Protege Tutorial Based on ProtegeOWLTutorial at protege website.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
29/11/2004CS646: N. Drummond, M. Horridge1 Presented by the CO-ODE and HyOntUse projects Funded by CS646: OWL Tutorial (session 2)
Advertisements

CH-4 Ontologies, Querying and Data Integration. Introduction to RDF(S) RDF stands for Resource Description Framework. RDF is a standard for describing.
29/11/2004CS646: N. Drummond, M. Horridge1 Presented by the CO-ODE and HyOntUse projects Funded by CS646: OWL Tutorial (session 1)
Developing OWL Ontologies with Protégé 4
Protégé/OWL Imports/Namespace facilities Daniel Elenius.
Chronos: A Tool for Handling Temporal Ontologies in Protégé
An Introduction to RDF(S) and a Quick Tour of OWL
Based on “A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL” © 2005, The University of Manchester A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL Session 3: Additional.
1 OWL Pizzas: Practical Experience of Teaching OWL-DL: Common Errors & Common Patterns Alan Rector 1, Nick Drummond 1, Matthew Horridge 1, Jeremy Rogers.
Protege Tutorial Based on ProtegeOWLTutorial at protege website.
Tutorial Le Phuoc Son Hoang Huu Hanh Hue University.
Of 27 lecture 7: owl - introduction. of 27 ece 627, winter ‘132 OWL a glimpse OWL – Web Ontology Language describes classes, properties and relations.
Protégé Classes, Properties and Instances Susana R. de Novoa UNIK4710.
1 CSC 9010 Spring, Paula MatuszekSome slides taken from
Coastal Atlas Interoperability - Ontologies (continued) Luis Bermudez Stephanie Watson Marine Metadata Interoperability Initiative 1.
Chapter 8: Web Ontology Language (OWL) Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents – Munindar P. Singh and Michael N. Huhns, Wiley, 2005.
1 Ontology Visualization 10 th International Protégé Conference July 15, 2007, 11:00 – 12:30PM CEST Jennifer Vendetti, Stanford University.
The Semantic Web Week 15 Reasoning with (and Visualising) Ontologies Module Website: Practical :Protégé-2000 WITH.
The Semantic Web Week 14 Module Website: Lecture (SHORT): OWL PIZZAS Practical (LONGER): Getting to know Protégé-2000.
Editing Description Logic Ontologies with the Protege OWL Plugin.
Access Tutorial 10 Automating Tasks with Macros
Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK Protégé training Gary Polhill.
In The Name Of God. Jhaleh Narimisaei By Guide: Dr. Shadgar Implementation of Web Ontology and Semantic Application for Electronic Journal Citation System.
Logics for Data and Knowledge Representation
SEMANTIC WEB, OWL & PROTÉGÉ Matthew J Wood CS 570 – Topics in Artificial Intelligence Spring 2013.
| | Tel: | | Computer Training & Personal Development Outlook Express Complete.
Protege OWL Plugin Short Tutorial. OWL Usage The world wide web is a natural application area of ontologies, because ontologies could be used to describe.
1 Making OWL Easier: Practical Ontology Development in using Protégé-OWL-CO-ODE Tools Alan Rector, Hai Wang, Jeremy Rogers with acknowledgement to Nick.
8/11/2011 Web Ontology Language (OWL) Máster Universitario en Inteligencia Artificial Mikel Egaña Aranguren 3205 Facultad de Informática Universidad Politécnica.
INF 384 C, Spring 2009 Ontologies Knowledge representation to support computer reasoning.
Biomedical Informatics Introduction to Ontology Liqin Wang, MS SWE Workshop 2011 Aug 10 th, 2011.
® Microsoft Office 2013 Access Building a Database and Defining Table Relationships.
ONTOLOGY ENGINEERING Lab #1 - August 25, Lab Syllabus 2  Lab 1 – 8/25: Introduction and Overview of Protégé  Lab 2 – 9/8: Building an ontology.
Building an Ontology of Semantic Web Techniques Utilizing RDF Schema and OWL 2.0 in Protégé 4.0 Presented by: Naveed Javed Nimat Umar Syed.
Based on “A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL” © 2005, The University of Manchester A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL Session 1: Primitive.
OWL 2 in use. OWL 2 OWL 2 is a knowledge representation language, designed to formulate, exchange and reason with knowledge about a domain of interest.
XP New Perspectives on Microsoft Office Access 2003, Second Edition- Tutorial 2 1 Microsoft Office Access 2003 Tutorial 2 – Creating And Maintaining A.
BioHealth Informatics Group A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL Session 2: Defined Classes and Additional Modelling Constructs in OWL Nick Drummond.
Umi Laili Yuhana December, Context Aware Group - Intelligent Agent Laboratory Computer Science and Information Engineering National Taiwan University.
Advanced topics in software engineering (Semantic web)
EEL 5937 Ontologies EEL 5937 Multi Agent Systems Lecture 5, Jan 23 th, 2003 Lotzi Bölöni.
® Microsoft Access 2010 Tutorial 10 Automating Tasks with Macros.
Based on “A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL” © 2005, The University of Manchester A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL Session 2: Defined.
© O. Corcho, MC Suárez de Figueroa Baonza 1 OWL and SWRL Protégé 4: Building an OWL Ontology Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, Oscar Corcho {mcsuarez,
OilEd An Introduction to OilEd Sean Bechhofer. Topics we will discuss Basic OilEd use –Defining Classes, Properties and Individuals in an Ontology –This.
Organization of the Lab Three meetings:  today: general introduction, first steps in Protégé OWL  November 19: second part of tutorial  December 3:
2nd Feb 2005Protege-OWL tutorial, © 2005 Univ. of Manchester1 Protégé-OWL Tutorial Session 2: Defined Classes Nick Drummond.
OWL & Protege Introduction Dongfang Xu Ph.D student, School of Information, University of Arizona Sept 10, 2015.
ONTOLOGY ENGINEERING Lab #3 – September 15,
Ontology Engineering Lab #4 - September 23, 2013.
Microsoft PowerPoint Prepared by the Academic Faculty Members of IT.
BioHealth Informatics Group Copyright © 2005, The University of Manchester1 A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL Additional Exercises: Common Errors.
Based on “A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL” © 2005, The University of Manchester A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL Session 1: Primitive.
Ontology Technology applied to Catalogues Paul Kopp.
Ccs.  Ontologies are used to capture knowledge about some domain of interest. ◦ An ontology describes the concepts in the domain and also the relationships.
Chapter Describing Individuals OWL Individuals ▫Ontological Primitive Layer  Mostly described with RDF ▫Instances of user-defined ontological.
OWL (Ontology Web Language and Applications) Maw-Sheng Horng Department of Mathematics and Information Education National Taipei University of Education.
A Practical Introduction to Ontologies & OWL
Access Tutorial 2 Building a Database and Defining Table Relationships
Based on ProtegeOWLTutorial at protege website
Information Organization
Presentation by the COODE and
Session 2: Defined Classes Nick Drummond
Ontology.
CS646: OWL Tutorial (session 2)
ece 720 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
Session 1: Primitive Classes Nick Drummond
Ontology.
4CeeD Demonstration Step-by-step demonstration showing creation, uploading, and sharing of research data Timothy Spila, Ph.D. June 4, 2018.
Knowledge Representation Part VII Protégé / RDFS / OWL / ++
Presentation transcript:

Protege Tutorial Based on ProtegeOWLTutorial at protege website

What is protege? Protege is a free, open-source platform to construct domain models and knowledge-based applications with ontologies. Ontologies range from taxonomies, classifications, database schemas to fully axiomatized theories. Ontologies are now central to many applications such as scientific knowledge portals, information management and integration systems, electronic commerce and web services

Install Protege Go to started.html to download protege (version 3.x) started.html Protege OWL editor is built with the full installation of protege platform. During the install process, choose the “Basic+OWL” option. For more details: started.html

Protege There are two main ways of modelling ontologies: Frame-based OWL Each has its own user interface Protege Frames editor: enables users to build and populate ontologies that are frame-based, in accordance with OKBC (Open Knowledge Base Connectivity Protocol). Classes Slots for properties and relationships Instances for class Protege OWL editor: enables users to build ontology for the Semantic Web, in particular to OWL Classes Properties Instances reasoning

Building an OWL Ontology E2: Create a new OWL project Start protege File – New Project – OWL/RDF files – Ontology URI ( – OWL DL – Properties View A new empty Protege-OWL project has been created. Save it in your local file as pizza.owl

Named Classes Go to OWL Classes tab The empty class tree contains one class called owl:Thing, which is superclass of everything. E3: Create subclasses Pizza, PizzaTopping and PizzaBase. They are subclasses of owl:Thing. Naming convention no special naming convention consistency

Disjoint classes E4: How to say that Pizza, PizzaTopping and PizzaBase classes are disjoint. 1.Select the class Pizza 2.Press “add siblings” button on the disjoint classes widget 3.Add PizzaBase and PizzaTopping 4.Select the class PizzaTopping, 5.Add Pizza and PizzaBase to the disjoint class

E5: Create group of classes Create ThinAndCrisyBase and DeepPanBase as the subclasses of PizzaBase, and each of them are disjointed. Select PizzaBase, right click the mouse, select “create subclasses” Follow the wizard to create these two disjoint classes. It will save lots of time when there is need to create lots of disjoint classes.

E6: Create some subclasses of PizzaTopping Select PizzaTopping, Create subclaesses as MeatTopping, VegetableTopping, CheeseTopping and SeafoodTopping. Make sure that these classes are disjoint to each other. Select the class MeatTopping, Add disjoint subclasses: SpicyBeefTopping, PepperoniTopping, SalamiTopping and HamTopping Select VegetableTopping: Add disjoint subclasses: TomatoTopping, OliveTopping, MushroomTopping, PepperTopping, OnionTopping, CaperTopping

E6: Creating disjoint subclasses Select PepperTopping Add disjoint subclasses: RedPepperTopping, GreenPepperTopping, JalapenoPepperTopping Select CheeseTopping Add disjoint subclasses: MozzarellaTopping, ParmezanTopping Select SeafoodTopping Add disjoint subclasses: TunaTopping, AnchovyTopping and PrawnTopping

OWL Properties OWL Properties represent relationships between two objects. There are two main properties: Object properties: link object to object datatype properties: link object to XML Schema datatype or rdf:literal OWL has another property – Annotation properties, to be used to add annotation information to classes, individuals, and properties

E7: Create an object property Switch to the “Properties” tab, Use “Create Object Property” button to create a new object property. Rename it to hasIngredient

E8: Creating sub-properties Select hasIngredient property Add hasTopping and hasBase as the subproperties

Inverse Properties Each object property may have a corresponding inverse property. If some property links individual a to individual b, then its inverse property will link individual b to individual a.

E9: Create inverse properties Create a new object property called isIngredientOf Press “Set inverse property” button, Select “hasIngredient” Then the inverse relation has been set up. Select hasBase Create the isBaseOf as the inverse property of hasBase isBaseOf is the subproperty of isIngredientOf, why? Select hasTopping create isToppingOf as the inverse property. isToppingOf is the subproperty of isIngredientOf, why?

Functional Properties If a property is functional, for a given individual, there can only be at most one individual to be related via this property. For a given domain, range must be unique Functional properties are also known as single valued properties.

Inverse Functional Properties If a property is inverse functional, then its inverse property is functional. For a given range, domain must be unique.

Functional vs. inverse functional properties FunctionalProperty vs InverseFunctionalProperty domainrangeexample Functional Property For a given domain Range is unique hasFather: A hasFather B, A hasFather C  B=C InverseFunctional Property Domain is unique For a given range hasID: A hasID B, C hasID B  A=C

Transitive Properties If a property is transitive, and the property related individual a to individual b, and also individual b to individual c, then we can infer that individual a is related to individual c via property P.

Symmetric Properties If a property P is symmetric, and the property relates individual a to individual b, then individual b is also related to individual a via property P.

E10: Make the hasIngredient property transitive Select the hasIngredient property Tick the transitive tick box Select the isIngredientOf property, make sure that the transitive tick box is ticked.

E11: Make the hasBase property functional Select the hasBase property Tick the “functional” tick box OWL-DL does not allow datatype properties to be transitive, symmetric or have inverse properties.

Property domains and ranges Properties link individuals from the domain to individuals from the range. OWL uses domain and range as axioms in reasoning.

E12: Specify the range of hasTopping Select hasTopping Press range button Select PizzaTopping Press OK button PizzaTopping should be displayed in the range list. When multiple classes are added to the range, they represent the union of all classes.

E13: Specify Pizza as the domain of the hasTopping property Select hasTopping property Press add domain button Select Pizza Press OK Pizza is displayed in the domain list. When multiple classes are added as domain, they represent as the union of these classes.

E14: Specify the domain and range for the isToppingOf property Select the isToppingOf property Set the domain of the isToppingOf property to PizzaTopping Set the range of the isToppingOf property to Pizza.

E15: Specify the domain and range for the hasBase property and its inverse property isBaseOf Select the hasBase property Specify the domain as Pizza Specify the range as PizzaBase Select the isBaseOf property Specify the domain as PizzaBase Specify the range as Pizza

Property restrictions In OWL, properties are used to create restrictions. Restrictions are used to restrict the individuals that belong to a class Three restrictions: Quantifier restrictions Existential quantifier ( ) Universal quantifier ( ) Cardinality restrictions hasValue restrictions

E16: Add a restriction to Pizza Add a restriction to Pizza that specifies a Pizza must have a PizzaBase Select Pizza Select Necessary header to create a necessary condition Select create a restriction wizard Select hasBase as restricted property Select someValueFrom as restriction Put PizzaBase into the filler

Add a restriction to Pizza

E18: Creating different kinds of Pizzas Create a subclass of Pizza called NamedPizza, and a subclass of NamedPizza called MargheritaPizza. Add comment to MargheritaPizza: A pizza that only has Mozarella and Tomato toppings

E19: Adding restrictions to MargheritaPizza To specify that MargheritaPizza has at least one MozzarellaTopping. Select MargheritaPizza Go to “Asserted Conditions”, create new restriction. Select someValueFrom Select hasTopping as the property to be restricted. Enter MozzarellaTopping as the filler Press OK button

E20: Adding restrictions to MargheritaPizza To specify that MargheritaPizza has at least one TomatoTopping. Select MargheritaPizza Go to “Asserted Conditions”, create new restriction. Select someValueFrom Select hasTopping as the property to be restricted. Enter TomatoTopping as the filler Press OK button

E21: Create AmericanPizza Create AmericanPizza with toppings of pepperoni, mozzarella and tomato. Through cloning and modifying the description of MargheritaPizza. Select MargheritaPizza Select create clone Add additional restriction to AmericanaPizza Adding PepperoniTopping Press OK.

E22: Create an AmericanHotPizza and a SohoPizza An AmericanHotPizza is almost the same as an AmericanaPizza, but has JalapenoPepperTopping on it. A SohoPizza is almost the same as a MargheritaPizza, but has additional OliveTopping and ParmezanTopping

E23: Make subclasses of NamedPizza disjoint from each other Select MargheritaPizza Press “add all siblings” button on the “Disjoints widget” to make the pizzas disjoint from each other.

Using a reasoner Ontology described in OWL-DL can be processed by a reasoner. Go to owl—preference, to make sure that OWL-DL is selected. The main services offered by a reasoner is to test whether or not one class is a subclass of another class. By performing such tests on all of the classes, it is possible for a reasoner to compute the inferred ontology class hierarchy. Another reasoning service is consistency checking – to check whether or not it is possible for the class to have any instances. A class is deemed to be inconsistent if it cannot possibly have any instances.

Using Racer In order to reason over the ontology in Protege-OWL, a DIG compliant reasoner should be installed and started. In this tutorial, we use Racer, Download at: systems.com/products/download/index.phtmlhttp:// systems.com/products/download/index.phtml Double click RacerPro to start Racer.

Invoking the reasoner Having started Racer, the ontology can be sent to the reasoner to automatically compute the classification hierarchy, and also check the logical consistency of the ontology. In Protege, the manually constructed class hierarchy is called the asserted hierarchy. The automatically computed by the reasoner is called the inferred hierarchy. Go to OWL – classify taxonomy – to invoke the reasoner If a class has been reclassified, then the class name will appear in a blue color in the inferred hierarchy. Go to OWL – Check consistency – to invoke the reasoner If a class has been found to be inconsistent, it’s icon will be circled in red color. Computing the inferred class hierarchy is also known as classifying the ontology.

Invoke the reasoner

E24: Inconsistent classes In order to demonstrate the use of the reasoner to detect inconsistencies in the ontology, we will create a class ProbeInconsistentTopping, Which is the subclass of CheeseTopping Select ProbeInconsistentTopping, go to asserted condition to add named classes, select VegetableTopping and then press OK. Go to OWL – check consistency

E25: Classify the ontology again To see ProbeInconsistentTopping is inconsistent.

E26: Remove the disjoint statement Between CheeseTopping and VegetableTopping to see what happens Select CheeseTopping Go to Disjoint part Select VegetableTopping, right click and “Delete the selected row”. Classify taxonomy The inconsistency no longer exists.

E27: Fix the ontology By making CheeseTopping and VegetableTopping disjoint from each other.

Resources Protege Ontology Libraries _Ontology_Library Protege tutorial Protege Website