Health Transformation in Ohio: What’s Next? The Center for Community Solutions 71 st Annual Human Services Institute November 6, 2013 www.HealthTransformation.Ohio.gov.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on Recent Health Reform Activities in Minnesota.
Advertisements

SIM- Data Infrastructure Subcommittee January 8, 2014.
The Rhode Island Chronic Care Sustainability Initiative: Building a Patient-Centered Medical Home Pilot in Rhode Island.
Transforming Illinois Health Care Illinois Medicaid 1115 Waiver.
Opportunities to Leverage HIT for Medicaid Reform in New York Rachel Block, United Hospital Fund C. William Schroth, NYS Department of Health eHealth Initiative.
SUPPORTING THE INTEGRATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKERS IN MINNESOTA JUNE 5, 2014 The Minnesota Accountable Health Model (SIM Minnesota)
Will Groneman Executive Vice President System Development TriHealth
1 Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission New All-Payer Model for Maryland Population-Based and Patient-Centered Payment Systems.
Paying for Primary Care: Robert Graham Center Primary Care Forum Washington, DC Two CMS/CMMI payment experiments Jay Crosson March 25, 2014.
NYS Health Innovation Plan and SIM Testing Grant
March 16, 2015 Tricia McGinnis and Rob Houston Center for Health Care Strategies Value-Based Purchasing Efforts in Medicaid: A National Perspective.
Exhibit 1. Medicare Shared Savings Program: Year 1 Performance of Participating Accountable Care Organizations (2013) Source: Centers for Medicare and.
SoonerCare and National Health Care Reform Oklahoma Health Care Authority Board Retreat August 26, 2010 Chad Shearer Senior Program Officer Center for.
Building the Foundations for Better Health Health Services Organization.
State Innovation Models Initiative: Medicaid Delivery System Innovation & Payment Redesign Jim Roberts, Policy Analyst NW Portland Area Indian Health Board.
Nancy B. O’Connor Regional Administrator, CMS June 2, 2011
Population Health Initiatives in Maryland Regional Forum on Hospital-Community Partnerships Cumberland, Maryland September 29, 2014 Laura Herrera, MD,
MaineHealth ACO in Context W 5 Who? What? Why? When? HoW? 1.
Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and FinancingColorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing Colorado Department of Health Care Policy.
Patient Centered Medical Homes Marcia Hamilton SW722 Fall, 2014.
Presented by: Kathleen Reynolds, LMSW, ACSW
MaineCare Value-Based Purchasing Strategy Quality Counts Brown Bag Forum November 22, 2011.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Developing Innovative Payment Approaches: Finding the Path to High Performance Stuart Guterman Assistant Vice President and Director,
An Integrated Healthcare System’s Approach to ACOs Chuck Baumgart, M.D., Chief Medical Officer Presbyterian Health Plan David Arredondo, M.D., Executive.
Innovation and Health System Transformation Chisara N. Asomugha, MD, MSPH, FAAP (Acting) Director, Division of Population Health Incentives & Infrastructure,
1 HEALTH CARE REFORM – Changes in Delivery Systems Kenneth W. Kizer, MD, MPH Alaska State Hospital and Nursing Home Association Fairbanks, AK September.
Incentives & Outcomes Committee Draft Recommendations Public Employer Health Purchasing Committee October 25, 2010.
A Presentation of the Colorado Health Institute 1576 Sherman Street, Suite 300 Denver, Colorado Hot Issues in.
Accelerating Care and Payment Innovation: The CMS Innovation Center.
ARIAL Use Arial as the Font. Use The Health Collaborative Colors Above Ohio Healthcare Efficiencies Study Committee Richard Shonk, MD, PhD Chief Medical.
Rural Input for Health Care Payment Learning and Action Network March 25, 2015.
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program (DSRIP), Transforming the Medicaid Health Care System.
Arizona SIM Strategy. SIM Overview CMS established State Innovation Model (SIM) Initiative for multi-payer efforts around payment reform and health system.
Applying Science to Transform Lives TREATMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE TRI science addiction Mady Chalk, Ph.D Treatment Research Institute CADPAAC Conference.
The MARYLAND HEALTH CARE COMMISSION. Telehealth Landscape Telehealth adoption is increasing 2013: ~ 61 percent of acute care hospitals; ~9 percent of.
Bob Doherty Senior Vice President, Governmental Affairs and Public Policy American College of Physicians March 3, 2009 Designing new payment models for.
1 Health Care Reform: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) Impact on Medicaid John G. Folkemer Deputy Secretary Health Care Financing.
Maine State Innovation Model (SIM) August 2, 2013.
November 18, 2014 Connecticut State Innovation Model Initiative Presentation to the Health Care Cabinet.
Iowa’s Section 2703 Health Home Development October 04, 2011 Presentation to: 24 th Annual State Health Policy Conference Show Me…New Directions in State.
Section 1115 Waiver Implementation Plan Stakeholder Advisory Committee May 13, 2010.
Better, Smarter, Healthier: Delivery System Reform U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1.
A Journey Together: New Maryland Healthcare Landscape Baltimore County Forum Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission June 2015.
Improving Patient-Centered Care in Maryland—Hospital Global Budgets
Community Paramedic Payment Reform December 2 nd,2015 Terrace Mall- North Memorial.
1 Implementing Transformation at Scale William Golden MD MACP Medical Director, AR Medicaid UAMS Prof. Int. Med and Public Health.
Jeanene Smith MD, MPH Office for Oregon Health Policy and Research SCI Coverage Institute - July, 2009 Albuquerque, NM Building a Healthy Oregon: Delivery.
Nevada State Innovation Model (SIM) Delivery System and Payment Alignment May 6,
State Innovation Model (SIM) Sustaining Healthcare Transformation Craig Jones Director, Vermont Blueprint for Health December 8, 2015.
A NEW REIMBURSEMENT STRUCTURE FOR AMERICA ADVANCED DISEASE CONCEPTS.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act The Greens: Elijah, Amber, Kayla, Patrick.
Vantage Care Positioning System®: Make Your Case with Medicare Spending Data November 2014 avalere.com.
Medicaid Expansion New Issues and Regulations. Medicaid Expansion Map 2 Source: Medicaid & CHIP Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations and Enrollment.
Maine State Innovation Model (SIM) October, 2013.
Approaches to Slowing Cost Growth in Public Programs State Coverage Initiatives National Meeting August 5, 2010 Nikki Highsmith Center for Health Care.
Preliminary working draft; subject to change 0 The shift to paying for results is just one part of a broader program to improve the way that care is delivered.
Transforming Payment for a Healthier Ohio Greg Moody, Director Governor’s Office of Health Transformation Columbus Medical Association November 18, 2014.
1 Patrick Conway Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Payment and Delivery System Reform in Medicare Alliance for Health Reform April 11, 2016 Cristina Boccuti, MA, MPP Associate Director, Program on Medicare.
DSRIP OVERVIEW. What is DSRIP? 2  DSRIP = Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment  An effort between the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH)
Putting people first, with the goal of helping all Michiganders lead healthier and more productive lives, no matter their stage in life. 1.
CMS Innovation and Health Care Delivery System Reform Matthew Press, MD, MSc Senior Advisor Office of the Director Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation.
HEALTH TRANSFORMATION IN COLORADO: HOW SIM CAN LEVERAGE AND SUPPORT COLORADO’S HEALTHY SPIRIT.
Post Acute Care in the Changing Health Care Landscape
Todd Baker, Chief Executive Officer
State Payment Reform Bringing physicians together for a healthier Ohio
Ohio House Healthcare Efficiencies Summer Study Committee:
Making Healthcare Affordable
67th Annual HSFO Conference Louisville, KY
Presentation transcript:

Health Transformation in Ohio: What’s Next? The Center for Community Solutions 71 st Annual Human Services Institute November 6,

The Challenge Target Hot Spots:A few people account for most spending Align Programs:The system is fragmented, and things go wrong as a result

The Vision Person-CenterednotProgram-Centered IndependencenotDependence ProsperitynotPoverty InnovationnotBureaucracy

Existing Resources Health$22.2B Education$13.9B Workforce$2.0B Other Social Services $6.0B Programs for Children = $18B Notes: Includes federal and state funding, not local; Health Care includes Medicaid, BWC, DRC, DAS and PERS; Education includes ODE and Regents; Workforce includes Supplemental Security Income, not Unemployment Compensation; Other Social Services includes JFS non-workforce plus Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits.

Transformation Priorities Health Continue to modernize Medicaid and improve overall health system performance Education Coordinate programs that support the best possible start for Ohio’s children Workforce Create a unified workforce system that supports business in meeting its workforce needs Shared Services Share services within and beyond boundaries to improve program efficiency Target Hot Spots and Align Programs

Modernize Medicaid Streamline Health and Human Services Pay for Value Initiate in 2011Initiate in 2012Initiate in 2013 Advance the Governor Kasich’s Medicaid modernization and cost containment priorities Share services to increase efficiency, right-size state and local service capacity, and streamline governance Engage private sector partners to set clear expectations for better health, better care and cost savings through improvement Extend Medicaid coverage to more low-income Ohioans Eliminate fraud and abuse Prioritize home and community services Reform nursing facility payment Enhance community DD services Integrate Medicare and Medicaid benefits Rebuild community behavioral health system capacity Create health homes for people with mental illness Restructure behavioral health system financing Improve Medicaid managed care plan performance Create the Office of Health Transformation (2011) Implement a new Medicaid claims payment system (2011) Create a unified Medicaid budget and accounting system (2013) Create a cabinet-level Medicaid Department (July 2013) Consolidate mental health and addiction services (July 2013) Simplify and replace Ohio’s 34- year-old eligibility system Coordinate programs for children Share services across local jurisdictions Recommend a permanent HHS governance structure Participate in Catalyst for Payment Reform Support regional payment reform initiatives Pay for value instead of volume (State Innovation Model Grant) ­ Provide access to medical homes for most Ohioans ­ Use episode-based payments for acute events ­ Coordinate health information infrastructure ­ Coordinate health sector workforce programs ­ Report and measure system performance Ohio Health and Human Services Transformation Plan

Governor Kasich’s policy team preparing for Controlling Board, Oct. 16, 2013

Controlling Board testimony to extend Medicaid coverage, Oct. 21, 2013

Controlling Board approval to extend Medicaid coverage, Oct. 21, 2013

Modernize Medicaid Streamline Health and Human Services Pay for Value Initiate in 2011Initiate in 2012Initiate in 2013 Advance the Governor Kasich’s Medicaid modernization and cost containment priorities Share services to increase efficiency, right-size state and local service capacity, and streamline governance Engage private sector partners to set clear expectations for better health, better care and cost savings through improvement Extend Medicaid coverage to more low-income Ohioans Eliminate fraud and abuse Prioritize home and community services Reform nursing facility payment Enhance community DD services Integrate Medicare and Medicaid benefits Rebuild community behavioral health system capacity Create health homes for people with mental illness Restructure behavioral health system financing Improve Medicaid managed care plan performance Create the Office of Health Transformation (2011) Implement a new Medicaid claims payment system (2011) Create a unified Medicaid budget and accounting system (2013) Create a cabinet-level Medicaid Department (July 2013) Consolidate mental health and addiction services (July 2013) Simplify and replace Ohio’s 34- year-old eligibility system Coordinate programs for children Share services across local jurisdictions Recommend a permanent HHS governance structure Participate in Catalyst for Payment Reform Support regional payment reform initiatives Pay for value instead of volume (State Innovation Model Grant) ­ Provide access to medical homes for most Ohioans ­ Use episode-based payments for acute events ­ Coordinate health information infrastructure ­ Coordinate health sector workforce programs ­ Report and measure system performance Ohio Health and Human Services Transformation Plan

Ohio Resident Health Insurance Process Flow CRIS-E (current)Ohio Integrated Eligibility (new)Federal Exchange (new) Citizen Portal Eligibility System Sources of Coverage Beginning October 1, 2013, Ohio residents may go to Benefits.Ohio.gov or Healthcare.gov to seek assistance for health insurance coverage Coverage via the ExchangeCoverage via Ohio Medicaid Federal Health Insurance Exchange If likely eligible for benefits on the Exchange, then refer Healthcare.gov Eligibility categories will be added to the new Integrated Eligibility System over time: Some Medicaid (1/2014) All Medicaid (11/2014) SNAP and TANF (7/2015) Retire CRIS-E (7/2015) Other programs (ongoing) Ohio Integrated Eligibility System Ohio Client Registry Information System (CRIS-E) County caseworkers have access to both systems If likely eligible for benefits under the current eligibility rules, then refer If likely eligible for benefits under the new eligibility rules, then proceed to application Benefits.Ohio.gov Federal Data Services Hub (Justice, Treasury, IRS, HHS, Social Security, Homeland Security) Verify Data If eligible on the other system, then transfer data

Modernize Medicaid Streamline Health and Human Services Pay for Value Initiate in 2011Initiate in 2012Initiate in 2013 Advance the Governor Kasich’s Medicaid modernization and cost containment priorities Share services to increase efficiency, right-size state and local service capacity, and streamline governance Engage private sector partners to set clear expectations for better health, better care and cost savings through improvement Extend Medicaid coverage to more low-income Ohioans Eliminate fraud and abuse Prioritize home and community services Reform nursing facility payment Enhance community DD services Integrate Medicare and Medicaid benefits Rebuild community behavioral health system capacity Create health homes for people with mental illness Restructure behavioral health system financing Improve Medicaid managed care plan performance Create the Office of Health Transformation (2011) Implement a new Medicaid claims payment system (2011) Create a unified Medicaid budget and accounting system (2013) Create a cabinet-level Medicaid Department (July 2013) Consolidate mental health and addiction services (July 2013) Simplify and replace Ohio’s 34- year-old eligibility system Coordinate programs for children Share services across local jurisdictions Recommend a permanent HHS governance structure Participate in Catalyst for Payment Reform Support regional payment reform initiatives Pay for value instead of volume (State Innovation Model Grant) ­ Provide access to medical homes for most Ohioans ­ Use episode-based payments for acute events ­ Coordinate health information infrastructure ­ Coordinate health sector workforce programs ­ Report and measure system performance Ohio Health and Human Services Transformation Plan

Sources: CMS Health Expenditures by State of Residence (2011); The Commonwealth Fund, Aiming Higher: Results from a State Scorecard on Health System Performance (October 2009). Ohioans spend more per person on health care than residents in all but 17 states 36 states have a healthier workforce than Ohio Health Care Spending per Capita by State (2011) in order of resident health outcomes (2009)

Shift to population-based and episode-based payment Population-based (PCMH, ACOs, capitation) Episode-based Fee-for-service (including pay for performance) Payment approachMost applicable ▪ Primary prevention for healthy population ▪ Care for chronically ill (e.g., managing obesity, CHF) ▪ Acute procedures (e.g., CABG, hips, stent) ▪ Most inpatient stays including post-acute care, readmissions ▪ Acute outpatient care (e.g., broken arm) ▪ Discrete services correlated with favorable outcomes or lower cost

Patient-centered medical homesEpisode-based payments Goal percent of Ohio’s population in some value-based payment model (combination of episodes- and population-based payment) within five years Year 1 ▪ In 2014 focus on Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative (CPCi) ▪ Payers agree to participate in design for elements where standardization and/or alignment is critical ▪ Multi-payer group begins enrollment strategy for one additional market Year 3 Year 5 ▪ State leads design of five episodes: asthma (acute exacerbation), perinatal, COPD exacerbation, PCI, and joint replacement ▪ Payers agree to participate in design process, launch reporting on at least 3 of 5 episodes in 2014 and tie to payment within year ▪ Model rolled out to all major markets ▪ 50% of patients are enrolled ▪ 20 episodes defined and launched across payers ▪ Scale achieved state-wide ▪ 80% of patients are enrolled ▪ 50+ episodes defined and launched across payers State’s Role ▪ Shift rapidly to PCMH and episode model in Medicaid fee-for-service ▪ Require Medicaid MCO partners to participate and implement ▪ Incorporate into contracts of MCOs for state employee benefit program 5-Year Goal for Payment Innovation

Ohio is one of only seven CPC sites nationally Multi-payer: Medicare, Medicaid, nine commercial insurance plans Bonus payments to primary care doctors who better coordinate care 75 primary care practices (261 providers) serving 44,500 Medicare enrollees in 4 Kentucky and 14 Ohio counties (Dayton to Cincinnati) Practices were selected based on their use of HIT, advanced primary care recognition, and participation in practice improvement activities Supported by a unique regional collaborative: Comprehensive Primary Care (CPC) Initiative

CPC Informed Ohio’s PCMH Model Design StandardizeAlign in PrincipleDiffer by Design Care Delivery Model Target patients and scope Care delivery improvements Target sources of value Payment Model Technical require- ments for PCMH Attribution / assignment Quality measures Payment streams / incentives Patient incentive Check-mark indicates whether most design decisions will need to be standardized, aligned in principle, or differ by design. However, within any component of the model, there may be individual design decisions that fall into each bucket

Retrospective episode model mechanics Patients seek care and select providers as they do today Providers submit claims as they do today Payers reimburse for all services as they do today 123 Patients and providers continue to deliver care as they do today SOURCE: Arkansas Payment Improvement Initiative ▪ Providers may: ▪ Share savings: if average costs below commendable levels and quality targets are met ▪ Pay part of excess cost: if average costs are above acceptable level ▪ See no change in pay: if average costs are between commendable and acceptable levels Review claims from the performance period to identify a ‘Principal Accountable Provider’ (PAP) for each episode Calculate incentive payments based on outcomes after close of 12 month performance period Payers calculate average cost per episode for each PAP 1 Compare average costs to predetermined ‘’commendable’ and ‘acceptable’ levels 2

Retrospective thresholds reward cost-efficient, high-quality care SOURCE: Arkansas Payment Improvement Initiative; each vertical bar represents the average cost for a provider, sorted from highest to lowest average cost 7 Provider cost distribution (average episode cost per provider) Acceptable Gain sharing limit Commendable ILLUSTRATIVE Ave. cost per episode $ Principal Accountable Provider Risk sharingNo changeGain sharing Eligible for gain sharing based on cost, didn’t pass quality metrics ILLUSTRATIVE - No change in payment to providers Gain sharing Eligible for incentive payment Risk sharing Pay portion of excess costs +

Selection of episodes in the first year Guiding principles for selection: ▪ Leverage episodes in use elsewhere to reduce time to launch ▪ Prioritize meaningful spend across payer populations ▪ Look for opportunities with clear sources of value (e.g., high variance in care) ▪ Select episodes that incorporate a diverse mix of accountable providers (e.g., facility, specialists) ▪ Cover a diverse set of “patient journeys” (e.g., acute inpatient, acute procedural) ▪ Consider alignment with current priorities (e.g., perinatal for Medicaid, asthma acute exacerbation for youth) Working hypothesis for episodes in the first year: ▪ Perinatal ▪ Asthma acute exacerbation ▪ Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation ▪ Joint replacement ▪ Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Next Steps 1.Convene clinical workgroups to create Ohio specific technical definitions for five episodes (next 3 months) 2.Continue CPCi efforts in SW Ohio (ongoing) 3.Submit a State Healthcare Innovation Plan to CMMI (online now for stakeholder review) 4.Apply for a federal SIM Testing Award (early 2014)