PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting Geotechnical Seismic Simulation uAhmed Elgamal uUCSD PEER 2002 Annual Meeting Vision: Professor Steven Kramer (PEER Geotechnical.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Recent Experience in Turkey for Building Vulnerability and Estimating Damage Losses P. Gülkan and A. Yakut Middle East Technical University.

Advertisements

Earthquake and Civil Engineering Dynamics Research John Macdonald et al.

Seismic Simulation: Advances with OpenSees

Seismic Performance Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Bridges

Y.P. Wang 1, W.H. Liao 2 and C.L. Lee 2 1 Professor of Civil Engineering 2 Research Assistant Professor of NHMRC National Chiao-Tung University Y.P. Wang.

Meisina C., Lo Presti D., Persichillo M.G.. modified by EMERGEO W.G., NHESS, 2013 TWO MAIN SHOCKS: 20th May: Mw= 5.9;

3-D Dynamic Base Shaking Model 2-D Static BNWF Pushover Model

Development of an In-Situ Test for Direct Evaluation of the Liquefaction Resistance of Soils K. H. Stokoe, II, E. M. Rathje and B.R. Cox University of.

Caltrans Guidelines on Foundation Loading Due to Liquefaction Induced Lateral Spreading Tom Shantz, Caltrans 2010 PEER Annual Meeting.

Hyung-Suk Shin Pedro University of Washington Steven L. Kramer

USING THE RAPID LOAD TESTER TO PROVIDE PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL.

Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift Marios Panagiotou Assistant Professor, University of.

Presented at the 2009 AK EPSCoR All-Hands Meeting, Anchorage, Alaska Zhaohui (Joey) Yang, Ph.D. Associate Professor University of Alaska Anchorage 14 May.

PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting Performance of Improved Ground u Elizabeth A. Hausler and Nicholas Sitar.

WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.

Seismic Retrofit of the Historic North Torrey Pines Bridge Jim Gingery, PE, GE Principal Engineer, Kleinfelder, San Diego PhD Student, University of California.

RECOVERY and RECONSTRUCTION after the PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE CHOOSING OPTIONS THAT WILL FACILITATE LONG-TERM RECOVERY THE OCTOBER 8, 2005 DISASTER.

RECOVERY and RECONSTRUCTION after the PAKISTAN EARTHQUAKE CHOOSING OPTIONS THAT WILL FACILITATE LONG-TERM RECOVERY FROM THE OCTOBER 8, 2005 DISASTER.

Experimental & Analytical Studies of Drilled Shaft Bridge Columns Sandrine P. Lermitte, PhD Student Jonathan P. Stewart, Assistant Professor John W. Wallace,

Shake Table Testing of a Large Scale Two Span R-C Bridge Univ. of Washington *PI: Marc Eberhard Co-PI: Pedro Arduino Co-PI: Steven Kramer RA: Tyler Ranf.

Bridge Vulnerabilities Oct What puts bridges at risk? Ability to withstand seismic forces and displacements.

Seismic Refraction. Some uses of seismic refraction Mapping bedrock topography Determining the depth of gravel, sand or clay deposits Delineating perched.

Modeling Seismic Response for Highway Bridges in the St. Louis Area for Magnitude 6.0 to 6.8 Earthquakes J. David Rogers and Deniz Karadeniz Department.

SEISMIC ANALYSIS Stability of a slope can be affected by seismicity in two ways: earthquake and blasting. These seismic motions are capable of inducing.

PEER Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles May 22, 2002 Geotechnical Uncertainties for PBEE.

PBEE Assessment and Design of Bridges Steve Mahin, UC Berkeley

Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.

Analysis of UCS by OpenSees GSR Tae-Hyung Lee PI Khalid M. Mosalam May 23 rd, 2002 Meeting at RFS.

OpenSees Capabilities & Integration with NEES Silvia Mazzoni, Frank McKenna, Gregory L. Fenves University of California, Berkeley NEES Annual Meeting –

Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director PEER GMSM Workshop, UC Berkeley October 27, 2006 PEER Ground Motion Selection & Modification (GMSM) Workshop.

PEER Research: Accomplishments & Impact Greg Deierlein, Stanford University and the PEER Research Committee PEER Summative Meeting – June 13, 2007.

PEER A Survey of Bridge Practitioners to Relate Damage to Closure Keith Porter Bridge Testbed Meeting 21 Oct 2003.

Damage Illustrations. Potential Bridge Damage Bridge Component / DamagePossible Cause Approach Slab or Pavement  Raised, lowered, cracked, or buckled.

Seismic LRFD for Pile Foundation Design

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Nick Simos NSLS2 Ground Motion and Vibration Studies.

Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency US NRC Approach for Seismic Hazard Assessments INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON LESSONS LEARNED FROM STRONG EARTHQUAKES.

Time-dependent vulnerability assessment of RC buildings considering

Liquefaction Analysis For a Single Piled Foundation By Dr. Lu Chihwei Moh and Associates, Inc. Date: 11/3/2003.

Incremental Dynamic Analyses on Bridges on various Shallow Foundations Lijun Deng PI’s: Bruce Kutter, Sashi Kunnath University of California, Davis NEES.

Structural Engineering Issues for a Large Cascadia Event.

Learning Package 1: Disaster Risk Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment Dr Richard Haigh Disaster Risk By Dr Richard Haigh – licensed under the.

1 Interpretation and Visualization of Model Test Data for Slope Failure in Liquefying Soil Bruce L. Kutter Erik J. Malvick R. Kulasingam Ross Boulanger.

MAE CENTER RESEARCH SUCCESS WITH DOTs Past and Future Neil M. Hawkins - Professor Emeritus University of Illinois MAE Center Annual Meeting With.

Feasibility Level Evaluation of Seismic Stability for Remedy Selection Senda Ozkan, Tetra Tech Inc. Gary Braun, Tetra Tech Inc.

Seismic Retrofitting of Bridges Donald Kirkcaldie Seismic Retrofitting of Bridges Donald Kirkcaldie.

LIQUEFACTION FAILURE OF FOUNDATION - STRUCTURE COLLAPSE.

Weian Liu 3. Research Interest Soil Structure Interaction Seismic Analysis and Design of Bridge Structures Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics.

1 Earthquake Hazard Update April 21, 2015 NMSZ ROC.

Natural Hazards and Our Dynamic Planet LAB 7 What natural hazards do dynamic events cause? Our planet is dynamic because it is powerful, active Our planet.

Next Generation Attenuation Models for Central & Eastern US (NGA-East) Stakeholder Workshop: Introduction March 7, 2008 Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER.

Session 1A – Ground Motions and Intensity Measures Paul Somerville Andrew Whittaker Greg Deierlein.

PEER 2G02 – Code Usage Exercise: OpenSees Zhaohui Yang UCSD 2/15/2005.

NEEDS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING

Earthquake Engineering SE 180 Thursday, September 26, 2002Fall 2002 Instructor: Ahmed Elgamal Office: SERF 255 Tel. x

Mahadevan (Lanka) Ilankatharan Adviser: Professor Bruce Kutter

Roof Terms Span –Distance across the building. Roof Terms Run –1/2 the distance across the building (1/2 span distance)

The Leaning Tower of Pisa

1 Quake Summit 2010 October 9, 2010 Centrifuge Testing and Parallel Numerical Simulations of Lateral Pressures Measured Against a Rigid Caisson PI: Scott.

Progress towards Structural Design for Unforeseen Catastrophic Events ASME Congress Puneet Bajpai and Ben Schafer The Johns Hopkins University.

Davide Forcellini, Univ. of San Marino Prof. Ahmed Elgamal, Dr. Jinchi Lu, UC San Diego Prof. Kevin Mackie, Univ. of Central Florida SEISMIC ASSESSMENT.

The EPIKH Project (Exchange Programme to advance e-Infrastructure Know-How) OpenSees On Grid Final Report Gouri Kadam

Mapping of lateral spread Displacement hazard, Weber County, Utah

Mapping of Liquefaction hazard for Salt lake and Weber Counties, Utah

International Workshop on Micropiles May , 2002 Venice, Italy Full Scale Field Tests on Single Micropiles and Groups/Networks of Titan Micropiles.

BRIDGES MOST IMPORTANT GEOTECHNICAL EFFECT- LIQUEFACTION

Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington

Topics on Micropiles in Japan

COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING IN GEOTECHNICAL EQ ENGG.

SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS

Presentation transcript:

PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting Geotechnical Seismic Simulation uAhmed Elgamal uUCSD PEER 2002 Annual Meeting Vision: Professor Steven Kramer (PEER Geotechnical Thrust Area Leader)

Humboldt Bay, Middle Channel Bridge 330 meters long, 9-span built in 1972 (seismic retrofit in 95 & 00) Supported on piles in soft soil vulnerable to liquefaction Near active seismic zone with reverse faulting mechanism Instrumented including nearby downhole array Selected in Collaboration with Caltrans Recently: Pat Hipley Keith Porter (PEER) Cliff Roblee Tom Shantz Mark Yashinsky

Project Goals Develop a bridge seismic assessment framework based on computational modeling and sound probabilistic analysis Ultimately…, a “Decision Making Tool”: Estimate Maintenance/repair expenses Estimate down-time/reduced capacity Explore Retrofit scenarios Predict Emergency shutdown scenarios

Maintenance/repair cost

Down-time… Lane closure….Emergency Shutdown (e.g., repair cost or loss of functionality) Professor Joel Conte

Finite Element Model Mesh generated using GID ( Prof. Pedro Arduino Water Table Abutments Structural Joints Liquefaction SSI OpenSees: Professor Greg Fenves Dr. Frank McKenna Dr. Zhaohui Yang, Prof. Joel Conte

Abutment Joints: ZeroLength Element with Gap-Hook Material As Built 1/2” Expanded Joint Filler All Around Shear Key Abutment Superstructure Approach Slab Beam Abutment: Quad Elements Finite Element Model Hook Gap ZeroLength Element Gap-Hook Material Force [kips] Prof. Joel Conte

Soil Constitutive Model Pressure-dependent multi-surface plasticity model (for gravel, sand, and silt), incorporating liquefaction effects Dr. Zhaohui Yang

UC Berkeley Shear Tests: Pestana, Seed, and Kammerer

Comparison of Matlock’s (1970) test on soft clay and PySimple1 with the same loading path. Prof. Ross Boulanger SSI

Yang, Conte, Zhang

clay Sand (Dr=50%) Sand (Dr=80%) Centrifuge model setupSimulated 1D response Simulation of UC Davis Centrifuge Test Kutter, Boulanger, Idriss, and Wilson

Current Research: Seismic Hazard Analysis Middle Channel Bridge Dr. Paul Somerville J. Conte Site Specific Eq. motions at 3 Hazard Levels (50%, 10%, and 2%)

Plastic Bowl Method Prof. Jacobo Bielak/Prof. Boris Jeremic Current Research: Spatial Definition of Input Excitation SCEC Lateral Boundaries, Base of the Mesh, Transmitting boundary, Wave propagation

4x3 pile model Plastic zone 3D 2D Mesh, Piles, and Abutments Professor Boris Jeremic

UC Berkeley Photo Database 100 years “too late” for this Bridge, But just in time for Humboldt Bay. OpenSees