Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Main Injector Gap clearing kickers Phil Adamson (#) AEM 14th March 2011.
Advertisements

Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.
PIP and the Booster Notch Bob Zwaska October 12, 2011 PIP Meeting.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Fermilab Accelerator Complex in the Near Term: Muon Physics Program Eric Prebys Accelerator Physics Center FNAL.
FFAG Workshopfermilab April 2005 f Summary: FFAG WORKSHOP nonscaling electron model muon FFAGs C. Johnstone Fermilab.
Re-commissioning the Recycler Storage Ring at Fermilab Martin Murphy, Fermilab Presented August 10, 2012 at SLAC National Laboratory for the Workshop on.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Collimation System for Beam Loss Localization with Slip Stacking Injection in the Fermilab Main Injector Bruce C. Brown Main Injector Department Accelerator.
Proton beams for the East Area The beams and their slow extraction By : Rende Steerenberg PS/OP.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Cooler Injector Synchrotron (CIS) at IUCF V.S. Morozov MEIC Collaboration Meeting March 30-31, 2015.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
ION COMMISSIONING REVISITED 1 Thanks to: John Jowett, Walter Venturini. Matteo Solfaroli.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
F 1 MW Proton Beam for Neutrinos Dave McGinnis AAC Meeting May 10, 2006.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
S. Pordes - to part of CD 09/10/031 Introduction to some Beams Division jargon in some order…see how far we get:
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Accelerator Issues Fermilab Antiproton Experiment Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department Accelerator Division Fermilab.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Booster Losses Keith Gollwitzer PIP and MI 700 kW review January 2015.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
Proton Source Improvement Workshop Cogging W. Pellico Dec 6&
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Upgrade: Status and Plans Rob Kutschke All Experimenters’ Meeting April 3, 2006 Beams-doc-2217-v3.
Orbit related issues of the spin tune control at RHIC V.Ptitsyn, M.Bai, W.MacKay, T.Roser.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
F Possible Proton Capabilities at Fermilab Dave McGinnis April 16, 2007.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
MI Beam Loss upon Acceleration 5E11/div 11BLMA=LM GeV/c 9.8GeV/c Start of Ramp Fast loss ~10 ms Slow loss.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
Beam loss and radiation in the SPS for higher intensities and injection energy G. Arduini 20 th November 2007 Acknowledgments: E. Shaposhnikova and all.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
MI/RR Operation Status Ioanis Kourbanis August 21, 2014.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Slip stacking in Recycler Ioanis Kourbanis 9/14/11.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
PPP Booster. Outline of Booster PPP tasks Beam Quality Goals K Seiya W Pellico Injection Dave Johnson CY Tan W Pellico Capture CY Tan K Seiya W Pellico.
MI/RR Status January 3, 2014 D. Capista. MI Preformance.
Pre-Meeting Meeting Brian Drendel Accelerator Shift Plot.
Optimization of the Collider rings’ optics
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Multiturn extraction for PS2
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
CEPC-SPPC Beihang Symposium
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
JLEIC Ion Integration Goals
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
Presentation transcript:

Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group

Contents Confirm Nova Operations Will Work – Operating the MI8 Injection line at the Recycler energy The MI8 line transfers beam from the booster The RR has a slightly different energy to the MI MI8 has many permanent magnets – Stacking in the Recycler Do we have enough aperture? – What are the expected tune shifts? Due to MI Ramp As Intensity Increases Due to RF Frequency Changes Other Experiment Example – Finding Zero Chromaticity with Schottky and BPMs

Operating MI8 Line at RR Energy The RR has a slightly different energy to the MI – Change Booster Energy and RF Frequency, f RF – Try to Inject into MI Differences between MI and Recycler – Momentum From to GeV/C – Fix the MI Dipole field at RR value and adjust Booster dipole (B:VIMAX) – Calculated change is ~4 A – f RF From to Hz, ∆f=2 400Hz – Change MI f RF and Booster locks to that

Change B:VIMAX Beam in Booster B:VIMAX

MI8 Orbit 1 st attempt beam hits MI8 collimators Calculate changes to horizontal trims and try again 2 nd attempt beam is injected into MI

