© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Control of Nonconforming Product.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Food Safety Management Systems
Advertisements

Transition from Q1- 8th to Q1- 9th edition
Understanding the Requirements Qimpro Standards Organization
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Suppliers Performance.
ISO 9001 : 2000.
1 MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS (ERT 455) HAZARD ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) SYSTEM Munira Mohamed Nazari School.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Facility Environment.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Pest Control.
Contractor Management and ISO 14001:2004
OHSAS 18001: Occupational health and safety management systems - Specification Karen Lawrence.
Prepared by Long Island Quality Associates, Inc. ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements Based on ISO/TC 176/SC 2 March 2001.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Control of Measuring.
ISO 9000 Certification ISO 9001 and ISO
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Management Responsibility.
4. Quality Management System (QMS)
4. Quality Management System (QMS)
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Complaint Handling.
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
Establish Documentation and Record Keeping (Task 12 / Principle 7)
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Corrective Action.
ISO STANDARDS TRAINING & CONSULTING
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Specifications.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Procedures FSKN.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Staff Facilities.
ISO 9001:2000 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
Understanding ISO 22000:2005 TCISys.com.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Water Quality.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Product Analysis.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Product Contamination Control.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Supplier Qualification.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Transport and.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
1 Thank you for visiting our site and welcome to the “Introduction to ISO 22000” Presentation that you requested. For more information.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Document Control.
4.3 Document control 4.4 Review of requests, tenders and contracts
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Traceability.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
ISO MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be.
Implementation into Child Nutrition Programs
It was found in 1946 in Geneva, Switzerland. its main purpose is to promote the development of international standards to facilitate the exchange of goods.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Waste Management.
Chapter 9 Corrective Actions. Objective In this module, you will learn: u The definition of corrective actions u Procedures for corrective action, and.
ISO 9001:2015 Subject: Quality Management System Clause 8 - Operation
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
© Food – a fact of life 2009 Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) HACCP is a system which looks for and prevents potential problems before they.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Incident Management.
HACCP Principle 3 – Establish Critical Limits
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Suppliers Performance.
Quality Management: Mutually beneficial supplier relationships.
A LOOK AT AMENDMENTS TO ISO/IEC (1999) Presented at NCSLI Conference Washington DC August 11, 2005 by Roxanne Robinson.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
Facility Environment 1.
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP).
HACCP Principle 5 – Establish Corrective Actions
Prepared by Rand E Winters, Jr. ASR Senior Auditor October 2014
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Food Production Systems
Quality Management Systems – Requirements
Registration Decision Criteria
The Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point
Regional Seminar for OIE National Focal Points on Animal Production Food Safety Importance of collaboration between the Veterinary Services and industry.
The Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Presentation transcript:

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Control of Nonconforming Product

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Basic Level Requirements for Food Manufacture The organisation shall ensure that any product, which does not conform to requirements, is clearly identified and controlled to prevent unintended use or delivery.

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Presentation Outline Definitions Requirements for Nonconforming Products Management and Records

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Definition Nonconforming Product ◦ Food product produced during a loss of control that necessitates a correction. ◦ Includes all product back to the last valid determination that the process was under control.

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Requirements for Nonconforming Products Actions will be taken to prevent the nonconforming product from entering the food chain unless it can be assured that: ◦ The food safety hazard(s) of concern has(have) been reduced to the defined acceptable levels, ◦ The food safety hazard(s) of concern will be reduced to identified acceptable levels prior to entering the food chain, or ◦ The product still meets the defined acceptable level(s) of the food safety hazard(s) of concern despite the nonconformity.

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Requirements for Nonconforming Products All lots of product affected by a nonconforming situation shall be held under control of the organization until they have been evaluated. If products that have left control of the organization are subsequently determined to be unsafe, the organization shall notify relevant interested parties and initiate a withdrawal. The controls and related responses and authorization for dealing with potentially unsafe products shall be documented.

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at ISO 22000:2005 Evaluation for Release Each lot of product affected by the nonconformity shall only be released as safe when any of the following apply: ◦ Evidence other than the monitoring system demonstrates that the control measures have been effective. ◦ Evidence shows that the combined effect of the control measures for that particular product complies with the performance intended. ◦ The results of sampling, analysis and/or other verification activities demonstrate that the affected lot of product complies with the identified acceptable levels for the food safety hazard(s) concerned.

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at ISO 22000:2005 Disposition of Nonconforming Products Following evaluation, if the lot of product is not acceptable for release it shall be handled by one of the following activities: ◦ Reprocessing or further processing within or outside the organization to ensure that the food safety hazard is eliminated or reduced to acceptable levels. ◦ Destruction and/or disposal as waste.

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at ISO 22000:2005 Withdrawals To enable and facilitate the complete and timely withdrawal of lots of end products which have been identified as unsafe: ◦ Top management shall appoint personnel having the authority to initiate a withdrawal and personnel responsible for executing the withdrawal, and ◦ The organization shall establish and maintain a documented procedure for:  Notification to relevant interested parties  Handling of withdrawn products as well as affected lots of the products still in stock, and  The sequence of actions to be taken.

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at ISO 22000:2005 Withdrawals Withdrawn products shall be secured or held under supervision until they are destroyed, used for purposes other than originally intended, determined to be safe for the same (or other) intended use, or reprocessed in a manner to ensure they become safe.

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Summary 1. Determine if the product presents a safety hazard, based on:  Expert evaluation  Biological, chemical, or physical testing 2. If no hazard exists, the product may be released 3. If a potential hazard exists, determine if the product can be:  Reworked/reprocessed  Diverted for an alternate use 4. If potentially hazardous product cannot be handled as described in Step 3, the product must be destroyed

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Records Records for corrective actions and nonconformities must include: ◦ The actual production records for the product ◦ A standard form listing the following:  Hold number, deviation, reason for hold, date and code of product held, name of responsible individual ◦ Authority recommendations on final disposition of product in question ◦ Accurate accounting of all units in question ◦ Statement of the procedure for handling the nonconformity

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Questions?

© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at License to Reuse © 2009 Michigan State University, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-SA). Source: © 2009 Michigan State University, original at licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported. To view a copy of this license, visit or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA.