An Overview of Preparation Program Effectiveness Measures Georgia Assessment Directors’ Association Fall 2013 Meeting Chuck McCampbell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
Ohio Board of Regents Update OCTEO: October 2013.
Assessing Candidates’ Impact on Student Learning The Don of the Georgia Teacher Preparation Family.
C ERTIFICATION IN G EORGIA NASDTEC Conference June 2015.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
Quarterly Update Blue Ribbon Commission’s Recommendations of the 2009 Criterion Referenced Competency Test (CRCT) Erasure Investigation Dr. Beverly L.
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) The Albany Marriott Albany, New York September 15, 2010.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Technology Leadership
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Lynne Weisenbach Vice Chancellor Educational Access and Success Teacher Preparation Program Accountability Report RACAA February 26, 2014.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Legislative Update and Educator Effectiveness Laura Preston, Legislative Advocate 2015 Negotiators Symposium January 15, 2015.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Quarterly Update Blue Ribbon Commission’s Recommendations of the 2009 Criterion Referenced Competency Test (CRCT) Erasure Investigation Dr. Beverly L.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Toolkit #3: Effectively Teaching and Leading Implementation of the Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including the Common Core.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Assessing Candidates’ Impact on Student Learning The Don of the Georgia Educator Preparation Family.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Massachusetts Tiered System of Supports State Personnel Development Grant National Meeting Fall 2014 Madeline Levine
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Presented at State Kindergarten Entry Assessment (KEA) Conference San Antonio, Texas February, 2012 Comprehensive Assessment in Early Childhood: How Assessments.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Subgrant Goals and Activities Frostburg State University.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
Application for Funding for Phase II of the Education Fund under the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Program CFDA Number:
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
NEW YORK STATE STAFF/CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK SCDN December 1, 2005.
CTC: A Year in Review ACSA Personnel Institute October 7-9, 2015 Teri Clark, Director Professional Services Division Commission on Teacher Credentialing.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
Implementing edTPA: Best Practices for Capacity Building and Using Data to Inform Decisions 2015 GaPSC Certification and Program Officials Conference December.
IOWA Department of Education A Continuing Conversation Assessment in Iowa: Where are we now? Where are we going? November 1, 2013.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Measures of Teacher Impact on P-12 Students Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
NC Digital Learning Competencies School Administrators and Classroom Teachers ****** Partnering for Education Impact April 19, 2016.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
Vermont’s Core Teaching & Leadership Standards. 13-member, teacher majority, policy-making board appointed by the Governor What is the VSBPE?
National Board Process
Who is Involved? Partners.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Bob Michael Associate Vice Chancellor, University System of Georgia
Using survey data for continuous improvement
Georgia Educator Preparation
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
UPDATE Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation:  A Data-Informed Approach to State Program Review Presentation to the Alabama State Board of Education.
Teacher & Leader Preparation Program Effectiveness Measures
PROGRAM REVIEW AS PART OF THE CAEP ACCREDITATION PROCESS
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
The Next Step in Transforming
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Bob Michael Associate Vice Chancellor, University System of Georgia
Standard one: revisions
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

An Overview of Preparation Program Effectiveness Measures Georgia Assessment Directors’ Association Fall 2013 Meeting Chuck McCampbell

Topics 1.PPEMs: Purpose and Theory of Action 2.Implementation Timeline 3.The measures—Overview and a few details 4.PPEMs and Reporting 5.PPEMs and Program Improvement 6.Resources 7.Next steps

Purpose & Theory of Action

Hold EPPs accountable to high program standards Apply a consistent set of state-determined effectiveness measures across all teacher and leader preparation programs Improve the effectiveness of teacher and leader preparation programs Inform the citizens of Georgia about preparation program quality Improve teaching and learning in P-12 schools Purpose

