELOPMENT IN THE BANKING SECTOR BANKSETA.
Complying with Changes in Legislation Fasset Presentation May to June 2008.
Audit Advisory Committee Public health transition update 22 January 2013.
....providing education and training opportunities of first choice.
©BANKSETA 2008 CABINET PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 3 NOVEMBER 2009 ENABLING SKILLS DEVELOPMENT IN THE BANKING SECTOR BANKSETA.
Ministry for Women, Youth, Children and Persons with Disabilities.
INSETA LEARNERSHIPS. 2 Background INSETA is working on an exit strategy towards completion and NSDS 2 and preparation for the QCTO and NSDS 3. In order.
Vision “…promoting a transformed, vibrant and globally competitive sector that reflects the demographics of SA, and contributes to the establishment of.
CHE Business Plan Mission The mission of the CHE is to contribute to the development of a higher education system that is characterised by.
Sub-theme 4 Building blocks for NSDS 3 REPORT BACK National Skills Conference 2008 “Reflection on a decade of skills development for the future”:
Learning Programmes SMME Support Model Tumi Peele.
Developing a Sustainable Procurement Policy and Strategy EAUC – EAF Programme.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
1 Transformation in the Petroleum Industry – The Journey Presentation to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee for Minerals and Energy 10 MAY 2007 Prepared.
ENROLMENT REPORT: FEBRUARY 2012 Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training 15 February 2012.
1 Annual Report Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training 19 November 2014 Stability in Shifting Sands.
Leading Nottingham Programme update to ACOS 7 September 2010 Angela Probert Director of HR and Organisational Transformation Contributions from Lisa Sharples.
Friday 1 st December 2006 Careers & Employment Workshop Group B: Policy.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE MEETING PRESENTATION ON THE APP AND BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR THE YEAR 2016/ th APRIL 2016.
1. 2 Nation-wide programme which will draw significant numbers of the unemployed into productive work, so that workers gain skills, and increase their.
PROGRESS ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE “SKILLS PLANNING UNIT” PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING 06 SEPTEMBER 2017 Dr.
Fasset Presentation March to April 2008
PARLIAMENT BRIEFING 15 SEPTEMBER 2009
PRESENTATION TO CHIETA JOINT CHAMBER INDUCTION
Monitoring the implementation of Skills Development Delivery
Parliamentary Committee: Minerals and Energy
Fasset Update Global Economic Trends May - June 2011
Albanian VET Strategy and Action Plan for the period
BRIEFING TO THE PARLIAMENTARY LABOUR PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE
Monitoring the implementation of Skills Development Delivery
Department of Higher Education and Training
Presentation transcript:

INSETA Western Cape Stakeholder Forum Workshop – 4 October 2005 FSC Learnership Implementation Lessons Learnt

Workshop Agenda FSC Criteria (Guidelines)9.00 Lessons9.15 Planning and Joint Ventures Learning Other Learnership Infrastructures Tea Break10.45 INSETA Session on New Grant Policies

Financial Sector Charter

When, where, who & why? In August 2002, at the Nedlac Financial Sector summit, the Financial Sector committed itself to the development of a BEE charter. The parties committed themselves to actively promote a transformed, vibrant and globally competitive financial sector that reflects the demographics of SA and contribute to the establishment of an equitable society by effectively providing accessible financial services to black people and by directing investment into targeted sectors of the economy.

What is the FSC? Voluntarily developed by the sector Transformation charter as contemplated in the BBBEE legislation Framework - establishes the principles upon which BEE will be implemented in the Financial sector Partnership programme as outlined in the Government’s strategy for BBBEE Basis for the sector’s engagement with other stakeholders, including Government Targets and unquantified responsibilities in respect of each principle Processes for implementing the charter and mechanisms to monitor and report on progress

Application of FSC Targets applied from 01 January 2004 (effective date) – 31 December – FSC Council to review charter and make decisions re. implementation in 2 nd term FSC Council to review charter to establish impact & further steps to address short comings. Exemptions from HRD provisions - companies less than 50 employees exempt from 5, 11.3 and Exemption from all provisions - companies less than 50 ee’s and less than R10 m designated investments.

Targets regarding HRD By 2008: Senior management (R501, plus p.a.): 20 – 25% black people 4% black women Middle management (R278,482 – R501, p.a.): 30% black people 10% black women Junior management (R167, – R278,481 p.a.): 40 – 50% black people 15% black women By 2014 – 33% black women representation across all levels.

Human Resource Development Paragraph 5 (5.7) “The financial sector undertakes to implement a Learnership Pogramme in terms of which, over one learning cycle of three intakes, each financial institution will employ up to 4.5% of its total staff in the form of black matriculants, or the NQF Level 4 equivalent, in registered learnerships. Direct spending in excess of that recovered from the Seta’s or Government will form part of the skills development targets of 5.5. The sector commits to review its matriculant learnership programme after the first cycle in consultation with the department of labour, with a view to implementing a second cycle. This commitment is subject to satisfactory resolution of the principles and funding of matriculant learnerships with Government and the relevant Seta’s.”

Paragraph 5.5 “Over and above any skills levies payable by a financial institution, each financial institution will, from the effective date of the charter to 2008, spend 1.5% of total basic payroll per annum on training of black employees.”

Impact on industry Implementation of learnership programmes – restrictive / other initiatives less costly? Learning cycles 4.5% (calculated when?) Black matriculants (advantaged / Employed) NQF level 4 (address right level in industry?) Prescriptive list of learnerships? Review after 1 st cycle (who to facilitate the process and when – Dec 2007?) Commitment subject to funding & principles …

Charter Council Chairperson = Cas Coowadia Operations committee (Ops Co) Sub-committees: HRD/SME/access/procurement/etc. Reone Kerr – Chairperson HR sub-committee 2 weekly progress/status report to Ops Co: -issues being addressed by committee -’dummies’ guide to understand HRD component (clear definitions, practical issues, scorecard – early 2006)

Issues being addressed by the FSC Committees Human Resources sub-committee –Verification of baseline data and targets –Definition of employees –Reporting periods between DOL, INSETA and FSC –Increase to the salary bands –Definition on package –Clarity on Learnerships –Clarity on training spend “HR Sub-com status report”

Inseta’s role regarding FSC Quality Assurance regarding: Qualifications Providers Learnership implementation Certification Upload onto NLRD Facilitation of NSF application process on behalf of industry

Planning and Joint Ventures Planning Process Funding Joint Venture Recruitment Provider Procurement

Planning Process Workplace readiness established upfront Senior management and Finance managers must have a clear understanding of funding of learnerships as well as the direct and indirect costs involved to implement a learnership –Must enable senior managers to make informed decisions (about the implementation of learnerships within the organisation and on where learners will be placed in the business Compressed time lines Return on Investment and Employment strategy thinking must be moved forward to planning stage and not at end of learnership

Planning (Continued…) B/U need to provide details on: - number of Learners required - Job Profile - Areas that learners will be placed in Work/Job Streams of learner identified and additional training requirements identified Reconciliation to be done on number of Learners required per qualification -Training requirements discussed with training provider Regional structures must exist for National implementation

Planning (Continued…) Problems / Recommendations: -LS Co-ordinator’s must provide information to LM’s on an ongoing basis and on time The Question on who is accountable for taking decisions on placement of learners must be clarified - accepted targets to be signed off senior Stakeholders

Funding FSC Grants (R per learner per LS) Tax Rebates –based on Learner Allowance (average rebate on allowance of R PA = R10 000) –Not direct income –Difficult to factor into income budgets of large companies Direct and Indirect Costs –Direct cost (Recruitment cost, Training provision, cost of co- ordination etc) –Indirect Costs (Technical Training, Cost of accommodating the learner in the workplace) Actual Expenditure vs Income –Real full costs are much higher than Grants + Tax Rebates

Joint Venture Very good organisational partnerships Economies of Scale - Training Provision - Recruitment Learnings - Group Dynamic (not possible to have mixed groups of learners) Consistencies with Learner allowance Sharing experiences on implementation processes

Recruitment Standard pricing for recruitment costs In general high caliber learner (intellectual capacity) Selection of the learners with the right attitude Profile testing must be based on qualification Profile testing also as an additional business need – to be included before appointment During recruitment learners were assessed for “Job Fit”

Recruitment (Continued…) When selecting a Recruitment Agency ensure that: - Criteria is clear - Infrastructure is sufficient to handle mass - National Footprint - Community links - Minor errors are eliminated (application form, Telephone line, Fax line problems)

Provider Procurement Standard Pricing Standard Process for Implementation Flexibility Learners Support Administration - Learnership Agreements - Progress Reports - Closure Reports - Updating of Learner Records onto NLRD Briefing sessions for LM’s Assessment and Internal Moderation

Learning Academic Learning Workplace Learning and Training Coaching, Mentorship and Management Experiences of Learners Learner Support

Academic Learning Not more or less important than workplace learning Learnership implementation partnership established with provider – not only responsible for training Invaluable role of Student counselor Line Managers need to ensure that they remain informed on learner academic progress and problems whilst with training provider Methodology – Lectures and Facilitated classroom training interventions Academic learning content is generic and learners will not be immediately productive Portfolio of evidence projects versus workplace production versus company specific training (ratio) Manage expectations of line managers

Workplace learning and training Induction - To include organisational Performance management processes (KPA) Orientation and Induction - Importance of workplace commitment (and possible prospects of employability) management of learner expectations Induction - To take place before attending first training block and not after training block Orientation and Induction - Learners must see the “bigger picture” regarding learnerships

Good acceptance of learners in workplace by employed staff Consistency between workplace and training must be maintained Learners should form part of existing functional teams –Learners should be placed between employed staff and not seen as separate individuals or teams Learners need a workstation and access to a PC for workplace projects and production purposes Learners need access to Internet for Qualification research purposes Co-ordinated workplace schedule de-briefing and guidelines to Line Managers – % time for workplace projects/learner portfolio of evidence – % time for Company specific training – % time for job shadowing and other activities Workplace learning and training

Learner attendance reporting processes whilst in training needs to pull through to Line Manager (Business) Reporting processes whilst in training –Role of facilitators vs Line Manager whilst in training must be clarified While on Training the Learner is still an employee and the contractual rules still apply Workplace learning and training

Coaching, Mentorship and Management The Learner as an Employee Line Manager (Supervisor) Coach (On Job Trainer) Mentor (Role Model / Generic Support)

Line managers 1. To manage the day to day performance and production of the business unit 2. To expose learners to the work done in the business unit 3. To help learners find opportunities for completion of projects 4. To ensure learners have adequate coaching and support in completing projects. 5. To sign-off projects where appropriate 6. To meet with learners regularly to see what activities they have been provided with and to assist the learner to plan his/her progress. 7. Coordinate feedback on learner progress 8. To assist with trouble-shooting if needed

Coach (focuses on technical support) 1. Responsible for on the job training 2. To provide technical help to learners in completing projects 3. Signing off projects completed by learners to confirm that: –It is the work of the learner –It meets the requirements of the unit standard 4. Giving feedback as needed

Mentor (focuses on personal support) 1. To provide support to learners in dealing with difficulties in: –Integrating into the business unit –Personal difficulties 2. Giving feedback as needed

Experiences of learners High uptake of learners into business –Shifted paradigm in industry –Matriculants without experience now recruited Employability increased Good resources for industry (brokers, other industries) Allowances served as income and support for families

Learner support Remember the profile, age and diversity of the learner ! Corporate world of work a new and daunting experience Channel to address personal problems –Diverse range of personal problems – E.g. Pregnancy, HIV/Aids, substance abuse etc. Special support required for learners with disabilities

Other Learnership Infrastructure Admin Grants Learnership Co-ordination Learning Record Data Base Exit Strategies

Admin Labour and Admin intensive despite outsourcing of Admin to Lead Provider Paper Based Rigid processes and requirements

Grants Challenge to align funding criteria to implementation plans / timelines Paper Based Template / Format driven Release of grants dependant on individual learner reports

Learnership Co-ordination Establishing and managing relations with mentors, training providers, learners & senior role players within the business Ensuring that learners commence training on dates as communicated to them, investigating if there are problems Setting them up in worplace (conducting a company orientation programme, supporting mentors on-going, dealing with problems as they arise) Single point of contact for business stakeholders Management of the implementation plan Financial Management Change Management Marketing and Communication

Updating of Learner Records Challenge experienced by providers to get information loaded onto National system Manage learner expectations around certification - process (this includes internal and external Quality Assurance processes - and time-lines (aligning closure reports with project finalisation) - Graduation and Certificate allocation happens at different stages

Exit Strategy Managing expectations of learners for employment post the learnership B/U’s abdicated responsibility to advise learners of whether they were accepted or not Process to be defined of how learners will be made available to the business - Make data available to the business for recruitment of the learner - Additional support to be defined on how learners not taken will be marketed - Link up with internal agencies, INSETA website, Other contacts