Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct 2008 1 Dipole magnet for CBM: current status P.G. Akishin, A.V. Alfeev, V.S. Alfeev, V.V. Borisov,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Advertisements

JINRs PARTICIPATION IN SIS100 & SIS300 JINRs PARTICIPATION IN SIS100 & SIS300 5 th WORKSHOP on the SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION between GERMAN RESEARCH CENTERS.
Hall C SHMS Fringe Field Analysis Michael Moore Hall C Winter Meeting
Simona Bettoni and Remo Maccaferri, CERN Wiggler modeling Double-helix like option.
SLAC, 5-Dec-2006 Magnets and Magnetic Measurements for Prototype Energy Spectrometer T-474.
Electric field calculation for the neutron EDM SNS experiment. Septimiu Balascuta Ricardo Alarcon ASU, 02/07/2008.
A.KOVALENKO SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS for NICA BOOSTER & COLLIDER NICA ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION - 3 JINR, Dubna, November 05, 2008.
Magnetic Field Design of a Superconducting Magnet for the FFAG Accelerator T.Obana, T.Ogitsu A,T.Nakamoto A,K.Sasaki A A.Yamamoto A, M.Yoshimoto A, Y.Mori.
CEA DSM Irfu - Bernard GASTINEAU - R3B Technical Board Meeting -April 4, Reactions with Relativistic Radioactive ions Beams GSI Large Acceptance.
Guenther Rosner FAIR Design Study, PANDA 3, GSI, 19/1/06 1 PANDA3: Magnet design and integration of detectors Tasks & participants Progress Milestones.
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
Guenther Rosner DIRACmidterm, GSI Darmstadt, 8/12/06 1 Task 4  PANDA 3 Magnet design and integration of detectors Milestones Status Outlook.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
T. Horn, SHMS Optics Update SHMS Optics Update Tanja Horn Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009.
CBM Superconducting Dipole Magnet
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
GEANT Study of Electron ID and  0 Rejection for Containerized detectors Compare detectors in shipping containers to idealized continuous detector with.
SPECIALISED CYCLOTRON FOR BEAM THERAPY APPLICATION Yu. G. Alenitsky, A
115 December 2011 Holger Witte Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Elliptical Dipole.
SC dipole magnet for CBM E.A.Matyushevskiy, P.G. Akishin, A.V. Alfeev, V.S. Alfeev, V.V. Ivanov, E.I. Litvinenko, A.I. Malakhov JINR, Dubna CBM Collaboration.
Forum March 2003H.Taureg1 Magnetic Fields in ALICE Mapping and Monitoring.
Calculation of the beam dynamics of RIKEN AVF Cyclotron E.E. Perepelkin JINR, Dubna 4 March 2008.
Hall D Design Status GlueX Collaboration Meeting JLab, Ravi Anumagalla.
PrimEx collaboration meeting Energy calibration of the Hall B bremsstrahlung tagging system using magnetic pair spectrometer S. Stepanyan (JLAB)
S. Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting, Split, CBM beam pipe and integration inside the Magnet Status report Sergey Belogurov,
CEA DSM Irfu - F. KIRCHER - [Seoul Workshop, Feb 16-18, 2009] 1 ILD detector magnet: LoI version F. Kircher, O. Delferrière CEA Saclay, DSM/Irfu/SACM.
GlueX Collaboration Meeting. Jefferson Lab. September 9 – 11, Review of Tagger System.
CEA DSM Dapnia DIRAC-Phase-1 Annual Report meeting Status of the R3B-GLAD Magnet DIRAC-Phase-1 Annual Report Meeting 26 September 2006 Bernard Gastineau.
GlueX Two Magnet Tagger G. Yang University of Glasgow Part 1, 3 D Tosca analysis. Part 2, Preliminary Drawings. Part 3, Proposed Assembly Procedures (i)
EMMA injection & extraction Takeichiro Yokoi(Oxford University)
1 Yuri Shestakov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia Tagging system of almost-real photons for photonuclear experiments at VEPP-3 Moscow,
Geant4 Simulation of the Beam Line for the HARP Experiment M.Gostkin, A.Jemtchougov, E.Rogalev (JINR, Dubna)
1 V. Kashikhin for ILC ALCPG 2007, FNAL Meeting October 23, 2007 Ring to Main Linac Magnets.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Johann M. Heuser – The CBM Experiment at FAIR 1 STS and magnet engineering.
Muon Cooling Channel Superconducting Magnet Systems Muon Collider Task Force Meeting on July 31, 2006 V.S. Kashikhin.
HERMES dipole magnet model for CBM CBM Collaboration Meeting September 25-28,2006 Pavel Akishin Elena Litvinenko Victor Ivanov LIT JINR, Dubna
Ring finding efficiencies and RICH event display Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna X CBM collaboration.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Mokka simulation studies on the Very Forward Detector components at CLIC and ILC Eliza TEODORESCU (IFIN-HH) FCAL Collaboration Meeting Tel Aviv, October.
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
AUGUST 3, 2010 BRYCE AUSTELL UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FERMILAB SIST INTERN ADVISOR: RYUJI YAMADA Muon-to-Electron Conversion Experiment (Mu2e) Detector Solenoid.
1 Implementation at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering Department, RAL MICE Collaboration.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design Jim Kellie Glasgow University.
1 Perturbation of vacuum magnetic fields in W7X due to construction errors Outline: Introduction concerning the generation of magnetic islands Sensitivity.
SAMURAI magnet Hiromi SATO SAMURAI Team, RIKEN Requirements Geometry Magnetic field Superconducting coil and cooling system Present status of construction.
HTS and LTS Magnet Design and Prototyping for RAON
Updates on Vertex Detector NA61/SHINE Collaboration meeting, Wrocław Oct. 8, 2013.
Superconducting dipole magnet for CBM. The status of the SC dipole magnet for project CBM. E.A. Matyushevskiy, P.G. Akishin, A.V. Alfeev, V.S. Alfeev,
CBM Dipole Conceptional Design Review
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
The Status of the CBM Experiment
Status of the forward tracker design
Dipole Magnetic Field Effect on the Antiproton Beam
Interaction Region and Detector
A 3D design model of the apparatus for the Laser Wakefield Acceleration of electrons at ELI-NP S. Balascuta1 , R. Dinca1 1) “Horia Hulubei” National.
AEGIS Magnet System.
Pierre-Alexandre Thonet
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
Conceptual Design of CEPC Interaction Region Superconducting Magnets
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
Magnet design, field calculations
Presentation transcript:

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Dipole magnet for CBM: current status P.G. Akishin, A.V. Alfeev, V.S. Alfeev, V.V. Borisov, V.V. Ivanov, E.I. Litvinenko, A.I. Malakhov, E.A.Matyushevskiy JINR, Dubna

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct The task definition The main task is to provide the design of a magnet with: the working angular acceptance at least of 50° for the height of a gap (1.2 m) and 60° for the width of a gap (1.4 m), and, for the mounting inside the gap MVD/STS detectors, the sizes of its rectangular part should be at least 1.2 x 1.2 m ; the magnetic yoke size along the beam is equal to 1 m; the integral of the magnetic field in the region of the yoke of the magnet along the beam from 1 to 1.2 T*m; the magnetic field distribution, which is similar to the map “FieldMuonMagnet”, that is the current standard for the magnetic field for CBM simulations.

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Technical drawing 1. Beam; 2. Rack; 3. Coil; 4. Adapter; 5. Filler; 6. Support of a magnet; 7. Magnetic screens.

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct The conceptual project of a magnet

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Yoke of the magnet Yoke material: magnetically soft steel with the low content of carbon Yoke sizes: 280 (310) x 260 x 100 [cm] 2.8 m 1.4 m 1.2 m m 1m

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Windings («the Cossack saddle») The top part of a winding with cryostat Coil Nitric screen

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Cryostat Top part of cryostat (front view) Top & bottom cryostats with connectors (back view) m m two adapters: - current connection; - elements of monitoring systems; - transportation of helium and nitric.

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct SC winding cross-section Vacuum casing 4.5˚K < 80˚K 300˚K Nitric screenHelium vessel SC cable Cover of a vacuum casing Helium pipe Support of the nitric screen Hatches Pipe of the nitric screen (circulating liquid nitrogen) 328 mm mm

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct General view of the magnet Filler facility: - evacuation of energy; - inputs for submission of liquid helium and liquid nitrogen.

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Magnet geometry implementation for TOSCA

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Comparison with “MuonMagnet” Used in CBM: “MuonMagnet”New design: “Muon4”

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Blue – FieldMuonMagnet Red - FieldMuon4 |By| (z) x=y=0 (target: z=0 cm)

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| (z,y) x=0 (target: z=0 cm) Vertical plane along the beam:

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |By| (z,y) x=0 (target: z=0 cm) Vertical plane along the beam:

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| (x,y) z=0 (target position) z=0 Vertical plane perpendicular to the beam:

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |By| (x,y) z=0 (target position) z=0 Vertical plane perpendicular to the beam:

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| (x,y) z=50 cm (magnet yoke center) z=50

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |By| (x,y) z=50 cm (magnet yoke center) z=50

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |By| (x,y) z=50 cm (in the limits of Station 4)

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| (x,y) z=100 cm (edge of the magnet yoke) z=100

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |By| (x,y) z=100 cm (edge of the magnet yoke) z=100

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct z=160 |B| (x,y) z=160 cm (RICH entrance)

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |Bxy| (x,y) z=160 cm (RICH entrance) |Bxy| = sqrt (Bx 2 +By 2 )

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Let us consider Standard and Compact RICH cases: Data obtained from materials published on the site CbmRichMeeting Twiki

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct z=180 |B| (x,y) z=180 cm (photodetector plane for Compact RICH)

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| z=180 cm (photodetector areas for Compact RICH) (->0.04) (0.04->0.036)

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct z=180 |Bxy| z=180 cm (photodetector plane for Compact RICH) |Bxy| = sqrt (Bx 2 +By 2 )

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |Bxy| z=180 cm (photodetector areas for Compact RICH) (->0.03) (->0.015)

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| z=190 cm (photodetector plane for Standard RICH) z=190

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| z=190 cm (photodetector areas for Standard RICH) (->0.03)0.068 (->0.03) 0.034(->0.029)

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |Bxy| z=190 cm (photodetector plane for Standard RICH) (->0.03) (->0.02)

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Geometry implementation for Geant (cbmroot) Yoke +Coils +Nitric Screen +Cryostat +Magnetic Screens & Basement

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Compatibility with STS geometry

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct I) The suggested engineering design of the superconductive dipole magnet for CBM provides the following characteristics: angular acceptance is 50° for the height of the gap (1.2 m) and 60° for the longest part of the width of the gap (1.4 m), and the sizes of the rectangular part of the gap x 120 cm should be suitable for the mounting of MVD/STS detectors; the magnetic yoke size along the beam is equal to 1 m; the integral of the magnetic field in the region of the yoke of the magnet along the beam is equal to 1.07 T*m when the current through the coils is set to a value MA (in the case of “MuonMagnet” the current equal to MA corresponds to the integral equal to 1.01 T*m); the distribution of By component of the magnetic field along the beam axis is very close to the map “FieldMuonMagnet”; the mean values of the the new magnetic field in the regions, in which the RICH photodetectors are to be placed, are about 300 Gs for the last calculated field map. II) The 3D model of the magnet was developed for TOSCA. The magnetic field map was calculated and converted for cbmroot. A new C++ class was developed to support the changes in the symmetry of the field. III) The Geant geometry of the magnet was created for cbmroot and tested together with the latest available STS geometry. IV) The final decision about the sizes, shape and positions of the magnetic screens and the basement (and material of the basement) will be made after further studies directed to the magnet optimization. Conclusion and outlook

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct Backup slides …

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| (x,y) z=154 cm (end of the magnetic screens) z=154

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |By| (x,y) z=154 cm (end of the magnetic screens) z=154

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |Bxy| (x,y) z=154 cm (end of the magnetic screens) |Bxy| = sqrt (Bx 2 +By 2 )

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct |B| and |By| (z,y) in linear scale

Elena.Litvinenko CBM Collaboration Meeting Dubna 17 Oct “No magnetic screen” vs “Screen” cases