MI Orbit & Correction Strength Reasonable injection and closed orbit in MI Less current used in horizontal trim magnets Injection Vertical

Longitudinal Stability in MI WCM data shows stable bunches and bunch spacing – Phase is well matched

Slip-Stacking NOVA operations will increase the beam power through the Main Injector by a factor 2 Previously the beam was stacked in the MI then ramped For Nova we will slip-stack beam in the Recycler whilst the MI is ramping – Approximately halves the cycle time

Slip Stacking Stack Beam in Longitudinal Phase Space – Two sets of bunches separated in azimuth and energy in 2 RF systems – They “Slip” relative to each other – Apply large voltage RF to capture 2 bunches in 1 bucket – In the Recycler we plan to do 12 batch slip stacking. Inject 6 Booster batches at one frequency, Reduce that frequency Inject 6 more batches at original frequency Transfer to MI and Recapture +∆f -∆f

Recycler Requirements for 12 Batch Slip Stacking Different schemes can affect the amount of momentum aperture required – We could inject on momentum, decelerate, inject, accelerate Preferred option, centres beam in magnets, better lifetime, etc. – Inject off-momentum, with half required ∆f, then decelerate Requires less momentum aperture 0 -∆f +∆f Inject on momentum Inject off momentum f RF time 52 MeV 40 MeV

Recycler Requirements for 12 Batch Slip Stacking The central frequency separation between the two beams is fixed – ∆f = 1260 Hz or ∆p =24 MeV. Assume Booster beam has momentum spread of ±8 MeV (95%) – The min. momentum aperture required is 40 MeV or ∆p/p = 0.45% 24 MeV 10.2 MeV 95 KV Bucket 8 MeV 40 MeV

Measured RR Momentum Aperture Change RF frequency and measure beam transmission This will need to be remeasured – Currently equipment is being removed, Lambertsons, E-Cool, etc. – This should only increase the aperture > 99% Transmission ∆p/p =0.45 % > 95% Transmission ∆p/p =0.65 % Minimum ∆p/p required H Chrom = +3.0 V Chrom = -4.6

Tune Change with MI Ramp The Ramp of Magnets in MI will affect the RR tune Tune measured from BPM data taken after beam is pinged Time of ping varied over event Kicker firing at different time in cycle

Tune Change vs MI Ramp Tends to follow rate of change of momentum (pdot) Faster ramp may increase ∆Q ? Max ∆Q=0.005

Tune Change with Intensity Measured tune for different intensity beams in MI Line is theory (B. Ng) From Batch 1 to 6 Max ∆Q=0.01

Tune Change with f RF Tune measured with Schottky, for low chromaticity, Hchrom=+3, Vchrom=-4.6 Change at High Chromaticity (-17) measured in MI Max ∆Q=0.04

Zero Chromaticity Measurements with Schottky Width of Schottky signal measures chromaticity – Minimum width is zero chromaticity How does measured 0 Chrom. compare with “Set” 0 Chrom ? Saved Scope images whilst changing Chrom Extract coordinates Fit Gaussian Find min width

Zero Chromaticity Measurements with BPMs Measured Qv vs ∆f RF for different Vchrom settings Plot gradient of each VChrom setting Zero gradient = Zero Chromaticity, at Vchrom=-0.38 (-0.75 from Schottky)

Conclusions Successfully Operated MI8 Line at RR Energy – MI8 line works better with RR energy – Energy matching worked second attempt, phase matching first attempt Verified the RR has the Min. Aperture Required – Slip stacking requires momentum aperture, between 40 and 52 MeV – Measured aperture is at least 40 MeV – Should only increase after Lambertson E-Cool removal, etc. – Re-measure after shutdown Measured Tune Changes that Need Compensating – with MI Ramp – 0.01 with intensity, from batch 1 to 6 – 0.04 for RF changes (at high chromaticity) Other Experiments for Fun and Learning

Thanks Ming-Jen Yang Denton Morris Ioanis Kourbanis & Operations