PDQ-Evidence. What is PDQ-Evidence? PDQ (“pretty darn quick”)-Evidence facilitates rapid access to the best available evidence for decisions about health.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Cochrane Library. What is The Cochrane Library? The Cochrane Library offers high-quality evidence for health care decision making
Advertisements

Evidence-Based Decision Making: The Contribution of Systematic Reviews in Synthesizing Evidence.
Secondary Data Analysis: Systematic Reviews & Associated Databases
Medical Library & Peyton T. Anderson Learning Resources Center Macon, GA Memorial University Medical Center Health Sciences.
Identifying the evidence Phil Hannaford NHS Grampian Chair of Primary Care.
Disability Research to Practice Program NIDRR RERC Project Directors Meeting April 3 & 4, 2006.
A Multilingual, Relational Database of Health Evidence Gabriel Rada, Daniel Capurro, Daniel Perez Epistemonikos foundation.
The Cochrane Library Via Wiley InterScience Or OVID Evidence-Based Medical Reviews Angela Murrell Outreach and Instruction Librarian
The Cochrane Library University Library.
An Overview. BizLink BizLink is a Social Networking platform for business. It allows colleagues to come together, ask questions, share resources, form.
The Cochrane Library University Library.
Accessing Sources Of Evidence For Practice Introduction To Databases Karen Smith Department of Health Sciences University of York.
1 Improving Access to Public Health Information: A Study of Information Needs in a State Health Department E. Hatheway Simpson, MPH Nancy R. La Pelle,
Using Social Care Online: an overview Version 1.0 April 2015.
Brighton and Sussex NHS LKS is part of Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust KnowledgeShare a web-based tool to facilitate collaboration and.
1 Digital Libraries and Evidence in the Developing World Context Dr. Jon Ferguson Senior Health Database Scientist IMMPACT Project University of Aberdeen.
Speech Pathology: An Introduction to Systematic Reviews Micah Walsleben, MLS February 18, 2014.
Renae Barger, Executive Director National Network of Libraries of Medicine, Middle Atlantic Region Partners in Information Access for the Public Health.
LIBRARY SERVICES Internet sources of information Paula Funnell Senior Academic Liaison Librarian (Medicine and Dentistry)
American Medical Association Journals include: JAMA (journal of the American Medical Association.), Archives of surgery, Archives of ophthalmology and.
Information Retrieval for High-Quality Systematic Reviews: The Basics 6.0.
The following slides were presented at a meeting of potential editors and methods advisors for the proposed Cochrane review group in February The.
Systematic Reviews and Information Retrieval: Problem Formulation and Database Searching Lecture 2 of the course "Developing Evidence-Based Products Using.
Web 2.0 for Government Knowledge Management Everyone benefits by sharing knowledge March 24, 2010 Emerging Technologies Work Group Rich Zaziski, CEO FYI.
*To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academy Press, 2001 Why is DynaMed Needed? Between 44,000 and 98,000 American deaths per year.
Scientific writing | September |1 | Designing and reporting search strategies in public health papers Institute for Population and Social Research.
South African Education Portal
Fielding Graduate University Library Locating Tests and Measures.
1 How to find literature - A very short introduction SMED 8004 Medicine and Health Library October 2014.
THE COCHRANE LIBRARY ON WILEY INTERSCIENCE. Presentation Agenda Brief introduction of Evidence-Based Medicine theories The Cochrane Collaboration – origins,
Systematic Reviews.
Module Six Retrieving Full-text Articles and Other Sources of Evidence.
Evidence-Based Public Health Practice: Using Research and Data to Improve Your Programs Week 3: Literature Searches Helena VonVille Library Director University.
Zoe G. Davies Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation University of Birmingham, UK Systematic Review Methodology: a brief summary.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
The Cochrane Collaboration and South African Cochrane Centre (SACC) Godwin N. Aja, MCH, CHES Department of Health Sciences Babcock University Ilishan-Remo,
Identifying the evidence Laura Macdonald Health Protection Scotland
Systematic reviews to support public policy: An overview Jeff Valentine University of Louisville AfrEA – NONIE – 3ie Cairo.
Cochrane Injuries Group. About the Cochrane Injuries Group What does the CIG do? Who makes up the CIG? What injury prevention research does the CIG do?
NHS Education for Scotland The NHS Scotland e-Library – a portal to best evidence Sandra Davies E-Library Team Leader.
Medical searching Kazem Heidari. Reading in medicine Browsing  Reading for fun of it  Books and journals are used. Reading for information  Approach.
From the Advanced Search page of the Cochrane Library, we have clicked on the Cochrane Reviews: By Topic hyperlink. This has displayed the Topics for Cochrane.
Zoe G. Davies Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation University of Birmingham, UK Systematic Review Protocol Development.
Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. Cochrane_QuickRefBooklet.indd 114/8/15 5:41 pm.
Table of Contents – Part B HINARI Resources –Clinical Evidence –Cochrane Library –EBM Guidelines –Essential Evidence Plus –HINARI EBM Journals.
Systematic Review Krit Pongpirul, MD, MPH. Johns Hopkins University.
Search strategies and literature ‘finding’ for systematic reviews Jenny Basford, Systematic Reviews Support Librarian mEsh
Validity and utility of theoretical tools - does the systematic review process from clinical medicine have a use in conservation? Ioan Fazey & David Lindenmayer.
From the initial page of the Cochrane Library, we have clicked on the Cochrane Reviews: By Topic hyperlink. This has displayed the Topics for Cochrane.
Table of Contents – Part B HINARI Resources –Clinical Evidence –Cochrane Library –EBM Guidelines –BMJ Practice –HINARI EBM Journals.
Statistics Explained your guide to European statistics Luxembourg, User Support Workshop, 25 January 2010.
Olaf Jensen, Centre for Maritime Health & Society, Institute of Public Health, Southern Danish University, Esbjerg Denmark IMHA RESEARCH GROUP MEETING.
Primary studies Secondry studies. Primary studies Experimental studies Clinical trial studies Surveys studies.
Sources of systematic reviews Arash Etemadi, MD PhD Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Evidence-Based Public Health Practice: Using Research and Data to Improve Your Programs Week 2, Part 1: Step 3 of 6--Use the research literature to guide.
A web-based tool connecting people with evidence Ben Skinner Head of Library and Knowledge Services Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust.
Identifying evidence and maintaining a specialised register of studies Dr Alison Weightman Director, Support Unit for Research Evidence (SURE), Cardiff.
Systematic Reviews of Evidence Introduction & Applications AEA 2014 Claire Morgan Senior Research Associate, WestEd.
Evidence-based Insurance Medicine What is Cochrane and Cochrane Insurance Medicine? Rebecca Weida, MSc University of Basel.
NICE Evidence Search workshop Revised short slide set with speakers’ notes June
Knowledge Translation for Policymakers
How to Find Systematic Reviews
Automation of systematic reviews: the reviewer’s viewpoint
a review of outcome measures
Guidelines International Network
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
Search Strategies for a Successful Literature Review
Things to Remember… PubMed
Research & scholarship
Table of Contents – Part B
Presentation transcript:

PDQ-Evidence

What is PDQ-Evidence? PDQ (“pretty darn quick”)-Evidence facilitates rapid access to the best available evidence for decisions about health systems and population health

It is a version of Epistemonikos database for Health systems and population health evidence

Epistemonikos is a non-for-profit organisation based in Santiago, Chile Our mission is “to bring high quality information closer to health decision making through the use of information technologies”

What evidence? Systematic reviews Overviews of reviews High-quality structured summaries Primary studies included in systematic reviews

The problem: information overload

The challenge: to separate the wheat from the chaff 23,000,000 records only in PubMed 0,25% are systematic reviews

Our goal TO AGGREGATE ALL THE RELEVANT HEALTH EVIDENCE (FOR DECISION-MAKING IN HEALTH SYSTEMS AND POPULATION HEALTH) INTO A SINGLE DATABASE.

A little bit more about PDQ-Evidence: Search strategy PDQ-Evidence was developed and is maintained by systematically searching PubMed and other databases for relevant systematic reviews and overviews of reviews. PubMed

Where do we search Cochrane database of systematic reviews (CDSR) Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) Health Technology Assessment Database PubMed LILACS SUPPORT Summaries EPPI-Centre Evidence Library 3ie Systematic Reviews and Policy Briefs WHO Database Campbell Library SURE policy briefs European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies DFID NICE public health guidelines and systematic reviews Guide to Community Preventive Services CADTH Rx for Change McMaster Plus KT+ McMaster Health Forum Evidence Briefs

Systematic reviews (SR) at the centre The average SR takes about 1-year of work We rescue that effort by storing identified studies From: The Centre for Health Communication and Participation with support from the Australasian Cochrane Centrehttp://

Where do we search?  20 databases

Systematic reviews (SR) at the centre The average SR takes about 1-year of work We rescue that effort by storing identified studies From: The Centre for Health Communication and Participation with support from the Australasian Cochrane Centrehttp://

All that effort into a single database

Where do we search?  20 databases

Relations are stored in the database

Unique feature One of PDQ-Evidence unique features is that it connects systematic reviews and their included studies. This makes possible to navigate between primary studies and reviews

Multilingual Spanish Portuguese French

Filters

Advanced search For systematic searches E.g. systematic reviews

Grey literature / unpublished Our search process implies searching for published literature And then going to: - the list of studies included in reviews - the list of reviews included in overviews and policy briefs INDEPENDENT OF - WHERE IS PUBLISHED (OR IF IT IS PUBLISHED AT ALL) - LANGUAGE

Unique feature: matrix of evidence One of PDQ-Evidence unique features is that it connects systematic reviews and their included studies. This makes possible to navigate between primary studies and reviews, but also allows clustering systematic reviews based on the primary studies they have in common. The concept of ‘Systematic reviews sharing included studies’ is a proxy of ‘systematic reviews answering a similar question’

Matrix of evidence

How do we feed PDQ-Evidence? Combination of machine technology and human collaboration ~ 10 Software engineers (for 5 years) ~ 400 collaborators (Epistemonikos)

Automatic search and upload Selection of actual systematic reviews by a network of collaborators Extraction of the studies included in the systematic review 1 2 3

The numbers 30,000 records 3,300 systematic reviews

Conclusions One-stop shop for evidence Multilingual database User friendly Relation between articles answering a similar question Visualisation of ‘all the evidence’ for a specific question

Let’ see some examples

Many thanks!! Contact us: …or follow us in your preferred language: ….also in Facebook and google+

Gabriel Rada Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile Director of the Evidence-Based Healthcare Program (Chilean Cochrane Centre), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile Co-director of the Southern American Branch of the Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre Member of GRADE working group Co-founder, President and CEO of Epistemonikos Foundation More details here: about.me Twitter: