FLOWABLE COMPOSITE Robert W. Hasel D.D.S. Associate Professor

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Resilon Primer : a self-etch primer, which contains a sulfonic acid-terminated functional monomer, HEMA, water and a polymerization initiator. Resilon.
Advertisements

Tokuyama Dental Corp. ESTELITE Σ Composite Resin for Anterior & Posterior Teeth.
33 Chairside Restorative Materials. 2 Introduction Materials are generally divided and categorized according to their functions. The American Dental Association.
Classification of filling materials There are several classification of filling materials. Depending to which group the tooth belongs, filling materials.
Polymers Dr. Waseem Bahjat Mushtaha Specialized in prosthodontics.
Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Physical Properties of Dental Materials Chapter 3.
Dental Materials Restorations, Luting and Pulp Therapy Introduction.
By:dr.heidary The pulp undergoes histopathological changes in response to irritation or destruction of dentin Pulp injury may result from anoxious.
RESTORATIVE RESINS.
Composite restorative materials
Restorative Materials in Pediatric Dentistry S.Lal, DDS Course Director.
Composite Resin Material
Dr.HINA ADNAN.  It is a tooth colored restorative material that is composed of organic resin matrix and inorganic filler particles dispersed in it.
Fissure sealants DCP1 S2 Lecture 8 - part 1 By Dr A. Eldarrat & A. Uni
Dental luting cement Bond Strength Strength Flow (viscosity) Wetting Film thickness (
Provisional Restorations
BONDING Dr. Raghuwar D Singh Associate Professor
Chapter 59 Dental Sealants Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. No part of this product may be reproduced or transmitted in any.
DENT 1200 Materials I Lesson 1 Structure and Properties of Materials.
DENTAL CERAMICS Dr.linda maher.
LECTURE 1 By Head Of DEPARTMENT Dr Rashid Hassan Assistant Professor Science of Dental Materials DEPARTMENT RAWAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SCIENCES RAWAL.
Etching in dentistry provided by:A.radanipour & E.ahmadi.
GLASS IONOMER CEMENT Dr.linda maher.
Chapter 5 – 6 Dental Materials DAE/DHE 203
Surface properties and adhesion
Protemp™ Crown Temporization Material Scientific Presentation
DENT 1200 Dental Materials I Lesson 2 Composite Main Objective of Restorative Dentistry Restore is to replace or bring back to natural appearance and.
Dental luting cement Bond Strength Strength Flow (viscosity) Wetting Film thickness (
Introduction to Operative Dentistry
DH220 Dental Materials Lecture #4 Prof. Lamanna RDH, MS.
B) Self or cold or chemically cured acrylic resin
Volume contraction in photocured dental resins : the shrinkage - conversion relationship revisited Dewaele M.- Truffier D.- Leloup G.- Devaux J. Université.
Composites, Glass Ionomers, and Compomers
Restoring Primary PosteriorTeeth With A Compomer Using L.D. Caulk’s “Dyract”
Bonding of resin-based materials Libyan International Medical University.
© 3M ESPE All Rights Reserved Filtek  Supreme Ultra Flowable Restorative Competitive Product Comparisons.
Composite Resin Material
Module 5 Restorative Dentistry. The Aims of Restorative Dentistry To restore teeth and gums To prevent the advance of caries and periodontal diseases.
INFLUENCE OF THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION UPON THE PROPERTIES OF SOME EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL INDIRECT RESIN COMPOSITES C. Prejmerean, M. Moldovan, L. Vezsenyi,
Quiz April.
Features preparation carious cavities different classes in temporary and permanent teeth in children. Cavity Preparations.
Chapter 59 Dental Sealants Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. No part of this product may be reproduced or transmitted in any.
©2013 Delmar, Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in.
Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry, 2 nd Ed., by Summitt JB, Robbins JW, and Schwartz RS. Copyright 2001 by Quintessence Publishing Co. Sturdevant’s Art.
Hannah Ghamdi 5666 Hind saeed 5082 Orob ghalib 5221
Dr. Gaurav Garg Lecturer,M.D.S College of Dentistry, Zulfi, M.U.
Tetric EvoCeram ® Bulk Fill Nano-Optimized Composite Restorative.
Impression Materials Impression materials are substances that are used to take and record the shape, size, or position of teeth, appliances, and oral.
Dr. Gaurav Garg (M.D.S.) Lecturer, College of Dentistry Al Zulfi, MU.
PEDODONTICS 1-6 Dr. Abdullah Abumoamar.
By Dr.Reham Mohammed Abdallah. Science of dental materials  Is defined as; compositionproperties manner in which they interact with the environment “The.
Asalaam Alekum 12/2/2015.  At the end of lecture students should know:  Introduction & definition of Dental (Pit & fissure) sealants  Role of sealants.
Dental material DENTAL CEMENTS z
Resin - Matrix Composites
Class IV Cavity Preparation
PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS
Name of the commercial Composite Degree of conversion (%)
Approx. Filler conc.(wt%)
DENT204, UNC School of Dentistry
Dental luting cement dr shabeel pn Bond Strength Strength
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Introduction to Dental Materials
Composite Restorative Material part I
Introduction to Adhesion
We are going to present our product, Luna-Wing
Direct Tooth colored restorative materials
5. Application of Resin Composite a. Bulk-Packing
Chapter 4 Adhesive Materials
Presentation transcript:

FLOWABLE COMPOSITE Robert W. Hasel D.D.S. Associate Professor Restorative Dentistry Midwestern University College of Dental Medicine Glendale, Arizona

Composite History 1956 Dr. R.L. Bowen ‘bis-GMA’ 1960’s “Adaptic” Microfilled composite Light-initiated composite Posterior composite 1980’s 1990’s Hybrid composite Flowable, packable, etc. 2000’s Nanocomposite Non-shrink composite ?

Development of Materials USA COMPOSITES UK GLASS-IONOMERS BRITISH DEVELOPMENT VISIBLE LIGHT CURING AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT RESIN-MODIFIED GLASS-IONOMERS

Resin Composites & derived materials Development Dissatisfaction with silicates/acrylics Development of ‘Bowen’s resin’ – Bis-GMA Introduction of first materials – two paste systems Developments in filler content Smaller particles Microfine particles Command setting – UV cure Single paste – VLC Change in viscosity – flowable/packable Nanocomposites? Low shrinkage materials?

TECHNOLOGY

Alter the Paradigm

Dental composite Review Resin matrix Ceramic fillers Silane coupling agent Ceramic fillers

Fillers Variations Type SiO2 , barium glass, ZrO2 Size macrofills (>10 mm); midifills (1-10 mm) minifills (0.1-1 mm); microfills (0.04-0.1 mm); nanofills (0.02-0.07 mm) Content 40% - 80+% by weight Variations Fillers Note : vol % is 15-20 % lower

Classification Traditional (‘macrofilled’) Based on filler size Lutz & Philips, 1983 Traditional (‘macrofilled’) Glass particles ; size 1-15 mm Microfilled Amorphous silica ; size ~ 0.04 mm Hybrid Filler load ~ 80 wt% Glass particles (Avg size ~ 5 mm) + microfillers

Fillers Zirconia/silica sol-gel process spherical polishability continuum in sizes high packing density (85 wt %) Z100, Z250, Palfique (3M ESPE) (Tokuyama)

(light-activated composite) Review Resin matrix (light-activated composite) Monomer : bis-GMA , bis-EMA, UDMA Dimethacrylate Diluent : TEGDMA Photoinitiator : camphorquinone Co-initiator : tertiary amine

+ O2 Reaction Amine co- initiator CQ Free radical Activated state C=C Dimethacrylate monomer C=C

Polymerization shrinkage Resin matrix Polymerization shrinkage Current systems : 2-3 % vol shrinkage Methacrylate-based monomers Free radical, addition polymerization Products in development : ‘no shrinkage’ Ring-opening reaction expand

Biocompatibility O2 inhibition layer Resin matrix = uncured monomer film at the surface film thickness ~ 10 mm not biocompatible should be removed ? between increments ? ‘Most monomers have some biologic activity ………but … biocompatible when reacted into polymer…’ Biocompatibility

Recommendations Well cured Remove O2 inhibition layer Resin matrix Recommendations Well cured Remove O2 inhibition layer Avoid contact with uncured resin 5% of dental personel have contact allergy to methacrylates Protective gloves are inadequate Wallenhammar et al, 2000 Estrogenic effect Olea et al, 1996 Adverse reaction: asthma, blister, rashes Hallstrom, 1993 Oral lichenoid lesions Lind, 1998

FLOWABLE COMPOSITE

Problems with Paste Composite Difficult to use Difficult to manipulate Sticky, pull back Voids Porosities Unpolymerized areas Shrinkage Surface and Marginal integrity

Problems with Paste Composite Difficult to use Difficult to manipulate Sticky, pull back Voids Porosities Unpolymerized areas Shrinkage Surface and Marginal integrity Easy Stays put Eliminates Less Minimizes (technique) Best

Rheology Definition Dental importance Rheology is the study of the flow and deformation of matter Dental importance Important for any material placed in the mouth in a fluid state – examples: Impression materials Directly-placed tooth restorative materials

Rheology of Resin Composites VERY WIDE RANGE OF MATERIALS SEALANTS MICROFILL FLOWABLE HYBRID & RELATED MATERIALS PACKABLE or CONDENSABLE INCREASING VISCOSITY

Viscosity B A C A has highest viscosity C is the most fluid B is inter- mediate

HIGH FLUIDITY LOW VISCOSITY LOW FLUIDITY HIGH VISCOSITY dkjdfjkl

Rheology of Resin Composites General idea - lower filler content - usually hybrid filler. Includes fumed silica, claimed to give thixotropy* Original claims (patent literature) - recommended for Class I, II, III, IV and V cavities Now being recommended for many applications (e.g. fissure sealing – discussed later) *What is thixotropy?

Rheology of Resin Composites Thixotropy is a reversible structural breakdown of a material that occurs when the material is stressed Flowable composites were designed to be thixotropic This means that when the material is being syringed, the high stress from syringing breaks down some of the structure (e.g. hydrogen bonding), so the material flows But when the material is placed into the cavity, it will not flow (‘non-drip’) because the hydrogen bonding structure quickly recovers

Flowable Composites THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT ‘FLOW’ PROPERTY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DIFFERENT PRODUCTS VERY FLUID; VIRTUALLY NEWTONIAN: NO “THIXOTROPY” -- contrast with ....

Flowable Composites THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT ‘FLOW’ PROPERTY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DIFFERENT PRODUCTS …contrast HIGHER VISCOSITY; SHOWS “SHEAR THINNING” DIFFERENT TECHNIQUE AND APPLICATIONS?

Flowable Composites THERE ARE SIGNIFANT COMPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DIFFERENT PRODUCTS

Flowable Composites SOME MATERIALS (at least 34!) – examples - Florestore (Den-Mat) Flowable composite (Henry Schein) Revolution – Formula 2 (Kerr) Starflow (Danville Materials)

Flowable Composites There is no such thing as a standard flowable material 34 brands (some identical); many with different formulations, handling characteristics, properties and applications Confusion because of untested materials - no track record of clinical success

1. Philosophy 1. Dental materials do not naturally belong in the mouth! 2. All synthetic materials evoke a host response 3. Synthetic materials not as good as health tooth substance 4. Best treatment is the least treatment 5. Best treatment is the most durable treatment THEREFORE – there is an obligation to prevent dental disease, and where treatment is necessary, to choose the best materials, and manipulate them in such a way that optimum properties are obtained.

Principles of Selection (i) Evidence from laboratory data (ii) Clinical performance (iii) Esthetic considerations (iv) Clinical needs (v) Patient’s preferences (vi) Operator’s preferences (vii) Cost effectiveness (viii) Environmental considerations

Flowable composites higher shrinkage compromised mechanical properties Filler content (wt %) 56 68 53 75 80 flowable hybrid Filler contents have Caught up higher shrinkage compromised mechanical properties Wear (mm) 28 26 21 22 flowable hybrid Fracture toughness 1.36 1.24 2.05 1.90

Conclusion The criteria for choice of a material include not only factors such as physical and mechanical properties, but also include ease of manipulation. Note that there are no standard specifications for these materials, and that they differ considerably in their flow properties.

Need improvements? B I C M E P Biocompatibility Interfacial properties cured vs uncured Interfacial properties adhesive system Biodegradation Chemical properties C=C C- O esterase O Mechanical & physical properties Esthetic consideration & Polishability Practical questions Flowable / Packable

Failure Zone Biofilm Improper Etching Thick Layers Porosities Unpolymerized areas Porosities Voids in the body Marginal Integrity Surface Integrity Shrinkage

FAILURE ZONE Biofilm Improper Etching Improper Curing Thick Layers Unpolymerized areas Porosities Voids in the body Marginal Integrity Surface Integrity Shrinkage