… teaching and learning in P-12 schools will improve because GaPSC will develop and implement stronger standards for program approval EPPs will – design more effective program curricula – provide better instruction and more meaningful field experiences and clinical practice – create stronger partnerships with school districts – provide appropriate support systems for candidates Theory of Action

Educator preparation will be more transparent to Georgia citizens who will make more informed decisions when selecting programs to prepare for careers in education Data reported by EPPs will show candidates are better prepared as they enter the profession Performance of early career teachers and leaders as measured by selected data within TPPEM and LPPEM measures will demonstrate teachers are well-prepared to improve teaching and learning in Georgia classrooms Theory of Action

Implementation Timeline

Past – PPEM Task Force I revised the PPEM measures submitted in the original Race To The Top grant application – PPEM Task Force II – Planning and Development – Policies, implementation and evaluation plans, timelines, systems, and procedures necessary to pilot and implement

Present – Pilot Phase I – PPEM Task Force II continues – Limited pilot using available measures – Data collection, analysis, interpretation, and reporting procedures – Evaluation of pilot procedures and data – Determinations for Pilot Phase II

Future – Pilot Phase II – Sub-set of PPEM Task Force II will continue – Comprehensive pilot: All available data from all program providers – Data collection, analysis, interpretation, and reporting procedures – Limited edTPA data will be incorporated – Determinations for full implementation

Future & beyond – Full Implementation – PPEMs will be fully implemented for all EPPs – All PPEM components will be collected, analyzed, and reported to EPPs, and shared with all stakeholder agencies – PPEM data will be incorporated into the GaPSC approval process – Ongoing evaluation of the measures

The Measures

Teacher Preparation Program Effectiveness Measures (TPPEMs) TEM Scores of Graduates 50% Induction Success Rate 10% Content Knowledge 30% GaPSC Annual Program Performance Data 10% Overview Leader Preparation Program Effectiveness Measures (LPPEMs) LEM Scores of Graduates 50% Content Knowledge 20% GaPSC Annual Program Performance Data 30%

Relation to Race to the Top Teacher Preparation Program Measures and Leader Preparation Program Measures defined initially as a Race To The Top project Race To The Top funded period: 2013-June 30, 2015 (if the no-cost extension is granted) PPEM Task Force will evaluate the effectiveness of the measures After June 30, 2015 any changes deemed necessary will be made to do what is best for Georgia

Annual Reporting

Performance Levels Based solely on PPEM data Each program will be rated in one of four performance levels Exemplary Effective At-risk of Low Performing Low Performing Based on program performance levels, an overall performance level rating will be applied to the EPP Performance levels will be updated annually Assistance and interventions will be provided for programs falling below Effective

State Approval Status EPP and program performance level ratings will impact approval status Exemplary performers will enjoy streamlined review procedures and approval review reporting requirements Effective performers will also enjoy streamline review procedures to a lesser degree than Exemplary performers EPPs and/or programs rated below Effective for more than one year risk probation or revocation of approval

PAAR Beginning in 2014, PAAR will change drastically EPPs will retrieve their PPEM data via PAAR An estimate: up to 80% of data in PAAR will be pre- populated EPPs will respond to PPEM data and other data such as: Ethics violations data Data from the administration of the new statewide assessment of ethics Survey data (completer survey, first year teacher survey, employer survey)

CAEP GaPSC is developing a Data Sharing Plan with CAEP PPEM data align with the data required for the CAEP Annual Report GaPSC will send all GA EPP data to CAEP, eliminating the need for EPP reporting to CAEP

Resources

GaPSC Website From select the Preparation Reform bar.

GaPSC Website On the Preparation Reforms page, scroll down to the PPEM section and click on the links for additional information. Updates will be made periodically. Check footers for version numbers and latest revision dates.

Next Steps PPEM Task Force II will continue to meet Pilot data will be evaluated Performance levels and resulting approval processes will be further developed Report formats will be developed for various audiences PAAR re-design Integration of GaPSC tools to further streamline data collection and reporting

Questions? Contacts: